scholarly journals Academic Tax Articles 1980-2000: Tax Faculty Productivity Analyses

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Hutchison ◽  
Craig G. White
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Faculty Productivity ◽  
Accounting Research ◽  
Accounting Faculty ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
Doctoral Institutions ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Tax Accounting

This study extends knowledge pertaining to accounting research productivity in taxation and provides data that may be useful for faculty career development or assessment purposes by administrators.  The authors develop an academic tax article database that contains research from 1980 through 2000 and use it to review tax faculty publication quantity and timing over a 20-year career window for both those at doctoral and non-doctoral granting institutions.  Results indicate that publication rates tend to spike within the first five years in academia for faculty at both doctoral and non-doctoral institutions and trail off from that point to year +20.  Further, faculty at doctoral schools published almost twice as many academic tax articles as faculty at non-doctoral institutions.  Relative publication differences between faculty at the two school types remain constant over time.  Additional insights include that non-tax accounting faculty contributed to almost half of all academic tax articles in the study, most faculty retain the tax designation during the first 20 years of their career, movement to doctoral schools by tax faculty happens early in a career, and in contrast, movement from doctoral schools happens later in academia.

scholarly journals Research Productivity of Canadian Radiation Oncology Residents: A Time-Trend Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-12
Author(s):  
Adam Mutsaers ◽  
Sangyang Jia ◽  
Andrew Warner ◽  
Timothy K. Nguyen ◽  
Joanna M. Laba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Resident Training ◽  
Trend Test ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Publication Productivity ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Over Time

(1) Background: Research productivity is a mandatory component of Canadian radiation oncology (RO) resident training. To our knowledge, Canadian RO resident research publication productivity has not previously been analysed. (2) Methods: We compiled a 12-year database of RO residents in Canadian training programs who completed residency between June 2005 and June 2016. Resident names and dates of training were abstracted from provincial databases and department websites and were used to abstract data from PubMed, including training program, publication year, journal, type of research, topic and authorship position. Residents were divided into four time periods and the linear trend test evaluated publication rates over time. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify authorship predictors. (3) Results: 227 RO residents representing 363 publications were identified. The majority were first-author publications (56%) and original research (77%). Overall, 82% of first-author, and 80% of any-author articles were published in resident year 4 or higher. Mean number of publications for first-author and any-author positions increased significantly over time (p = 0.016 and p = 0.039, respectively). After adjusting for gender and time period, large institutions (> 3 residents per year) trended toward associations with more first-author publications (odds ratio (OR): 2.44; p = 0.066) and more any-author publications (OR: 2.49; p = 0.052). No significant differences were observed by gender. (4) Conclusions: Canadian RO resident publication productivity nearly doubled over a 12-year period. The majority of publications are released in the last 2 years of residency, and larger residency programs may be associated with more publications. These findings serve as a baseline as programs transition to Competency Based Medical Education (CBME).

scholarly journals Research Creativity and Productivity in Political Science: A Research Agenda for Understanding Alternative Career Paths and Attitudes Toward Professional Work in the Profession

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
Kim Quaile Hill
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Career Paths ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Scientific Career ◽  
Scientific Careers ◽  
Publication Success ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Over Time

ABSTRACTA growing body of research investigates the factors that enhance the research productivity and creativity of political scientists. This work provides a foundation for future research, but it has not addressed some of the most promising causal hypotheses in the general scientific literature on this topic. This article explicates the latter hypotheses, a typology of scientific career paths that distinguishes how scientific careers vary over time with respect to creative ambitions and achievements, and a research agenda based on the preceding components for investigation of the publication success of political scientists.

scholarly journals Scholarly Research Productivity among Otolaryngology Residency Graduates and its Relationship to Future Academic Achievement

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110043
Author(s):  
Austin L. Johnson ◽  
Adam Corcoran ◽  
Matthew Ferrell ◽  
Bradley S. Johnson ◽  
Scott E. Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Academic Success ◽  
Academic Medicine ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Academic Career ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Fundamental Aspect ◽  
High Positive Correlation ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Publication Rates

