University Management in Russia: Goals, Culture, Criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4-1) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Vladimir Diev ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Effective Management ◽  
University Management ◽  
Management Culture ◽  
Russian Higher Education ◽  
The Right ◽  
Main Message ◽  
Hierarchical Management

The paper presents a response to the article by P.A. Orekhovsky and V.I. Razumov, which was devoted to the various problems of Russian higher education and science. As far as we agree with the main message of this article, we are trying to look at the exposed problems from the point of view of management theory. We think that our view seems relevant and methodologically justified, since most of the exposed problems require serious management decisions. It is shown that sometimes absurd reforms and reorganizations pursue very specific goals, which, at the same time, are not reported to the affected entities. In this context, the metaphor of the carnival fits perfectly, and P. A. Orekhovsky and V.I. Razumov use it well. We show the importance of organizational culture within university management. Culture is not an object of manipulation. It is created by people and sometimes controls the leader even more than vice-versa. This is especially important because most of the elements of effective management (task setting, evaluation, monitoring, feedback, etc.) in each organization are to a certain extent determined by culture. It is proposed to return to a system of appointing university rectors, as this will increase the rector’s responsibility for decisions made, as well as eliminate elections, which are often formalities. The pyramidal structure of decision making means a critical dependence of the effectiveness of the organization on the qualities and abilities of the central unit, which, as a rule, consists of one senior official. If that official makes ineffective decisions, then even a perfect hierarchy will idle or even begin to self-destruct. The main flaw of such a structure is that all the information necessary for making decisions is concentrated at the bottom of the hierarchical pyramid (among the subordinates), and all the responsibility and the right to make decisions are at the top (among the senior officials). Our own position presupposes the justification of the transition from the current vertical hierarchical management model within the Russian higher education institutions to a subsidiarity model, according to which decision-making should be carried out at the lowest or least centralized level of government.

scholarly journals The Role of Simulation and Serious Games in Teaching Concepts on Circular Economy and Sustainable Energy

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Rocio de la Torre ◽  
Bhakti S. Onggo ◽  
Canan G. Corlu ◽  
Maria Nogal ◽  
Angel A. Juan
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Circular Economy ◽  
Serious Games ◽  
Sustainable Energy ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
University Management ◽  
Teaching Methodologies ◽  
The Will

The prevailing need for a more sustainable management of natural resources depends not only on the decisions made by governments and the will of the population, but also on the knowledge of the role of energy in our society and the relevance of preserving natural resources. In this sense, critical work is being done to instill key concepts—such as the circular economy and sustainable energy—in higher education institutions. In this way, it is expected that future professionals and managers will be aware of the importance of energy optimization, and will learn a series of computational methods that can support the decision-making process. In the context of higher education, this paper reviews the main trends and challenges related to the concepts of circular economy and sustainable energy. Besides, we analyze the role of simulation and serious games as a learning tool for the aforementioned concepts. Finally, the paper provides insights and discusses open research opportunities regarding the use of these computational tools to incorporate circular economy concepts in higher education degrees. Our findings show that, while efforts are being made to include these concepts in current programs, there is still much work to be done, especially from the point of view of university management. In addition, the analysis of the teaching methodologies analyzed shows that, although their implementation has been successful in favoring the active learning of students, their use (especially that of serious games) is not yet widespread.

Suggested Model for Business Intelligence in Higher Education

Data Mining ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. 550-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaidoun Alzoabi ◽  
Faek Diko ◽  
Saiid Hanna
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Business Intelligence ◽  
University Management ◽  
Suggested Model ◽  
Business Decision ◽  
Data Mining Approach ◽  
Input Processing ◽  
The University

BI is playing a major role in achieving competitive advantage in almost every sector of the market, and the higher education sector is no exception. Universities, in general, maintain huge databases comprising data of students, human resources, researches, facilities, and others. Data in these databases may contain decisive information for decision making. In this chapter we will describe a data mining approach as one of the business intelligence methodologies for possible use in higher education. The importance of the model arises from the reality that it starts from a system approach to university management, looking at the university as input, processing, output, and feedback, and then applies different business intelligence tools and methods to every part of the system in order to enhance the business decision making process. The chapter also shows an application of the suggested model on a real case study at the Arab International University.

