Ensuring the Balance of Interests in the Practice of the Federal Law «On Protection of Competition» Article 17 Law Enforcement

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
K. A. Pisenko ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Soloviev, ◽  
S. V. Yushkin ◽  
S. V. Maksimov*

The article examines the etymology and prehistory of the introduction of the institution of antimonopoly compliance in Russian business practice, the relationship of this institution with the institution of general compliance. The article considers the definition of the concept of antimonopoly compliance, enshrined in the new article 91 of the Federal Law "On Protection of Competition".The authors propose their own definition of the concept of antimonopoly compliance as an activity of an economic entity aimed at ensuring compliance with antimonopoly legislation by employees of an economic entity and an economic entity as a whole by preventing and suppressing violations of the requirements of such legislation and regulatory legal and law enforcement acts based on it.The authors also substantiate the advisability of developing a special national standard GOST R "System of internal compliance with the requirements of antimonopoly legislation (antimonopoly compliance system) of an economic entity".It is noted that the effectiveness of the antimonopoly compliance system will depend not only on the ability of an economic entity to form an antimonopoly compliance system on the basis of an appropriate national standard, but also on the state's ability to determine and guarantee effective incentives to comply with antimonopoly legislation.The authors substantiate the advisability of supplementing the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation with provisions that provide for the obligation and limits to reduce the amount of punishment or replace the punishment with a softer one in the event of an anticompetitive administrative offense by a person who has implemented an effective system of antimonopoly compliance.


Author(s):  
O. A. Moskvitin ◽  
I. P. Bochinin

The article discusses some problems of the formation of a uniform law enforcement practice on the example of specific decisions of the FAS Russia Board of Appeals on issues related to: the application of the rules for the qualification of antitrust violations provided for in part 1 of art. 10 of the Federal Law «On Protection of Competition»; the need to prove the fulfillment of an agreement prohibited by art.16 of the same Law; the exercise of the right of the FAS Russia collegial bodies to refer the matter for a new consideration to the territorial antimonopoly body. It is concluded that the legal positions of the Appeal Board of FAS Russia, being based on the law and applied only in compliance with the law, help to effectively resolve controversial problems of pre-trial Antimonopoly law enforcement and to develop uniform approaches to the interpretation of the rules of competition law.


Author(s):  
Екатерина Станиславовна Брылякова

Статья посвящена отдельному виду социальных гарантий сотрудникам учреждений и органов уголовно-исполнительной системы - праву на получение ежемесячного пособия по уходу за ребенком до достижения им полутора лет при сохранении своего рабочего места. Данная социальная гарантия не лишена нюансов: правовая проблема реализации права сотрудника учреждений и органов уголовно-исполнительной системы состоит в том, что он лишен права на «полноценное» ежемесячное пособие по уходу за ребенком. Актуальность данной темы обусловлена тем, что на сегодняшний день Федеральный закон от 19.05.1995 № 81-ФЗ «О государственных пособиях гражданам, имеющим детей» устанавливает для сотрудников органов и учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы ежемесячное пособие по уходу за ребенком в размере 40 процентов среднего денежного довольствия по месту службы за последние 12 календарных месяцев, предшествующих месяцу наступления отпуска по уходу за ребенком. При этом обозначенный нормативно-правовой акт регламентирует минимальный (1500 рублей) и максимальный размер пособия (6000 рублей) для данной категории лиц. Однако для такой категории лиц, как матери, осуществляющие уход за ребенком и подлежащие обязательному социальному страхованию, Федеральный закон № 81-ФЗ устанавливает пособие по уходу за ребенком в размере 40 процентов среднего заработка, на который начисляются страховые взносы на обязательное социальное страхование на случай временной нетрудоспособности и в связи с материнством и не ограничивает максимальным размером. В связи с этим в правоприменительной сфере возникает дискуссионный вопрос относительно приоритетности ущемления прав одной категории граждан над другими в части размера пособия по уходу за ребенком. В статье предпринята попытка разобраться с регламентированным законодателем подходом к определению размеров выплаты пособия по уходу за ребенком определенному кругу субъектов и предложить рекомендации разрешения сложившейся ситуации. The presented article is devoted to a separate type of social guarantees for employees of institutions and bodies of the penal system-the right to receive a monthly allowance for the care of a child up to the age of one and a half, while maintaining their jobs. However, this social guarantee is not devoid of nuances, namely, the legal problem of exercising the right of an employee of institutions and bodies of the penitentiary system is that he is deprived of the right to a “full-fledged” monthly child care benefit. The relevance of this topic is due to the fact that today the Federal law of 19.05.1995 No. 81-FZ “On state benefits to citizens with children” establishes for the employees of bodies and establishments of criminally-Executive system of monthly allowances for child care in the amount of 40 percent of the average monetary allowances at the place of service in the last 12 calendar months preceding the month of the onset of leave to care for a child. In this case, the designated legal act regulates the minimum (1500 rubles) and the maximum amount of benefits (6000 rubles) for this category of persons. However, such a category of persons as mothers who take care of a child and are subject to compulsory social insurance, Federal law No. 81-FZ establishes a child care allowance in the amount of 40 percent of the average wage, which is charged with insurance contributions for compulsory social insurance in case of temporary disability and in connection with motherhood, and does not limit the maximum amount. In this regard, in the field of law enforcement there is a debatable question about the priority, infringement of the rights of one category of citizens over others in terms of the amount of child care benefits. The article attempts to deal with a regulated by the legislator approach to determining the amount of payment of childcare benefits to a specific circle of subjects and to offer recommendations for resolving the current situation.


