scholarly journals Small mammals in the biomonitoring system of protected areas (on the example of the Ishim District of the Tyumen Region)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Alyona Yuryevna Levykh
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Small Mammals ◽  
Information Structure ◽  
Steppe Zone ◽  
Anthropogenic Load ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
The Stability

The article presents the results of the field studies of small mammals carried out from 1997 till 2017 on three specially protected natural areas of the Ishim District of the Tyumen Region (on the example of subzone of the northern forest-steppe). The method of synecology helped to analyze both the species and structural diversity and integral indices of the state of communities. The method of epigenetics aimed to show the stability of development in the populations of dominant species (on the example of Myodes rutilus and Sorex araneus ). The article shows that the level of species diversity and stability of small mammalian communities is directly proportional to the area of specially protected natural areas and reversely proportional to the level of anthropogenic load on the habitat. High anthropogenic load is the reason of neutrals and anthropophiles disappearing from communities of small mammals. The index of dominance of Apodemus agrarius increases as well as the exoanthropic species. The author establishes that the information structure of all studied communities is that of poorly disturbed habitats of the forest-steppe zone of Western Siberia. The information structure of the small mammals community of the most protected areas (1108 hectares), experiencing minimal anthropogenic impact is consistently reproduced in the number of years. The analysis of small mammals community showed a low resource potential of a forest park with an area of 14,5 hectares, located in the center of the city. At the same time the integral indices of the fluctuating asymmetry of the nonmetric features of the skull in the investigated populations of M. rutilus and S. araneus indicate the stability of epigenetic processes and the good state of the land and air environment.

Topical issues of cartographic supporting specially protected natural areas of Russia

2019 ◽  
Vol 943 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
N.A. Alekseenko
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas

In protected areas of Russia unique spatial-coordinated data on their territories on certain positions and methods is collected by local and other scientists. The data is stored in various formats (sometimes physically lost), very rarely in the form of maps, some of them in the annual reports are transferred to the MNR. Systematically arranged collecting, storage, analysis and transfer of these data could be significantly enhanced and optimized

scholarly journals ECOTOURISM IN RUSSIA: MAIN DESTINATIONS AND TOURIST ARRIVALS

2017 ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
Александр ДОРОФЕЕВ ◽  
Alexander DOROFEEV ◽  
Лидия БОГДАНОВА ◽  
Lidiy BOGDANOVA ◽  
Елена ХОХЛОВА ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
National Parks ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
The People ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Ecological Tourism ◽  
Specially Protected Areas

The concept of “ecological tourism” both in the world and in Russia has appeared in the second half of the twentieth century, although people traveled with natural-focused purposes, including around the protected areas, much earlier. The article presents several definitions of ecotourism, including the two given by the authors. The authors note that ecotourism can be developed in two ways: as a journey on any remaining natural areas or as tour, excursion exclusively within specially protected natural areas (SPNA). The second option is successfully developed in many Englishspeaking countries. The article confirms this fact using the original modern data on the dynamics of visits to the most famous national parks in the USA. Based on the analysis of literature and Internet sources it is concluded that the governance of the Russian Federation considers it necessary to develop eco-tourism in our country according to the second “North American” concept. In this case, the people attending the state protected areas – national parks and reserves with educational and recreational goals should be considered as eco-tourists. Based on this assumption the authors of the article give modern official data concerning the number of specially protected areas of different types in Russia as main destinations of ecotourism. The article presents the diagrams showing the quantitative characteristics of the infrastructure for ecotourists in specially protected areas: visitor centers, museums, ecological paths and routes. The dynamics of tourist arrivals in the reserves and national parks of Russia for the period 2001-2016 years is analyzed. In the final part of the article the main problems of eco-tourists recording are identified.

scholarly journals The system of specially protected natural areas of Kuzbass

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 00034
Author(s):  
Olga Zueva
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
The State ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Natural Park ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
State Nature Reserve ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Natural Monument ◽  
State Nature

On the territory of Kuzbass there are 29 specially protected natural areas with a total area of 1.3 thousand hectares. The existing system of protected areas of Kuzbass is a protected area of federal significance (the State Nature Reserve Kuznetskiy Alatau, the National Natural Park Shorskiy, the State Natural Monument Lipovy Ostrov), 22 protected areas of regional and 4 protected areas of municipal importance. The purpose of this study is to analyze the location of specially protected natural areas in terms of the floristic zoning of Kuzbass and the primary analysis of the PA system in Kuzbass.

