scholarly journals Criminal Combating of the Use of Sexual Services of Minors in the Russian Empire in the Early XX Century and in the Russian Federation on the Modern Stage (Historical and Legal Research)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 52-60
Author(s):  
Andrey V. Makarov ◽  
◽  
Artem S. Petrov ◽  

The paper is a review on the textbook by A. V. Yeremin, «The History of the National Prosecutor’s office» and the anthology «The Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Empire in the Documents of 1722–1917» (authors: V. V. Lavrov, A. V. Eremin, edited by N. M. Ivanov) published at the St. Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the University of the Prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation in 2018. The reviewers emphasize the high relevance and high level of research, their theoretical and practical significance. The textbook and the anthology will help the students increase their legal awareness, expand their horizons.


Ethnomusic ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-114
Author(s):  
Nadiya Suprun-Yaremko ◽  

Musical and folkloristic activities of the Kuban activist Hryhorii Kontsevych, Ukrainian in origin, lasted for half a century under conditions of the Russian Empire, and from 1920 – Soviet totalitarian socio-political reality, of which he became the in- nocent victim in 1937, accused of being involved in the preparation of terrorist attack against Stalin. Kontsevych’ name o and his versatile activity as a chanter, folklorist, composer, teacher and organizer of music affairs in the Krasnodar Territory of the Russian Federation have been hushed up for 52 years (until 1989). In her paper, the author, as a native of the Krasnodar Territory and researcher of folk culture of the Ukrainians from Kuban, set out an objective to draw up a creative portrait of H. Kont- sevych and review his folklore collections and papers that were reprinted or found in the libraries and archives of Krasnodar with the support of the leader of Kuban Cossack Choir, folklorist, Honoured Artist of Russia, Ukraine and Adygea Viktor Zakharchenko. The paper draws up Kontsevych’s creative portrait, examines (based on republication of 2001) the entire corpus of arranged and published in 1904–1913 276 song and analyses the collection “Musical folklore of Adygei in the records by H. M. Kontsevych”, written shortly before his death, but first published in 1997. The research essay “Chumaks in folk songs” introduced to the scientific circulation. The research essay “Chumaks in folk songs” introduced to the scientific circulation. The conclusion is drawn up that it was exactly Hryhorii Komtsevych, who made the great- est contribution to the formation of Kuban musical folklore.


Author(s):  
Aneta Pavlenko

This chapter examines four aspects of language management—nativization, linguistic assimilation, de-russification, and bilingual education—in the multilingual territory first occupied by the Russian Empire, then by the USSR, and then by the successor states. The rationale for this diachronic approach is twofold. The three settings are interrelated: post-Soviet developments cannot be fully understood outside their historic context, just as the full impact of Soviet language policies can only be established through the post-Soviet lens. In addition, sociolinguists generally lack familiarity with Russian and Soviet language management. The discussion focuses on the territories occupied by the fourteen successor states and on their titular languages; the processes taking place in the Russian Federation are sufficiently different to merit a separate review.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-379
Author(s):  
Elena A. Bakina

The article discusses the Eurasian doctrine of Askar Akayev, the president of Kyrgyzstan in 1991-2005. This is a very little studied problem in Russian historiography. Meanwhile, A. Akayev developed and largely implemented in practice a harmonious philosophical and political concept. This article is intended to fill this gap. The place of Russia in the geopolitical concept of A. Akayev deserves special attention, which emphasizes the importance and central role of Russia in Eurasian integration, which never acted as a colonial power, but was a center of attraction for the multinational people of the Russian Empire, the USSR and the Russian Federation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
V M Bolshakova

