scholarly journals Transformasi Nilai-nilai Hukum Islam dalam Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Teori Hukum Integratif

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Saifullah Saifullah ◽  
Abdul Azis ◽  
Mustafa Lutfi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Judicial Decisions

Abstract:Research examines the rationale and transformation of the value of Islamic law in the Constitutional Court jurisprudence decision No. 06/PUU-II/2004; 27/PUU-VII/2009 and 138/PUU-VII/2009 in the perspective of Integrative Legal Theory (THI). Normative legal research is used with a legislative and conceptual approach and sources of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study are the rationale for decision No: 06/PUU-II/2004 according to QS 2: 185, 286, 4: 58, 135; 5: 6,8,42; 16: 9; 22: 7. No: 27/PUU-VII/2009 according to QS. 2: 185; 5: 6; 22: 78, and No: 138 / PUU-VII / 2009, according to QS 2: 173; 4: 13,58; 5: 3, 8, 42; 6: 119.Transforming the value of Islamic law No. 06/PUU-II/2004, values of justice, human rights, facilities, and humanism. No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, the value of effectiveness, not burdensome, realizing benefits, and No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 the value of creating law, a legal substance, benefit, realizing benefit and justice. Three judicial decisions of the Constitutional Court reviewed from the THI indicator have implemented a system of norms, behavior, and values.Keywords: integrative law; Constitutional Court; jurisprudence.Abstrak: Riset menelaah landasan pemikiran dan transformasi nilai hukum Islam pada yurisprudensi putusan mahkamah konstitusi No.06/PUU-II/2004; 27/PUU-VII/2009 dan 138/PUU-VII/2009 dalam perspektif Teori Hukum Integratif (THI). Penelitian hukum normatif digunakan dengan pendekatan perundangan dan konseptual serta sumber bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian adalah landasan pemikiran putusan No: 06/PUU-II/2004, sesuai QS. 2 :185, 286 ; 4 : 58, 135  ;  5 : 6,8,42 ; 16 :  9 ; 22 : 7. No: 27/PUU-VII/2009, sesuai QS. 2:185 ;  5: 6 ; 22 :78, dan No: 138/PUU-VII/2009, sesuai QS. 2:173 ; 4 : 13,58; 5 : 3, 8, 42 ; 6 : 119.Transformasi nilai hukum Islam No. 06/PUU-II/2004, nilai keadilan, HAM, kemudahan dan humanisme. No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, nilai efektifitas, tidak memberatkan, merealisasikan manfaat, dan No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 nilai terciptanya hukum, substansi hukum, kemaslahatan, merealisasikan kemanfaatan dan keadilan. Tiga putusan yurisprudensi Mahkamah Konstitusi dikaji dari indikator THI telah mengimplemntasikan sistem norma, perilaku dan nilai.  Kata Kunci: hukum integratif; Mahkamah Konstitusi; yurisprudensi.

scholarly journals Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Umbu Rauta ◽  
Ninon Melatyugra
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Constitutional Tradition ◽  
The Relationship

Tulisan ini ingin menjawab dua isu utama mengenai hubungan hukum internasional dan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi RI (MKRI). Isu pertama adalah legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai alat interpretasi dalam pengujian undang-undang, sedangkan isu kedua adalah urgensi penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MKRI. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan historis dalam menjelaskan perkembangan pengujian undang-undang di Indonesia sekaligus menemukan legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional oleh MK RI. Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini menegaskan bahwa hukum internasional memiliki sumbangsih yang penting dalam perannya sebagai alat interpretasi dalam proses pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, khususnya terkait hak asasi manusia. Justifikasi keabsahan praktik penggunaan hukum internasional tersebut ditarik dari tradisi ketatanegaraan yang secara implisit dikehendaki UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Manfaat positif yang diberikan hukum internasional nyatanya harus disertai juga dengan penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK RI supaya hukum internasional dapat digunakan secara tepat. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini dibagi ke dalam empat sub bahasan inti yakni, pengujian undang-undang, penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang oleh MK, legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang, pentingnya penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK.This article intentionally answers two principal issues regarding the relationship between international law and judicial review by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The first issue is the legitimacy of international use as an interpretative tool in judicial review. The second issue talks about the necessity of urgent international law mastery by the Constitutional Court’s judges. This legal research utilizes both a conceptual approach and a historical approach to explain the development of judicial review in Indonesia, and to find legitimacy of international law by the Constitutional Court. The analysis in this article affirms that international law positively contributes as an interpretative tool in judicial review by the Constitutional Court, particularly pertaining to human rights. A justification of a legitimate international law use is withdrawn from constitutional tradition which is implicitly desired by the Indonesian Constitution (UUD NRI 1945). Since international law has provided better insights into norms, a mastery of international law should be encouraged. There are four main discussions in this article: judicial review, application of international law in judicial review process, legitimacy of international law application in judicial review, and the importance of international law mastering by Constitutional Court judges.

