scholarly journals O PROGRAMA DE INVESTIMENTO EM LOGÍSTICA (PIL): diretrizes, objetivos, política e desfechos

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (20) ◽  
pp. 202104
Author(s):  
Roberto Mauro Da Silva Fernandes ◽  
Márcia Da Silva

THE LOGISTICS INVESTIMENT PROGRAMA (PIL): guidelines, objectives, politics and upshotsEL PROGRAMA DE INVERSIÓN EN LOGÍSTICA (PIL): directrices, objetivos, politica y resultadosRESUMOO Programa de Investimento em Logística (PIL) foi lançado durante a primeira gestão (2011-2014) da Presidenta Dilma Rousseff. O PIL tinha como objetivo ampliar a infraestrutura e a logística referente à movimentação de cargas no Brasil. Entretanto, a produção de conflitivas relações políticas/econômicas/ideológicas no Brasil, entre os anos de 2013 e 2016, influenciou e colocou fim ao que estava previsto. Desta maneira, o objetivo deste artigo é descrever as estratégias, as diretrizes e objetivos do PIL, bem como, demonstrar quais foram os resultados obtidos. Para tal, fizemos uso de levantamento bibliográfico, documental e no ciberespaço.Palavras-chave: Programa de Investimento em Logística; Parceria Público-Privada; Golpe de 2016.ABSTRACTThe Logistics’ Investment Program (PIL) was launched during the first management (2011-2014) of President Dilma Rousseff. The PIL aimed to increase the infrastructure and logistics related to carrying loads in Brazil. However, the production of political/economic/ideological conflicting relations in Brazil, between the years of 2013 and 2016, influenced and putted end to what was planned. In this way, the objective of this article is to describe the strategies, the guidelines and the objectives of the PIL, as well as to demonstrate the results obtained and the political relations that influenced the process. For this, we perform bibliographical, documentary and cyberspace surveys.Keywords: Logistics Investment Program; Public-Private Partnership; Coup of 2016.RESUMEN El Programa de Inversión en Logística (PIL) se lanzó durante la primera gestión (2011-2014) de la Presidenta Dilma Rousseff. El objetivo de la PIL era aumentar la capacidad, la eficiencia, la eficacia y reducir los costos logísticos relacionados con el transporte de cargas en Brasil. Sin embargo, la producción de relaciones políticas/económicas/ideológicas conflictivas en Brasil, entre los años 2013 y 2016, influyó y puso fin a lo planeado. De esta manera, el objetivo de este artículo es describir las estrategias, las directrices y objetivos del PIL, así como, demostrar cuáles fueron los resultados obtenidos y las relaciones políticas que influyeron en el proceso. Así, realizamos levantamiento bibliográfico, documental y en el ciberespacio.Palabras-clave: Programa de Inversión en Logística; Asociación Público-Privada; Golpe de 2016.

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-165
Author(s):  
Nandita Vadali ◽  
Anand Prakash Tiwari ◽  
Thillai Rajan A.

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilal Anwar ◽  
Muhammad Imran Ashraf ◽  
Aftab Alam

This study delineates a 1000 Megawatt (MW) very large scale Photovoltaic (PV) system designed in three phases, from which 100 MW has functional and the remaining two phases of 300MW, 600 MW has yet to be functional at Quaid-eAzam solar park (QSP) in Cholistan desert near Bahawalpur City of Pakistan. This study describes the opportunities and risks in the construction of solar PV plant (QSP), which is constructed through public-private partnership (3P).This study uses the case study as a part of research methodology. Firstly it explains about 3Ps, their various types and necessity. Secondly, explores the critical factors in the construction of QSP PV Plant through PESTLE (political, economic, social, technological, legal, environmental) analysis. Thirdly outlines the effect of RE projects on the socioeconomic status of the periphery which is ignored in previous studies. The recommendations will guide the policymakers how they can embed social acceptance in RE projects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 34-45
Author(s):  
Abel G. Aganbegyan ◽  

In April 2020, Russia entered a structural social and financial-economic crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic and catastrophic decline of oil and gas exports. Assessing the current socio-economic situation in the country, the author concludes that, in contrast to the crisis of 2009, which was mainly financial and economic in nature, the 2020 crisis for the most part has got a social character, when indicators of the people’s well-being are declining particularly. According to the author, only return to planning would ensure implementation of an integrated financial plan, an investment program for the whole country, directive indicators of enterprises and organizations controlled by the state, as well as would impact public-private partnership.


Author(s):  
A A Kinyakin ◽  
Aleksey Vyacheslavovich Teplov ◽  
Mariya Gennad'evna Ivanova ◽  
Ekaterina Andreevna Lutsenko ◽  
Ivan Evgen'evich Khlebnikov ◽  
...  

