scholarly journals UEHARA Senroku’s education theory in postwar Japan ‒the formation of another national education theory‒

2014 ◽  
Vol null (44) ◽  
pp. 275-294
Author(s):  
富山仁貴
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-739
Author(s):  
G. MATTHEW ADKINS

This article considers the philosophical foundations of the French Enlightenment through a close study of the Stoic influences on the Marquis de Condorcet's education philosophy. The article argues that although Condorcet did not acknowledge any direct Stoic influence, his philosophy of education nevertheless should be understood in the eclectic idiom of eighteenth-century Stoic discourse. Furthermore, Condorcet's Stoicism was entirely compatible with Rousseau's Stoicism to the degree that one could call Condorcet a Rousseauean at least in matters of education theory—even though Condorcet, a protégé of Voltaire, is usually presented as a critic of Rousseau. Finally, the article suggests that the notion of liberty that Condorcet seeks to make flourish through his national education plan is in line with the Stoic ideal of rational autonomy, despite Condorcet's insistence that the modern idea of liberty (that is, his own idea) is fundamentally different from the ancient idea.


Author(s):  
І. Leontieva

In recent years, the education sector has been a key player in nation- and state-building, a leading social institu- tion responsible for innovative human development, the formation of competitive human capital, so the leading task of the Ukrainian state was and remains a functioning and self-sufficient national education system. would progressive traditions of the past, correspond to new social relations and accumulate innovative potential for fur- ther development. However, despite a number of positive developments in national education in recent years, the historically accumulated inconsistency of domestic education and science with best European and world practice is still acute. The article attempts to theoretically investigate the evolution of scientific views on the development and reform of education in Ukraine through the prism of publications of authors-researchers on the pages of the scientific professional publication «Pedagogical education: theory and practice. Psychology. Pedagogy» and the results of a comprehensive analysis of the state and development of national education for the 30-year period of indepen- dence of Ukraine, presented in analytical publications of the NAPS of Ukraine: White Book of National Education (2010), National Report on the state and prospects of education in Ukraine (2011, 2016, 2021). Attention is paid to the continuum of current problems in the educational sphere, assessment of the current state and short- term prospects of Ukrainian education and scientific substantiation of ways to modernize national education in the cross section of two planes — the position of leading NAPS scientists and practitioners. Building the concept of research of evolution of views, ideas, positions, beliefs of educational community on actual questions of development of education through a prism of scientific publications of authors of the researched edition, we outlined for ourselves two strategic vectors of the analysis: features of formation of the national self- sufficient integral system of education of the sovereign country for the periods 2001-2010, 2011-2015 and 2016- 2021 and the analytical characteristic of a focus of scientific attention of educators-contributors of magazine «Pedagogical education: theory and practice. Psychology. Pedagogy» in the studied periods.


Author(s):  
V. V. Rahozina

We present the national education theory journal “Art and Education”. The journal publishes materials on problems of the theory and history of art education, of the theory and methodology of education, and on methods of instruction in music, fine art and visual culture. We emphasize the uniqueness of this artisticpedagogical record, the only Ukrainian journal on art education, artistic and aesthetic development, one in which Ukrainian and foreign scientists and practical educators provide insight into the achievements of the pedagogy of art and the experience of art education in Ukraine and other countries of the world. We trace the stages of the journal’s development since its establishment and articulate its achievements over its 20-year existence.


Author(s):  
С.Д. Половецкий ◽  
А.В. Овчинников ◽  
К.Ю. Милованов

В статье исследуется проблема изучения идеологии и практики реформационной деятельности в системе народного просвещения в 60–70-х годах XIX столетия. Цель исследования — выявить ведущие стратегии образовательной политики, формы и виды модернизационной активности, персоналии, находящиеся в центре принятия судьбоносных решений для отечественного образования в период Великих реформ. Определено, что данная эпоха — это значимая историческая веха в контексте модернизации отечественного образования, время поступательного, достаточно интенсивного развития национальной системы образования, когда просвещение народа ставится в ряд приоритетных задач общегосударственной важности. В период правления императора Александра II в результате объединенных усилий власти и педагогического сообщества начала складываться единая национальная педагогическая школа, многообразная и весьма плодотворная по существу разрабатываемых проблем и решению их на практике. Представлена ретроспектива нормативно-правовой и законодательной базы в области народного образования. Выявлено, что идеи и постулаты, изложенные в трудах ученых, педагогов и общественных деятелей дореволюционного времени, существенно расширяют наши представления о мировоззренческих взглядах на просвещение населения России, национальных и общечеловеческих ценностях, необходимости их гармонизации в практической деятельности по обучению и воспитанию граждан своей страны. Охарактеризована реформа военного образования как неотъемлемая часть общей модернизации системы народного просвещения. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы при подготовке общих курсов по истории России, истории педагогики и образования, чтении лекций и спецкурсов по теории и истории модернизации. The article focuses on the investigation of the ideology of educational innovations and their implementation in the 1860s-1870s. The aim of the research is to single out major strategies of educational policy, to investigate types and kinds of innovations, to study people responsible for fateful decisions related to Russian education in the era of the Great Reforms. The article highlights that the analyzed epoch marks a milestone of Russian educational reforms. It is an epoch of continuous and intensive development of the national education system prioritizing public education as a task of national importance. During Alexander II’s reign, the government and teaching community collaborated to create a national pedagogical school capable of efficiently coping with diverse education-related problems. The article presents a retrospective view of a legal basis for public education. The article states that the analysis of ideas and views expressed in prerevolutionary scholars’, educators’, and statesmen’s works broadens our understanding of pubic education in Russia and our appreciation of national and universally human values, and enables us to better assess their implementation in Russian citizens’ education. The article characterizes military education reforms as an integral part of public education innovation. The results of the research can be used in courses of Russian history, history of pedagogy and education, theory and history of modernization.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152-159
Author(s):  
L. ZELENSKA ◽  
O. KOSTENKO

