scholarly journals Efficacy and Toxicity of Treatments for Primary Central System Lymphoma: Review of the Recent Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Mohammad Jay ◽  
David. A. MacDonald

Primary Central Nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an uncommon type of central nervous system lymphoma, most commonly presenting as hemiparesis and headache. Currently, there is a wide range of treatments for PCNSL, consisting of various permutations between chemotherapy, radiation and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Although the backbone of PCNSL treatment consists of High-dose Methotrexate (HD-MTX), the role of combination versus single agent chemotherapy, combined modality (chemotherapy + radiation) versus chemotherapy or radiation alone, and the use of consolidative ASCT are contested. Surgery does not have a role in the treatment of PCNSL although stereotactic biopsies tend to help with symptomatic relief. Radiation monotherapy is generally reserved for patients with contraindications to chemotherapy or as a palliative measure. Combined chemotherapy and radiation treatment has been shown to have a great efficacy, although its increased neurotoxicity compared to chemotherapy alone is a major drawback. A growing body of research is focused on comparing the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic regimens. Currently, the MATRix regimen comprising of HD-MTX(3.5g/m2)-cytarabine/rituximab/thiotepa is widely used. The additional survival benefit of ASCT is contested although its role in the treatment of refractory or relapsed PCNSL is generally agreed upon. Finally, intrathecal HD-MTX has been shown to have added survival benefit when added to the standard therapies. Further retrospective and prospective studies are required to compare the efficacy and toxicity of various treatment options, with a focus on different chemotherapeutic agents and ASCT.

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3040-3040
Author(s):  
Samir Dalia ◽  
Samantha L Price ◽  
Peter Forsyth ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare disorder with a poor prognosis. The mainstay of treatment is single agent or combination high dose (≥3.5g/m2) methotrexate (HDMTX) based regimens. There is no consensus as to which dose of HDMTX improves outcomes in patients with PCNSL but doses of MTX greater than 3 g/m2 intravenously achieve therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations. Purpose To determine if there is an optimal or total dose of HDMTX in PCNSL therapies that results in improved progression free (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Methods Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center with PCNSL were identified using our institutional database between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2011. Patients with complete treatment data who were treated with HDMTX were included in this study. HDMTX was defined as MTX at a dose ≥ 3.5g/m2. Patient demographics, clinical, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Treatment information collected included the starting dose of HDMTX, IV rituximab use, MTX toxicity and clearance, cycles of MTX, and total amount of MTX administered (g/m2). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median PFS and OS using the log rank test. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. All data was analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 21.0. Results A total of 51 patients were identified (Table 1). Median PFS was 13months (0-33) and median OS 43months (29-57). The addition of IV rituximab or other chemotherapy failed to improve PFS or OS. HDMTX dose reductions or the total dose of HDMTX administered did not significantly impact PFS or OS. Similarly, when comparing dosing of HDMTX there was no significant difference in 8g/m2 versus 3.5g/m2 (PFS p=0.56, OS p=0.68), or between patients receiving 8g/m2 versus <8g/m2 (PFS p=0.77, OS p=0.6) (Figure 1). Patients receiving 8g/m2 versus those receiving <8g/m2 of HDMTX had similar baseline characteristics except for more liver function abnormalities in the 8g/m2 group. Conclusions Differences in initial dosing of HDMTX or total dose of HDMTX therapy did not influence outcomes in our patients with PCNSL. Dose reductions in HDMTX, addition of other chemotherapeutic agents, or rituximab were not associated with improved PFS or OS. An intriguing plateau was observed in OS in the 8gm/m2 arm despite similar PFS, suggesting that the receipt of novel therapies in the relapsed setting may contribute to OS. Multicenter collaborative clinical trials are needed to further assess the optimal initial dose of HDMTX to administer in PCNSL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Cesar Gentille Sanchez ◽  
Ethan Burns ◽  
Ibrahim Muhsen ◽  
Humaira Sarfraz ◽  
Carlo Guerrero ◽  
...  