The paper dedicated to the “round-table” conference “Public-Private Partnership” which was organized by the Department of the comparative politics of the Peoples` Friendship University of Russia (PFUR) and held on December 1 2014 on the faculty of the humanities and social sciences. Among the participants of the conference were the lecturers and the students of the political department of the PFUR.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljubiša Rajić

In the course of the last 150 years about 25 place-name changes have taken place in Belgrade. Some were more significant than others, and some of the renamed places have suffered as many as six name changes. These changes are part of a blanket process that includes renaming of state administration institutions, research institutes, schools, universities, factories, museums, sport clubs, etc., as well as personal names. This process reflects political, economic, demographic, and cultural changes serving the purpose of constructing and reconstructing political, ethnic, religious, and cultural identity, as well as political relations, and history. In this paper the author discusses this renaming process, its causes and consequences, as well as its potential for constructing and reconstructing reality.


2019 ◽  
pp. 61-85
Author(s):  
Brandi Thompson Summers

This chapter highlights the relationship between race, diversity, belonging, and urban development in the historical devaluation of H Street as a Black space, and its revaluation as an emerging multicultural neighborhood. In light of H Street’s violent past, the narrative describing its history reinvents itself in order to write the violent times away and repurpose the neighborhood for a new market and a new time. The chapter also focuses on local programs with intended race-neutral policies that have racial consequences. The chapter further explores how “diversity” is institutionalized as a valuable social commodity to market and constitutes the political economy of the corridor. In other words, the aestheticization of blackness and space contribute to the structuring of H Street as both universal and exclusive. Corporate brands, as well as local public/private partnership organizations, strategically incorporated “diversity” as part of their official language to justify their introduction to the space – signaling affective cohesion with the neighborhood.


2019 ◽  
pp. 429-444
Author(s):  
John Child ◽  
David Faulkner ◽  
Stephen Tallman ◽  
Linda Hsieh

Chapter 20 discusses public–private partnerships (PPPs) between government and major corporations. Generally, in PPPs the government sets the task and agrees the fee, while the private sector does the work and incurs the costs whilst receiving a contractually agreed profit. The project is normally building a major infrastructure facility. This arrangement has been very popular in the UK until recently, as well as in many other countries. In the USA a strong lobby is advocating the increased use of PPPs to update the country’s infrastructure. The chapter notes that the idea of public–private partnership is a good one in principle, but that scandals of excess profits (and sometimes losses) can result from deficiencies in negotiation and implementation. The chapter also considers success criteria for PPPs and concludes that they vary according to the political situation and hence motivation in the country in question.


2020 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 6-19
Author(s):  
Abel G. Aganbegyan ◽  

In April 2020, Russia entered a structural social and financial-economic crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic and catastrophic decline of oil and gas exports. Assessing the current socio-economic situation in the country, the author concludes that, in contrast to the crisis of 2009, which was mainly financial and economic in nature, the 2020 crisis for the most part has got a social character, when indicators of the people’s well-being are declining particularly. According to the author, only return to planning would ensure implementation of an integrated financial plan, an investment program for the whole country, directive indicators of enterprises and organizations controlled by the state, as well as would impact public-private partnership.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-442
Author(s):  
Lyudmila I. PRONYAEVA ◽  
Irina I. KRUZHKOVA

Subject. The article discusses the way the infrastructure of special preferential areas (special economic zones, socio-economic priority development areas) is being developed, and reviews respective processes. Objectives. We evaluate the current trends and identify difficulties in implementing infrastructure projects across preferential areas. Methods. The study relies upon general methods, such as generalization, synthesis and analysis of available scientific results concerning the economic category of infrastructure and classification of its types. We applied general methods of analysis and comparative analysis to determine the future development of the infrastructure in special preferential areas. To detect what hampers PPP infrastructure projects and describe them, we used the synthesized approach and methods of logic-intuitive and comparative analysis. Results. We analyzed the pool of scientific results to determine the economic category of infrastructure and classify its types. We provide our own definition of the infrastructure of preferential areas and evaluate the current trends in infrastructure projects, including those in special preferential areas. Investment in the ongoing projects was found to be insufficient to meet all infrastructure development needs. Public-private partnership was proved to contribute to the infrastructure development in special preferential areas. We discovered some barriers to PPP development mechanisms in special preferential areas. Conclusions and Relevance. Public-private partnership will contribute to the successful implementation of the above projects provided respective parties will eliminate an array of barriers. The elimination of social, political, economic, environmental and other barriers will help the areas become more competitive to secure investment resources and demonstrate better results of the socio-economic development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document