scholarly journals Peer Correction On Writing Quality Of College Students Having Different Cognitive Styles

INFERENSI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-282
Author(s):  
Sri Wahyuni

Correction in writing process is beneficial to improve students’ writing quality. However, different kinds of correction may affect students’ writing quality differently. Furthermore, depending on their cognitive style, students may receive correction differently. This research aims at investigating the effect of peer correction on writing quality of college students’ having different cognitive styles. Two groups of students participated in this study. In the treatment, one group conducted peer correction, and the other group conducted self correction on their writings. To collect the data on students’ cognitive styles, Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) was used. To collect the data on students’ writing quality before and after the treatment, writing tests were used. To test the hypotheses, an analysis of covariate (ANCOVA) was used. The results shows that both types of corrections, peer and self corrections, and students’ cognitive styles, field dependent and field independent, significantly affects the students’ writing quality. However, it seems to be no significant interaction between types of corrections and students’ cognitive styles. The types of correction and cognitive styles do not affect students’ writing quality at the same time. 

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Rizky Alimuddin

The study aims at examining the characteristics of open ended problem solving based on student cognitive styles, namely field independent and field dependent. The study was descriptive qualitative started by determining research subject using group embedded figure test (GEFT) to group students based on their cognitive and the result of GEFT, the reasearcher choose 6 subjects from 19 students of drade IX at SMPN 1 Ma�rang consisted of three subjects of field independent and three of field dependent. Afterwards, the researcher gave open ended problem solving test on algebra and geometry mate rials, and conducted interview. Data validity of the study employed triangulation technique. The results of the study reveal tha the steps and strategy of open ended problem solving of field independent subject and field dependent subject: (1) in the steps of open ended problem solving, field independent subjects overall were able to understand the problem, plan the solution, and conduct the plan up to recheck it. One of field independent subject even was able to draw conclusion form one of the problems given which was the algebra 2 problem. In contrast, the field dependent subjects overall had steps of open ended problem solving that only able to understand and recheck it, (2) in problem solving strategy, there was no difference between field independent subjects and field dependent subjects. The field independent subjects used open ended problem solving strategy by thinking backward, thinking inductively, and thinking forward. Similarly, the field dependent subjects also used open ended problem solving by thinking backward, thinking inductively, and thinking forward


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-33
Author(s):  
Siti Lailiyah ◽  
Nuriyatul Muslimah ◽  
Sutini Sutini

[English]: This study aims to examine and compare students’ level of statistical thinking with different cognitive styles (Field-dependent, FD and Field-independent, FI) in solving mathematical problems. It is descriptive qualitative research involving 31 ninth-graders given the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) to determine their cognitive styles. From the results of GEFT, four students with two cognitive styles and high mathematics ability were selected as participants. A test and interviews were administered for data collection. The test was analyzed based on the level of statistical thinking indicators, and the interview results were used to confirm and explore the students' statistical thinking. The results of data analysis revealed that in representing data, both FI and FD students are at transitional level. In other stages of statistical thinking: describing data display, organizing and reducing data, analyzing and interpreting data, FD students reach a quantitative level meanwhile FI students are at an analytical level. Indeed, students with FI cognitive style have a higher level of statistical thinking than FD students. This finding shows that characteristics of students with FI, for example, being more analytic, support the achievement of better levels of statistical thinking. [Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan membandingkan level berpikir statistik siswa dengan gaya kognitif berbeda (Field-dependent, FD dan Field-independent, FI) dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif yang melibatkan 31 siswa kelas 9. Siswa tersebut diberikan Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) untuk menentukan gaya kognitif. Selanjutnya, dipilih 4 siswa pada kedua gaya kognitif dengan kemampuan matematika tinggi. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes dan wawancara. Hasil tes dianalisis berdasarkan indikator level berpikir statistik dan hasil wawancara dianalisis untuk mengonfirmasi dan menggali lebih dalam berpikir statistik siswa. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dalam menyajikan data, siswa FD dan FI berada pada level transisional. Pada tiga tahap berpikir statistik lain; menjelaskan sajian data, mengatur dan mengurangi data, menganalisis dan menerjemahkan data, siswa FD berada pada level kuantitatif sedangkan siswa FI berada pada level analitik. Dalam hal ini, siswa dengan gaya kognitif FI memiliki level berpikir statistik yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa FD. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik siswa dengan gaya kognitif FI, misalnya cenderung lebih analitis dibandingkan FD, mendukung capaian level berpikir statistik yang lebih baik.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Vaula Greennita Kusumawati ◽  
Andriyani Andriyani

This research aim is to describe deaf-mute students' cognitive style which seen in the condition of the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). Data was collected through given by GEFT to four deaf-mute students of SLBN 2 Bantul and the data were analyzed through an interactive analysis of the Miles & Huberman model namely data collection, data reduction, data display, verification or conclusion inferred. From the test results, two students were categorized to Field-Dependent (FD) cognitive style and the other students were categorized to Field-Independent (FI) cognitive style. Students with FD cognitive styles tend to have difficulty focusing on something or analyzing the pattern into different parts. In contrary, students with FI cognitive style are more capable to accept separate parts of an overall pattern and analyzing the pattern into its components.