In the context of metamorphoses that the state of Ukraine and the Ukrainian school go through, it is expedient to study and retrospectively analyse pedagogical thought of a specific historical period in order to find answers and form mature solutions to complex issues that arise in modern conditions. Due to certain similarity of historical circumstances, theoretical works and practical realization of ideas of Ukrainian pedagogues from the begin of the XXth century have deep potential as an ideological-inspiring source for contemporaneity. Based on the study of original sources using the comparative theoretical analysis and analytical generalization, the article summarizes the leading ideas of Sophia Rusova on the ways of implementing the concept of labour (activity method of teaching) in the system of preschool institutions and active (labor) school in the 20s of the XXth century. Recommendations for the use of this method are specified, taking into account the age of children and the specifics of the school subjects. Based on the analysis of Sophia Rusova’s works (“New School of Social Education”, “Theory and Practice of Preschool Education”, “Unified Active (Labor) School”, “Extracurricular Education”), the advantages of the labour method, its potential for the formation and development of the child’s personality has been investigated. The connection of Sofia Rusova’s ideas with the classical European pedagogical thought and practical application of such educational concepts in the European countries is traced. Emphasis is placed on the agreement of Sofia Rusova’s ideas on the advantages of the activity method of teaching with the task of reforming the national education system in Ukraine at the beginning of the XXIst century.


2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-19
Author(s):  
Stuart R. Palmer ◽  

The range of rationales that underpin conceptions of flexible education, and the re-making over time of the official meaning of flexibility in national education policy, have led to the point where flexibility might be found, or be required, in nearly every aspect of Australian higher education. This paper seeks to identify those rationales and the development of public policy rhetoric that have framed the development of the meaning of flexible education over time in an Australian context. By considering the intersection of theoretical and policy perspectives on flexible education with the realities of teaching and learning practice in the discipline context of engineering, this paper proposes the essential importance of individual context and agency in the making of real meaning from, and creating practical boundaries around, the otherwise tenuous definitions of flexibility often offered by institutional policy.


Author(s):  
Myroslava Vovk ◽  
Julia Gryshchenko

The article presents the analysis of axiological foundations in the development of the scientific school of academician I. A. Ziaziun. It covers the conceptual idea of the scientific school of the scholar, based on ethical and aesthetic orientations of the pedagogical activity of a teacher, philosophical principles of the "pedagogy of good", value priorities of reforming the modern education and science. There are outlined basic directions of pedagogical studies of the scientific school: theoretical and methodological foundations in the development of pedagogical education, functioning of the system of postgraduate education, theory and practice of art education, professional training for teachers of art disciplines, personological aspect in the development of educational thought, foreign experience in training teachers, art studies in the course of defining the pedagogical potential of art, psychological and pedagogical aspects of in the development of children and young adults, retrospective of forming the national education, etc.Axiological actualities in the heritage of academician I. A. Ziaziun determine leading directions in the development of his scientific school of theory and practice of pedagogical skills, known in Ukraine and abroad. Perspective ideas of the academician, which contribute to the effectiveness of reformational changes in the educational and scientific development of the Ukrainian society, are being developed by scholars of the Institute of Pedagogical  and Adult Education  of the National Academy  of  Educational  Sciences  of  Ukraine,  where  under  the  mentorship  of I. A. Ziaziun formed a brilliant group of contemporary scholars, individuals with high methodological culture, fundamental training, and the humanistic style of scientific thinking. The heritage of the academician and ideas of his scientific school will be complemented by the generation of students, professors, teachers, scholars, and will always find the creative potential of research works, as well as the powerful resource for personal and professional growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document