Objective: Scholastic activity through research involvement is a fundamental aspect of a physician’s training and may have a significant influence on future academic success. Here, we explore publication rates before, during, and after otolaryngology residency training and whether publication efforts correlate with future academic achievement. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included a random sample of 50 otolaryngology residency programs. From these programs, we assembled a list of residents graduating from the years in 2013, 2014, and 2015. Using SCOPUS, PubMed, and Google Scholar, we compiled the publications for each graduate, and data were extracted in an independent, double-blinded fashion. Results: We included 32 otolaryngology residency programs representing 249 residents in this analysis. Graduates published a mean of 1.3 (SD = 2.7) articles before residency, 3.5 (SD = 4.3) during residency, and 5.3 (SD = 9.3) after residency. Residents who pursued a fellowship had more total publications ( t247 = −6.1, P < .001) and more first author publications ( t247 = −5.4, P < .001) than residents without fellowship training. Graduates who chose a career in academic medicine had a higher number of mean total publications ( t247 = −8.2, P < .001) and first author publications ( t247 = −7.9, P < .001) than those who were not in academic medicine. There was a high positive correlation between residency program size and publications during residency ( r = 0.76). Conclusion: Research productivity correlated with a number of characteristics such as future fellowship training, the pursuit of an academic career, and overall h-index in this study.

NIH Funding of Researchers in Surgery: Decreased Career Development Awards Over Time

2021 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Mary Smithson ◽  
M. Chandler McLeod ◽  
Dan I. Chu ◽  
Greg Kennedy ◽  
Melanie Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Nih Funding ◽  
Over Time

scholarly journals Rankings Season is Here

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Altbach
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Zero Sum ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
Over Time

The major international rankings of higher education have appeared in recent months. The ranking is an inevitable result of the massification and commercialization of higher education worldwide. Ranking presumes a zero-sum game, but in reality, improvement is taking place everywhere. The current rankings are largely measured by research productivity, and they are advantageous for major English-speaking countries. Each ranking use different measures, and also changes over time. The user must be aware of the uses and problems of rankings.

Gender Gaps in North American Research Productivity: Examining Faculty Publication Rates in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S.

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Padilla-Gonzalez ◽  
Amy Scott Metcalfe ◽  
Jesús F. Galaz-Fontes ◽  
Donald Fisher ◽  
Iain Snee
Keyword(s):  
North American ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Gender Gaps ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
American Research ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals 30 years of parasitology research analysed by text mining

Parasitology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (14) ◽  
pp. 1643-1657
Author(s):  
John T. Ellis ◽  
Bethany Ellis ◽  
Antonio Velez-Estevez ◽  
Michael P. Reichel ◽  
Manuel J. Cobo
Keyword(s):  
Text Mining ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
Major Research ◽  
Research Themes ◽  
Antiparasitic Drugs ◽  
Over Time

AbstractBibliometric methods were used to analyse the major research trends, themes and topics over the last 30 years in the parasitology discipline. The tools used were SciMAT, VOSviewer and SWIFT-Review in conjunction with the parasitology literature contained in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions databases. The analyses show that the major research themes are dynamic and continually changing with time, although some themes identified based on keywords such as malaria, nematode, epidemiology and phylogeny are consistently referenced over time. We note the major impact of countries like Brazil has had on the literature of parasitology research. The increase in recent times of research productivity on ‘antiparasitics’ is discussed, as well as the change in emphasis on different antiparasitic drugs and insecticides over time. In summary, innovation in parasitology is global, extensive, multidisciplinary, constantly evolving and closely aligned with the availability of technology.

US academic libraries' staffing and expenditure trends (1996–2016)

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4/5) ◽  
pp. 247-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Starr Hoffman ◽  
Samantha Godbey
Keyword(s):  
Academic Libraries ◽  
The United States ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Size Category ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Education Statistics ◽  
Trends Over Time ◽  
Doctoral Institutions ◽  
Over Time

