Implications of Self-organized Learning Environments and Minerva School for Schools’Online Instructional Design

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Bokyeong Kim ◽  
Suk So
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Self Organized

scholarly journals Educational elements of instructional design to enhance the construction of virtual learning environments

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nadia Sarahi URIBE-OLIVARES ◽  
Paul Rafael SIORDIA-MEDINA ◽  
Aldo ZEA-VERDÍN
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Virtual Learning ◽  
Virtual Learning Environments ◽  
Virtual Education ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Administrative Staff ◽  
Educational Model ◽  
Professional Profile

From the perspective of experts in instructional design, what pedagogical elements favor the construction of virtual learning environments? It is the question that guides the present investigation. Education has had significant changes in recent decades, so institutions would be expected to transform. The management of educational change must be carried out from within the institutions themselves, who, through the operability of their educational model, foster the learning of their students. The innovation elements of an institution involve the entire educational community. The pedagogical foundations must permeate the management team, teachers and administrative staff to achieve true educational quality in any educational modality. This research focuses on the particularities of the virtual modality. It aims to analyze the different perspectives of instructional designers of institutions of higher and higher education regarding what pedagogical elements are necessary in offering virtual education. It also analyzes the professional profile of those who exercise the role of instructional designer in the different institutions.

scholarly journals Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine McLoughlin ◽  
Ron Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Goal Orientations ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Learning Theories ◽  
Cultural Dimension ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Cultural Issues ◽  
Indigenous Australian

<span>Flexible delivery of educational resources must take account of cultural variables and recognise the specific learning needs, preferences and styles of learners. In designing instruction, there may be a tension between the need to ensure access for a diverse student population, while at the same time taking into account the need for localisation to accommodate learners' particular cultures, cognitive styles and preferences. Considering the micro and macro cultural levels of instructional design is therefore essential if appropriate learning environments are to be created. The acceptance, use and impact of WWW sites is affected by the cultural backgrounds, values, needs and preferences of learners.</span><p>One of the limitations in current instructional design models is that they do not fully contextualise the learning experience, and are themselves the product of particular cultures. The design of Web based instruction is not culturally neutral, but instead is based on the particular epistemologies, learning theories and goal orientations of the designers themselves. Recently, theorists have argued for a cultural dimension in the design process and the need to provide culturally sensitive learning environments.</p><p>In this paper, we trace the design processes involved in the development of an online learning environment for indigenous Australian learners preparing to enter university, and account for the cultural issues that impacted on creation of learning tasks and styles of communication. The paper argues for cultural localisation, which means incorporating the local values, styles of learning and cognitive preferences of the target population. It also means going beyond surface level design considerations, to achieve culturally inclusive constructivist learning environments. Examples of tasks, activities and forms of online interaction are provided in the context of a bi-cultural model of learning that recognises diversity and different learning needs. It is recommended that when creating WWW based course support sites for cultural inclusivity, systematic attention must be given to particular design guidelines, which include responsiveness to learner needs, community based learning and cultural contextualisation of learning activities.</p>

An Ecological Model of Student Interaction in Online Learning Environments

2020 ◽  
pp. 387-415
Author(s):  
Genevieve Marie Johnson ◽  
Audrey Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Ecological Theory ◽  
Ecological Systems ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Online Learning Environments ◽  
University Culture ◽  
Environmental Systems

Ecological theory conceptualized the student as surrounded by a series of environmental systems and the processes of learning as interaction between the student (i.e., bioecology) and the systems (i.e., microsystem, exosystem and macrosystem). This chapter synthesizes the literature and proposes an ecological model of student interaction in online learning environments. Specifically, learner-learner, learner-instructor and learner-content interactions occur in the microsystem and are mediated by the interface subsystem. Student microsystemic interactions influence and are influenced by the instructional design exosystem. The macrosystem reflects the indirect influence of university culture on all aspects of the microsystem, exosystem and interface subsystem. The chronosystem captures the effect of time on the student and on all ecological systems (e.g., students mature and university culture evolves)

Online Learning and Metacognition

2020 ◽  
pp. 310-331
Author(s):  
Geraldine Torrisi-Steele
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Online Learning ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Great Emphasis ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Online Learning Environments ◽  
Metacognitive Scaffolding

Online learning experiences are becoming the norm for an increasing number of higher education students. Although there are clear advantages to online learning in terms of flexibility and access, many students struggle to succeed, especially in purely online learning environments. To a large extent student success in online learning environments is dependent on students' ability to self-regulate and ‘learn for themselves'- both abilities related to academic metacognition. Unfortunately, even at university, many students do not have well developed metacognition. It is therefore important to consider carefully metacognitive scaffolding in the design of online learning experiences. However, the models of instructional design commonly used in online learning tend not to place great emphasis on the importance of metacognitive scaffolding. The aim of the present chapter is therefore to increase awareness of metacognition, as one of the important considerations in the design of online learning environments that can help to maximize chances of student success. Towards this end, a framework of instructional design that is more sensitive to metacognition is developed.

