scholarly journals O Papel dos Testes de Estimulação Farmacológica no Diagnóstico da Deficiência de Hormona do Crescimento em Crianças e Adolescentes

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 587
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Gonçalves ◽  
Filipa Correia ◽  
Helena Cardoso ◽  
Teresa Borges ◽  
Maria João Oliveira

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> The incidence of short stature associated with growth hormone deficiency has been estimated to be about 1:4000 to 1:10000. It is the main indication for treatment with recombinant growth hormone.<br /><strong>Objectives:</strong> The aims of the study were to evaluate the results of growth hormone stimulation tests and identify the growth hormone deficiency predictors.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional, analytical and observational study was conducted. We studied all the children and adolescents submitted to growth hormone pharmacological stimulation tests between January 2008 and May 2012. Growth hormone deficiency diagnosis was confirmed by two negatives growth hormone stimulation tests (growth hormone peak &lt; 7 ng/ml). The statistical analysis was performed using student t-test, chi-square, Pearson correlation and logistic regression. Statistical significance determined at the 5% level (p ≤ 0.05).<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Pharmacological stimulation tests were performed in 89 patients, with a median age of 10 [3-17] years. Clonidine (n = 85) and insulin tolerance test (n = 4) were the first growth hormone stimulation tests performed. Growth hormone deficiency was confirmed in 22 cases. In cases with two growth hormone stimulation tests, the growth hormone peak showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.593, p = 0.01). In logistic regression model height (z-score) and the growth hormone peak in first stimulation test were predictors of growth hormone deficiency diagnosis (each one unit increase in z-score decrease the growth hormone deficiency probability).<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> Measurement of IGF-1 cannot be used in diagnosing growth hormone deficiency.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Auxological criteria associated with a positive test seems to be a reliable diagnostic tool for growth hormone deficiency.</p><p><br /><strong>Keywords:</strong> Growth Disorders; Human Growth Hormone/blood.</p>

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A678-A679
Author(s):  
Prim de Bie ◽  
Annemieke C Heijboer ◽  
Martine M L Deckers

Abstract In the Netherlands, the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children follows the Dutch national guidelines for Triage and Diagnosis of Growth Disorders in Children. Initial biochemical evaluation includes an IGF-1 measurement as screening parameter for growth hormone deficiency. Based on the clinical probability of growth hormone deficiency and the IGF-1 Z-score, a growth hormone stimulation test is performed if serum IGF-1 Z-score is &lt; 0 SD in case of a high probability and if serum IGF-1 Z-score is &lt; -1 SD in case of low probability. An IGF-1 Z-score &gt; 0 SD virtually excludes a growth hormone deficiency disorder. The interpretation of growth hormone stimulation testing is dependent on both the peak growth hormone concentration, but also on the baseline IGF-1 Z-score, particularly in cases of partial deficiency. Although, nation wide, Dutch laboratories have harmonized their measurement for IGF-1 (as was previously done for growth hormone), a Dutch harmonized normative data set has not been widely adopted. Moreover a clinical evaluation of the implementation of this dataset based on dynamic testing has not been published. To assess the impact of choice of a particular normative dataset on the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency we recalculated Z-scores of IGF-1 measurements between 2016 and 2019, using our home reference values based on de normative dataset by Elmlinger (E)1, and using the normative datasets defined by Bidlingmaier (B)2 and by the Dutch IGF-1 harmonization program (NL). Based on these three Z-scores, the outcomes of growth hormone stimulation tests performed in this period (n=86) were reassessed according to the interpretation described in the Dutch guideline. Using all three normative datasets the same 4 patients were identified as likely to have a growth hormone deficiency, whereas 10(E), 10(B), or 8(NL) patients were identified as possible partial growth hormone deficiency. In 70(E), 66(B) or 72(NL) patients the growth hormone stimulation test was unaffected. Using normative dataset B, 6 patients displayed a pattern associated with a possible growth hormone resistance, or of bio-inactive growth hormone syndromes, which based on its incidence would be unlikely for a secondary care setting. A striking observation was however, that of all patients with a normal stimulation test 9 (E)/16 (B) or 30 (NL) had a IGF-1 Z-score of &gt; 0 SD. This implies that, for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency, it is safe to implement the Dutch harmonized dataset, which in addition could result in a reduction in the number of growth hormone stimulation tests that have to be performed. References: 1. Elmlinger MW et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42(6):654-64. 2. Bidlingmaier M et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 May;99(5):1712-21.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 385-389
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD NADEEM HAMEED ◽  
FAUZIA SADIQ ◽  
ASIM MUMTAZ ◽  
Hina Mohiuddin ◽  
Sana Khan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Despite the use of growth hormone replacement therapy for decades, our ability to make a definitive diagnosisof growth hormone deficiency in children is limited. Growth hormone stimulation tests have been used to discriminate between Growthhormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature. However all these tests lack reproducibility, accuracy, cost affectivity and safety. Insulinlikegrowth factor-1 is an effector hormone and its serum level may be used as simple, easy to perform diagnostic test for growthhormone deficiency. Objective: To determine the efficacy of IGF-1 as a diagnostic tool in children with growth hormone deficiency. StudyDesign: Prospective cross sectional survey. Place of Study: Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Shalamar Medical & DentalCollege, Lahore. Duration of study: 1st July to 31st December, 2011. Material & Methods: We included 40 children of 3.5 – 17 year ageand detailed clinical data was collected. All these children were subjected to stimulation by standardized exercise on treadmill, after takingbasal blood samples for GH and IGF-1. Post stimulation growth hormone was recorded to identify growth hormone deficient children.Results: 17 (42.5%) children had post stimulation growth hormone level <10ng/ml while 23 (57.5%) had values >10ng/ml. Postexercise stimulation GH level showed weak correlation with IGF-1 in either of the two study groups. P value was found >0.05 in deficientas well as sufficient groups, depicting non significance of IGF-1 in relation to post stimulation GH level. Conclusions: IGF-1 is not asuitable surrogate diagnostic marker for growth hormone deficiency. Diagnosis should always be based on combination of auxologicalbiochemical, radiological and genetic considerations, Abbreviations: GHD – Growth Hormone Deficiency, GH – Growth Hormone,GHSTs – Growth Hormone Stimulation Tests, IGF-1 – Insulin-like Growth Factor-1, MPH – Mid Parental Height, BA – Bone Age.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Iulia Armean ◽  
Raluca Pop ◽  
Iuliana Gherlan ◽  
Ionela Pașcanu