scholarly journals An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Xavier Nugraha ◽  
Kusuma Wardani Raharjo ◽  
Ahmad Ardhiansyah ◽  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Guardian

The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, where the Constitutional Court removed the element "Some other deeds or unpleasant treatment/act" in Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. With the removal of the core elements of Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, raises questions related to the existence of the offense whether it still exists or not. Based on this, this study will examine 1) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code Before the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 and 2.) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on this research, it was found that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 that offenses of unpleasant acts had been reconstructed into forced offenses.

scholarly journals The Position of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Agsel Awanisa ◽  
Yusdianto Yusdianto ◽  
Siti Khoiriah
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Case Number

The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutional complaint mechanism based on comparisons in other countries, practices, and adaptation of constitutional complaints under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Many cases with constitutional complaint substance have been submitted to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia even though they don’t have this authority. This research uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a case approach. This research indicates that the constitutional complaint mechanism in Germany, South Korea, and South Africa has been well implemented. In practice, cases with constitutional complaint substance are filed to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia by changing the form by using the legal means of a judicial review, such as case number 16/PUU-VI/ 2008, case number 140/PUU-XIII/2015 and case number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Due to the consideration of the structure, substance, and culture of law, adaptation of constitutional complaint within the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be carried out by amending Law Number 24 of 2003 jo. Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Ulang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
I Kadek Andika Setiawan ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
State Revenue ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
Election Commission

A failed general election will result in a re-election and will certainly require additional budget. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the implementation of the re-election and to analyze the use of the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-election. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for implementing the re-election is a dispute over the results of the disputed General Election, by presidential candidates and members of the legislative candidates through the Constitutional Court decision. The mechanism for the provision of funds from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-General Election is the submission of additional costs by the General Election Commission to the Budget Institution and the Budget Department to revise the budget for the implementation of General Elections that are undergoing re-election.

scholarly journals Menakar Tujuan Hukum dibalik Putusan MA No. 46 P/HUM/2018 Yang Pro Koruptor

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-134
Author(s):  
Nurlindah Nurlindah ◽  
A. Sugirman ◽  
Rosita Rosita
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Track Record ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Executive Body

In welcoming 2019 concurrent general elections, the General Election Commission issued PKPU No. 20 of 2018, one of which banned former convicts of corruption from becoming legislative candidates on the grounds that corruption is an extraordinary offense that is commonly practiced by legislators both individually and in congregation. The regulation is stated in Article 4 paragraph (3) PKPU No. 20 of 2018 concerning Nominations for Members of DPR, Provincial DPRD and Regency / City DPRD. However, the regulation was canceled with the issuance of Supreme Court decision No. 46 P / HUM / 2018. Based on this, the limitation of the problem of this research is how to measure the aspects of the legal objectives behind the decision No. 46 P / HUM / 2018 which are more pro-corrupt so that they can understand the judge's decidendi ratio in canceling the prohibition of ex-convicts from becoming legislators. This type of research is normative legal research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The theoretical basis in the presentation of research results is the theory of legal goals by Gustav Radbruch namely justice, certainty and usefulness which is compared with Islamic law. The results of this study indicate that the Supreme Court's consideration overturned PKPU No. 20 of 2018 because it is considered contrary to Article 240 of Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and Article 12 of Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Laws and Regulations. The Supreme Court's considerations in the a quo ruling contain the three legal objectives. However, it is more inclined to legal certainty, so it does not reflect the value of justice that lives in the community. The cause of not achieving the values of justice that live in the community in the a quo decision is because the basis for testing the regulation is Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections does not prohibit such matters, even though the nomination rules on the executive body namely the President and Vice President require that they do not have a bad track record. Likewise when viewed from Islamic law which requires legislative candidates called ahlul ahli wal aqdi must have a fair way which means having integrity and a good image in the society.