Features of the Legal Regime of the Land Plots within the Boundaries of Protected Areas of Specially Protected Natural Territories

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-213
Author(s):  
K. M. Shirokov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Protection Zones ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Territories

Introduction. This article is devoted to the analysis of the peculiarities of the legal regime of land plots within the boundaries of protected zones of specially protected natural territories. Due to their special significance and uniqueness, specially protected natural territories form the nature reserve fund of the Russian Federation with a special mechanism for protection and protection from negative anthropogenic impact. Protected areas are one of the measures to protect such specially protected natural areas as state nature reserves, national parks, natural parks and natural monuments, as well as one of the most important elements of the legal regime of lands of specially protected natural areas. The creation of data on specially protected natural areas, as a rule, is followed by the subsequent approval of the regulations on their protected zones. Since the legislation does not have peremptory norms on the mandatory creation of protection zones, such zones are not widespread at the federal and regional levels. Theoretical Basis. Methods. An important role in the process of studying the peculiarities of the legal regime of land plots within the boundaries of specially protected natural territories was played by systematic, comparative, formal-legal methods. Results. The features of the establishment, modification and termination of the protection zones of specially protected natural areas, as well as the features of coordination of their borders and the entry of information into cadasters and registers are considered. Based on a comprehensive analysis of judicial practice, conclusions are drawn about the need to improve the mechanism for determining the feasibility of economic activity on land in protected areas. Particular attention is paid to the characteristics of the legislation of the Russian Federation and the legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on protected areas of specially protected natural territories of federal and regional significance and the legal regime of land plots within their borders. Discussion and Conclusion. This study showed that the establishment of protected areas of specially protected natural areas significantly affects the legal regime of land within their borders. Despite the fact that the turnover of these land plots is not limited, they are not withdrawn or redeemed from private property, individually defined characteristics are not significantly changed, but at the same time restrictions are set on the possibility of carrying out economic and other activities, the need for additional coordination with state bodies authorities order to carry out such activities on land. Changes associated with the establishment of protective zones entail a change in the cadastral and market value of land, and as a result, the right of land owners to demand compensation from state authorities for civil and land laws.

scholarly journals Current State of Haplic Chernozems in Specially Protected Natural Areas of the Steppe Zone

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saglara S. Mandzhieva ◽  
Lyudmila Yu. Goncharova ◽  
Abdulmalik A. Batukaev ◽  
Tatiana M. Minkina ◽  
Tatiana V. Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steppe Zone ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Current State ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Haplic Chernozems ◽  
Protected Natural Areas

scholarly journals BASIC TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FACILITIES FOR PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-103
Author(s):  
Tatiana Ya. VAVILOVA ◽  
Polina S. KOMAROVA
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Protected Areas ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Infrastructural Development ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Research And Education

The results of the research are presented, its tasks were the analysis and systematization of approaches to the design of buildings and structures for scientifi c research and educational purposes for specially protected natural areas (SPNA). It was revealed that Russian architectural science and design regulations do not cover this architectural-typological direction. Therefore, to search for relevant methods of architectural design, principles and techniques of volumetric-spatial organization, engineering solutions, foreign experience was involved. The study of best practices has shown that the infrastructural development of protected areas is associated with restrictions due to natural-climatic and regulatory factors, and the development of requirements for the consumer properties of objects for these territories is infl uenced by the principles of sustainable development - environmental, social and economic. Examples are given.

scholarly journals On the formation of the framework model of the Specially Protected Natural Areas system in the regions within the Ural-Siberian sector of the steppe and forest-steppe zones

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-74
Author(s):  
V. P. Petrishchev ◽  
E. А. Shcherbakova
Keyword(s):  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Local Development ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Territorial Structure ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
The Republic

