scholarly journals Menakar Tujuan Hukum dibalik Putusan MA No. 46 P/HUM/2018 Yang Pro Koruptor

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-134
Author(s):  
Nurlindah Nurlindah ◽  
A. Sugirman ◽  
Rosita Rosita
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Track Record ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Executive Body

In welcoming 2019 concurrent general elections, the General Election Commission issued PKPU No. 20 of 2018, one of which banned former convicts of corruption from becoming legislative candidates on the grounds that corruption is an extraordinary offense that is commonly practiced by legislators both individually and in congregation. The regulation is stated in Article 4 paragraph (3) PKPU No. 20 of 2018 concerning Nominations for Members of DPR, Provincial DPRD and Regency / City DPRD. However, the regulation was canceled with the issuance of Supreme Court decision No. 46 P / HUM / 2018. Based on this, the limitation of the problem of this research is how to measure the aspects of the legal objectives behind the decision No. 46 P / HUM / 2018 which are more pro-corrupt so that they can understand the judge's decidendi ratio in canceling the prohibition of ex-convicts from becoming legislators. This type of research is normative legal research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The theoretical basis in the presentation of research results is the theory of legal goals by Gustav Radbruch namely justice, certainty and usefulness which is compared with Islamic law. The results of this study indicate that the Supreme Court's consideration overturned PKPU No. 20 of 2018 because it is considered contrary to Article 240 of Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and Article 12 of Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Laws and Regulations. The Supreme Court's considerations in the a quo ruling contain the three legal objectives. However, it is more inclined to legal certainty, so it does not reflect the value of justice that lives in the community. The cause of not achieving the values of justice that live in the community in the a quo decision is because the basis for testing the regulation is Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections does not prohibit such matters, even though the nomination rules on the executive body namely the President and Vice President require that they do not have a bad track record. Likewise when viewed from Islamic law which requires legislative candidates called ahlul ahli wal aqdi must have a fair way which means having integrity and a good image in the society.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Ulang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
I Kadek Andika Setiawan ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
State Revenue ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
Election Commission

A failed general election will result in a re-election and will certainly require additional budget. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the implementation of the re-election and to analyze the use of the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-election. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for implementing the re-election is a dispute over the results of the disputed General Election, by presidential candidates and members of the legislative candidates through the Constitutional Court decision. The mechanism for the provision of funds from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-General Election is the submission of additional costs by the General Election Commission to the Budget Institution and the Budget Department to revise the budget for the implementation of General Elections that are undergoing re-election.

scholarly journals The Relevance of the Application of the Presidential Threshold and the Implementation of Simultaneous Elections in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Rizki Bagus Prasetio ◽  
Febri Sianipar
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The One ◽  
Number Of Parties

This research is intended to discuss the relevance of the application of presidential threshold and the implementation of simultaneous general elections in Indonesia. The concept of simultaneous general elections is the implementation of legislative and executive elections which are carried out simultaneously. The implementation of the first simultaneous general elections in Indonesia was motivated by a request for a judicial review of Law Number 42 Year 2008 concerning the Election of the President and Vice President. The Constitutional Court issued the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-IX/2013 with the decision granting part of the request which later gave birth to the implementation of simultaneous elections in Indonesia starting in 2019. However, from the various articles that were reviewed, there was one article that was not decided by the Constitutional Court, namely regarding the presidential threshold. The Constitutional Court is of the opinion that the regulation regarding the presidential threshold is an open legal policy for the legislature. This paper is a normative legal research, with conceptual approach and statute approach to find answers to existing problems. The research source used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as explanation for primary legal materials. From the results of this research, it was found that the simultaneous elections and the presidential threshold were not compatible. On the one hand, the presidential threshold aims to simplify the number of parties.

INTERPRETASI MODERN MAKNA MENYALAHGUNAKAN WEWENANG DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
A'an Efendi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Core Element ◽  
The Core ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Contemporary Interpretation

