Role of preoperative CA-125 levels in predicting the DFS and OS in epithelial ovarian cancer

Background: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among all the other gynaecologic malignancies. Stage I cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy report a 5-year overall survival of 95% while this value significantly drops to 25% in stage IIIC and IV patients. Unfortunately, effective screening methods to detect the early cancer are yet to be identified.Methods: All the patients diagnosed to have epithelial ovarian carcinoma from January 2012 to December 2014 at our center with pre-treatment CA-125 levels were included in this retrospective study. Disease free survival and overall survival were tabulated either by telephonic conversation or on a regular follow up visit to the hospital.Results: Among the 69 patients enrolled 38% of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 years. 58% of patients had stage 3 disease up front. mean CA-125 levels were lowest in patients with stage I disease and the highest in stage IV disease with a statistically significant rise in CA-125 levels with the stage of disease. Only 52% of the patients completed the treatment as per protocol. There was a significant negative co relation between the CA-125 levels and survival rates in both the sub groups of patients who received complete and incomplete treatment respectively.Conclusions: In the present study we would like to conclude that pre-operative CA-125, which has already been included in the screening algorithms like ROCA, has a greater potential to become a prognostic marker. Present study is limited by the small number of patient’s and thus larger multi centric studies with better randomization could establish the role of CA-125 as a prognostication marker.

Download Full-text

Performance of preoperative plasma HE4 and CA-125 levels in predicting ovarian cancer mortality in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e17076 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e17076-e17076 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Isabelle Bairati ◽

Jean Gregoire ◽

Marie Plante ◽

Pierre Douville

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

External Validation ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Roc Curves ◽

Ca 125 ◽

Youden Index ◽

P Value ◽

Optimal Thresholds ◽

Lr Test

e17076 Background: Additional prognostic biomarkers are needed to better manage women with EOC, especially dichotomized indicators for decision making. The objective of this external validation study was to assess the performance of preoperative plasma HE4 and CA-125 levels in predicting mortality by EOC. Methods: Eligible EOC women were newly diagnosed cases treated by upfront debulking surgery in a gynecology oncology center (CHU de Québec, L’Hôtel-Dieu, Canada) in 1988-2006 (cohort 1, n=136) and in 2007-2013 (cohort 2, n=177). All FIGO stages were included. Preoperative plasma HE4 and CA-125 levels were measured by Elecsys® automated immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics). Dates and causes of death were obtained by record linkage with the Quebec mortality files. In cohort 1, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed and optimal thresholds for HE4 and CA-125 were generated using the Youden index J. In cohort 2, crude and standardized Cox proportional models were done to validate the usefulness of these biomarkers according to their optimal thresholds. Standardized models included standard prognostic factors. The Likelihood Ratio (LR) tests were done to compare the standardized models with and without each biomarker. Results: In cohorts 1 and 2, medians of follow-up were respectively 5.3 and 3.2 years. Five-year disease free survival rates were 53% in cohort 1 and 54% in cohort 2. In cohort 1, the AUC for HE4 and CA-125 were respectively 64.2 (95% CI: 54.7-73.6) and 63.1 (95%CI: 53.6-72.6). The optimal thresholds were 277 pmol/L for HE4 and 282 U/ml for CA-125. In cohort 2, higher levels of plasma HE4 (≥277 pmol/L) were significantly associated with death by EOC (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.80; 95% CI: 1.03-3.15; p-value for LR test: 0.03), while higher levels of CA-125 (≥282 U/ml) were not associated with death by EOC (aHR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.88-2.55; p-value for LR-test: 0.12). In serous EOC, the associations with mortality were respectively 2.46 (95% CI: 1.26-4.80) for HE4 and 1.56 (0.87-2.80) for CA-125. Conclusions: Preoperative plasma HE4 is a promising prognostic biomarker in women with EOC and performs better than CA-125 to predict mortality.

