Effect of level of food intake of ewes on the secretion of LH and FSH and on the pituitary response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in ovariectomized ewes

1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Rhind ◽  
G. B. Martin ◽  
S. McMillen ◽  
C. G. Tsonis ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Bolus Injection ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Plasma Prolactin ◽  
High Intake ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Pituitary Glands ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone

ABSTRACT The effect of level of food intake on LH and FSH profiles and pituitary sensitivity to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was investigated in two groups of 12 ovariectomized ewes. Ewes with a high intake (group H) had a mean daily intake (± s.e.m.) of 1·99 ± 0·075 kg dry matter (DM)/head per day while ewes with a moderate intake (group M) consumed a mean of 1·02 ± 0·021 kg DM/head per day. Ovaries were surgically removed from six ewes of each group on day 11 of the luteal phase and from the remainder 30 h after an injection of 100 μg prostaglandin analogue given on day 11 to induce luteolysis. During both the luteal phase and the follicular phase, mean LH and FSH concentrations and LH pulse frequencies and amplitudes were unaffected by the level of intake but mean plasma prolactin concentrations were higher (P < 0·05) in group H than in group M ewes in the follicular phase. Mean LH and FSH concentrations at day 2 after ovariectomy were unaffected by treatment while mean prolactin concentrations were higher (P < 0·05) in group H than in group M ewes. At day 7 after ovariectomy, mean LH and FSH concentrations were lower (P < 0·05) in group H than in group M ewes although mean LH pulse frequencies and pulse amplitudes were not significantly affected by the level of intake at either time. The level of food intake and the stage of the oestrous cycle at the time of ovariectomy did not affect the amount of LH released in response to a bolus injection of GnRH (10 μg, i.v.) but the FSH response was significantly (P < 0·05) greater in group M than in group H ewes. It is concluded that the pituitary glands of ovariectomized ewes with moderate levels of intake are more responsive to GnRH than those of ewes with a high intake and that hypothalamic activity and GnRH secretion are not affected by the level of food intake. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 121, 325–330

Effect of graded doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone on serum LH concentrations in mares in various reproductive states: comparison with endogenously generated LH pulses

1986 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Alexander ◽  
C. H. G. Irvine
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Hormone Release ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Serum Lh ◽  
Small Doses ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Log Linear

ABSTRACT Luteinizing hormone release induced by a range of small (3·3–33 μg) and large (300–500 μg) i.v. doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was measured in acyclic (n = 4), luteal phase (n = 3) and follicular phase (n = 5) mares and compared with endogenously generated LH pulses in the same reproductive states. Extrapolation from log–linear dose–response curves showed that an LH pulse comparable to an endogenous one would be simulated by i.v. injection of 7·0 (n = 4) and 4·1 (n = 6) μg GnRH in luteal and follicular phase mares respectively; a much smaller dose than the 500 μg usually given clinically or experimentally. In acyclic mares (n = 4), LH pulses occurred too infrequently to be characterized. At small doses of GnRH the amount of LH released by the same dose was similar in all three reproductive states, although the steroid hormone milieu differed markedly. This implies that observed differences between states in mean (± s.e.m.) serum LH concentrations (0·7 ± 0·01, 1·2 ± 0·03 and 11·6 ± 0·33 (μg/l) in acyclic, luteal and follicular phase mares respectively) were produced by differences in GnRH pulse frequency and/or amplitude and not by steroid-mediated changes in pituitary response to GnRH. In acyclic, luteal and follicular phase mares, LH pulse frequency was: immeasurably low, 0·09 and 1·14 pulses/h respectively, which supports the important contribution of pulse frequency to determining mean LH concentration. The LH response to large doses of GnRH was significantly greater in the luteal than in the follicular phase, and was greater than the response to 33 μg in the luteal phase but not in the other two states. Thus, to a large but not to a small dose of GnRH, the pituitary appeared most responsive in the luteal phase. Therefore, in studies of the physiology of the hypothalamic-pituitary system, small doses of GnRH, which induce physiologically sized LH responses, may be preferred to large doses, which result in a level of stimulation to which the pituitary is never naturally exposed and to which it may respond in a non-physiological manner. J. Endocr. (1986) 110, 19–26

Varying the patterns and concentrations of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone stimulation does not alter the ratio of LH and FSH released from perifused sheep pituitary cells