Pricing for higher education institutions: a value-based approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 929-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amizawati Mohd Amir ◽  
Sofiah Md Auzair ◽  
RUHANITA MAELAH ◽  
Azlina Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Educational Programme ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Content Type ◽  
A Value ◽  
One Step ◽  
The Right

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose the concept of higher education institutions (HEIs) offering educational services based on value for money. The value is determined based on customers’ (i.e. students) expectations of the service and the costs in comparison to the competitors. Understanding the value and creating customer value are a means to attain competitive advantage and constitute the basis of price setting. Drawing upon this belief, as an initial step towards value-based pricing method, the possible value factors are suggested for calculating educational programme prices across HEIs. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper introducing the value-based pricing approach in setting HEI tuition fees. Extending prior discussion on the demand for quality education and current financial challenges faced by HEIs, it introduces the concept pricing based upon customer perceived value (student/industry). Value-based pricing is deemed appropriate in view of the value of short tangible and intangible investment by both parties (students and HEIs) to differentiate in terms of setting the right price for the right university for the right student. Findings – The primary aim is to suggest the applicability of value-based pricing for HEIs, which is likely to be both relevant and fruitful for the sustainability of the sector. It represents a personal point of view; building upon a review of the literature, the paper extends the established knowledge one step further in terms of setting the right price for the right university, which is deemed worthy of further study and development. Originality/value – The paper will be of use to the management and policymakers in the education sector in searching for a contemporary pricing mechanism for higher education.

scholarly journals Glosa do wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Opolu z dnia 2 lutego 2017 r. II SA/Op 577/16

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-257
Author(s):  
Dariusz Mucha
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Higher Education Institution ◽  
The Right

In the judgment with commentaries, the Provincial Administrative Court in Opole made a statement concerning the penalty of expulsion from a higher education institution as a disciplinary penalty declared only by disciplinary committees. From the point of view of the judgment with commentaries, it is of importance to specify that this penalty is not of “life-long” nature, nor dśs it result in deprivation of the right to study in other institutions. The author approves of the position held by the judgment with commentaries and claims it to be an accurate and significant voice of the judiciary, which may prove substantial in eliminating legal ambiguities (and absurdities) arising as a result of applying the provisions of law in regard to responsibilities of higher education students, drawing attention to the incomplete and insufficient form of the provision of the relevant legal regulation.  

Suggested Model for Business Intelligence in Higher Education

2012 ◽  
pp. 223-239
Author(s):  
Zaidoun Alzoabi ◽  
Faek Diko ◽  
Saiid Hanna
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Business Intelligence ◽  
University Management ◽  
Suggested Model ◽  
Business Decision ◽  
Data Mining Approach ◽  
Input Processing ◽  
The University

BI is playing a major role in achieving competitive advantage in almost every sector of the market, and the higher education sector is no exception. Universities, in general, maintain huge databases comprising data of students, human resources, researches, facilities, and others. Data in these databases may contain decisive information for decision making. In this chapter we will describe a data mining approach as one of the business intelligence methodologies for possible use in higher education. The importance of the model arises from the reality that it starts from a system approach to university management, looking at the university as input, processing, output, and feedback, and then applies different business intelligence tools and methods to every part of the system in order to enhance the business decision making process. The chapter also shows an application of the suggested model on a real case study at the Arab International University.

Today’s Urban Black Male: The Importance of Finding the Right College to Realize Maximum Success

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 1051-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriel A. Hilton ◽  
Fred A. Bonner
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
African American ◽  
College Student ◽  
African American Males ◽  
Black Male ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Physical Location ◽  
The Right

When it comes to higher education, finding the right school is only one obstacle in the lives of most African-American males. Studies show that even out of the number of enrolled African-American males in the nation, about one-third of them will actually complete an undergraduate degree. A lack of experience in higher education may affect the decision-making process when shopping for the right school. The decision selecting the right school may be predicated on circumstance rather than outright choice, and may depend on the prospective student’s physical location or residence, whether they are urban or rural, and whether they are a first, second or third generation college student in their family. One solution to overcoming these and other obstacles in the college decision-making process for African-American males is to enroll in an institution where they will be supported and nurtured.

scholarly journals Analysing Cybernetic Governance at Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia: How is Co- Production Linked to the Transformation of Higher Education Institutions via Governance?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Marhaini Mohd Noor
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Resource Sharing ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
University Management ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Vice Chancellor ◽  
Processing Information