Download Full-text

Minimal Macroscopic Residual Disease (0.1–1 cm). Is It Still a Surgical Goal in Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1097/igc.0000000000000690 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 26 (5) ◽

pp. 906-911 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Luis M. Chiva ◽

Teresa Castellanos ◽

Sonsoles Alonso ◽

Antonio Gonzalez-Martin

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Pubmed Database

ObjectiveThe objective of this review was to try to determine by searching in the literature what is the survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a primary debulking with minimal macroscopic residual disease (MMRD; 0.1–10 mm). Additionally, this review aimed to explore the survival in patients with residual disease from 0.1 to 0.5 cm.MethodsA retrospective search was accomplished in the PubMed database looking for all English-language articles published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014, under the following search strategy: “ovarian cancer and cytoreduction” or “ovarian cancer and phase III trial”. We selected those articles that contain information on both percentage of MMRD (0.1–1 cm) and median overall survival (OS) in this subset of patients with stage III to stage IV ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery.ResultsThirteen publications were obtained including information of a total 11,999 patients with stage III to stage IV ovarian cancer. Five thousand thirty-seven patients (42%) had MMRD after the primary debulking (0.1–1 cm). Median overall survival in patients with MMRD was 40 months and disease-free survival (DFS) was 16 months. This group of patients obtained an advantage of 10 months in OS (40 vs 30 m) and 4 months in DFS (16 vs 12 m) compared with the group with suboptimal debulking (P < 0.001). Compared with the group of complete resection, patients with minimal macroscopic residuum showed a significant inferior median OS and DFS of 30 months and 14 months, respectively (OS, 70 vs 40 m; DFS, 30 vs 16 m) (P < 0.001). The group of residual disease of 0.1 to 0.5 cm reached a median survival of 53 months.ConclusionsPatients with ovarian cancer with MMRD after primary surgery obtain a modest but significant advantage in survival (10 months) over suboptimal patients. Patients with macroscopic residual disease (0.1–0.5 cm) obtain a better survival (53 months) than those with more than 0.5 to 1 cm. We propose that they should be classified as a different prognostic group.

Download Full-text

Laboratory predictors of survival in ovarian cancer

Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira ◽

10.1590/1806-9282.66.1.61 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 66 (1) ◽

pp. 61-66

Author(s):

Millena Prata Jammal ◽

Agrimaldo Martins Filho ◽

Guilherme Henrique Bandeira ◽

Beatriz Martins Tavares Murta ◽

Eddie Fernando Candido Murta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Fasting Glucose ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Ca 125 ◽

Rank Test ◽

Type I ◽

Type Ii ◽

Free Survival ◽

Disease Free

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE To relate disease-free survival and overall survival with type I and type II ovarian cancer and preoperative laboratory parameters biomarkers. METHODS A retrospective study was carried out based on the collection of data from medical records of patients with ovarian tumors. Kaplan-Mayer curves were drawn based on the statistical analysis of the data and were compared using the Log-rank test. RESULTS Disease-free survival in type I ovarian cancer was significantly higher than in type II (p=0.0013), as well as in those with normal levels of CA-125 (p=0.0243) and with a platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) lower than 200 (p=0.0038). The overall survival of patients with type I ovarian cancer was significantly higher than in patients with type II, as well as in patients with normal CA-125 serum levels (p=0.0039) and those with a preoperative fasting glucose of less than 100 mg/dL. CONCLUSION CA-125 levels may predict greater overall and disease-free survival. PLR < 200 may suggest greater disease-free survival, whereas normal fasting glucose may suggest greater overall survival.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Importance of Preoperative CA-125 in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Australian Multicenter Study

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2005.08.151 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 23 (25) ◽

pp. 5938-5942 ◽

Cited By ~ 48

Author(s):