EDUPEDIA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Sayyidah Umma Rahmawati ◽  
Senja Putri Merona

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan berpikir reflektif siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field independent dan field dependent. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Adapun istrumen yang digunakan adalah Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), tes soal berpikir reflektif dan wawancara. Sedangkan analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis data Miles dan Huberman yang tediri dari reduksi data, penyajian data dan kesimpulan atau verifikasi.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pada indikator berpikir reflektif reacting terdapat kesamaan berpikir reflektif antara siswa field independent dan field dependent. Pada indikator berpikir reflektif comparing terdapat perbedaan dalam hal menghubungkan pengetahuan yang diberikan dengan pengetahuan yang dimiliki. Pada indikator berpikir reflektif contemplating terdapat perbedaan pada kemampuan mendeteksi kesalahan. Temuan lain dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa siswa field independent menjelaskan jawabannya dengan detail dan rinci, cenderung menggunakan cara menghafal dan memiliki kepercayaan diri yang tinggi. Sedangkan siswa field dependent menjelaskan jawabannya secara umum, memiliki analisis yang baik dan menyukai cara yang telah ditetapkan


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3-5) ◽  
pp. 363-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Guo ◽  
Ming Bao ◽  
Luyang Guan ◽  
Lihan Chen

Crossmodal correspondences are the automatic associations that most people have between different basic sensory stimulus attributes, dimensions, or features. For instance, people often show a systematic tendency to associate moving objects with changing pitches. Cognitive styles are defined as an individual’s consistent approach to think, perceive, and remember information, and they reflect qualitative rather than quantitative differences between individuals in their thinking processes. Here we asked whether cognitive styles played a role in modulating the crossmodal interaction. We used the visual Ternus display in our study, since it elicits two distinct apparent motion percepts: element motion (with a shorter interval between the two Ternus frames) and group motion (with a longer interval between the two frames). We examined the audiovisual correspondences between the visual Ternus movement directions (upward or downward) and the changes of pitches of concurrent glides (ascending frequency or descending frequency). Moreover, we measured the cognitive styles (with the Embedded Figure Test) for each participant. The results showed that congruent correspondence between pitch-ascending (decreasing) glides and moving upward (downward) visual directions led to a more dominant percept of ‘element motion’, and such an effect was typically observed in the field-independent group. Importantly, field-independent participants demonstrated a high efficiency for identifying the properties of audiovisual events and applying the crossmodal correspondence in crossmodal interaction. The results suggest cognitive styles could differentiate crossmodal correspondences in crossmodal interaction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noor Fajriah ◽  
Arief Angky Suseno

Karakteristik siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika berbeda-beda karena cara bertingkah laku, menerima, menilai, berpikir, dan memproses informasi dari masalah tersebut berbeda. Perbedaan ini disebut dengan “cognitive styles” (gaya kognitif) yang kemungkinan mempengaruhi kemampuanmatematika siswa. Gaya kognitif yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini  adalah gaya kognitif Field Dependent (FD) dan Field Independent (FI). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan yang signifikan kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif tersebut. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) di Banjarmasin Tengah. Teknik analisis data menggunakan statistika deskriptif dan statistika inferensial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaaan yang signifikan kemampuansiswa SMP dalam masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif.Kata kunci: masalah matematika, gaya kognitif.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Syamsul Arifin ◽  
Punadji Setyosari ◽  
Cholis Sa’dijah ◽  
Dedi Kuswandi

The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of learning models to develop student critical thinking skills and retention in mathematics through the application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) models and multimedia assisted Direct Instruction (DI) models for students who have different cognitive styles. This research is quasi-experimental type, using non-equivalent control group design. Subject of this research are students in three different senior high school with two class samples in each school. There are 102 students of control class with Direct Instruction learning model by multimedia and 97 students of experiment class with Problem Based Learning model. The instrument of this research are test and questionnaires. The findings of this research are that there are significant differences in student critical thinking skills and retention between groups of student with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles and also between group of student with Direct Instruction model and Problem Based Learning model. Each learning model has interaction with critical thinking skills but not student retention. This research is useful for educators to develop students critical thinking skills processes with an effective learning model approach especially for senior high school students. The educators can know the interaction of cognitive styles with student retention, the extent to which cognitive styles are able to have an impact on student retention. This research provides knowledge an effective learning model to develop critical thinking skills and retention of student both Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style. Based on cognitive style, Field Independent students have higher retention and critical thinking skills compared to Field Dependent students.


1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore T. Y. Hsieh

Christian college students classified as either Word or Spirit-oriented through a questionnaire were tested with the Rod and Frame Apparatus. Word-oriented subjects were found to be field-independent and Spirit-oriented subjects to be field-dependent in their perceptual style. No sex difference on field-dependence or independence was found within either the Word-oriented or the Spirit-oriented groups, but a significant difference in sex distribution of Word or Spirit-orientation was found. Socialization and sex role expectation effects in the churches and implications for these findings and further studies were discussed.


1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen M. Vaught ◽  
Paul A. Roodin

Forty-two male and 42 female college students were subdivided into field independent, medium, and field dependent identity groups and matched for sex. Each subject was given 24 active and 24 passive touch form discrimination trials. The results showed that active touch form discrimination yielded fewer errors than passive touch and that females were better form discriminators than males. The interaction between field dependence, form discrimination and sex showed that in contrast to field independent subjects, field dependent males made more form discrimination errors while females improved. This interaction is discussed in relation to the field dependence literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document