No-Spouse Employment and the Problem of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
I. Gede YUSA ◽  
Bagus HERMANTO ◽  
Nyoman Mas ARYANI
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Employment Policy ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Worker Rights ◽  
The One

The role of Constitutional Court as the protector of human rights related with the effort to guarantee the human rights also the worker’s rights with their decision. The decision in this study related with constitutionality of no-spouse employment norms. This study aims to examine the constitutionality aspects related with no-spouse employment policy related with human rightsor worker rights. This study is using statutory approach, conceptual approach and comparative studies concerning no-spouse employment policy. The results show that no-spouse employment policy is contrary with the Constitution and human rights legal instruments. Moreover, there is problem concerning the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia on the one hand is final and binding but non-executable automatically. This study to encourage the new paradigm to ensure the execution of the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia, in this context related with decision on the constitutionality no-spouse employment norms.  

scholarly journals Perbedaan Pemahaman Konsep Ikrar Talak Menurut Putusan Pengadilan Agama dengan Syariat Islam

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Nourma Dewi ◽  
Femmy Silaswaty
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Islamic Period ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Religious Courts

This study aims to determine the differences in understanding the concept of talaq pledges according to the decisions of religious courts with Islamic Shari'a. This research is normative legal research. The research approach used in this study is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. Based on the results of the research and discussion it can be concluded that there is a concept inconsistency between the religious courts that adhere to the Compilation of Islamic law with Islamic Shari'a which includes the fall of divorce, legal remedies, and the enactment of the Islamic period.

scholarly journals REVITALISASI MAQÂSHID AL-SYARÎ’AH DALAM ISTINBÂTH HUKUM ISLAM: KAJIAN ATAS PEMIKIRAN MUHAMMAD AL-THÂHIR IBNU ‘ÂSYÛR

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Ainol Yaqin
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Personal Rights

The essence of human rights is to protect and ensure the glory and dignity of people. So it becomes important human rights principles stipulated in the legislation in order to guarantee the state of human rights can be implemented optimally. However, there are some parties who deliberately rammed by the Islamic Human Rights as a product of the Liberals are opposed to the  Sharia. In fact, both Islam and human rights, aimed at ensuring the glory and dignity of man as the principles “maqhasidu al-syari’ah” are the main objectives the implementation of Islamic law. This paper aims to prove that human rights are not contrary to Islam because it has been expressly stipulated that one-on-one purpose in religion is upholding human dignity. This paper uses legal research methods that reveal the fact that Islam protects personal rights of his people so that the necessary regulatory and enforcement of human rights in the Indonesia. Tulisan ini terfokus mengkaji pemikiran Ibnu âsyûr tentang maqâṣid al-syarî’ah. Sebagai pemikir islam kontemporer ibnu âsyûr berupaya merumuskan maqâṣid al-syarî’ah menjadi disiplin ilmu yang mandiri dan pertimbangan utama dalam pegistinbathan hukum islam.Konsep independensi maqâṣid al-syarî’ah sebelumnya memang sudah digagas oleh al-syâthibî, namun Ibnu ‘âsyûr memperkokoh dan mempertegas kembali urgensi maqâṣid al-syarî’ah sebagai suatu disiplin ilmu.Menurutnya, ada empat unsur yang paling mendasar dalam pondasi bangunan maqâṣid al-syarî’ah, yaitu al-fithrah, al-musâwah, al-samâhah dan al-hurriyah.Keempat unsur ini mesti mendapat perhatian dan pertimbangan dalam proses pergumulan teks dan konteks realitas kekinian untuk melahirkan diktum-diktum hukum yang berkemashlahatan. Bagi ibnu ‘âsyûr, secara umum berdasarkan pengkajian atas dalil-dalil al-qur’an dan kasus-kasus parsial menunjukkanbahwa tujuan pensyari’atan hukum islam adalah memelihara sistem/tatanan kehidupan umat manusia dan kelestarian kemashlahatan itu dengan cara menjaga kemashlahatan manusia itu sendiri yang meliputi mashlahah akal, perbuatan dan alam dimana ia hidup. Dengan demikian maka bisa dikatakan kaidah umum dalam syari’at islam adalah untuk mewujudkanmashlahah dan menolak mafsadah.