Aim. To analyze the regional systems of location of Specially Protected Natural Areas within the Ural-Siberian sector of Russia's steppe and forest-steppe zones.Discussion. The territory of the study includes the following regions: Orenburg, Chelyabinsk, Kurgan, Tyumen, Omsk, and Novosibirsk Regions, the Republic of Bashkortostan and Altay Territory. Each of these areas has its particularities of SPNA location that are component of the ecological framework. Ecological frameworks on the regional and local levels are the models of stable land use and of biological diversity conservation. The determination of model systems of Specially Protected Natural Areas is necessary to reach a balance between a comfortable and favorable environment for the life of the population and the protection of unique natural heritage. The rational allocation of SPNAs promotes optimizing the territorial structure of nature management, the stable functioning of biological processes, and local development within regional natural borders.Conclusion. It was ascertained that the SPNA allocation system of each examined region had its peculiarities connected with natural objects. Protected territories with federal, regional and local significance are located only in Chelyabinsk and Novosibirsk regions and Altay Territory. Also, positive dynamics in forming a new SPNA are observed in the Chelyabinsk and Tyumen regions and Altay Territory (data for 2019-2020). An excellent balance and development of the protected territories system are seen within the Ural-Siberian regions. The location of the SPNA system within the foothill regions of the Ural-Siberian sector (Altay Territory and Cheleyabinsk region) is the closest to the classical etalon of the ecological framework's formation.

scholarly journals Prospects for Improving the Nature Protection Efficiency of the Wildlife Preserve of the Volgograd Region

2019 ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Anna Kholodenko ◽  
◽  
Aleksandra Grebennikova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Nature Protection ◽  
Natural Protected Areas ◽  
Protection Efficiency ◽  
Ecological Features ◽  
Volgograd Region ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas

Qualitative assessment of the current and perspective nature protection efficiency of specially protected natural areas as forms of the animals, plants biodiversity conservation directly in habitats and unique landscapes for optimization of territorial conservation is necessary. Environmental efficiency can be an assessment parameter of the completeness of the certain specially protected natural areas implementation, caused by its belonging to a category, the status, natural and ecological features of the territory. The technique developed by WWF of Russia in 2012 and published by M.S. Stishov is effective for such research. An advantage of this technique consists in an opportunity to estimate results in the sphere of conservation for some specially protected natural areas and their regional systems as in the current conditions, and in the long term, including at change ecological situations. Wildlife preserves areas of the Volgograd region which make 15 % of total number of natural protected areas of the region acted as the main object of research and occupy 26 % of the total area of protected areas, belong mainly to a faunal area. The contribution of wildlife preserves to the saving of regional biological and landscape diversity is very significant, especially in the absence of natural sanctuaries as a priority form of territorial conservation in the specially protected natural areas system of the Volgograd region. As a result of research, we estimated values of nature protection relevance, significance and effectiveness of wildlife preserves in the Volgograd region. Factors influencing realization of nature protection function by specially protected natural areas are allocated. The result received can be considered as a basis for plan of increase in the effectiveness of each wildlife preserve of the Volgograd region.

scholarly journals Актуализация историко-культурного наследия в музейных институциях особо охраняемых природных территорий Байкальского региона

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Sartakova
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Protected Areas ◽  
Baikal Region ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Cultural Sites ◽  
Specially Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
The Republic