1986 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. A. McIntosh ◽  
R. P. McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Dose Interval ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Pituitary Cells ◽  
Ovulatory Cycle ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Dissociated Cells ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone

ABSTRACT Our aim was to determine whether release of LH and FSH can be controlled differentially by the characteristics of applied signals of stimulatory gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) alone, free of the effects of steroid feedback or other influences from the whole animal. The outputs of both gonadotrophins were significantly correlated (r≈0·90; P<0·0005) when samples of freshly dispersed sheep pituitary cells were perifused in columns for 7 h with medium containing a range of concentrations of GnRH in various patterns of pulses. Hormone released in response to the second, third and fourth pulses from every column was analysed in detail. Dose–response relationships for both LH and FSH were very similar when cells were stimulated with 5–8500 pmol GnRH/1 in 5-min pulses every hour. When GnRH was delivered in pulses at a maximally stimulating level, the outputs of both hormones increased similarly with increasing inter-pulse intervals. Efficiency of stimulation (release of gonadotrophin/unit stimulatory GnRH) decreased (was desensitized) with increasing pulse duration in the same way for both hormones. Thus, varying the dose, interval and duration of GnRH pulses did not alter the proportions of LH and FSH released in the short-term from freshly dissociated cells. However, the same cell preparations released more LH relative to FSH when treated with maximally stimulating levels of GnRH for 3 h in the presence of 10% serum from a sheep in the follicular phase of its ovulatory cycle compared with charcoal-treated serum. Because there was no gonadotrophin synthesis under the conditions used in vitro these results suggest that changes in the LH/FSH ratio seen in whole animals are more likely to result from differential clearance from the circulation, ovarian feedback at the pituitary, differential synthesis in intact tissue or another hormone influencing FSH secretion, rather than from differences in the mechanism of acute release controlled by GnRH. J. Endocr. (1986) 109, 155–161

Relationship between gonadotrophin subunit gene expression, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor content and pituitary and plasma gonadotrophin concentrations during the rebound release of FSH after treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid during the luteal phase of the cycle

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brooks ◽  
W. J. Crow ◽  
J. R. McNeilly ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Fluid ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Cessation Of Treatment

ABSTRACT The modulation of FSH secretion at the beginning and middle of the follicular phase of the cycle represents the key event in the growth and selection of the preovulatory follicle. However, the mechanisms that operate within the pituitary gland to control the increased release of FSH and its subsequent inhibition in vivo remain unclear. Treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid (bFF) during the luteal phase has been previously shown to suppress the plasma concentrations of FSH and, following cessation of treatment on day 11, a rebound release of FSH occurs on days 12 and 13. When luteal regression is induced on day 12, this hypersecretion of FSH results in an increase in follicle growth and ovulation rate. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the control of FSH secretion, ewes were treated with twice daily s.c. injections of 5 ml bFF on days 3–11 of the oestrous cycle and luteal regression was induced on day 12 with prostaglandin (PG). The treated ewes and their controls were then killed on day 11 (luteal), or 16 or 32h after PG and their pituitaries removed and halved. One half was analysed for gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor content. Total pituitary RNA was extracted from the other half and subjected to Northern analysis using probes for FSH-β, LH-β and common α subunit. Frequent blood samples were taken and assayed for gonadotrophins. FSH secretion was significantly (P<0.01) reduced during bFF treatment throughout the luteal phase and then significantly (P<0.01) increased after cessation of treatment, with maximum secretion being reached 18– 22h after PG, and then declining towards control values by 32h after PG. A similar pattern of LH secretion was seen after bFF treatment. Pituitary FSH content was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by bFF treatment at all stages of the cycle. No difference in the pituitary LH content was seen. The increase in GnRH receptor content after PG in the controls was delayed in the treated animals. Analysis of pituitary mRNA levels revealed that bFF treatment significantly (P<0.01) reduced FSH-β mRNA levels in the luteal phase. Increased levels of FSH-β, LH-β and α subunit mRNA were seen 16h after PG in the bFF-treated animals, at the time when FSH and LH secretion from the pituitary was near maximum. These results suggest that the rebound release of FSH after treatment with bFF (as a source of inhibin) is related to a rapid increase in FSH-β mRNA, supporting the concept that the rate of FSH release is directly related to the rate of synthesis.