Introduction Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of extra-nodal non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), with diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) reported in 90% of cases. Secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) may occur as an isolated recurrence of previously diagnosed NHL or occur simultaneously as a manifestation of systemic disease. Comparative data on survival in treated PCNSL and SCNSL in the real-world setting is lacking. We present a retrospective analysis of outcomes in PCNSL and SCNSL patients treated at the Houston Methodist Cancer Center. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with a diagnosis of PCNSL or SCNSL from 2015 to 2020. Data collected included age, race, sex, diagnosis (PCNSL, SCNSL), histology and immunohistochemistry, treatment type (chemotherapy, radiation), transplant rates as well as outcomes (alive/dead). Responses were classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and log-rank tests were used to compare survival distributions. P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 50 patients with CNS lymphoma identified between 2015 and 2020; 68% were PCNSL. Out of 43 with available pathology, 2 patients were T-cell lymphomas and 41 DLBCL. Out of the DLBCL cases, 95% of cases expressed CD20 while close to 60% were positive for MUM1, bcl-2 and bcl-6. Less than 15% of cases were positive for CD10. CD30 was positive in 17% of cases. Cerebral hemispheres (76%) was the most common organ involved, followed by ocular (8%), intraventricular space (6%) and cerebellum (6%). Median age at diagnosis was 67 years; male to female ratio was 1.27. Caucasian (62%) and Hispanic (24%) were most common ethnicities. Epstein-Barr Virus was positive in 14% of patients (5 in PCNSL and 2 in SCNSL). One patient with SCNSL had human immunodeficiency virus. The median follow-up time was 9.1 months. Multiagent chemotherapy including high dose methotrexate (MTX), cytarabine and rituximab was given to 48% of the patients while 32% received high dose MTX alone plus rituximab. From the latter group, five out of sixteen patients received temozolomide. Other regimens were used in 6% of the cases. Median dose of MTX in a multiagent chemotherapy regimen was 2.5gr/m2 and 2.25gr/m2 when used alone or with temozolomide. Median number of cycles given was 3. Radiation therapy alone was given to 8% of cases. Three patients did not receive treatment. For patients with PCNSL, overall response rate (ORR) was 82.8% (CR 65.5%, PR 13.8%, SD 3.4%). ORRs were similar between multiagent chemotherapy and methotrexate alone (+/- temozolomide) with 86.7% and 83.3% respectively. ORR for SCNSL was 57.1% (CR 35.7%, PR 21.4%); only 1 patient was treated with MTX alone. Further lines of therapy were required in 9.3% of patients. Consolidation with whole brain radiation was given in 22% of the cases (29.4% for PCNSL and 6.3% for SCNSL). Autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 10% of the patients (2 PCNSL, 3 SCNSL). Overall survival for patients with PCNSL was 74.8 months and 10.1 months for SCNSL (p=0.0444) (Figure 1). Survival was not significant between patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy and MTX alone or in combination with temozolomide (3-year OS 57.3% vs 73.4%, p= 0.5652) (Figure 2). Conclusion Most patients diagnosed with PCNSL are non-germinal center DLBCL. Median MTX dose was lower than 3gr/m2 with excellent ORR of over 80% in PCNSL. Response rates were lower in SCNSL and in general, patients with PCNSL had better outcomes. Survival did not differ significantly between regimens, suggesting that a lower intensity therapy may perform similarly to multiagent chemotherapy. These results need to be confirmed by prospective studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-208
Author(s):  
Karine Moineau-Vallée ◽  
Justine Rinfret ◽  
My Hanh Luu Hoai ◽  
Valérie St-Louis ◽  
France Berthelet ◽  
...  

Natalizumab is used as a second-line treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Some reports have linked natalizumab to primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), although few have described its management. A 45-year-old woman with Balo’s Concentric Sclerosis presented dizziness, vertigo accompanied by dysarthria, weakness on the left side and blurred vision to the right eye after the fourth dose of natalizumab. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a brain biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of PCNSL. The patient received modified PCNSL chemotherapy (MATRix protocol) followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) supported by an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) as a consolidation therapy. Thirty months later, she is still in complete remission of her PCNSL and MS. In this case, whole brain radiotherapy was excluded because it may be associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity in MS. ASCT was preferred because it has been shown to prevent disability progression in less advanced MS stages. Our patient is the second to receive an ASCT in this context and this option of treatment should be the preferred if the patient is eligible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii385-iii385
Author(s):  
Ahitagni Biswas ◽  
Swarnaditya Roy ◽  
Yousra KN ◽  
Sameer Bakhshi ◽  
Vaishali Suri ◽  
...  

Abstract Paediatric primary central nervous system lymphoma(PCNSL) constitutes 1% of all PCNSLs. Data pertaining to paediatric PCNSL (2016–19) was abstracted by retrospective chart review. We identified 7 paediatric patients with PCNSL. None had congenital or acquired immunodeficiency. The median age at presentation was 13 years. The male to female ratio was 4:3. The median ECOG performance status was 2. On neuro-imaging, 3 patients had solitary and 4 patients had multiple lesions. CSF cytology showed atypical cells in 1 patient. None had ocular involvement. Systemic lymphoma work-up was negative in all. Biopsy and resection of tumour were done in 4 patients each. Histopathology revealed DLBCL in 6 and B-cell NHL in 1 patient. All patients underwent induction chemotherapy (median-5 cycles)- modified DeAngelis protocol (IV Methotrexate-2.5g/m2,IT Methotrexate-12 mg,Vincristine,Procarbazine and Rituximab-375mg/m2 every 2 weeks) in 6 and single agent Methotrexate -3.5g/m2 every 3 weeks in 1 patient. Severe haematological toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia, leucopenia and febrile neutropenia in 2,1 and 1 patient respectively. Radiotherapy(RT) was administered in all-whole brain RT(36-45Gy/20-25fractions/4-5weeks) in 6 patients and craniospinal RT(36Gy/18fractions/3.5weeks) followed by whole brain RT(9Gy/5fractions/1week) in 1 patient(with positive CSF cytology). Subsequently consolidation chemotherapy with 2 cycles of Cytarabine(3g/m2 IV D1-2 every 3 weeks) was administered in 5 patients. After a median follow-up of 14 months(mean-18.2 months), all patients are in complete radiological remission. Paediatric PCNSL is a rare tumour entity and multimodality management with high dose Methotrexate and Rituximab based chemo-immunotherapy and cranial radiotherapy leads to excellent early clinical outcome.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren R. Schaff ◽  
Christian Grommes