Sellva Paramasivam ◽

Lee Tripcony ◽

Alex Crandon ◽

Micheal Quinn ◽

Ian Hammond ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Figo Stage ◽

International Federation ◽

Histologic Grade ◽

Stage I ◽

Surgical Staging ◽

Ca 125 ◽

Histologic Type ◽

Gynecology And Obstetrics

Purpose To evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative CA-125 levels on overall survival of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods Data from 518 patients with FIGO stage I EOC treated in seven gynecologic oncology centers throughout Australia between 1990 and 2002 were analyzed. Patients with borderline tumors and nonepithelial ovarian carcinomas were excluded, as were women in whom CA-125 had not been determined preoperatively. Preoperative CA-125 levels were studied in surgically staged and incompletely staged patients and compared with prognostic factors, such as substage, grade, and histologic type. Multivariate Cox models were calculated. Results CA-125 levels more than 30 U/mL were associated with higher grade, substage 1B and 1C, nonmucinous histologic type, and older age. In univariate analysis, higher histologic grade, the absence of surgical staging, and preoperative CA-125 levels more than 30 U/mL were associated with impaired survival. Multivariate analysis identified histologic grade, preoperative CA-125, and surgical staging as independent predictors for survival. In the subgroup of completely surgically staged patients, the 5-year overall survival rate was 82% (95% CI, 76% to 88%) for patients with CA-125 levels more than 30 U/mL and 95% (95% CI, 90% to 99%) for patients with CA-125 levels of 30 U/mL or less (P = .028). In the group of incompletely staged patients, the 5-year survival rates were similar for patients with elevated and normal serum CA-125 levels. Conclusion Complete surgical staging, histologic grade, and preoperative serum CA-125 levels are independent prognostic factors and should be included in the decision making for chemotherapy.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Role of CA-125 Nadir in Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.15.7594 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 26 (10) ◽

pp. 1771-1772 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Aleix Prat ◽

Marta Parera ◽

Josep Maria Del Campo

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Ca 125 ◽

Prognostic Role

Download Full-text

Multimodality adjuvant therapy and survival outcomes in stage I–IV uterine carcinosarcoma

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2020-001315 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (7) ◽

pp. 1012-1017

Author(s):

Jennifer McEachron ◽

Taryn Heyman ◽

Lisa Shanahan ◽

Van Tran ◽

Monica Friedman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Uterine Cancer ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Stage I ◽

High Recurrence Rate ◽

Uterine Carcinosarcoma ◽

Treatment Delays ◽

Free Survival

ObjectivesUterine carcinosarcoma is a rare, aggressive form of uterine cancer with a high recurrence rate and poor survival at all stages. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy versus a combination of chemotherapy and radiation (chemoradiation) to determine survival.MethodsA multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with stage I–IV carcinosarcoma was conducted from January 2000 to December 2017. Inclusion criteria were primary surgical management, defined as hysterectomy ± salpingo-oophorectomy, comprehensive surgical staging and/or tumor debulking, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Differences in the frequencies of stage, cytoreduction status, treatment delays and sites of disease recurrence were identified using Pearson’s χ2 test. Progression-free and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.ResultsFinal analysis included 148 patients; 40.5% (n=60) chemotherapy and 59.5% (n=88) chemoradiation. The mean age was 67 years (range 39–89). Stage distribution included 24.3% stage I, 12.2% stage II, 37.2% stage III, and 26.3% stage IV. There was no difference in the frequency of stage (p=0.81), cytoreduction status (p=0.61), treatment delays (p=0.57), or location of recurrence (p=0.97) between cohorts. The most frequent location of recurrence was the abdomen (50.0%). The median progression-free survival favored chemoradiation over chemotherapy (15 vs 11 months, respectively), as did the median overall survival (26 vs 20 months, respectively). Chemoradiation was associated with a statistically significant improvement in 2 year progression-free survival (22.5% vs 13.6%; p=0.006) and 2 year overall survival (50.0% vs 35.6%; p=0.018) compared with chemotherapy alone. On subanalysis of patients receiving chemoradiation, ‘sandwich sequencing’ (chemotherapy–radiation–chemotherapy) was associated with superior overall survival compared with alternate therapy sequences (chemotherapy–radiation and radiation–chemotherapy) (34 months vs 14 months and 14 months, respectively) (p=0.038).ConclusionsChemoradiation was associated with improvement in both progression-free and overall survival for all stages of carcinosarcoma compared with chemotherapy alone.

