scholarly journals Literature Review of Language Planning and Language Policy since 21st Century

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 888
Author(s):  
Ningning Hao

As a major part of sociolinguistics, language planning has become a major research topic for many scholars. As a branch of Applied Linguistics, language planning is not a theoretical field of academic research, but mainly based on solving language problems in society. In the past 50 years, language planning research has been deepened and the coverage has gradually expanded. Especially, since 1990s, language planning has become a subject of rejuvenation, which has increasingly highlighted its importance and research prospects. This paper will review and analyze the general situation of language planning research in the past 20 years at home and abroad, and look forward to the future trend of language planning research.

1989 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. vii-xi
Author(s):  
Robert B. Kaplan

This tenth volume of the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) concerns itself with a survey of applied linguistics broadly, as this series did in volume I and volume V. The changes which have occurred in the field generally over the past decade are impressive; indeed, a volume such as this one would have been quite impossible ten years ago. Some of the topics covered in this volume are ones to which this series has repeatedly returned—e.g., language planning, language-in-education planning, bilingualism; others are unique to this volume—e.g., language and aging, and still others represent sub-fields which have been treated previously but which have expanded significantly in the years since volume I was published—e.g., second-language acquisition, language testing.


Author(s):  
Christos Bouras ◽  
Eri Giannaka ◽  
Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos

E-Collaboration is an important research topic, with a great number of researchers contributing on many aspects. The main reason for this major research activity is the broad topic’s scope, which involves not only technological but also social and psychological issues. As a result there are multiple interpretations about what e-collaboration is. More specifically we definitely can say that e-collaboration has been defined in many ways in the past, and the number of definitions has grown recently. The next section present the main terms in this area.


2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182

07–341Al-Kufaishi, Adil (Copenhagen U, Denmark; [email protected]), A pedagogic model of translating expository texts. Babel (John Benjamins) 52.1 (2006), 1–16.07–342Anderson, Wendy (U Glasgow, UK), ‘Absolutely, totally, filled to the brim with the Famous Grouse’. English Today (Cambridge University Press) 22.3 (2006), 10–16.07–343Boudreault, Patrick (California State U, Northridge, USA; [email protected]) & Rachel I. Mayberry, Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 21.5 (2006), 608–635.07–344Charles, M. (U Oxford, UK), The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics (Oxford University Press) 27.3 (2006), 492–518.07–345Frazier, Lyn (U Massachusetts, Amherst, USA; [email protected]), Katy Carlson & Charles Clifton Jr., Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Elsevier) 10.6 (2006), 244–249.07–346Goatly, Andrew (Lingnan U, Hong Kong, China), Ideology and metaphor. English Today (Cambridge University Press) 22.3 (2006), 25–39.07–347Goral, Mira (City U New York, USA; [email protected]), Erika S. Levy, Loraine K. Obler & Eyal Cohen, Cross-language lexical connections in the mental lexicon: Evidence from a case of trilingual aphasia. Brain and Language (Elsevier) 98.2 (2006), 235–247.07–348Hellermann J. (Portland State U, USA), Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics (Oxford University Press) 27.3 (2006), 377–404.07–349Joseph, John E. (U Edinburgh, UK), Linguistic identities: Double-edged swords. Language Problems & Language Planning (John Benjamins) 30.3 (2006), 261–267.07–350Kuo, I-Chun (Canterbury Christ Church U College, UK; [email protected]), Addressing the issue of teaching English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal (Oxford University Press) 60.3 (2006), 213–221.07–351McDonald, Janet L. (Louisiana State U, Baton Rouge, USA; [email protected]), Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners.Journal of Memory and Language (Elsevier) 55.3 (2006), 381–401.07–352Mori, Junko & Makoto Hayashi (U Wisconsin-Maddison, USA), The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics (Oxford University Press) 27.2 (2006), 195–219.07–353Oberlander, Jon (U Edinburgh, UK) & Alastair J. Gill, Language with character: A stratified corpus comparison of individual differences in e-mail communication. Discourse Processes (Erlbaum) 42.3 (2006), 239–270.07–354Rosenberger Shankar, Tara (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA), Speaking on the record: A theory of composition. Computers and Composition (Elsevier) 23.3 (2006), 374–373.07–355Sanford, Anthony J. (U Glasgow, UK) & Arthur C. Graesser, Shallow processing and underspecification. Discourse Processes (Erlbaum) 42.2 (2006), 99–108.07–356Sears, Christopher R. (U Calgary, Canada), Crystal R. Campbell & Stephen J. Lupker, Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (American Psychological Association) 32.4 (2006), 1040–1062.07–357Sebastian-Gallés, Núria (GRNC, Parc Científic Universitat de Barcelona & Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Spain; [email protected]), Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Ruth de Diego-Balaguer & Begoña Díaz, First- and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 18.8 (2006), 1277–1291.07–358Sebba, Mark (Lancaster U, UK), Ideology and alphabets in the former USSR. Language Problems & Language Planning (John Benjamins) 30.2 (2006), 99–125.07–359Valdois, Sylviane (Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, France) & Sonia Kandel, French- and Spanish-speaking children use different visual and motor units during spelling acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes (Routledge/Taylor & Francis) 21.5 (2006), 531–561.


2009 ◽  
pp. 8-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Bouras ◽  
Eri Giannaka ◽  
Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos

E-Collaboration is an important research topic, with a great number of researchers contributing on many aspects. The main reason for this major research activity is the broad topic’s scope, which involves not only technological but also social and psychological issues. As a result there are multiple interpretations about what e-collaboration is. More specifically we definitely can say that e-collaboration has been defined in many ways in the past, and the number of definitions has grown recently. The next section present the main terms in this area.