ABSTRAKKetiadaan kejelasan makna menyalahgunakan wewenang sebagai bagian inti tindak pidana korupsi dalam Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 (UU PTPK), berimplikasi pada kewajiban bagi hakim yang menerapkan pasal tersebut terhadap kasus konkret (kasus tindak pidana korupsi), untuk melakukan interpretasi guna menemukan apa makna yang sebenarnya. Penelitian ini fokus pada masalah interpretasi modern untuk menemukan makna menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan: pertama, menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan UU PTPK harus ditafsirkan dalam konteks tindak pidana dalam ruang lingkup hukum pidana bukan hukum administrasi. Kedua, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 977 K/Pid/2004 yang menafsirkan makna menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam Pasal 3 UU PTPK dengan mengambil alih konsep menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam hukum administrasi adalah tidak tepat. Menafsirkan menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam Pasal 3 UU PTPK sama dengan menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam hukum administrasi, berimplikasi pada dualism pengaturan dan penyelesaian menyalahgunakan wewenang, dan hal ini berakibat pada tidak adanya kepastian hukum.Kata kunci: interpretasi modern; menyalahgunakan wewenang; korupsi. ABSTRACT The lack of clarity on the definition of the term “abusing authority” as the core element of corruption, as stated in Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 (PTPK Law), implies the obligation for judges who apply the article against concrete cases to interpret the real meaning. This research focuses on the problem of modern (contemporary) interpretation to find the purpose of abusing the authority in corruption. The type of research is doctrinal legal research with the legislation approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. This research concludes: First, abusing authority in corruption must be interpreted in the context of criminal acts within the scope of criminal law rather than administrative law. Second, the Supreme Court Decision Number 977 K/Pid/2004 that understanding the meaning of abusing authority in Article 3 of the PTPK Law by taking over the concept of abusing authority in administrative law is inappropriate. Interpreting the term “abusing authority” in Article 3 of the PTPK Law is similar to that in administrative law, can be implicated in the dualism of regulation and resolution of this problem, and this can cause the absence of legal certainty. Keywords: modern interpretation; abuse of authority; corruption.

scholarly journals LEGACY IN DIFFERENT RELIGION AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WAJIBAH HERITAGE AGAINST NON MOSLEM HEIR IN INDONESIAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Sujana
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Religious Differences ◽  
Good Deeds

This study examines more deeply about the judge's consideration in establishing a Muslim as an heir of the assets of a non-Muslim heir in Indonesia, and why wajibah must be chosen as a solution in providing inheritance to non-Muslim heirs in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research by using statute approach conceptual approach and case approach. The result showed that firstly the judges' considerations that deviate from the Word of the Prophet (peace be upon him): "It is not right for a Muslim to inherit unbelievers, nor do infidels inherit Muslims" is based on the values of justice and legal certainty regarding the rights of heirs to the inheritance arising from the relationship of the heirs arising from the relationship kinship that is so close and peaceful despite different beliefs/different religions, the ability of Muslim heirs to receive inheritance from non-Muslim heirs will bring more kemashalatan (goodness) for Islam. By leaving the inheritance of non-Muslim heirs to Muslim heirs, it will safeguard these assets to bring good deeds in accordance with the teachings in Islam. Secondly, mandatory wills are chosen as a way out in giving inheritance to non-Muslim heirs, because the heir does not leave a will or grant during his lifetime to non-Muslim heirs, so that for the sake of fairness, usefulness and legal certainty, the judge with his authority has the authority to determine compulsory testaments to non-Muslim heirs. Because the kinship system in Islamic law is more important when compared to religious differences as a barrier to inheritance.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGEMBALIAN KEWENANGAN ISTIMEWA MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT MELALUI PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Putu Ayu Anastasia Wierdarini
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Material Content ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Strategic Position

The amendment of the Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 positioned the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat no longer as the highest state institution and the highest sovereign of the people. This has implications for the authority of the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat to have a strategic position, namely to UUD 1945, to stipulate GBHN, to elect the president and vice president through amendment of its authority to be very limited and weak. This paper examines jurisdictionally how to restore the privileges possessed by the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat through the amendment of the UUD 1945. A normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach is used to analyze this problem.The results of the study indicate that the MPR's repatriation in the main and vital position in the Indonesian state administration system is very important, namely through amendments to the material content of the UUD 1945 which must be implemented on an ongoing basis.

scholarly journals THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF SUBMISSION IN DIVORCES CASES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-78
Author(s):  
Haqqiyah Uthlufah
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Divorce Law ◽  
Islamic Family Law ◽  
Materials Used

The problem of the principle of submission in the divorce law in the Religious Court by a non-Muslim couple occurs because the couple's marriage is based on Islamic law. What cannot be separated from Islamic law is Islamic family law because it is related to the faith of a Muslim. Islamic family law can only apply to Muslims and cannot apply to non-Muslims. The problem of the principle of submission to the divorce law was incomplete (incomplete norm) or the existence of a legal vacuum (vacuum of norm) in marriage law in Indonesia. This research is a legal research and is normative in nature. The approach used is statutory, case, and conceptual. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary. The method of collecting legal materials is first to qualify the facts and then to qualify the law. The analytical tool used is legal interpretation in the form of principal, systematic and grammatical interpretation.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Yuridis Akta Konsen Roya Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Sebagai Syarat Pencoretan Hak Tanggungan

