A Case Study on Program Evaluation Using Orientation Principles of the CIPP Evaluation Model and Program Evaluation Standards

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 67-97
Author(s):  
Daeyoung Kim ◽  
Seung-wan Lim
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Evaluation Standards

scholarly journals Planning For Evaluation In Online Learning: University Of Hawaii Case Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Menchaca ◽  
Ellen S. Hoffman
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Online Learning ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Online Delivery ◽  
Effective Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Approach ◽  
Overall Evaluation ◽  
The University

With contemporary requirements for objective measurement, program evaluation is a certain necessity. Most program evaluation is designed in response to external demands for assessment. Moreover, such evaluation is typically developed only after programs already exist. However, the proliferation of online learning provides new opportunities for approaching evaluation. Specifically, many higher education institutions are currently augmenting existing campus-based programs with online learning—either by hybridizing traditional delivery or by providing parallel online options. At the University of Hawaii, while designing a parallel online delivery model for an existing campus-based program, careful consideration was given to the unique requirements for evaluation and assessment. In this way, an overall plan for evaluation was developed that incorporated multiple layers of assessment: from specific programmatic to internal university to external accreditation requirements. Commonalities among the multiple layers were considered to develop a single, overall evaluation approach. In a case study model, this paper describes eight practical steps taken to develop an overall, effective evaluation model.

A Case Study for the 10-Step Approach to Program Evaluation

TechTrends ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-342
Author(s):  
Suzanne Ensmann ◽  
Angela Ward ◽  
Andrea Fonseca ◽  
Erika Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation

scholarly journals Grey Clustering Evaluation for the Cooperation Efficiency of PPP Project: Taking Beijing Metro Line 4 as an Example

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Sun ◽  
Yingzi Liang ◽  
Yuning Wang
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Evaluation Index System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Clustering Model ◽  
Grey Clustering ◽  
Public Products ◽  
Infrastructure Project

PPP model is an important model which provides public products or services based on the coordination between the public sector and private sector. The implementation of PPP model is helpful for relieving the stress of insufficient funding for public sector and improving the efficiency of resource allocation. Comparing with traditional infrastructure project, PPP project involves many stakeholders, and the cooperation efficiency during the different stakeholders impacts the results of the project directly. Thus, it is important to explore the cooperation efficiency of PPP project. Based on grey clustering model, this paper evaluates the cooperation efficiency of PPP project. An evaluation index system including 36 indexes is established based on the aims and objectives of three stakeholders (public sector, private sector, and passengers). A case study of Beijing Metro Line 4 PPP project is implemented to verify the validity and applicability of the evaluation model. And the results showed that the cooperation efficiency of Beijing Metro Line 4 PPP project is relatively high. The model also provided insights into the shortage of the cooperation efficiency of Beijing Metro Line 4 PPP project. As such, the results can assist all stakeholders in adjusting the cooperation efficiency.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF THREE PROGRAM-EVALUATION MODELS –A REVIEW ON THEIR IMPLICATION IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-336
Author(s):  
Zafar Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Anees ◽  
Rahim Khan ◽  
Abdul Wadood ◽  
Shakila Malik
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Scholarly Journals ◽  
Cipp Model ◽  
Evaluation Models ◽  
High Standards ◽  
Kirkpatrick’S Model

Purpose of the study: This article reviews the comparative efficacy, theoretical and practical background of three program evaluation models (Stufflebeam’s CIPP model, Kirkpatrick’s model, and outcome-based evaluation models) and their implications in educational programs. The article discusses the strengths and limitations of the three evaluation models. Methodology: Peer-reviewed and scholarly journals were searched for articles related to program evaluation models and their importance. Keywords included program evaluation’, ‘assessment’, ‘CIPP model’, ‘evaluation of educational programs, ‘outcome-based model, and ‘planning’. Articles on Stufflebeam’s CIPP model, Kirkpatrick’s model, and outcome-based evaluation models were particularlyfocused because the review aimed at analysing these three models. The strengths and inadequacies of the three models were weighed and presented. Main Findings: The three models –outcome-based evaluation model, the Kirkpatric model, and the CIPP evaluation model –discussed in this review, have some strengths and weaknesses. Among the compared models, the CIPP model seems more appropriate for its implantation in evaluating educational programs because it is broader, comprehensive, flexible, cost-effective, and feasible. Applications of this study: Like other programs and projects, evaluation of educational programs is necessary to achieve high standards, better outcomes, and meet the objectives. Evaluation is employed before designing a particular educational program or during the already designed program. This review concludes that among different evaluation models, the CIPP evaluation model is more appropriate in evaluating educational programs because it is more comprehensive, efficient, and feasible.Employment of the CIPP model for evaluating educational programs can achieve plausible results about the overall progress of the educational programs. Novelty/Originality of this study: This review highlights the importance of different program evaluation models. It concludes that the CIPP evaluation model offers an excellent mechanism to evaluate educational programs at different stages.