AbstractObjective: The objective of this study was to analyze the performance of 2 stimulation tests used in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.Method: A retrospective study was conducted on a non-random sample of 310 patients, between 2 and 20 years old, who were hospitalized in the Mureș County Hospital’s Endocrinology Department and in the National Institute of Endocrinology C.I. Parhon with short stature between 2009-2015. Inclusion criteria: all subjects who underwent growth hormone stimulation tests in accordance with the national protocol. Microsoft Office Excel was used for data collection and MedCalc v 12.5 was used for statistical analysis.Results: From the total of 310 patients, 102 were diagnosed in Târgu Mureș and 208 in Bucharest. Sex ratio favored boys (boys:girls 1.64:1). In 173 subjects growth hormone deficiency was confirmed. For both tests the percentage of maximum response was the highest for the 60 minutes blood sample regardless if the test were positive or not. Both tests have 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value, with the highest specificity for the 60 minutes clonidine and 30 minutes insulin. The false positive rate was 60% for the insulin test and 27.2% for clonidine for Târgu Mureș sample and 86.9% for the insulin test and 62.5% for clonidine for Bucharest sample. The concordance of the 2 tests was 49.36%.Conclusions: Stimulating growth hormone testing has a number of limitations but is still needed in some auxological circumstances. We recommend performing the clonidine test first to exclude idiopathic short stature and then the insulin tolerance test for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.


Author(s):  
George M Bright ◽  
Peter A Morris ◽  
Ron G Rosenfeld

Given the low prevalence rate of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and the high false positive rates for growth hormone stimulation tests, the probability of GHD in a child with short stature and positive growth hormone stimulation tests is 0.028 (about 1 in 36). Without further information, most positive growth hormone stimulation tests will be false positives. Further study may yield the necessary improvements in the diagnostic accuracy for GHD in children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regis Coutant ◽  
Jordi Bosch Muñoz ◽  
Cristina Patricia Dumitrescu ◽  
Dirk Schnabel ◽  
Caroline Sert ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe International Cooperative Growth Study, NutropinAq® European Registry (iNCGS) (NCT00455728) monitored long-term safety and effectiveness of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH; NutropinAq® [somatropin]) in paediatric growth disorders.MethodsOpen-label, non-interventional, post-marketing surveillance study recruiting children with growth disorders. Endpoints included gain in height standard deviation score (SDS), adult height, and occurrence of adverse events (AEs).Results2792 patients were enrolled. 2082 patients (74.6%) had growth hormone deficiency (GHD), which was isolated idiopathic in 1825 patients (87.7%). Non-GHD diagnoses included Turner syndrome (TS) (n=199), chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) (n=10), other non-GHD (n=498), and missing data for three participants. Improvements from baseline height SDS occurred at all time points to Month 132, and in all subgroups by disease aetiology. At Month 12, mean (95% CI) change in height SDS by aetiology was: idiopathic GHD 0.63 (0.61;0.66), organic GHD 0.71 (0.62;0.80), TS 0.59 (0.53; 0.65), CRI 0.54 (-0.49;1.56), and other non-GHD 0.64 (0.59;0.69). Mean height ( ± SD) at the last visit among the 235 patients with adult or near-adult height recorded was 154.0 cm ( ± 8.0) for girls and 166.7 cm ( ± 8.0) for boys. The most frequent biological and clinical non-serious drug-related AEs were increased insulin-like growth factor concentrations (314 events) and injection site haematoma (99 events). Serious AEs related to rhGH according to investigators were reported (n=30); the most frequent were scoliosis (4 events), epiphysiolysis (3 events), and strabismus (2 events).ConclusionsThere was an improvement in mean height SDS in all aetiology subgroups after rhGH treatment. No new safety concerns were identified.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 929-937
Author(s):  
S. Douglas Frasier

