scholarly journals The Concept of Malware as a Means of Committing Computer Crimes: Classification and Methods of Illegal Use

Author(s):  
Elena Rossinskaya ◽  
Igor Ryadovskiy

The authors analyze problems connected with malware from the standpoint of the doctrine of the methods of computer crimes/offenses as one of the components of the theory of information-computer support of criminalistic work. Most methods of computer crimes are based on the unauthorized access to computer facilities and systems gained through malware that, in fact, acts as a weapon of crime. The authors present a classification of malware based on different parameters: from the standpoint of criminal law and criminology; the standpoint of information technology; the standpoint of the doctrine of computer crimes/offenses. Various grounds for the classification of malware are examined. A general classification, widely used by the developers of antiviral software, includes virus-programs, worm-programs and trojan-programs. In the modern situation of massive digitization, it is not practical to regard masquerading as a legitimate file as a dominant feature of trojan software. On the contrary, criminals try hard to hide from the user the downloading, installation and activity of malware that cannot self-propagate. The key method of propagating trojan programs is sending mass emails with attachments masquerading as useful content. The classification of malware by the way and method of propagation - viruses, worms and trojan programs - is only currently used due to traditions and does not reflect the essence of the process. A different classification of malware into autonomous, semi-autonomous and non-autonomous programs is based on the possibility of their autonomous functioning. At present there is practically no malware whose functions include only one specific type of actions, most of it contains a combination of various types of actions implemented through module architecture, which offers criminals wide opportunities for manipulating information. The key mechanisms of malwares work are described and illustrated through examples. Special attention is paid to harmful encryption software working through stable cryptographic algorithms - ransomware, when criminals demand ransom for restoring data. There is no criminal liability for such theft. The authors outline the problems connected with the possibility of the appearance of new malware that would affect cloud resources.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-82
Author(s):  
Vadim V. Khilyuta

Criminal law institutions and basic concepts are being reformatted. This work focuses on the objective signs of theft and the mode of activity - the seizure of someone elses property. The existing law enforcement practice and the current recommendations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the qualification of thefts are critically perceived. The article focuses on provisions of the general theory of criminal law on the classification of theft. This study aims to substantiate the need for correlation of objective signs of theft in relation to the expansion of the boundaries of the object of theft and the method of activity. During the study, traditional methods of the sociolegal and formal-dogmatic analysis were used: documentary, comparative-legal, analytical, systemic, and logical. On the basis of the results of the study, adjustments were made to understand the objective side of theft and expand the boundaries of the method of action. The seizure of other peoples property cannot characterize the mechanism of embezzlement and reflect all aspects of qualification. The prospect of identifying theft with the extraction (receipt) of property benefits carries the risk of erasing the boundaries between embezzlement and other economic crimes. The author proposes models for the development of criminal legislation to establish criminal liability for crimes against property (property crimes). To modify the object of theft, its purpose, and mode of activity, the author proposes to identify a new group of crimes (crimes against the circulation of objects of civil rights) that would cover illegal acts against property and compulsory relations. Further scientific study requires a detailed separation of embezzlement (as attacks on bodily goods), crimes against the circulation of civil rights (as attacks on non-bodily goods), and crimes in economic activity (as attacks on the procedure for performing operations in the economy), summarizing their characteristic features and designing new formulations of crimes in the property sphere.


Author(s):  
S.A. Styazhkina

The article discusses the issues of criminal liability for encroachments on the procedure of official document circulation. The concept and features of a document and an official document as subjects of criminal law protection are analyzed in detail. Criteria are proposed for distinguishing between a document and an official document, as well as the classification of documents. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of amendments to Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, made in the summer of 2019, which provide for responsibility for the falsification, production or circulation of fake documents, state awards, stamps, seals or letterheads. The article examines in detail the objective features of the elements of crimes encroaching on official documents, which include the acquisition, sale, stealing, destruction, damage, concealment, as well as forgery of official documents, the sale of fake official documents and their use. The issues of the subjective side of these crimes are considered. The article also focuses on the problems of delimiting the use of obviously fake official documents, the responsibility for which is provided for in paragraph 4 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from crimes, where the use of fake documents acts as a means of committing a crime, such as fraud, illegal obtaining a loan, etc. Suggestions are made on the appropriateness amending a number of articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, providing for liability for encroachment on official documents.


2021 ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
O. РONOMARENKO

The article is devoted to determining the features of criminal law protection of state secrets under US law. The system of US regulations in the field of protection of state secrets is considered. The classification of types of state secrets is given. The grounds for criminal liability for crimes in the field of protection of state secrets have been determined. The measures of criminal and legal influence applied to the persons who have committed such crimes are revealed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 02007
Author(s):  
Konstantin Aleksandrovich Volkov ◽  
Vladimir Valerievich Agildin ◽  
Bulat Umerzhanovich Seitkhozhin