scholarly journals Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap UUD NRI 1945 (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1479
Author(s):  
Irene Angelita Rugian
Keyword(s):  
General Principle ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Narrow Sense ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Test Norms ◽  
Federal Constitutional ◽  
Principle Of Proportionality

AbstractIn several decisions that have been decided by the Mahkamah Konstitusi, some of the judges considerations only test norms with benchmarks contrary to the UUD NRI 1945 or not? However, MK has not tested the basis of the petition itself, there are limitation of rights, open legal policy, and the real harm felt by the petitioner. Therefore, it is necessary to have a principle of proportionality that can be used by judges to assist in deciding cases related to limiting rights and open legal policy. In order to know the concept of the principle of proportionality, it is necessary to conduct a comparative study between Indonesia and Germany by analyzing the concept and development of this principle. The method used is legal research with a statute approach, a case approach, a comparative approach and a conceptual approach. From the results of these studies, it was found that the principle of proportionality in Germany was well conceptualized and developed rapidly. In fact, this principle has become a general principle in the Germany Federal Constitutional Court. Meanwhile in Indonesia, this principle is still unknown and undeveloped like Germany.Keywords: The Principle of Proportionality; Legitimate Aim; Suitability; Neccesity; Balancing in Narrow Sense.AbstrakDalam beberapa putusan yang telah diputus oleh MK, beberapa pertimbangan hakim hanya menguji norma dengan tolak ukur bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 atau tidak? Namun, MK belum menguji sampai kepada dasar dari permohonan itu sendiri, yaitu pembatasan hak, open legal policy, dan kerugian yang nyata dirasakan oleh pemohon. Maka dari itu, perlu adanya prinsip proporsionalitas yang dapat digunakan para hakim untuk membantu memutus perkara yang berkaitan dengan pembatasan hak dan open legal policy. Agar mengetahui konsep dari prinsip proporsionalitas, maka perlu melakukan studi perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Jerman dengan menganalisis konsep dan perkembangan prinsip tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah legal research dengan pendekatan statute approach, case approach, comparative approach dan conceptual appoach. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa prinsip proporsionalitas di Jerman telah terkonsep dengan baik dan berkembang dengan pesat. Bahkan prinsip tersebut telah menjadi prinsip umum dalam Germany Federal Constitutional Court. Sedangkan di Indonesia, prinsip tersebut masih belum dikenal oleh MK. Sehingga, proporsionalitas belum memiliki konsep yang jelas dan tidak berkembang seperti negara Jerman.Kata Kunci: Prinsip Proporsionalitas; Legitimate Aim; Suitability; Neccesity; Balancing in Narrow Sense.

scholarly journals POSSIBILITY TO CORRECT THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN INDONESIAN LAW: COMPARISON BETWEEN SINGAPORE LAW AND INDONESIAN LAW ON BROADCASTING

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63
Author(s):  
Dian Narwastuty ◽  
Christian Nugraha
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Sanction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Fear Of Retaliation

Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. This principle is one of the Human Rights principles that are necessary for the progress of humanity itself. But its existence has always triggered a dispute because of the abuse of the right. The abuse of the rights consists of Hate Speech and Hoaxes. This research is normative legal research that uses a comparative approach and conceptual approach. And also, this research will compare the Freedom of Speech and Broadcasting laws in Indonesia and Singapore, especially law in the broadcasting sector. Theoretically, the benefits of this research are to answer the problem of correcting Freedom of Speech, especially in broadcasting law. Practically, it is helpful for society to know much more about hate speech and hoaxes also the possibility to correct the broadcasting law in Indonesia based on the same regulation in Singapore.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document