The antagonistic effect of exogenous LH pulses on FSH-stimulated preovulatory follicle growth in ewes chronically treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist

1990 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Picton ◽  
C. G. Tsonis ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Follicular Development ◽  
High Amplitude ◽  
Follicle Growth ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT The hypogonadotrophism model induced by the chronic administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was used to investigate the effects of different concentrations of FSH with or without LH pulses on the stimulation of follicular development in the ewe. Continuous administration of an agonist (buserelin) by osmotic minipump to thirty-six Welsh Mountain ewes from the early luteal phase for 5 weeks resulted in a sustained suppression of the plasma concentration of FSH and inhibited the pulsatile release of LH. The inhibition of gonadotrophin secretion was due to the desensitization and/or down-regulation of pituitary gonadotroph function, since the agonist-treated animals showed no response to a challenge of 1 μg GnRH. During week 6 of agonist treatment, ewes were infused with either 4-hourly pulses of ovine LH (9 μg/pulse), low concentrations of ovine FSH (3 μg/h) or high concentrations of FSH (9 μg/h) alone or with 4-hourly pulses of LH. After 5 days of gonadotrophin infusion, there was no difference between the mean number of follicles per ewe from the animals treated with LH alone, low concentrations of FSH with or without LH pulses or the high concentration of FSH alone compared with the mean number of follicles from control ewes on day 8 of the luteal phase. Infusion of the high concentration of FSH alone stimulated the development of an increased number of large oestrogenic follicles (follicles > 2·5 mm in diameter and secreting > 3·7 nmol oestradiol/h in vitro) compared with control ewes. The addition of high-amplitude LH pulses to the infusion of the high concentration of FSH prevented follicles developing beyond 2·5 mm in diameter, but doubled the number of small follicles (≤2·5 mm) present in the ovaries. These results show that normal follicular development can be induced by physiological concentrations of FSH alone in the absence of pulsatile LH release. The addition of high-amplitude LH pulses antagonized this stimulatory effect of FSH on follicle growth in the ewe. Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 127, 273–283

Effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone and its antagonist on the gene expression of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and GnRH receptor in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary gland of follicular phase ewes

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Ciechanowska ◽  
Magdalena Łapot ◽  
Tadeusz Malewski ◽  
Krystyna Mateusiak ◽  
Tomasz Misztal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pituitary Gland ◽  
Anterior Pituitary ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Corticotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Crh Receptors

There is no information in the literature regarding the effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) on genes encoding gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in the hypothalamus or on GnRHR gene expression in the pituitary gland in vivo. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate, in follicular phase ewes, the effects of prolonged, intermittent infusion of small doses of CRH or its antagonist (α-helical CRH 9-41; CRH-A) into the third cerebral ventricle on GnRH mRNA and GnRHR mRNA levels in the hypothalamo–pituitary unit and on LH secretion. Stimulation or inhibition of CRH receptors significantly decreased or increased GnRH gene expression in the hypothalamus, respectively, and led to different responses in GnRHR gene expression in discrete hypothalamic areas. For example, CRH increased GnRHR gene expression in the preoptic area, but decreased it in the hypothalamus/stalk median eminence and in the anterior pituitary gland. In addition, CRH decreased LH secretion. Blockade of CRH receptors had the opposite effect on GnRHR gene expression. The results suggest that activation of CRH receptors in the hypothalamus of follicular phase ewes can modulate the biosynthesis and release of GnRH through complex changes in the expression of GnRH and GnRHR genes in the hypothalamo–anterior pituitary unit.

The effect of a potent gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist on ovarian secretion of oestradiol, inhibin and androstenedione and the concentration of LH and FSH during the follicular phase of the sheep oestrous cycle

1990 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. K. Campbell ◽  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
H. M. Picton ◽  
D. T. Baird
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Experimental Period ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Inhibitory Feedback ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone

