scholarly journals This Story Needs to Be Told: Formative Research on Using Animated Storytelling to Address Prospective Minority Clinical Trials Participants’ Need for Comprehensive Knowledge

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Younker ◽  
Katherine E. Ridley-Merriweather
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Breast Tissue ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Formative Research ◽  
Tissue Donation ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Communication Tool ◽  
Comprehensive Knowledge

Background: The Komen Tissue Bank (KTB), a clinical trial that collects women’s healthy breast tissue for use as research study controls, currently stores samples demonstrating a noted paucity of minority specimens. Studies have shown minority groups’ participation in clinical trials is dependent upon the groups’ knowledge about the associated research. This study’s purpose is to conduct formative research on animated storytelling’s effectiveness as a communication tool to address minority groups’ expressed need for knowledge and encourage participation in cancer clinical trials.   Methods: I re-coded data previously gathered from a KTB study to evaluate the perceptions of Latinas (n=14) and Asian Americans (n=17) toward breast tissue donation. Extensive review of the current literature yielded data concerning African Americans’ outlooks toward clinical trial participation, and also illustrated the efficacy of using narratives and animation as communication and education tools.  Results: The literature review clearly illuminated the importance of storytelling in minority cultures and suggested the success of using narratives as communication tools. We anticipate our findings could be influenced by a) minorities’ lack of, and need for, comprehensive knowledge, b) previously obscured participation barriers, and c) animated storytelling as an effective delivery method.  Projected Conclusion and Potential Impact: Using an animated storytelling communication tool may successfully increase knowledge about, and comfort with, participation in a cancer clinical trial. The next phase, an animated video production, will tell the comprehensive story of healthy breast tissue donation. The use of this tool could help increase minority participation in cancer prevention and cancer clinical trials.

scholarly journals Novel Participatory Methodologies for Identifying Motivations of Minority Women to Participate in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline Evans ◽  
Katherine Ridley-Merriweather
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Asian Americans ◽  
Breast Tissue ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Common Factors ◽  
Minority Women ◽  
Tissue Donation

Background: The Komen Tissue Bank (KTB), a biorepository that stores healthy breast tissue for use as controls in breast cancer (BC) research, has a notable deficiency in tissue donations from racial and ethnic minority women. Though studies have documented similar disparities in many clinical trials, the reasons why minority women agree or decline to participate in clinical trials remain largely unknown. This study used two novel participatory communication methodologies with minimal researcher intervention to explore potential motivations for minority women (Latinas, Asian Americans, and Black women) to donate breast tissue to the KTB.  Methods: Two novel methodologies rooted in Grounded Practical Theory and Grounded Theory were used to study the attitudes of non-donors toward tissue donation and the reasons donors chose to donate tissue to the KTB, respectively. The non-donors (Latinas, n=14; Asian Americans, n=17) participated in interactive focus groups, and donors (Black, n=20) participated in open-ended interviews, all of which were then transcribed and coded to identify common motivations for donating breast tissue.  Results: The interactive methodology of both the focus groups and interviews yielded rich data that may not have arisen in a traditional question-driven format. Though the manifestation differed between minority groups, three common factors influencing the decision to donate breast tissue were present in all groups: altruistic tendencies, cultural norms, and personal connection to BC. Non-donors also expressed their need for more information before making the decision to donate.  Conclusion and Potential Impact: Common factors that influence the decision to donate tissue were identified using these two novel interactive methodologies, though the expression differed between minority groups. The information gleaned from this study will inform future communication efforts by the KTB and other clinical trial researchers, with the ultimate goal of distributing targeted recruitment materials to increase the representation of minority women in clinical trials. 