1964 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Ornstein

The proliferation of new sovereign states, well over sixty since World War II, has created language problems on a scale unknown in the past. In many of the emergent lands there is a great diversity of tongues, with none of them predominant. Ethnic and tribal rivalries quite often are so acute that the choice of any one language over the others would evoke stubborn opposition and fan already existing resentments. For example, Nigeria with some two hundred distinct languages simply saw fit to adopt English as the over-all official medium, although several important vernaculars are employed for primary education and local administration.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1460
Author(s):  
Jie Li

Australia, as a multicultural and multilingual country, has been highly appraised by international linguists and statesmen for its formulation and implementation of language policies. Over the past years, linguists, statesmen, educators and residents have been devoting themselves to the further improvement of language education policies and laws, and the implementation of bilingual education for Aboriginal people. They have gradually resolved language problems, and most importantly, preserved linguistic and cultural diversity. This has set a successful example for China to follow. Under such circumstance, the proposed research, based on sociolinguistic theories concerning language policy and language planning, makes implications, suggesting how our country should proceed from the actual situations to take more practical measures and formulate better policies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-293

04–576Alexander, Neville (U. of Cape Town, South Africa; Email: [email protected]). The politics of language planning in post-apartheid South Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 28, 2 (2004), 113–130.04–577Bayley, Robert and Langman, Juliet (U. of Texas, USA; Email: [email protected]). Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Berlin, Germany), 42, 4 (2004), 303–318.04–578Cruickshank, Ken (U. of Wollongong, Australia; Email: [email protected]). Literacy in multilingual contexts: change in teenagers' reading and writing. Language and Education (Clevedon, UK), 18, 6 (2004), 459–473.04–579Dailey, René M., Giles, Howard and Jansma, Laura L. (U. of California, Santa Barbara, USA; Email: [email protected]). Language attitudes in an Anglo-Hispanic context: the role of the linguistic landscape. Language and Communication (Oxford, UK), 25, 1 (2005), 27–38.04–580Davis, Kathryn and Skilton-Sylvester, Ellen (U. of Hawai'i at Manoa, USA). Looking Back, Taking Stock, Moving Forward: Investigating Gender in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA), 38, 3 (2004), 381–404.04–581Dewaele, Jean-Marc (U. of London, UK; Email: [email protected]). Vous or tu? Native and non-native speakers of French on a sociolinguistic tightrope. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Berlin, Germany), 42, 4 (2004), 383–402.04–582Gordon, Daryl (Temple U., USA). “I'm tired. You clean and cook.” Shifting gender identities and second language socialization. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria,VA, USA), 38, 3 (2004), 437–457.04–583Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. (Howard U., USA; Email: [email protected]). The language policy/language economics interface and mother-tongue education in post-apartheid South Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 28, 2 (2004), 131–146.04–584Ordonez, Claudia Lucia (U. de los Andes, Santafé de Bogota, Colombia; Email: [email protected]). EFL and native Spanish in elite bilingual schools in Colombia: a first look at bilingual adolescent frog stories. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (Clevedon, UK), 7, 5 (2004), 449–473.04–585Simpson, M. JoEllen (Formerly at U. del Valle, Cali, Colombia; Email: [email protected]). A look at early childhood writing in English and Spanish in a bilingual school in Ecuador. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (Clevedon, UK), 7, 5 (2004), 432–448.04–586Skliar, Carlos and Muller Quadros, Ronice (U. Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Email: [email protected]). Bilingual deaf education in the south of Brazil. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (Clevedon, UK), 7, 5 (2004), 432–448.04–587Spezzini, Susan (U. of Alabama at Birmingham, USA; Email: [email protected]). English immersion in Paraguay: individual and sociocultural dimensions of language learning and use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (Clevedon, UK), 7, 5 (2004), 412–431.04–588Wright, Laurence (Rhodes U., South Africa; Email: [email protected]). Language and value: towards accepting a richer linguistic ecology for South Africa. Language Problems and Language Planning (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 28, 2 (2004), 175–197.


Author(s):  
Mats Alvesson ◽  
Yiannis Gabriel ◽  
Roland Paulsen

This chapter introduces ‘the problem’ of meaningless research in the social sciences. Over the past twenty years there has been an enormous growth in research publications, but never before in the history of humanity have so many social scientists written so much to so little effect. Academic research in the social sciences is often inward looking, addressed to small tribes of fellow researchers, and its purpose in what is increasingly a game is that of getting published in a prestigious journal. A wide gap has emerged between the esoteric concerns of social science researchers and the pressing issues facing today’s societies. The chapter critiques the inaccessibility of the language used by academic researchers, and the formulaic qualities of most research papers, fostered by the demands of the publishing game. It calls for a radical move from research for the sake of publishing to research that has something meaningful to say.


Author(s):  
Jeasik Cho

This book provides the qualitative research community with some insight on how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research. This topic has gained little attention during the past few decades. We, qualitative researchers, read journal articles, serve on masters’ and doctoral committees, and also make decisions on whether conference proposals, manuscripts, or large-scale grant proposals should be accepted or rejected. It is assumed that various perspectives or criteria, depending on various paradigms, theories, or fields of discipline, have been used in assessing the quality of qualitative research. Nonetheless, until now, no textbook has been specifically devoted to exploring theories, practices, and reflections associated with the evaluation of qualitative research. This book constructs a typology of evaluating qualitative research, examines actual information from websites and qualitative journal editors, and reflects on some challenges that are currently encountered by the qualitative research community. Many different kinds of journals’ review guidelines and available assessment tools are collected and analyzed. Consequently, core criteria that stand out among these evaluation tools are presented. Readers are invited to join the author to confidently proclaim: “Fortunately, there are commonly agreed, bold standards for evaluating the goodness of qualitative research in the academic research community. These standards are a part of what is generally called ‘scientific research.’ ”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document