scholarly journals Metodologia SOAP na Formação da Medicina Geral e Familiar em Contexto Prático

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Miguel Santiago ◽  
Isabel Neto

Introduction: Medical records in General Practice/Family Medicine are an essential information support on the health status of the patient and a communication document between health professionals. The development of competencies in General Practice/Family Medicine during pre-graduation must include the ability to make adequate medical records in practical context. As of 2012, medicine students at the University of Beira Interior have been performing visits using the Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - SOAP methodology, with a performance evaluation of the visit, with the aim to check on which Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - SOAP aspects students reveal the most difficulties in order to define improvement techniques and to correlate patient grade with tutor evaluation.Material and Methods: Analysing the evaluation data for the 2015 - 2016 school year at the General Practice/Family Medicine visit carried out by fourth year students in medicine, comparing the averages of each item in the Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - SOAP checklist and the patient evaluation.Results: In the Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - SOAP, 29.7% of students are on the best grade quartile, 37.1% are on the best competencies quartile and 27.2% on the best patient grade quartile. ‘Evolution was verified/noted’ received the worst grades in Subjective, ‘Record of physical examination focused on the problem of the visit’ received the worst grades in Objective, ‘Notes of Diagnostic reasoning / differential diagnostic’ received de worst grades in Assessment and ‘Negotiation of aims to achieve’ received the worst grades in Plan. The best tutor evaluation is found in ‘communication’.Discussion: Only one single study evaluated student´s performance under examination during a visit, with similar results to the presentone and none addressed the patient’s evaluation.Conclusion: Students revealed a good performance in using the Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - SOAP. The findings represent the beginning of the introduction of the Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - SOAP to the students. This evaluationbreaks ground towards better ways to teach the most difficult aspects.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-724
Author(s):  
Artem V. KRIVOSHEEV

Subject. This article explores the need of public sector organizations, and universities in particular, to classify the source data to conduct a reliable and trustworthy analysis of their financial stability. Objectives. The article aims to develop information support for a comprehensive economic analysis of the financial stability of the university by determining the sources of data used to analyze its financial stability. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of analysis, synthesis, and comparison. Results. Based on the study of accounting (financial) reporting indicators, the article proposes to determine three levels of data systematization, i.e. managerial, departmental, and public ones. The article substantiates proposals to clarify the provisions of the Instructions on the preparation, presentation of the annual, quarterly accounting of State (municipal) budgetary and autonomous institutions for economic analysis of the financial stability of public sector institutions. Conclusions. The current state of the methods used to assess financial stability makes it difficult to widely disseminate and implement them in the analytical activities of public sector institutions, including universities. Practical application of the original developments by grouping data sources to analyze the financial stability of the university, as well as the division of these groups into levels will help provide the most objective assessment, which will have a high degree of confidence in the assessment of the financial sustainability of budgetary and autonomous institutions of higher education.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Bernardo ◽  
David Gonzalez-Chica ◽  
Jackie Roseleur ◽  
Luke Grzeskowiak ◽  
Nigel Stocks