ABSTRACT By selective removal and replacement of LH stimulation we sought to examine the relative importance of inhibin and oestradiol in controlling FSH secretion, and the role of LH in the control of ovarian hormone secretion, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle. Eight Finn–Merino ewes which had one ovary removed and the other autotransplanted to a site in the neck were given two injections of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (50 μg/kg s.c.) in the follicular phase of the cycle 27 h and 51 h after luteal regression had been induced by cloprostenol (100 μg i.m.). Four of the ewes received, in addition, i.v. injections of 2·5 μg LH at hourly intervals for 23 h from 42 to 65 h after GnRH antagonist treatment. Ovarian jugular venous blood samples were taken at 10-min intervals for 3 h before and 5 h after the injection of antagonist (24–32 h after cloprostenol) and from 49 to 53 h after antagonist (74–78 h after cloprostenol). Additional blood samples were taken at 4-h intervals between the periods of intensive blood sampling. The GnRH antagonist completely inhibited endogenous pulsatile LH secretion within 1 h of injection. This resulted in a marked decrease in the ovarian secretion of oestradiol and androstenedione (P<0·001), an effect that was reversible by injection of exogenous pulses of LH (P<0·001). The pattern of ovarian inhibin secretion was episodic, but removal or replacement of stimulation by LH had no effect on the pattern or level of inhibin secretion. Peripheral concentrations of FSH rose (P<0·01) within 20 h of administration of the antagonist and these increased levels were maintained in ewes given no exogenous LH. In ewes given LH, however, FSH levels declined within 4 h of the first LH injection and by the end of the experimental period the levels of FSH were similar to those before administration of antagonist (P<0·01). These results confirm that ovarian oestradiol and androstenedione secretion, but not inhibin secretion, is under the acute control of LH. We conclude that oestradiol, and not inhibin, is the major component of the inhibitory feedback loop controlling the pattern of FSH secretion during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in ewes. Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 126, 377–384

Effect of the body condition of ewes on the secretion of LH and FSH and the pituitary response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone

1989 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Rhind ◽  
S. McMillen ◽  
W. A. C. McKelvey ◽  
F. F. Rodriguez-Herrejon ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Body Condition ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Body Condition Score ◽  
Pulse Amplitude ◽  
Ovarian Hormones ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
High Body ◽  
Condition Score ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone

ABSTRACT The effects of body fat content (body condition) of ewes on hypothalamic activity and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and on pituitary sensitivity to GnRH were investigated using Scottish Blackface ewes. Two groups of 12 ewes were fed so that they achieved either a high body condition score (2·98, s.e.m. = 0·046; approximately 27% of empty body weight as fat) or a low body condition score (1·94, s.e.m. = 0·031; approximately 19% of empty body weight as fat) by 4 weeks before the period of study. Thereafter, they were differentially fed so that the difference in mean condition score was maintained. Oestrus was synchronized, and on day 11 of the subsequent cycle half of the ewes of each group were ovariectomized. On day 12, the remaining ewes were injected (i.m.) with 100 μg prostaglandin F2α analogue and ovariectomized 30 h later. Numbers of large ovarian follicles and corpora lutea present at ovariectomy were recorded. Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 12 h on day 10 of the cycle (luteal phase) and at 10-min intervals from 24 to 30 h after prostaglandin injection (follicular phase). At days 2 and 7 after ovariectomy, samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 8 h and ewes were then injected with 10 μg GnRH and samples were collected for a further 3 h. Samples were assayed for LH and FSH. Ewes in high body condition had more more large follicles than ewes in low body condition during the luteal phase (15·3 vs 6·5; P < 0·05) and follicular phase (11·5 vs 7·0; NS) and a slightly higher mean ovulation rate (1·50 vs 1·20; NS). However, during the luteal and follicular phases of the cycle before ovariectomy there was no effect of condition score on mean LH or FSH concentrations or mean LH pulse frequency or pulse amplitude. Two days after ovariectomy, ewes of high body condition had a higher mean LH pulse frequency than ewes of low body condition (P < 0·05) and higher mean FSH concentrations (P < 0·05). Mean LH concentration and pulse amplitude were not affected. LH and FSH profiles were not affected by body condition on day 7. GnRH-induced increases in LH and FSH concentrations on days 2 and 7 were not affected by body condition. At day 7, but not day 2, ewes ovariectomized during the luteal phase of the cycle had a significantly (P < 0·05) greater GnRH-induced LH release compared with ewes ovariectomized during the follicular phase. It is concluded that body condition directly affects hypothalamic activity and GnRH secretion, but not pituitary sensitivity to GnRH, and that effects on reproductive performance are also mediated through changes in ovarian hormones or in hypothalamo-pituitary sensitivity to ovarian hormones. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 120, 497–502

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document