PurposeThis paper explores trends over time in library staffing and staffing expenditures among two- and four-year colleges and universities in the United States.Design/methodology/approachResearchers merged and analyzed data from 1996 to 2016 from the National Center for Education Statistics for over 3,500 libraries at postsecondary institutions. This study is primarily descriptive in nature and addresses the research questions: How do staffing trends in academic libraries over this period of time relate to Carnegie classification and institution size? How do trends in library staffing expenditures over this period of time correspond to these same variables?FindingsAcross all institutions, on average, total library staff decreased from 1998 to 2012. Numbers of librarians declined at master’s and doctoral institutions between 1998 and 2016. Numbers of students per librarian increased over time in each Carnegie and size category. Average inflation-adjusted staffing expenditures have remained steady for master's, baccalaureate and associate's institutions. Salaries as a percent of library budget decreased only among doctoral institutions and institutions with 20,000 or more students.Originality/valueThis is a valuable study of trends over time, which has been difficult without downloading and merging separate data sets from multiple government sources. As a result, few studies have taken such an approach to this data. Consequently, institutions and libraries are making decisions about resource allocation based on only a fraction of the available data. Academic libraries can use this study and the resulting data set to benchmark key staffing characteristics.

scholarly journals LO17: Examining publication bias among randomized controlled trials in child health research: a follow-up study

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S12-S12 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Crockett ◽  
T. Klassen
Keyword(s):  
Child Health ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Editorial Policy ◽  
Rank Correlation ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Introduction: Non-publication of trial findings results in research waste and compromises medical evidence and the safety of interventions in child health. The objectives of this study were to replicate, compare and contrast findings of a previous study (Klassen et al., 2002) to determine the impact of ethical and editorial mandates to register and publish findings. Methods: Abstracts accepted to the Pediatric Academic Societies meetings (2008-2011) were screened in duplicate to identify Phase-III RCTs enrolling pediatric populations. Subsequent publication was ascertained through a search of electronic databases. Study internal validity was measured using Cochrane Risk of Bias and Jadad Scale, and key variables (e.g., trial design, study stage) were extracted. Pearson X2, t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to examine association between variables and publication status. Logistic regression, log-rank tests, rank correlation and Egger regression were used to assess predictors of publication, time to publication and publication bias, respectively. Results: Compared to our previous study, fewer studies remained unpublished (27.9% vs 40.9%, p=.007). Abstracts with higher sample sizes (p=0.01) and those registered in ClinicalTrials.gov were more likely to be published (p<.0001). There were no differences in quality measures/risk of bias or in preference for positive results (p=0.36) between published and unpublished studies. Mean time to publication was 26.5 months and published manuscripts appeared most frequently in Pediatrics, the Journal of Pediatrics, and Pediatric Emergency Care. The funnel plot (p=0.04) suggests a reduced but ongoing existence of publication bias among published studies. Overall, we observed a reduction in publication bias and in preference for positive findings, and an increase in study size and publication rates over time. Conclusion: Despite heightened safeguards and editorial policy changes in recent decades, publication bias remains commonplace and presents a threat to assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions in child health. Our results suggest a promising trend towards a reduction in publication bias over time and positive impacts of trial registration. Further efforts are needed to ensure the entirety of evidence can be accessed when assessing treatment effectiveness.

Characterizing Accounting Research

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek K. Oler ◽  
Mitchell J. Oler ◽  
Christopher J. Skousen
Keyword(s):  
Academic Discipline ◽  
Financial Information ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
Accounting Research ◽  
Current State ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
Positive Perspective ◽  
Normative Perspective ◽  
Over Time

SYNOPSIS: In response to concerns over the viability of the academic discipline of accounting, we investigate trends in accounting research by examining papers published in six top accounting journals from 1960 to 2007. We use citations made by accounting papers as a proxy for their antecedent ideas and examine trends in citations, topics, and methodologies, in aggregate and by journal. Our results suggest that the growing body of accounting research draws increasingly from both finance and economics. Financial accounting topics and archival methodologies are becoming more dominant over time relative to other topics and methodologies, although these trends vary by journal. Though most concerns we discuss are recent, we find that the situation today is the result of trends set in motion decades ago with an explicit decision by influential researchers to move the discipline from a normative perspective to a positive perspective. Given its current state, accounting research may be broadly characterized as research into the effect of economic events on the process of summarizing, analyzing, verifying, and reporting standardized financial information, and on the effects of reported information on economic events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document