Abstract Focus and outcomes for participants Modern technologies offer innovative ways of monitoring health outcomes. Electronic medical records (EMRs) stored in primary care databases provide comprehensive data on infectious and chronic conditions such as diagnosis, medications prescribed, vaccinations, laboratory results, and clinical assessments. Moreover, they allow the possibility of creating a retrospective cohort that can be tracked over time. This rich source of data can be used to generate results that support health policymakers to improve access, reduce health costs, and increase the quality of care. The symposium will discuss the use and future of routinely-collected EMR databases in monitoring health outcomes, using as an example studies based on the MedicineInsight program, a large general practice Australian database including more than 3.5 million patients. This symposium welcomes epidemiologists, researchers and health policymakers who are interested in primary care settings, big data analysis, and artificial intelligence. Rationale for the symposium, including for its inclusion in the Congress EMRs are becoming an important tool for monitoring health outcomes in different high-income countries and settings. However, most countries lack a national primary care database collating EMRs for research purposes. Monitoring of population health conditions is usually performed through surveys, surveillance systems, or census that tend to be expensive or performed over longer time intervals. In contrast, EMR databases are a useful and low-cost method to monitor health outcomes and have shown consistent results compared to other data sources. Although these databases only include individuals attending primary health settings, they tend to resemble the sociodemographic distribution from census data, as in countries such as Australia up to 90% of the population visit these services annually. Results from primary care-based EMRs can be used to inform practices and improve health policies. Analysis from EMRs can be used to identify, for example, those with undiagnosed medical conditions or patients who have not received recommended screenings or immunisations, therefore assessing the impact of government programmes. At a practice-level, healthcare staff can have better access to comprehensive patient histories, improving monitoring of people with certain conditions, such as chronic cardiac, respiratory, metabolic, neurological, or immunological diseases. This information provides feedback to primary care providers about the quality of their care and might help them develop targeted strategies for the most-needed areas or groups. Another benefit of EMRs is the possibility of using statistical modelling and machine learning to improve prediction of health outcomes and medical management, supporting general practitioners with decision making on the best management approach. In Australia, the MedicineInsight program is a large general practice database that since 2011 has been routinely collecting information from over 650 general practices varying in size, billing methods, and type of services offered, and from all Australian states and regions. In the last few years, diverse researchers have used MedicineInsight to investigate infectious and chronic diseases, immunization coverage, prescribed medications, medical management, and temporal trends in primary care. Despite being initially created for monitoring how medicines and medical tests are used, MedicineInsight has overcome some of the legal, ethical, social and resource-related barriers associated with the use of EMRs for research purposes through the involvement of a data governance committee responsible for the ethical, privacy and security aspects of any research using this data, and through applying data quality criteria to their data extraction. This symposium will discuss advances in the use of primary care databases for monitoring health outcomes using as an example the research activities performed based on the Australian MedicineInsight program. These discussions will also cover challenges in the use of this database and possible methodological innovations, such as statistical modelling or machine learning, that could be used to improve monitoring of the epidemiology and management of health conditions. Presentation program The use of large general practice databases for monitoring health outcomes in Australia: infectious and chronic conditions (Professor Nigel Stocks) How routinely collected electronic health records from MedicineInsight can help inform policy, research and health systems to improve health outcomes (Ms Rachel Hayhurst) Influenza-like illness in Australia: how can we improve surveillance systems in Australia using electronic medical records? (Dr Carla Bernardo) Long term use of opioids in Australian general practice (Dr David Gonzalez) Using routinely collected electronic health records to evaluate Quality Use of Medicines for women’s reproductive health (Dr Luke Grzeskowiak) The use of electronic medical records and machine learning to identify hypertensive patients and factors associated with controlled hypertension (Ms Jackie Roseleur) Names of presenters Professor Nigel Stocks, The University of Adelaide Ms Rachel Hayhurst, NPS MedicineWise Dr Carla Bernardo, The University of Adelaide Dr David Gonzalez-Chica, The University of Adelaide Dr Luke Grzeskowiak, The University of Adelaide Ms Jackie Roseleur, The University of Adelaide


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Miguel Santiago ◽  
Inês Silva ◽  
José Augusto Simões