No suggested screening test meets all of the criteria set for such a procedure. The minimum incidence of a positive response in normal children detected in a single blood sample after diethylstilbestrol, sleep or exercise is approximately 70%. This is higher than that observed when a single sample is obtained following oral glucose. While both sleep and exercise are physiologic stimuli, the former may be quite inconvenient unless an outpatient facility staffed with appropriate personnel is available. An exercise test employed in the office may well be the best screening procedure for the practicing physician. The optimal criteria for a definitive test of growth hormone function are also not met by any single stimulus. Insulin-induced hypoglycemia, arginine infusion, intramuscular glucagon and oral 1-DOPA are all useful procedures. None alone discriminate completely between the normal and the growth hormone-deficient child. Despite potential hazards, insulin-induced hypoglycemia remains the standard against which other stimuli are judged. Arginine and 1-DOPA appear to be equally effective. The literature contains insufficient data to allow adequate evaluation of intramuscular glucagon alone, and the results of combined propranolol-glucagon stimulation, while promising, require confirmation. Because of an inconstant and/or small magnitude of response leading to results which are difficult to interpret, the use of glucose, pyrogen, vasopressin and ACTH are not adequate tests of growth hormone function. Bovril® is a satisfactory stimulus for those children who will take it. Those factors which modify the growth hormone response must be considered in evaluating the results of stimulation tests. Blunted responses should be interpreted with extreme caution in the obese child. A fasting growth hormone concentration ≥ 7 ng/ml is presumptive evidence of intact growth hormone function regardless of the subsequent response to stimulation. It is essential that patients be euthyroid in order to interpret the results of growth hormone function tests. Physiologic glucocorticoid replacement therapy should not confuse the interpretation of results. Whether or not pretreatment with sex steroids is worthwhile in the routine evaluation of children for suspected growth hormone deficiency is an open question. Although it is agreed that the definitive diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency depends on the demonstration of failure to respond to two stimuli, which two are most satisfactory is not settled. The sequential administration of arginine and insulin on the same day appears to limit significantly the incidence of false-positive laboratory diagnoses of growth hormone deficiency. The significance of intermediate values in response to stimulation remains unclear. Caution should be exercised in assigning a child to the category of partial growth hormone deficiency. This question must be answered ultimately by the response to HGH therapy in the individual patient. Finally, several points should be kept in mind. All of the tests described depend on the detection and quantitation of immunologically active HGH and biological activity is not necessarily associated with the material(s) being measured. Since many of the stimuli used in the evaluation of growth hormone function are clearly pharmacologic, the physiological significance of the response to such stimuli must be interpreted with caution. The best current evidence suggests that all of the stimuli described act through an intact hypothalamus and pituitary. Differentiation between hypothalamic and pituitary sites of defective growth hormone function awaits the availability of growth hormone-releasing factor(s).


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e231056
Author(s):  
Hiya Boro ◽  
Alpesh Goyal ◽  
Rajesh Khadgawat

Hypoglycaemia in infants and children is caused by a number of endocrine and metabolic defects, some of which are unique to this age group. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been rarely reported as a cause of recurrent fasting hypoglycaemia in children. An 18-month-old male child presented to us for evaluation of neuroglycopenic symptoms caused by recurrent episodes of fasting hypoglycaemia. Laboratory evaluation revealed ketotic hypoinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. The child was diagnosed to have GHD on the basis of two failed stimulation tests. A detailed work-up for metabolic and other hormonal causes of hypoglycaemia was negative. We present the case for its rarity and to highlight the importance of a detailed metabolic and hormonal assessment in evaluation of childhood hypoglycaemia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1191-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. J. Yuen ◽  
Beverly M. K. Biller ◽  
Sally Radovick ◽  
John D. Carmichael ◽  
Sina Jasim ◽  
...  

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH–stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document. LAY ABSTRACT This updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH–stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH–stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH–stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement. Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone–releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor–binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document