This paper attempts to analyse how important the cybernetic governance is to higher education institutions in Malaysia. Cybernetic governance is a structure, process of a system to empower greater decision making, autonomy, leadership, and greater accountability. Thus, cybernetic approach is heavily depending on information, utilise information for decision making, policy making and feedback to respond effectively. The concept also relevant with co-production strategy, whereby public services offered at the institution would focus on making use of resources through community building, collaboration, and resource sharing. In this context, “governance” refers to the role of multi-stakeholders involved in decision making, autonomy, leadership, and accountability. The effectiveness and success of this cybernetic governance depends on the institution community; the board, Vice-Chancellor, university management committee, Deans and Directors involved. The main idea is to analyse cybernetic governance as a model for processing information and a platform for co-production on governance empowerment at higher education institutions in Malaysia. Hence literatures are reviewed to apply the concepts to this research. An expected outcome of this research would be the evidence to improve policy performance in governance arrangements. Therefore, cybernetic governance contribution is the practice of good governance for intelligent institutions.

scholarly journals A Multi-Attribute Assisted Performance Deduction and Related Value in Triple Helix Innovation Networks

2020 ◽  
pp. 751-760
Author(s):  
Honxing Yao ◽  
Henry Asante Antwi ◽  
Evans Takyi Ankomah-Asare
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Innovation Networks ◽  
Higher Education Systems ◽  
Value Determination ◽  
The Relationship

Typically, Triple Helix relations, between, Higher Education Institutions, Governments and Industry(s) are inferred from patents and research output. Systemic determination of the relationship is because of observations over a period. It is, however, possible to analyze this relation from a system present from the word-go. This then allows for the interaction to be analyzed on the basis of performance and logically gains for participation by all the agents. Several models have been proposed to deduce the Triple Helix Relation and these hold. This paper has however introduced a new dimension to the analysis, by viewing participation from an investor point of view with decision making being of a complex and deductive nature based on the performance of higher education systems or institutions. The TOPSIS supported performance deductions helps synthesis decision solutions that facilitates value determination of performance and its resultant impact on investment gains. Possible future implications for this, are also provided

scholarly journals Competition model in the Russian higher education system

2021 ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
И.А. Константинов ◽  
В.А. Гончарова
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Game Theory ◽  
Education System ◽  
Technological Progress ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Higher Education System ◽  
Russian Higher Education ◽  
Controlled Structure

Одним из наиболее значимых институтов общества в любой стране мира является институт высшего образования. Именно система образования в целом и структуры высшего образования в частности непосредственно связаны с благосостоянием граждан страны. Однако, технический и технологический прогресс не стоят на месте, ежегодно создаются и развиваются новые предприятия, которые требуют новые компетенции от своих сотрудников. В свою очередь система высшего образования должна соответствовать быстро меняющейся цифровой отрасли. Проблема заключается в том, что система образования, как контролируемая Государством структура является куда более инертной структурой, чем предприятия, силами которых осуществляется цифровая трансформация. Бездействие в части реализации реформ в сфере высшего образования неизбежно повлечет разрыв между требуемыми компетенциями в отрасли и теми компетенциями, которыми будут фактически обладать выпускники. Увеличение этого разрыва сделает высшее образование нерелевантным со всеми вытекающими от сюда последствиями. В данной работе подробно рассмотрен процесс защит выпускных квалификационных работ магистров (ВКР), этот процесс сведен в термины теории игр, с формализацией ролей, мотиваций и стратегиями поведения участников этого процесса. После рассмотрения проблемы с позиции теории игр выделены слабые стороны процессов и рассмотрены меры по их устранению. One of the most important institutions of society in any country in the world is the Institute of Higher Education. It is the education system in general and the structures of higher education in particular that are directly related to the well-being of the country's citizens. However, technical and technological progress does not stand still, every year new enterprises are created and developed, which require new competencies from their employees. In turn, the higher education system must meet the rapidly changing digital industry. The problem is that the education system, as a state-controlled structure, is a much more inert structure than the enterprises that are engaged in digital transformation. Inaction in the implementation of reforms in the field of higher education will inevitably lead to a gap between the required competencies in the industry and the competencies that graduates will actually have. An increase in this gap will make higher education irrelevant, with all the consequences that follow. In this paper, the process of defending the final qualifying works of masters (WRC) is considered in detail, this process is reduced to the terms of game theory, with the formalization of roles, motivations and strategies of behavior of participants in this process. After considering the problem from the point of view of game theory, the weaknesses of the processes are identified and measures to eliminate them are considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document