Author(s):  
Max Felker-Kantor

The LAPD’s postwar model of policing routinely served as a standard for departments across the country. Backed by federal Law Enforcement Assistance Administration funds and support from newly elected law-and-order governor Ronald Reagan, the LAPD led the way in bolstering its paramilitary function through riot control plans, the use of helicopters, and the invention of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams, which was quickly adopted by other departments. At the same time, the department sought to legitimize the iron fist with the velvet glove of community relations and improved officer training. As this chapter shows, the LAPD engaged in a process of militarization and enhanced its martial capacity while expanding its reach through community relations programs.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
James R. Skillen

In April 2014, near Bunkerville, Nevada, Cliven Bundy and hundreds of armed supporters faced off with federal law enforcement officers who were removing his trespassing cattle from federal lands. Bundy described himself as the victim of a rogue federal government that trampled the US Constitution and deprived him of basic rights, and he was ready to “take this country back by force.”...


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 217-219
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Petit ◽  
Jason P. Stopyra ◽  
Ricardo A. Padilla ◽  
William P. Bozeman

Introduction:Interest in tactical medicine, the provision of medical support to law enforcement and military special operations teams, continues to grow. The majority of tactical physicians are emergency physicians with additional training and experience in tactical operations. A 2005 survey found that 18% of responding Emergency Medicine (EM) residencies offered their resident physicians structured exposure to tactical medicine at that time.Methods:This study sought to assess interval changes in tactical medicine exposure during EM residency and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) fellowship training. A secure online survey was distributed electronically to all 212 EM residency programs and 44 EMS fellowship programs in the United States.Results:Responses were received from 99 (46%) EM residency and 40 (91%) EMS fellowship programs. Results showed that 52 (53%) of the responding residencies offered physician trainees formal exposure to tactical medicine as part of their training (P < .0001 compared to 18% in 2005). In addition, 32 (72%) of the 40 responding EMS fellowships (newly established since the initial survey) offered this opportunity. Experiences ranged from observation to active participation during tactical training and call-outs. The EM residents and EMS fellows provide support to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. A small number of programs (six residencies and four fellowships) allowed a subset of qualified trainees to be armed during tactical operations.Conclusion:Overall, training opportunities in tactical medicine have grown significantly over the last decade from 18% to 53% of responding EM residencies. In addition, 72% of responding EMS fellowships incorporate tactical medicine in their training program.Petit NP, Stopyra JP, Padilla RA, Bozeman WP. Resident involvement in tactical medicine: 12 years later. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(2):217–219


2020 ◽  
pp. 009102601990052
Author(s):  
Helen H. Yu

Recent scholarship has examined the barriers women experience in well-known federal law enforcement agencies. However, there is scant research that examines a unique subgrouping of agents within the federal Offices of Inspectors General (OIGs). Drawing on survey data from 249 female agents, this study compares responses between female agents working in the OIGs and female agents working in all other federal law enforcement agencies to differentiate their experiences. Findings suggest that female agents in the OIGs experience less occupational barriers, namely, reduced number of relocations and incidences of sexual harassment, as well as higher agency adoption of family-friendly policies to promote work–life balance, resulting in women’s higher representation at those agencies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document