Download Full-text

Survival rates and prognostic factors in right- and left-sided colon cancer stage I–IV: an unselected retrospective single-center trial

International Journal of Colorectal Disease ◽

10.1007/s00384-021-04005-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Claudius E. Degro ◽

Richard Strozynski ◽

Florian N. Loch ◽

Christian Schineis ◽

Fiona Speichinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Blood Level ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Stage I ◽

Cancer Stage ◽

Single Center ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Purpose Colorectal cancer revealed over the last decades a remarkable shift with an increasing proportion of a right- compared to a left-sided tumor location. In the current study, we aimed to disclose clinicopathological differences between right- and left-sided colon cancer (rCC and lCC) with respect to mortality and outcome predictors. Methods In total, 417 patients with colon cancer stage I–IV were analyzed in the present retrospective single-center study. Survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and uni/multivariate analyses were performed with a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results Our study showed no significant difference of the overall survival between rCC and lCC stage I–IV (p = 0.354). Multivariate analysis revealed in the rCC cohort the worst outcome for ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score IV patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 16.0; CI 95%: 2.1–123.5), CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) blood level > 100 µg/l (HR: 3.3; CI 95%: 1.2–9.0), increased lymph node ratio of 0.6–1.0 (HR: 5.3; CI 95%: 1.7–16.1), and grade 4 tumors (G4) (HR: 120.6; CI 95%: 6.7–2179.6) whereas in the lCC population, ASA score IV (HR: 8.9; CI 95%: 0.9–91.9), CEA blood level 20.1–100 µg/l (HR: 5.4; CI 95%: 2.4–12.4), conversion to laparotomy (HR: 14.1; CI 95%: 4.0–49.0), and severe surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo III–IV) (HR: 2.9; CI 95%: 1.5–5.5) were identified as predictors of a diminished overall survival. Conclusion Laterality disclosed no significant effect on the overall prognosis of colon cancer patients. However, group differences and distinct survival predictors could be identified in rCC and lCC patients.

Download Full-text

Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States

Current Oncology ◽

10.3390/curroncol28010017 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 28 (1) ◽

pp. 138-151

Author(s):

Kelly A. Stahl ◽

Elizabeth J. Olecki ◽

Matthew E. Dixon ◽

June S. Peng ◽

Madeline B. Torres ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stage Iv ◽

The United States ◽

Current Treatment ◽

Stage I ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Chi Square ◽

Specific Guideline ◽

Kaplan Meier

Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. The National Cancer Database was used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients from 2004–2016. Chi-square tests were used to examine subgroup differences between disease stages: Stage I, II/III and IV. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline concordant care. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess three-year overall survival. The final cohort included 108,150 patients: 23,584 Stage I, 40,216 Stage II/III, and 44,350 Stage IV. Stage specific guideline concordant care was received in only 73% of patients with Stage I disease and 51% of patients with Stage II/III disease. Patients who received guideline consistent care had significantly improved survival compared to those who did not. Overall, we found only moderate improvement in guideline adherence and three-year overall survival during the 13-year study time period. This study showed underutilization of stage specific guideline concordant care for stage I and II/III disease.

Download Full-text

Sorafenib in Combination With Gemcitabine in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1111/igc.0b013e3181e273a8 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 20 (5) ◽

pp. 787-793 ◽

Cited By ~ 41

Author(s):

Stephen A. Welch ◽

Hal W. Hirte ◽

Laurie Elit ◽

Russel J. Schilder ◽

Lisa Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Response Rate ◽

Objective Response ◽

Evaluation Criteria ◽

Ca 125 ◽

Response Evaluation ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Response Evaluation Criteria

Objectives:Antiangiogenic strategies have demonstrated efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Sorafenib is a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Gemcitabine has known activity against EOC. A phase 1 clinical trial of this combination suggested activity in ovarian cancer with no dose-limiting toxicity. This phase 2 study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and sorafenib in patients with recurrent EOC.Methods:Patients with recurrent EOC after platinum-based chemotherapy and who had subsequently received up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenous [IV]) was administered weekly for 7 of 8 weeks in the first cycle, then weekly for 3 weeks of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Sorafenib (400 mg p.o. bid) was given continuously. The primary end point for this trial was objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 response, time to progression, overall survival, and toxicity.Results:Forty-three patients were enrolled, and 33 completed at least 1 cycle. Two patients had a partial response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors objective response rate = 4.7%). Ten patients (23.3%) maintained response or stable disease for at least 6 months. GCIG CA-125 response was 27.9%. The median time to progression was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 13.0 months. Hematologic toxicity was common but manageable. The most common nonhematologic adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, hypokalemia, and diarrhea.Conclusion:This trial of gemcitabine and sorafenib in recurrent EOC did not meet its primary efficacy end point, but the combination was associated with encouraging rates of prolonged stable disease and CA-125 response.

Download Full-text