В эпоху возрастающего антропогенного воздействия на природу именно особо охраняемые природные территории (ООПТ) стали уникальным явлением, так как они гармонично сочетают в себе природное и историко-культурное наследие и выполняют схожие с музеем функции, что позволяет интерпретировать их как музеи под открытым небом . В данной статье приводятся примеры репрезентации объектов историко-культурного и природного наследия ООПТ Байкальского региона. На основе полевых материалов автора приводится количественная и качественная характеристика музейных институций природоохранных зон, подчеркивается их особая роль в сохранении и популяризации объектов наследия. Кроме того, автор обращает внимание на реализуемые проекты музеефикации, являющейся приоритетным способом актуализации наследия ООПТ, и указывает на положительные и проблемные моменты, касающиеся особенностей сохранения и демонстрации историко-культурного наследия заповедных зон как туристических объектов.In the era of an increasing anthropogenic impact on nature, people seek to preserve pristine ecological systems and create specially protected natural areas. Such areas become a unique phenomenon of our time since they harmoniously combine natural, historical and cultural heritage and perform functions similar with museums, which allows perceiving them as open-air museums. This article discusses the updating of historical and cultural heritage in the museum-type institutions of the protected areas of the Baikal region. The work is interdisciplinary in nature and written at the intersection of related disciplines: museology, geography, history, ecology, and cultural studies. The article provides specific examples of the conservation and representation of movable and immovable objects of historical, cultural and natural heritage located in the protected areas of the Baikal region, namely in Irkutsk Oblast, in the Republic of Buryatia, in Zabaykalsky Krai. Based on field materials, the article provides a quantitative and qualitative description of the museum-type institutions of the specially protected natural areas of the region their special role in preserving, interpreting and popularising not only protected areas, but also objects of historical and cultural heritage located in these territories is shown. In addition, the article presents ongoing museumification projects as a priority way of updating the heritage of the protected areas. For example, the Zapovednoe Podlemorye project (Republic of Buryatia), which aims to convert the scientific base in the Davsha village into an environmental educational museum complex Timeless Shore, is briefly described. The variety of the historical and cultural sites of the protected areas of the Baikal region from the archaeological finds of researchers of the protected areas to the objects of religious significance. The article contains a brief description of some of the most popular historical and cultural sites of the protected natural areas in the region. The article also emphasises that, in order to preserve and update the heritage of the protected areas of the Baikal region, museum-type institutions have been established, namely, museums, visit centres, open-air exhibitions, exhibition complexes, ecological trails with display objects. In the final part of the article, generalisations and conclusions are made both positive points and problems are shown regarding the features of preserving and demonstrating the historical and cultural heritage of protected areas as tourist sites. This article is of interest to museologists, travel agencies, and researchers of environmental protection areas.

scholarly journals NETWORK OF PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS IN THE PERM REGION

2020 ◽  
pp. 135-148
Author(s):  
Sergey A. Buzmakov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Southern Taiga ◽  
Deciduous Forests ◽  
Middle Taiga ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
Natural Areas ◽  
Northern Urals ◽  
Protected Natural Areas ◽  
Perm Region

The paper considers the modern network of protected natural areas in the Perm region. The study determines the current status of the network and the priorities of its geographical formation; investigates representation of six natural areas in the network; identifies the role of protected areas in biodiversity conservation. Based on the regional method, the degree of the protected areas natural environment degradation has been established. The network of protected areas consists of 361 objects of federal, regional and local significance. The total area reaches 10.7% of the Perm region‘s territory. The main component of the network is represented by 257 protected areas of regional importance. In the region, 6 natural areas have been identified: middle taiga, southern taiga, mixed coniferous-deciduous forests, Kungur forest-steppe, Western Urals, Northern Urals. Theinternational level of the protected areas network development has only been achieved in the Northern Urals. The share of protected areas in the middle taiga is higher than the average Russian level; for mixed coniferous-deciduous forests, it is close to the average Russian level. The least protected are southern taiga (4.8%) and forest-steppe ecosystems (3.8%). The most disastrous is conservation of the natural environment of the Kungur forest-steppe. There is a very small number of forest-steppe areas suitable for creating full-fledged protected areas. 89 rare species of biota inhabit the protected areas. All mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates that are rare for the Perm region are covered with complete protection. Outside the network of protected areas, there are habitats of 7 species of birds, 21 species of angiosperms, 1 species of the fern-like, lycopods and lichen. On this basis, it is possible to develop territorial protection measures. The average environmental degradation of regional protected areas in the Perm region as a whole is 1.45 points. The degradation of protected areas is increasing in the series: middle taiga – Northern Urals – southern taiga – Western Urals – mixed coniferous-deciduous forests – Kungur forest-steppe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document