Clinical trial awareness in oncology patients of diverse ethnic background: A single-institution analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19217-e19217
Author(s):  
Gautam Valecha ◽  
Nishitha Thumallapally ◽  
Sandy El Bitar ◽  
Terenig O. Terjanian ◽  
Louise Madrigal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Staten Island ◽  
Enrollment Rates ◽  
Zip Code

e19217 Background: Clinical trials offer several advantages to the patients including access to innovative treatments with improved survival rates, closer monitoring and follow-up with removal of health disparity; and aim to advance the science of medicine. Yet, worldwide enrollment rates in cancer clinical trials have been only about 5 percent, despite the fact that a significantly higher percentage of Americans have a desire to participate in clinical trials [1, 2]. We conducted a single institution study to gain knowledge about clinical trial awareness in our cancer patient population as well as to identify the barriers within provider-consumer communication that prevent enrollment. Methods: A 10-question survey was distributed by medical assistants and surveys (n=222) were collected at the end of each clinic visit. Responders included racial/ethnic minorities and underserved patients, representative of the ethnic diversity in the Staten Island Borough of New York City. Demographic data including age, gender, zip code, race and ethnicity were recorded. Additionally, Charlson comorbidity index and tumor stage was also recorded. Results: 159/222 patients (71.62%) completed the survey. Of these patients, 47 (29.55%) answered every question on the survey, while 112/159 patients (70.44%) answered only few of the questions. The completed surveys are linked by zip code to the different boroughs of Staten Island, which allows us to identify hubs with lack of clinical trial awareness knowledge. Conclusions: Despite the several advantages for patients and medical field, enrollment rates in clinical trials remain very low. Our study results help in gaining knowledge about clinical trial awareness among oncology patients, correlated to comorbidity and tumor stage. In addition, demographic hubs with lack of knowledge are identified as targets for community outreach and education. A multilevel approach will be developed to address identified barriers that exist for patients, and will be implemented at community level, to reduce ethnic bias in trial enrollment and increase trial participation among an ethnically diverse population. References: 1. Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A: The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016, 35:185-198. 10.1200/EDBK_156686 2. Comis RL, Miller JD, Aldigé CR, Krebs L, Stoval E: Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21:830-835. 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.105.

scholarly journals Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 556-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona N. Fouad ◽  
Aras Acemgil ◽  
Sejong Bae ◽  
Andres Forero ◽  
Nedra Lisovicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
African American ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Patient Navigation ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Minority Participation ◽  
Navigation Support

Purpose: Less than 10% of patients enrolled in clinical trials are minorities. The patient navigation model has been used to improve access to medical care but has not been evaluated as a tool to increase the participation of minorities in clinical trials. The Increasing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials project used patient navigators (PNs) to enhance the recruitment of African Americans for and their retention in therapeutic cancer clinical trials in a National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Lay individuals were hired and trained to serve as PNs for clinical trials. African American patients potentially eligible for clinical trials were identified through chart review or referrals by clinic nurses, physicians, and social workers. PNs provided two levels of services: education about clinical trials and tailored support for patients who enrolled in clinical trials. Results: Between 2007 and 2014, 424 African American patients with cancer were referred to the Increasing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials project. Of those eligible for a clinical trial (N = 378), 304 (80.4%) enrolled in a trial and 272 (72%) consented to receive patient navigation support. Of those receiving patient navigation support, 74.5% completed the trial, compared with 37.5% of those not receiving patient navigation support. The difference in retention rates between the two groups was statistically significant (P < .001). Participation of African Americans in therapeutic cancer clinical trials increased from 9% to 16%. Conclusion: Patient navigation for clinical trials successfully retained African Americans in therapeutic trials compared with non–patient navigation trial participation. The model holds promise as a strategy to reduce disparities in cancer clinical trial participation. Future studies should evaluate it with racial/ethnic minorities across cancer centers.