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma that affects the brain, eyes, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or spinal cord without systemic involvement. Here, we review the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, novel pathophysiologic insights, and treatment of immunocompetent PCNSL patients. Diagnosis of PCNSL requires a high level of suspicion as clinical signs and deficits can vary depending upon the involved CNS compartments. Rapid initiation of therapy is essential for good neurologic recovery and disease control. In general, the prognosis of PCNSL has improved significantly over the past few decades, largely due to the introduction and wide-spread use of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) chemotherapy, considered the backbone of first-line polychemotherapy treatment. Upon completion of MTX-based treatment, a consolidation strategy is often required and can consist of non-myeloablative or myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant, radiation, maintenance therapy, or observation. Unfortunately, relapse is common and 5-year survival rates stand at only 30-40%. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of PCNSL have identified key mechanisms in tumor pathogenesis including activation of the B-cell receptor pathway, a suppressed tumor immune microenvironment, and immune evasion. These insights have led to the identification of novel small molecules and agents targeting these aberrant pathways. Agents such as the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) like lenalidomide or pomalidomide have shown promising response rates in the clinical trial setting for recurrent/refractory PCNSL and are increasingly being adopted in clinical use.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio M. P. Omuro ◽  
Lauren E. Abrey

✓Chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, is the mainstay of treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). High-dose methotrexate (MTX) is the most effective drug available to treat these lesions, and it is used in doses of 1 to 8 g/m2, either as a single agent or in combination with other drugs such as corticosteroid agents, cytarabine, procarbazine, vincristine, carmustine, lomustine, thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, temozolomide, and rituximab. To date, an overwhelming number of different regimens in which high-dose MTX is used have been reported. Given the lack of randomized trials, however, the optimal treatment remains controversial. Varying methodology makes the comparison of available studies extremely difficult, yet some common themes can be found throughout the literature. Treatment paradigms vary considerably according to the patient's age. Most studies support the use of chemotherapy-only treatments for elderly patients (> 60 years), given the high risks of neurotoxicity associated with radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor regardless of the chemotherapy chosen, and less toxic regimens might be preferable for such elderly patients. Conversely, in younger patients (< 60 years), there is growing evidence that commonly used chemotherapy-only regimens are associated with increased relapse rates that may not justify deferral of radiotherapy. Thus, a significant focus of research has been the development of intensified chemotherapy regimens that could replace radiotherapy. In this article, the authors discuss the principles guiding the use of chemotherapy for PCNSL, and critically review the available literature, including the most recent trials.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14544-e14544
Author(s):  
Savannah Gelhard ◽  
Amiee Maxwell ◽  
Howard Colman ◽  
Adam Louis Cohen ◽  
Joe Sammy Mendez

e14544 Background: Treatment for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) includes induction therapy consisting of polychemotherapy including high-dose methotrexate followed by consolidation therapy. There are various induction and consolidation regimens with wide variability in their treatment duration, inpatient vs outpatient administration, and the number of chemotherapeutic agents utilized. We performed a comparative cost and efficacy analysis of three consolidation techniques in an effort to provide insight into the cost-benefit of these treatment regimens. Methods: Patients treated for newly diagnosed PCNSL at our institution after July 1, 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who completed one of the following regimens and received consolidation therapy at our institution were included: rituximab/methotrexate/vincristine/procarbazine (R-MVP), rituximab/methotrexate/temozolomide (R-MT), or rituximab/methotrexate (R-M) for induction followed by consolidation with etoposide/cytarabine (EA), high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC), or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDC-ASCR). Cost to health system was derived from a Value Driven Outcomes tool and filtered to compare major costs of treatment. Survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis and last date of known survival. Results: Twenty-two patients met eligibility criteria and received the following four treatment regimens: R-MT+EA (12), R-MT+ HDC-ASCR (3), R-M+ HDC-ASCR (1), and R-MVP+HIDAC (6). Patients receiving HDC-ASCR (4) had a trend towards a more favorable overall survival (p = 0.0880) compared to the other two consolidation therapies with no recurrence or death in those patients treated with HDC-ASCR. Comparative cost analysis of facility and pharmacy costs of the three consolidation techniques found that HDC-ASCR was 40 times the cost of the cheapest treatment, HIDAC. Conclusions: This small retrospective review provides evidence that HDC-ASCR may be a superior consolidation strategy but with a profound increase in financial cost. To our knowledge this is the first study completed in the U.S. comparing treatment outcomes and cost in PCNSL. Based on our results, it is clear that a larger and prospective review could potentially shed light on selecting a standard of care based on cost-benefit analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document