The Role of Instructional Design in Transformative Learning

2020 ◽  
pp. 58-74
Author(s):  
Kimberley Gordon ◽  
Luanne Lewis ◽  
Jill Auten
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
Classroom Management ◽  
Transformative Learning ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Learning Theories ◽  
Modular Approach ◽  
Planning Tool ◽  
And Training

As transformative learning is rooted in the belief that humans make meaning of their experiences, the incorporation of instructional design (ID) techniques in classroom management as a planning tool is well suited to learning environments in which the facilitator subscribes to Mezirow's theory. ID refers to a systematic process for developing instruction by following a prescribed model focused on accomplishment of desired learning outcomes. ID provides a clear, direct map to guide educators through the creation of lessons in accordance with curriculum expectations. ID is an appropriate tool for the practitioners of the three primary learning theories: behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Reiser and Dempsey described ID as a systematic progression of steps undertaken to develop education and training programs in a consistent and reliable fashion; it enables educators to take a modular approach to delivery of learning. This chapter explores the role of instructional design in transformative learning.

Culturally Sensitive Instructional Design Principles for Online Learning Environments

2018 ◽  
pp. 292-326
Author(s):  
Gülten Kartal ◽  
Elif Toprak ◽  
Evrim Genc Kumtepe
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Cultural Diversity ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Culturally Sensitive ◽  
Online Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Efficient Learning ◽  
Instructional Design Principles

Distance education and e-learning practices are preferred by increasing number of people and institutions in the recent years all around the globe. It's clear that there are different interests, expectations, needs, characteristics, and backgrounds of participants in these learning environments. In this connection, it is important that courses are designed, taking cultural diversity into account, optimizing self-learning in such environments. The instructional designs that support multiculturalism in learning environments, lead to more efficient learning. Based on the awareness about cultural diversity, this chapter focuses on culturally sensitive instructional design principles for online learning environments. Firstly, “culture” as a concept and its components, based on various prominent definitions in literature are given. Then, the design principles are discussed with a critical look on online learning environments, with an eye to different theories and studies of leading researchers in the field.

Teacher Presence

2018 ◽  
pp. 7922-7934
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Mobile Learning ◽  
Support System ◽  
Distributed Learning ◽  
Learning Engagement ◽  
Teacher Presence ◽  
Instructional Facilitator

Teacher presence refers to the fully engaged instructional facilitator within a learning environment. Within this specific discussion of teacher presence, the focus is upon distributed learning environments that includes not only online learning environments but also mobile learning engagement efforts. Teacher presence engages not merely an instructional design and evaluative assessment effort, but integrally engages the learners within the instructional environment through discourse, reflective practices and supporting the motivational needs of the learner. Further, teacher presence directly impacts the motivational and cognitive support needs of learners, through instructionally appropriate actions of the instructor as a facilitative guide, as a self-regulatory maven, within a cognitive load support system, as well as mentor-focused instructional efforts.

Virtual and Augmented Reality

2019 ◽  
pp. 12-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liston William Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Instructional Design ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Common Elements ◽  
Research Institutions ◽  
Virtual And Augmented Reality ◽  
Instructional Design Practices

This chapter focuses on virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) as tools for teaching and learning. Attainment of skills and knowledge can be supported through the use of VR/AR applications that are being developed both in the commercial sector and at various research institutions. An overview of what differentiates VR and AR is provided to the reader along with considerations of how such applications might be used to support learning environments in the future. If instructional designers and programmers can synchronize their efforts it may be possible to make VA/AR a common feature across learning environments nationally. Common elements of a VR/AR system are discussed here as well as the need to incorporate instructional design practices into the design of learning applications that use VR/AR.

Culturally Significant Signs, Symbols, and Philosophical Belief Systems within E-Learning Environments

2012 ◽  
pp. 210-243
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Crawford ◽  
Ruth Gannon Cook
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Narrative Inquiry ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Belief Systems ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Shed Light

The contextual backdrop of the problem and goal of the study are based within the framework that the researchers wanted to be sure that the courses were unique in their appropriateness to their respective cultures; but they also wanted to see if the course adaptations provided cultural values and perspectives that were fairly consistent and appropriate across cultures and nations. The methodology is qualitative in nature, specifically focused upon development design research and narrative inquiry. The findings suggest that there were several levels of concern: learner concerns; instructional design or teaching concerns; management and organizational concerns; and, technology concerns. This study has addressed the question “what lessons could be learned from semiotic and philosophical instructional imperatives inclusion within e-learning environments?” As such, the interpretation of the findings of the study shed light on the importance of simple mediation tools, such as signs, symbols, and stories. The implications of the findings indicate that more research could shed light on how to help students feel comfortable enough to follow through and complete their e-learning courses. In viewing best practices for e-learning, students’ existent knowledge can be bridged with what they need to know by using a variety of the semiotic tools discussed in this study.

An Ecological Approach to Instructional Design

2013 ◽  
pp. 872-889
Author(s):  
Paul Resta ◽  
Debby Kalk
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Linear Process ◽  
Ecological Approach ◽  
Complex Environments ◽  
Design Strategies ◽  
Deep Appreciation ◽  
Opportunities For Learning ◽  
Traditional Approaches ◽  
Underlying Processes

The confluence of collaborative and social technologies, with the phenomenon of digital natives, creates new opportunities for learning environments, which, in turn, demand innovative instructional design strategies. An ecological approach to instructional design can yield rich learning environments that provide learners with authentic experiences. These learning experiences can be challenging, engaging, and effective, and provide students with deep appreciation of underlying processes, principles, and relationships. It’s a learner-centered design that features collaboration, authentic experiences, and complex environments. Designing for these complex systems requires thinking outside the boxes of traditional approaches. The ecological approach requires identifying the key contextual factors and interactions that are central to understanding and performing complex intellectual tasks. This non-linear process involves selecting appropriate technologies and social interactions, appropriate levels of scaffolding and support, and giving learners increasing levels of responsibility for their own successful outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document