Use of Communication Technology to Improve Clinical Trial Participation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Consensus Statement From the Children's Oncology Group Adolescent and Young Adult Responsible Investigator Network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viswatej Avutu ◽  
Varun Monga ◽  
Nupur Mittal ◽  
Aniket Saha ◽  
Jeffrey R. Andolina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Tumor Boards ◽  
Remote Patient

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; age 15-39 years) with cancer are under-represented in cancer clinical trials because of patient, provider, and institutional barriers. Health care technology is increasingly available to and highly used among AYAs and has the potential to improve cancer care delivery. The COVID-19 pandemic forced institutions to rapidly adopt novel approaches for enrollment and monitoring of patients on cancer clinical trials, many of which have the potential for improving AYA trial participation overall. This consensus statement from the Children's Oncology Group AYA Oncology Discipline Committee reviews opportunities to use technology to optimize AYA trial enrollment and study conduct, as well as considerations for widespread implementation of these practices. The use of remote patient eligibility screening, electronic informed consent, virtual tumor boards, remote study visits, and remote patient monitoring are recommended to increase AYA access to trials and decrease the burden of participation. Widespread adoption of these strategies will require new policies focusing on reimbursement for telehealth, license portability, facile communication between electronic health record systems and advanced safeguards to maintain patient privacy and security. Studies are needed to determine optimal approaches to further incorporate technology at every stage of the clinical trial process, from enrollment through study completion.

scholarly journals Re-Evaluating Eligibility Criteria for Oncology Clinical Trials: Analysis of Investigational New Drug Applications in 2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (33) ◽  
pp. 3745-3752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Jin ◽  
Richard Pazdur ◽  
Rajeshwari Sridhara
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
New Drug ◽  
Drug Clinical Trial ◽  
Oncology Clinical Trials ◽  
Eligibility Requirements

Clinical trial eligibility criteria are necessary to define the patient population under study and improve trial safety. However, there are concerns that eligibility criteria for cancer clinical trials are too restrictive and limit patient enrollment in clinical trials. Recently, there have been initiatives to re-examine and modernize eligibility criteria for oncology clinical trials. To assess current eligibility requirements for cancer clinical trials, we have conducted a comprehensive review of eligibility criteria for commercial investigational new drug clinical trial applications submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in 2015. Our findings suggest that eligibility criteria for current cancer clinical trials tend to narrowly define the study population and limit the study to lower-risk patients, which may not be reflective of the greater patient population outside of the study. We discuss potential areas for expanding eligibility criteria to include more patients in clinical trials and design options for clinical trials incorporating expanded eligibility criteria. The broadening of clinical trial eligibility criteria can be considered to better reflect the real-world patient population, improve clinical trial participation, and increase patient access to new investigational treatments.

Prospective Evaluation of Cancer Clinical Trial Accrual Patterns: Identifying Potential Barriers to Enrollment

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1728-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Primo N. Lara ◽  
Roger Higdon ◽  
Nelson Lim ◽  
Karen Kwan ◽  
Michael Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trial ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Clinical Trial Accrual ◽  
Patient Accrual

PURPOSE: Well-conducted cancer clinical trials are essential for improving patient outcomes. Unfortunately, only 3% of new cancer patients participate in clinical trials. Barriers to patient accrual in cancer clinical trials must be identified and overcome to increase patient participation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively tracked factors that potentially affected patient accrual into cancer clinical trials at the University of California Davis Cancer Center. Oncologists seeing new outpatients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding patient characteristics and the physician’s decision-making on patient eligibility, protocol availability, and patient opinions on participation. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate these parameters with subsequent protocol accrual. RESULTS: There were 276 assessable patients. At the initial visits, physicians did not consider clinical trials in 38% (105/276) of patients principally because of a perception of protocol unavailability and poor performance status. Physicians considered 62% (171/276) of patients for participation in clinical trials. Of these, only 53% (91/171) had an appropriate protocol available for site and stage of disease. Seventy-six of 90 patients (84%) with available protocols met eligibility criteria for a particular study. Only 39 of 76 patients (51%) agreed to participate in cancer clinical trials, for an overall accrual rate of 14% (39/276). The remainder (37/76, 49%) declined trial participation despite meeting eligibility criteria. The most common reasons were a desire for other treatment (34%), distance from the cancer center (13%), patient refusal to disclose reason (11%), and insurance denial (8%). Patients with private insurance were less likely to enroll in clinical trials compared to those with government-funded insurance (OR, 0.34; P = .03; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.9). CONCLUSION: Barriers to cancer clinical trial accrual can be prospectively identified and addressed in the development and conduct of future studies, which may potentially lead to more robust clinical trials enrollment. Investigation of patient perceptions regarding the clinical trials process and the role of third party–payers is warranted.