The article proves the expediency of applying the methodology of chrono-discrete mono-geography comparative jurisprudence when studying judicial transformations in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. The author proves that the judicial reforms of Emperor Alexander II and the judicial transformations late XX - early XXI century in their totality represent a chrono-discrete phenomenon. Examines the basic principles of the scientific school of chrono-discrete mono-geography comparative jurisprudence as applied to the study of Russian judicial reforms in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. In the paper it notes that the judicial transformation as a phenomenon include items such as 1) conceptual framework, ideas of reform; 2) judicial institutions; 3) theoretical and practical problems of implementation; 4) results; compliance, what happened, what was intended by the reformers; 5) attitude of the legal community and the public to reform on the whole and its separate institutions. The essential core of any judicial reform are newly constructed or transformed its institutions. Speaking of chrono-discrete judicial institutions, the author proposes to divide them into classical and non-classical. The first is the Institute of magistrate’s court, the juries and the Institute of bailiffs and institute of appeal. To non-classical chrono-discrete institutions include prosecutors and the legal profession. As the main comparable problems, characteristic for the studied periods, the author sees 1) the reforms “from above”; 2) the issue of financial support for reforms; 3) personnel problems; 4) problem of implementation of judicial reforms in space and time; 5) constant and numerous adjustment of normative legal acts, regulating the structure and activity of the relevant judicial institutions.


Author(s):  
Andrey V. Arkhipov ◽  
◽  

The article examines the history of the emergence and development of Russian legislation on criminal liability for fraud. It is noted that for the first time fraud is mentioned in the legal acts of the second half of the 16th century - the Codes of Justice of Tsars Ivan IV and Fyodor Ioannovich. Initially, fraud was most often understood as a deft but petty theft, in which de-ception was used to facilitate its commission. The understanding of fraud as the theft of other people's property, committed by deception, began to be formed only in the second half of the 18th century with the publication on April 3, 1781 by Empress Catherine II of the Decree "On the court and punishments for theft of different kinds and the establishment of working houses in all the gubernias." In the 19th century, the clarifying process of the content of the term "fraud" continued. It was reflected in the first codified criminal laws of the Russian Empire - Code of crimi-nal and corrective penalties of Russia of 1845 and the Charter on Punishments imposed by the justices of the peace of 1864. A significant contribution to the development of the Russian criminal law on liability for fraud was made by a group of legal scholars involved in the de-velopment of the Criminal Code of the Russian Empire, in which the whole Chapter 33 (Arti-cles 591-598) contained the rules on liability for fraud. Although the 1903 Criminal Code was not fully enacted, it had a significant impact on the formation of criminal law on liability for fraud in subsequent regulations. During the Soviet period, the legislation on the responsibility for fraud continued to develop. For the first time, abuse of trust was mentioned as a method of crime, along with deception. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the adoption in 1993 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law 10 of 01.07.1994 made signifi-cant changes to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 1960 that served as the basis for the system of crimes against property in modern Russia.


Author(s):  
Elena Goltsman

Based on the methodology of chrono-discrete monogeographic comparative law, we identify the comparative potential of bailiffs’ legal status in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. Until recently, the legislation of the Russian Federation did not give a clear idea of bailiffs’ legal position in the civil service. We believe that, speaking about a bailiff’s legal status and comparing the regulatory framework that regulates it, it is necessary to determine what elements constitute a bailiff’s legal status; to compare comparable, conditionally comparable and incomparable elements of this status. At present, this issue is more definite and developed in comparison with the pre-revolutionary period. Comparison of specific elements of legal status in different historical periods may lead to the development of prac-tical recommendations for improving the current legislation governing the structure and activities of the institution of bailiffs. We designate six ele-ments of bailiffs’ legal status, which are fundamentally comparable in rela-tion to the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. We also note the need to take into account the specific historical situation in the studied periods, the specifics of the political, economic, and social structure, and the peculiarities of legal awareness and mentality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-11
Author(s):  
M. I. SEREDINA ◽  
◽  
I. L. CHERKASOV ◽  

The authors considered the background and conducted a brief retrospective analysis of complex spatial studies in the Russian Empire, in Soviet and modern Russia. The use of world theoretical developments in justifying the spatial location of economic objects in the Russian Federation is studied. Conclusions are drawn about the weak level of regional forecasting, programming and planning at different levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document