The correct qualification of a crime provides the basis for achieving the goals of criminal liability, including sentencing a just punishment. During qualification, law enforcement agencies (investigative bodies, inquiry bodies, and court) often face problems caused by contradictions in criminal law regulation (a gap in law, defects in law, legal conflicts, evaluation categories of law, etc.). According to the authors, it is possible to eliminate the contradictions of criminal law regulation by applying the principles of criminal law as a direct regulator of criminal law relations. Purpose of the research: to identify the problems of qualifying crimes in the modern practice of preliminary investigation bodies and courts, as well as to determine the place and role of the principles of criminal law in the process. Framework of the research. The research was carried out with general scientific methods (dialectical, statistical, comparative legal); in addition, methods of analysis, deduction, synthesis, as well as a formally legal method, were used in the research. Conclusions: the authors draw the conclusion that the principles of criminal law should be considered as an independent fundamental form of Russian law.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Szczepaniec

The Computer as the Tool of the CrimeSummary The article presented the classification of computer crimes on the basis of Polish criminal law and some issues concerning computer crime. Was also presented a brief analysis of selected computer crime, such as: grooming and computer cheating. The article describes also questions concerning security of cyberspace.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
Lyubov Yu. Larina ◽  
◽  
Inga V. Pantyukhina ◽  

The article substantiates the existence of criminal liability and other types of liability in the criminal legislation. The authors give a classification of types of criminal liability depending on the legal fact entailing responsibility and specific measures that make up the content of a particular type. It is proposed to distinguish two main types-primary and secondary responsibility, each of which is divided into separate varieties. They argue for the need to include in the criminal code of the Russian Federation rules on the responsibility of minors who are not subject to criminal liability; make predictions about the possibility of new measures of responsibility in criminal law. In view of the different types of liability, the question of liability of legal persons under criminal law could be considered differently.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-366
Author(s):  
A.I. Bykov ◽  

The article discusses the issue of exemption from criminal liability under the special note of Art. 205 of the Criminal Code. The introduction draws attention to the particular danger of this type of crime as it can harm various objects of criminal law protection and also has not a local, but an international character. The author provides statistics on the number of terrorist crimes. In order to prevent the type of crime under consideration the legislator has developed a special rule that stipulates a certain condition, in case of fulfillment of which a person can be exempted from criminal liability. However when implementing this rule, some problems arise. Firstly, the question arises of understanding the conditions contained in the norm under consideration and its relevance to the special norm of exemption from criminal liability or to the voluntary refusal of a crime. As a result of the analysis the author proposes his own solution to this issue. Secondly, the article considers the question of a possible condition that may arise and be declared when a terrorist act was prevented by one of the participants who prepared a socially dangerous act in order to prevent a crime. The researcher gives examples, illustrating different situations in relation to the problem under consideration and gives a classification of requirements that contribute to the prevention of a terrorist act.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peyman Rostamian ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Hajjarian ◽  
Hassan Ali Moazzanzadegan

Having accepted the need for the presence of a psychological relationship between the act and the agent and the importance of the intent and the classification of crimes into intentional and unintentional crimes, the punishment of the perpetrators of these crimes differed so that today, in the distinction between civil and criminal liability, the condition of the psychological element in the proofs of the titles of criminal acts is necessary, so long as it is said that the principle is the deliberate nature of the offenses and the contrary is required to be specified. Therefore, the current paper aims at investigating the malic in crimes in Iran and The United Kingdom. First the conceptual research subject is expanded and then, qualitative research method was used to analyze the data collected from library sources using the legal literature analysis method. The findings indicate that: "The psychological element in Iran and The English Criminal Law is in full compliance in some aspects, while and and contradictory others. In addition, The English Criminal Law in some cases is more comprehensive in the field of psychological element, which, along with the sacred Islamic law, can be useful for Iranian law ".Key words: Crime, Moral pillar, Malice, Iranian law, The English Criminal Law  


Author(s):  
Elena Markova

The article analyses the legal characteristics of the criminal laws of foreign States belonging to the Anglo-Saxon legal family (in the case of Great Britain and the United States of America) with regard to criminal liability for crimes committed by electronic means of payment. The peculiarities of this legal family are noted, which affect the position of the legislator with regard to the regulation of cybercrime, including the legal nature of criminal law; The importance of resolutions of the Royal (Westminster) Courts, the Supreme Court on the constitutionality or unconstitutional nature of ordinary («current») laws (USA), in Canada, Australia and other English-speaking States, in which acts of the highest courts on identical subjects have acquired special importance. Problems affecting criminal legislation have been identified: the de facto absence of systematic rules on the limits of the criminal law; There are contradictions between the written sources of criminal law (in particular with regard to fraud and computer crimes; Recognition of the interpretation of the law by sources of criminal law, etc.). It is noted that there is no Criminal Code in the UK, however, issues of criminal liability for computer crimes are regulated at the level of written law: in the Law on Computer Crimes the adoption of which was facilitated by the judicial precedent of 1988 (R v Gold & Schifreen), in the Law on Fraud of 2006, which classifies the elements of crimes committed in the form of fraudulent fraud. The peculiarities of the criminal law of the United States, which like Great Britain, does not have a codified system of criminal law at the federal level, are noted. An analysis of the two-tier legal system of the United States, the peculiarities of criminal liability for cybercrime in certain states, including FOR theft and fraud by the use of payment cards, has been carried out.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrii Kofanov ◽  
Olena Kofanova
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document