scholarly journals Primary care physicians’ attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 518-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carma L Bylund ◽  
Elisa S Weiss ◽  
Margo Michaels ◽  
Shilpa Patel ◽  
Thomas A D’Agostino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Positive Attitudes

Background/Aims: Cancer clinical trials give patients access to state-of-the-art treatments and facilitate the translation of findings into mainstream clinical care. However, patients from racial and ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Primary care physicians are a trusted source of information for patients, yet their role in decision-making about cancer treatment and referrals to trial participation has received little attention. The aim of this study was to determine physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about cancer clinical trials, their experience with trials, and their interest in appropriate training about trials. Methods: A total of 613 physicians in the New York City area primarily serving patients from ethnic and racial minority groups were invited via email to participate in a 20-min online survey. Physicians were asked about their patient population, trial knowledge and attitudes, interest in training, and personal demographics. Using calculated scale variables, we used descriptive statistical analyses to better understand physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about trials. Results: A total of 127 physicians completed the survey. Overall, they had low knowledge about and little experience with trials. However, they generally had positive attitudes toward trials, with 41.4% indicating a strong interest in learning more about their role in trials, and 35.7% indicating that they might be interested. Results suggest that Black and Latino physicians and those with more positive attitudes and beliefs were more likely to be interested in future training opportunities. Conclusion: Primary care physicians may be an important group to target in trying to improve cancer clinical trial participation among minority patients. Future work should explore methods of educational intervention for such interested providers.

scholarly journals Identifying and Overcoming Barriers in Clinical Trial Enrollment for Veterans with Blood Cancers

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1920-1920
Author(s):  
Daphne R. Friedman ◽  
Thomas D. Rodgers ◽  
Leah Szumita ◽  
Elisa S. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Trial Participation ◽  
Blood Cancer ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

Abstract Introduction Equitable and diverse clinical trials participation is essential for practice-changing results to be applicable to all patients. However, patients who identify as minorities, who live in rural areas, and who have low income are typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Increasing clinical trial participation in general and among underrepresented patients in particular is a goal of The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's (LLS) Clinical Trial Support Center (CTSC), a clinical trial nurse navigation service for patients with blood cancers and their oncologists. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) is a national network of health care facilities. Approximately 3% of cancers in the United States are diagnosed in the VA. The prevalence of certain blood cancers is higher in the VA, in part due to military exposures. Veterans who receive care in the VA are more likely to have lower income, live in rural areas, and have comorbidities than patients who receive care in the private sector. Clinical trial participation among Veterans may be hampered by VA-specific factors (e.g. relatively fewer clinical trial options in the VA, lack of awareness that Veterans may be referred to participate in clinical trials outside of the VA) and patient-specific factors (e.g. income, rurality, comorbidities, and minority status). This study aimed to characterize and overcome barriers to Veteran enrollment in blood cancer clinical trials. Methods The LLS CTSC performs clinical trial searches using a database with information from clinicaltrials.gov and other proprietary data. To assess the impact of geography and rurality on the availability of clinical trials, we performed simulated searches for clinical trials in proximity of 13 VA facilities (6 rural, 7 urban), six blood cancers (AML, CLL, DLBCL, FL, MDS, MM), and two disease statuses (new diagnosis, relapsed/refractory). To further evaluate barriers to CTSC referral and clinical trial enrollment among Veterans who receive care in the VA, we collected data about referral patterns of VA hematologist-oncologists and Veterans' treatment choices at four VA facilities between September 2020 through May 2021. Results When evaluating both 100- and 200-mile radii from the VA facilities in simulated searches, there were significantly more clinical trials available for Veterans who receive care in urban compared to rural areas and on the East or West Coast compared to the Midwest, in aggregate (all cancers) and by disease type or status (p unadj &lt; 0.0001). Forty-eight Veterans with blood cancers at the Durham NC, Salem VA, Sioux Falls SD, and Clarksburg WV VA facilities had consideration of clinical trials as a treatment option by oncology providers over a nine-month period. All Veterans were male, with 33 White/15 African-American, 47 non-Hispanic/1 Hispanic, age 41-93 years (median 71), living 0.2-186 miles from their VA facility (median 33.1), with diverse diseases and stages represented. Of the 48 patients, 14 patients were not asked if they wanted clinical trials information; reasons were need for immediate therapy, co-morbidities, or patient circumstances. Of 34 patients who were asked if they wanted clinical trials information, 14 did not agree to a referral to the CTSC; reasons were preference for immediate therapy, wanting care in the VA, wanting standard therapy, and lack of transportation. Of 20 referred Veterans, two enrolled in clinical trials outside the VA (for CLL and PMF), with investigational therapy provided by the study sponsors. Conclusions Using data from simulated and actual patient referrals to the LLS CTSC, we identified patient, provider, and location specific barriers for Veteran referral and enrollment in blood cancer clinical trials. When offered information about clinical trials, the majority of patients agreed to an LLS CTSC referral, suggesting that patients are generally willing to receive education and information about trial participation if given the opportunity. The LLS CTSC nurse navigators can overcome barriers to enrollment by providing education and identifying potential clinical trials within a desired geographic area. In addition to resources provided by the LLS CTSC, opening additional clinical trials in rural areas and within the VA system could help increase Veteran participation in clinical trials for blood cancers. Disclosures Rodgers: MJH Lifesciences: Consultancy. Weiss: AbbVie Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A step towards equitable clinical trial recruitment: a protocol for the development and preliminary testing of an online prostate cancer health information and clinical trial matching tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hala T. Borno ◽  
Brian M. Bakke ◽  
Celia Kaplan ◽  
Anke Hebig-Prophet ◽  
Jessica Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Trial Participation ◽  
The Usa