scholarly journals Developing an Evaluation Model for Maternity Care: A Mixed-Method Study from Iran

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozita Firooznia ◽  
Hossein Dargahi ◽  
Tohid Jafari-Koshki ◽  
Zeinab Khaledian
Keyword(s):  
Maternity Care ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Health Program ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
Resources Management ◽  
Maternity Health

Background: Maternity care is an integral part of primary health care (PHC) systems worldwide. This study aimed to develop a new model for evaluating the maternity health program (MHP) in Iran. Methods: In this mixed-methods study, first, the challenges of MHP were surveyed through systematic review and expert interviews. Next, to identify the existing shortcomings in MHP evaluation system, the SWOT technique, cross-sectional study and comparative analyses were used. Finally, the Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on developed evaluation standards. Results: The final developed evaluation model contains five dimensions including reproductive health/family planning, maternity health, health records, evaluation, and resources management. Overall, this model has 32 standards and 289 measures. The scores obtained for the sum of the measures in two importance and applicability criteria were 8.24 and 7.85, which these scores are estimated to be equal to 91.55 and 87.22 percent of the highest possible scores, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the comprehensiveness of the obtained model, it is hoped that it could lead to performance improvement of the PHC centers in the area of maternity health.  

scholarly journals Multi-Granularity Feasibility Evaluation Method of the Partial Destructive Disassembly for an End-of-Life Product

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Guo ◽  
Xiufen ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Entropy Weight ◽  
Component Level ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Feasibility Evaluation ◽  
Entropy Weight Method ◽  
Weight Method

Abstract Partial destructive disassembly (PDD) is essential for end-of-life products to improve their automatic disassembly efficiency and reduce disassembly cost. A feasibility evaluation of the PDD is the key step to evaluate whether the PDD can be implemented. However, it has not been studied previously to our knowledge. To deal with this problem, a multi-granularity feasibility evaluation method is proposed. A multi-granularity feasibility evaluation model of the PDD was constructed based on the complex product’s hierarchical structure, which not only described the evaluation indices from the product level to the component level but also presented methods and rules to quantify them. 1Thus, disassembly entropy was introduced into the target group’s coarse granularity evaluation. The feasibility of the fine-grained index of the PDD for the component layer was constructed based on the product’s failure characteristic. The fine-grained index was calculated by the fuzzy trigonometric function and its weighting was obtained based on the structure entropy weight method. Thus, the results of the evaluation were used as feedback to guide the PDD process. Finally, a Passat engine case study illustrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the method.

scholarly journals THE EVALUATION OF DISTANCE LEARNING IN PANDEMIC ERA: CASE STUDY OF FINANCIAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING AGENCY OF MAKASSAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azwar Iskandar ◽  
Achmat Subekan
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Financial Education ◽  
Learning Gain ◽  
Training Performance ◽  
Implementation Evaluation ◽  
Training Materials ◽  
Effectiveness Of Training ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude ◽  
And Training

The objectives of this research are to: (i) evaluate the trainees’s satisfaction on trainers and training performance; (ii) evaluate learning gain or improvement of trainees’s skills, knowledge, and attitude after training; and (iii) know the significant obstacles that can reduce the effectiveness of training. Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model through questionnaire, interview, and descriptive statistics method, this research reveals that: (i) the overall aspect of the implementation evaluation was assessed by participants in the good category although it could not meet the level of expectations of participants that could be seen from the ratio of the average total perception to reality below 100%. On the other hand, the trainers aspect has been able to meet the expectations of participants where the overall level of trainers performance has been assessed by participants and entered into the category of very good; (ii) the results of the evaluation analysis at Level 2 (learning gain) show that most participants graduate with good predicate and get an up/up score so that it can be said that participants have gained additional knowledge after attending the training; (iii) although in general the evaluation results showed good results, there are still some obstacles faced by participants in attending the training. In terms of organizing, participants generally complained about inadequate internet quality in some areas. Meanwhile, in the trainers aspect, participants generally give feedback that teachers can multiply case studies and raise the latest issues in the confectionery of problems related to training materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document