Oestrogen–bromocriptine interaction in the control of luteinizing hormone and prolactin secretion in the neonatally oestrogenized female rat

1983 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Aguilar ◽  
C. Fernández Galaz ◽  
M. D. Vaticón ◽  
A. Tejero ◽  
A. Oriol

Neonatally oestrogenized female rats showed hyperprolactinaemia (prolactin, 230 μg/l), normal LH levels and absence of a positive feedback effect of oestrogen on secretion of LH at 5 months of age. Bromocriptine treatment for 13 days (1 mg/kg per day) caused no changes in LH levels and prolactin levels decreased to normal values (33 μg/l). This decrease in prolactin concentration was not followed by the recovery of phasic LH response to oestrogens. The effectiveness of oestrogens to induce prolactin secretion was greater in the neonatally oestrogenized rats than in the control group. In both cases the effect diminished after bromocriptine treatment. These results indicate that hyperprolactinaemia is not the cause of the anovulatory state in oestrogenized rats and that neonatal treatment with oestrogens alters oestrogen–prolactin relations, probably involving dopamine.

1970 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. TALEISNIK ◽  
M. E. VELASCO ◽  
J. J. ASTRADA

SUMMARY The influence that the interruption of the neural afferents to the hypothalamus exerts on ovulation and on the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) was studied in the rat. Animals with retrochiasmatic sections interrupting the neural connexions between the medial hypothalamus and the preoptic area (POA) showed constant oestrus and failed to ovulate. Animals in which the dorsal neural afferents to the POA were transected had oestrous cycles and ovulated normally. The positive feedback effect of progesterone on LH release in spayed animals primed either with 20 μg. oestradiol benzoate or 2·5 mg. testosterone propionate 3 days before was studied. Transection of the dorsal afferents to the POA favoured an increase in plasma LH, but in animals with retrochiasmatic sections the response was abolished. However, the negative feedback effect of ovarian steroids operated after both types of transection because an increase in plasma LH occurred after ovariectomy. It is concluded that the negative feedback effect of ovarian steroids acts on the medial hypothalamus which can maintain a tonic release of gonadotrophins in the absence of steroids. In contrast, the POA involved in the positive feedback effect of progesterone is concerned with the phasic release of LH.


1992 ◽  
Vol 263 (3) ◽  
pp. E507-E511 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Dondi ◽  
P. Limonta ◽  
R. Maggi ◽  
F. Piva

These experiments were performed to analyze whether treatments of ovariectomized female rats with ovarian steroid regimens able to induce either an increase (positive feedback effect) or a decrease (negative feedback effect) of serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) have some impact on the characteristics of mu-opioid binding sites in circumscribed areas of the brain. The increase of serum levels of LH elicited by a treatment with estradiol benzoate (EB) plus progesterone (P; positive feedback effect) was accompanied by a significant decrease in the number of mu-binding sites in the hypothalamus and in the corpus striatum. The decrease in serum levels of LH induced by a treatment with EB alone (negative feedback effect) brought about a significant increase of the number of mu-binding sites in the thalamus and in the hippocampus. These results seem to suggest that the release of LH induced by EB plus P may involve a decrease of hypothalamic mu-binding sites. Apparently, the inhibitory effect on LH release exerted by EB alone does not involve any change of the density of these binding sites in the hypothalamus.


1980 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1245-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
EI TERASAWA ◽  
JORGE F. RODRIGUEZ-SIERRA ◽  
DONALD J. DIERSCHKE ◽  
WILLIAM E. BRIDSON ◽  
ROBERT W. GOY

1971 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. McDONALD ◽  
D. P. GILMORE

SUMMARY Electrochemical stimulation of the basal and preoptic hypothalamus, under sodium pentobarbitone anaesthesia, was carried out on the day of pro-oestrus in normal cycling and in ovarian hormone-treated female rats. Control rats ovulated in response to 25, 50 and 100 μA for 60 s in the median eminence and to 10 μA for 60 s in the preoptic area. Oestradiol (1 μg) given 24 h before median eminence stimulation significantly increased the number of rats ovulating. An injection of progesterone (1 mg) 24 h before median eminence stimulation did not affect the number of animals ovulating or the number of ova shed. In contrast, there was a significant reduction in the number of animals ovulating after preoptic stimulation. Stimulation of the median eminence 2–4 h after progesterone administration increased the number of animals ovulating. The results suggest that both oestradiol and progesterone exert a positive feedback effect at or below the level of the median eminence and that the negative feedback effect of progesterone is exerted on the preoptic area.


1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 309-310
Author(s):  
El TERASAWA ◽  
JORGE F. RODRIGUEZ-SIERRA ◽  
DONALD J. DIERSCHKE ◽  
WILLIAM E. BRIDSON ◽  
ROBERT W. GOY

1980 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. SHARP ◽  
R. MASSA

In the laying hen, progesterone was shown to be converted in vitro in the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus to 5β-pregnane-3,20-dione (5β-DHP), 5β-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one (5β,3α-ol) and 5α-pregnane-3,20-dione (5α-DHP) and in the hyperstriatum dorsale to 5β-DHP and 5β,3α-ol. The conversion of progesterone to 5β-reduced metabolites was greater in the hyperstriatum dorsale than in the hypothalamus (P<0·001) and greater in the hypothalamus than in the pituitary gland (P <0·01). The conversion of progesterone to 5β-reduced metabolites was greater than its conversion to 5α-DHP in the pituitary gland (P <0·01) and the hypothalamus (P < 0·001). The possibility was investigated that 5α-DHP and 5β-DHP may act as metabolic intermediaries in the mechanism by which progesterone exerts a positive feedback effect on LH release. Progesterone, 5α-DHP and 5β-DHP were injected into laying hens at doses of 0·05,0·25 and 1·25 mg/kg and the changes in the concentration of plasma LH were followed for 4 h thereafter. Secretion of LH was stimulated after treatment with progesterone or 5α-DHP but not 5β-DHP. Progesterone stimulated LH release more effectively than did 5α-DHP, since an increase in the concentration of plasma LH was observed after 0·25 mg progesterone/kg but not after the same dose of 5α-DHP. It was concluded that in the hen 5α-DHP is unlikely to play a role in the induction of the preovulatory release of LH.


Author(s):  
Sajad Jeddi ◽  
Saeedeh Khalifi ◽  
Mahboubeh Ghanbari ◽  
Asghar Ghasemi

Background and objective: The effects of hypothyroidism during pregnancy and lactation on carbohydrate metabolism have been mostly studied in male animals. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate effect of fetal and neonatal hypothyroidism (FH and NH) on the glucose tolerance in middle-aged female rat offspring. Methods: Pregnant female rats were divided into three groups: Rats in the control group consumed tap water, while those in the FH and NH groups consumed 250 mg/L of 6-propyl-2-thiouracil (PTU) in their drinking water during gestation or lactation periods, respectively. After weaning, the female offspring were separated and divided into 3 groups (n=8/group): Control, FH, and NH. Body weight was recorded monthly and intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) was performed at month 12. Results: Compared to controls, female rats in the FH group had significantly higher plasma glucose levels than controls throughout the IVGTT except at min 60. Values at min 5 of the FH and control group were 196.1±1.9 and 155.3±5.9 mg/dL, respectively (P<0.05). In the NH group, plasma glucose levels were significantly higher only at min 5 (185.7±14.1 vs. 155.3±5.9 mg/dL, P<0.05). Conclusion: Hypothyroidism during fetal or neonatal periods caused glucose intolerance in middle-aged female offspring rats.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document