Guideline-orientated Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

2009 ◽  
Vol 05 (0) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Paschke ◽  
Enrico Papini ◽  
Hossein Gharib ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Thyroid nodules are very common. Their aetiology is due to the interaction between genetic and environmental factors. In 2006, two major society-sponsored guidelines and one major consensus statement for thyroid diagnosis and management were published by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AACE/AME), the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the European Thyroid Association (ETA). A careful review of these guidelines reveals that despite many similarities, significant differences are also present, likely reflecting differences in practice patterns, interpretation of existing data and availability of resources in different regions. The methodology of the guidelines is similar, but a few differences in the rating scales make a rapid comparison of the strength of both evidence and recommendations difficult for use in current clinical practice. Some recommendations are based mostly on expert opinion. The same recommendation may be based on different evidence; on the other hand, sometimes the same evidence may induce a different recommendation. A survey performed during an interactive symposium at the 32nd annual meeting of the ETA in Leipzig, Germany, was carried out to investigate whether these guidelines were able to affect the divergent management strategies for thyroid nodules that have previously been documented. The thyroid nodule guidelines obviously provide useful information and recommendations for practice and have a positive impact on patient care; however, guidelines should be considered as suggestions rather than a rigid formula for practice. With further accumulating evidence, these guidelines will need revision and updating.

2009 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Ralf Paschke ◽  
Enrico Papini ◽  
Hossein Gharib ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Thyroid nodules are very common. Their aetiology is due to the interaction between genetic and environmental factors. In 2006, two major society-sponsored guidelines and one major consensus statement for thyroid diagnosis and management were published by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AACE/AME), the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the European Thyroid Association (ETA). A careful review of these guidelines reveals that despite many similarities, significant differences are also present, likely reflecting differences in practice patterns, interpretation of existing data and availability of resources in different regions. The methodology of the guidelines is similar, but a few differences in the rating scales make a rapid comparison of the strength of both evidence and recommendations difficult for use in current clinical practice. Some recommendations are based mostly on expert opinion. The same recommendation may be based on different evidence; on the other hand, sometimes the same evidence may induce a different recommendation. A survey performed during an interactive symposium at the 32nd annual meeting of the ETA in Leipzig, Germany, was carried out to investigate whether these guidelines were able to affect the divergent management strategies for thyroid nodules that have previously been documented. The thyroid nodule guidelines obviously provide useful information and recommendations for practice and have a positive impact on patient care; however, guidelines should be considered as suggestions rather than a rigid formula for practice. With further accumulating evidence, these guidelines will need revision and updating.


2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 3037-3044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. McCartney ◽  
George J. Stukenborg

Abstract Context: Recently published guidelines are discordant regarding diagnostic approaches to small (10–14 mm) thyroid nodules. Objective: The objective of the study was to explore the relative desirability of alternative diagnostic approaches to small thyroid nodules using decision analysis. Design: Four diagnostic approaches to a 10- to 14-mm thyroid nodule are modeled: 1) observation only, consistent with American Thyroid Association guidelines; 2) routine fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), an approach traditionally chosen by many endocrinologists and consistent with American Thyroid Association guidelines; 3) FNAB only when microcalcifications are present, as recommended by Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound guidelines; and 4) FNAB only when the nodule is hypoechoic and has at least one other ultrasonographic risk factor, as endorsed by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included expected values; a priori likelihoods of prespecified outcomes; and two-way sensitivity analyses based on the utility of observation only in the setting of thyroid cancer and thyroid surgery for benign, asymptomatic thyroid disease. Results: Expected values (EVs) were similar among decision alternatives modeling Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound guidelines, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines, and routine observation (EVs from 0.912 to 0.927). Routine FNAB had the lowest EV (0.757–0.861), primarily related to a high a priori likelihood of having surgery for a benign nodule. Conclusions: As a general approach to 10- to 14-mm thyroid nodules, routine FNAB appears to be the least desirable. This analysis offers additional data that physicians can use when choosing diagnostic approaches to small thyroid nodules based on perceived risks of delayed cancer diagnosis and unnecessary thyroid surgery.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1948
Author(s):  
You-Bin Lee ◽  
Young-Lyun Oh ◽  
Jung-Hee Shin ◽  
Sun-Wook Kim ◽  
Jae-Hoon Chung ◽  
...  

We compared American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, Korean (K)-Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), EU-TIRADS, and American College of Radiology (ACR) TIRADS in diagnosing malignancy for thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory cytology. Among 1143 nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory aspirations from April 2011 to March 2016, malignancy was detected in 39 of 89 excised nodules. The minimum malignancy rate was 7.82% in EU-TIRADS 5 and 1.87–3.00% in EU-TIRADS 3–4. In the other systems, the minimum malignancy rate was 14.29–16.19% in category 5 and ≤3% in the remaining categories. Although the EU-TIRADS category ≥ 5 exhibited the highest positive likelihood ratio (LR) of only 2.214, category ≥ 5 in the other systems yielded the highest positive LR of >5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of all systems to predict malignancy were located statistically above the diagonal nondiscrimination line (P for ROC curve: EU-TIRADS, 0.0022; all others, 0.0001). The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were not significantly different among the four systems. The ATA guidelines, K-TIRADS, and ACR TIRADS may be useful to guide management for nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory nodules. The EU-TIRADS, although also useful, exhibited inferior performance in predicting malignancy for nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory nodules in Korea, an iodine-sufficient area.


2020 ◽  
Vol 128 (10) ◽  
pp. 687-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Feldkamp ◽  
F. Grünwald ◽  
Markus Luster ◽  
Kerstin Lorenz ◽  
Christian Vorländer ◽  
...  

AbstractThyroid nodules and cysts are frequently diagnosed in Germany with a prevalence of about 20% in young adults reaching up to 70% in older adults. Surgery is the standard treatment of symptomatic nodules, nodules with suspicion of malignancy and thyroid cancer. Radioiodine treatment is applied for autonomously functioning nodules. During the last years new non-surgical and non-radioiodine techniques have been introduced to treat thyroid nodules. These techniques include ethanol/polidocanol treatment, radiofrequency, microwave, and laser ablation, and high frequency ultrasound ablation. A significant reduction in nodule size could be documented for these techniques in several studies, but long-term outcome data are missing. Until now, there is no general consensus regarding the appropriate indications for these methods. For this reason, the Thyroid Section (German Society for Endocrinology), the Thyroid Working Committee (German Society for Nuclear Medicine), and the German Association of Endocrine Surgeons (CAEK) for the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) reviewed the respective literature, discussed the pro and cons and developed a consensus statement and recommendation to help physicians and patients in their decision making.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa May ◽  
Katherine Harter ◽  
Kabir Yadav ◽  
Ryan Strauss ◽  
Jameel Abualenain ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Moghissi ◽  
M. T. Korytkowski ◽  
M. DiNardo ◽  
D. Einhorn ◽  
R. Hellman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document