Abstract Background Recruitment of a diverse participant pool to cancer clinical trials is an essential component of clinical research as it improves the generalizability of findings. Investigating and piloting novel recruitment strategies that take advantage of ubiquitous digital technologies has become an important component of facilitating broad recruitment and addressing inequities in clinical trial participation. Equitable and inclusive recruitment improves generalizability of clinical trial outcomes, benefiting patients, clinicians, and the research community. The increasing prevalence of online connectivity in the USA and use of the Internet as a resource for medical information provides an opportunity for digital recruitment strategies in cancer clinical trials. This study aims to measure the acceptability, preliminary estimates of efficacy, and feasibility of the Trial Library intervention, an Internet-based cancer clinical trial matching tool. This study will also examine the extent to which the Trial Library website, designed to address the linguistic and literacy needs of broader patient populations, influences patient-initiated conversations with physicians about clinical trial participation. Methods This is a study protocol for a non-randomized, single-arm pilot study. This is a mixed methods study design that utilizes the statistical analysis of quantitative survey data and the qualitative analysis of interview data to assess the participant experience with the Trial Library intervention. This study will examine (1) acceptability as a measure of participant satisfaction with this intervention, (2) preliminary measure of efficacy as a measure of proportion of participants with documented clinical trial discussion in the electronic medical record, and (3) feasibility of the intervention as a measure of duration of clinical visit. Discussion The principles that informed the design of the Trial Library intervention aim to be generalizable to clinical trials across many disease contexts. From the ground up, this intervention is built to be inclusive of the linguistic, literacy, and technological needs of underrepresented patient populations. This study will collect essential preliminary data prior to a multi-site randomized clinical trial of the Trial Library intervention. Trial registration This study has received institutional approval from the Committee of Human Subjects Research at the University of California, San Francisco.

scholarly journals Barriers to Recruitment of Rural Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamsuddin Virani ◽  
Lola Burke ◽  
Scot C. Remick ◽  
Jame Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Trial Participation ◽  
Rural Patients ◽  
Patient Concerns

Rates of clinical trial participation are lower among patients in rural areas. Oncologists should be trained to address patient concerns regarding clinical trial availability, utility, and accessibility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document