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Putu Silkyamara Nandha Rossana ◽  
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
Keyword(s):  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach

This study aims to find out and anayze the capacity and the juridical power the deed of consent roya made by a notary as a condition for withdrawal of mortgage rights. This study uses normative legal research with approached by statue and conceptual approach. Based on the findings, it is known the deed of consent roya is a notarial deed which has a functions as a substituted for the lost mortgage certificate, functions as a condition for the write-off ot the mortgage rights. As for the juridicial power of the deed of consent roya can be seen from the perspective of legal certainty where the notary act a role in making the deed to fulfil roya process as the National Land Office and can be a concrete proof that the debt has been paid off and has been written off. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai kapasitas serta kekuatan yuridis akta konsen roya yang dibuat oleh notaris sebagai syarat pencoretan hak tanggungan. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Berdasarkan hasil temuan, diketahui bahwa akta konsen roya merupakan akta notariil yang memiliki kapasitas sebagai pengganti sertifikat hak tanggungan yang hilang, yang berguna sebagai syarat pencoretan hak tanggungan. Adapun mengenai kekuatan yuridis akta konsen roya dapat dilihat dari perspektif kepastian hukum yang mana notaris berperan dalam pembuatan akta tersebut guna memenuhi proses roya di Kantor Pertanahan Nasional dan dapat dijadikan alat pembuktian yang konkrit bahwa utang sudah lunas dan telah dihapuskan.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Jumlah Modal Dasar Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Setelah Berlakunya PP Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Putra Pratama ◽  
I Made Dedy Priyanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Basic Capital ◽  
Before And After

Research on legal certainty the amount of basic capital establishment of limited liability company based on the norms of conflict between article 32 paragraph (1) of the limted liability company law concerning "the limited liability company capital of at least Rp 50,000,000.00" with article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulations The limited liability of the company's capital of limited liability concerning "the founding capital of the company is determined by agreement”. 2 problem are formulated: (1) What is the form for deposit of stock capital on the provisions of article 33 of the limited liability company law, (2) How is the legal certainty of the number of basic capital of the limited liability After the validity of government regulation change of the limited liability company. This purpose research is finding form of the deposit of stock capital and the basic capital of the limited liability company before and after enforcement of government regulation of limited liability of the company. The legal research method used normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. Capital deposits of shares can be made in the form of money and other forms of immovable tangible objects such as land and intangible objects in the form of bill of Rights; and arrangements regarding the underlying capital applicable in the establishment of the limited liability company is Article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulation of the limited liability of the company.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Pemahaman Konsep Ikrar Talak Menurut Putusan Pengadilan Agama dengan Syariat Islam

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Nourma Dewi ◽  
Femmy Silaswaty
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Islamic Period ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Religious Courts

This study aims to determine the differences in understanding the concept of talaq pledges according to the decisions of religious courts with Islamic Shari'a. This research is normative legal research. The research approach used in this study is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. Based on the results of the research and discussion it can be concluded that there is a concept inconsistency between the religious courts that adhere to the Compilation of Islamic law with Islamic Shari'a which includes the fall of divorce, legal remedies, and the enactment of the Islamic period.

scholarly journals Regulation of Foreigner Stay Permit as Director of Limited Liability Company and Investor in Foreign Investment

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-100
Author(s):  
Tri Sutjiati ◽  
Ida Ayu Sadnyini
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Worker ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Foreign Workers ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Ideal Framework

Based to Article 10 Paragraph (1) on Regulation Ministry of Manpower Number 10 Year 2018 Concerning Procedure of Employ Foreign Worker says that employer of the foreign worker is not required to possess any EPP (working permit) to employ foreign workers who are shareholders with the position of the board of directors or board of commissioners, as it is stated before on Article 10 Paragraph (1) Presidential Decree No. 20 Year 2018 Concerning Foreign Worker. Nevertheless, the facility for investors to possess stay permits in Indonesia which is mentioned in Article 22 Paragraph (3), Regulation of Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Number 51 Year 2016 Concerning Change of Regulation Number 24 Year 2016 Concerning Technical Procedures for Application and Issuance of Visit Visas and Limited Stay Visas, says that the investor prohibited working. This study aims to investigate the procedure and the regulations that govern temporary stay permits of directors and foreign investors in Indonesia. The method used in this study is normative legal research and meanwhile, statute approach and conceptual approach are used as the approach of this study. The results of this study showed that 1) higher norms govern action, as to create lower norms, governs realization of action. Presidential Decree has a higher position in the hierarchy from Ministry Regulations. 2) ideal framework of statutory regulations shall consist of a balance portion of justice, legal certainty and finality.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document