Abstract Background Undergraduate teaching of General Practice/Family Medicine (GP/FM) must ensure students acquire the necessary competencies and skills to perform an adequate GP/FM consultation with adequate annotations (the SOAP model) and classifications.Objective To study and to correlate students’ evaluation by tutors and patients in specific consultations in the formal practical evaluation of GP/FM Curricular Unit of the Integrated Masters on Medicine at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra (IMM-FMUC) in the academic years of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019.Methods Observational study of the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years of the assessment grids for tutor’s evaluation of SOAP performance and fluency in consultation and for patient’s evaluation of the student ‘performance, in the convenience sample of those who chose to be so evaluated.Results We studied a population of 435 (67,7%) out of a universe of 646 students, 125 (28,7%) males, ns by sex and academic year who performed this evaluation. In a mark up to 20 from tutors, difference was found for Plan (P) mark, higher in 2018-2019 (18,38±2,18 vs 18,54±2,11, p=0,005) of the SOAP methodology evaluation. Patients’ evaluation was not different 19,34±1,70 vs 19,35±1,40, p=0,091. A positive significant correlation was found between tutors and patients marks (ρ=0,278; p<0,001), as well as between tutor mark and final mark (ρ=0,958; p<0,001) and patient and final marks (ρ=0,465; p<0,001). Final marks were not different in both years, 18,61±1,38 vs 18,78±1,15, p=0,158.Conclusions This innovative model of evaluation of student’s performance in medical appointment, showed a significant positive moderate correlation between patients’ and tutors’ marks in the setting of GP/FM at the IMM-FMUC, and was not different between years. Yearly evaluation must be continued.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Miguel Santiago ◽  
Inês Rosendo Silva ◽  
José Augusto Simões

Abstract Background: Undergraduate teaching of General Practice/Family Medicine (GP/FM) must ensure students acquire the necessary competencies and skills to perform an adequate GP/FM consultation with adequate annotations (the SOAP model) and classifications. So aimed to study and to correlate students’ evaluation by tutors and patients in specific consultations in the formal practical evaluation of GP/FM Curricular Unit of the Integrated Masters on Medicine at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra (IMM-FMUC) in the academic years of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019.Methods: Observational study of the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years of the assessment grids for tutor’s evaluation of SOAP performance and fluency in consultation and for patient’s evaluation of the student ‘performance, in the convenience sample of those who chose to be so evaluated.Results: We studied a population of 435 (67,7%) out of a universe of 646 students, 125 (28,7%) males, ns by sex and academic year who performed this evaluation. In a mark up to 20 from tutors, difference was found for Plan (P) mark, higher in 2018-2019 (18,38±2,18vs18,54±2,11, p=0,005) of the SOAP methodology evaluation. Patients’ evaluation was not different 19,34±1,70vs19,35±1,40, p=0,091. A positive significant correlation was found between tutors and patients marks (ρ=0,278; p<0,001), as well as between tutor mark and final mark (ρ=0,958; p<0,001) and patient and final marks (ρ=0,465; p<0,001). Final marks were not different in both years, 18,61±1,38vs18,78±1,15, p=0,158.Conclusions: This innovative model of evaluation of student’s performance in medical appointment, showed a significant positive moderate correlation between patients’ and tutors’ marks in the setting of GP/FM at the IMM-FMUC, and was not different between years. Yearly evaluation must be continued.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e045643
Author(s):  
Alison Fielding ◽  
Benjamin Eric Mundy ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Linda Klein ◽  
Sarah Gani ◽  
...  

IntroductionClinical teaching visits (CTVs) are formative workplace-based assessments that involve a senior general practitioner (GP) observing a clinical practice session of a general practice registrar (specialist vocational GP trainee). These visits constitute a key part of Australian GP training. Despite being mandatory and resource-intensive, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the content and educational utility of CTVs. This study aims to establish the content and educational utility of CTVs across varying practice settings within Australia, as perceived by registrars and their assessors (‘CT visitors’). In addition, this study aims to establish registrar, CT visitor and practice factors associated with CTV content and perceived CTV utility ratings.Methods and analysisThis study will collect data prospectively using online questionnaires completed soon after incident CTVs. Participants will be registrars and CT visitors of CTVs conducted from March 2020 to January 2021. The setting is three Regional Training Organisations across four Australian states and territories (encompassing 37% of Australian GP registrars).Outcome factors will be a number of specified CTV content elements occurring during the CTV as well as participants’ perceptions of CTV utility, which will be analysed using univariate and multivariable regression.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been granted by the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee, approval number H-2020-0037. Study findings are planned to be disseminated via conference presentation, peer-reviewed journals, educational practice translational workshops and the GP Synergy research subwebsite.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Altinoluk-Davis ◽  
S Gray ◽  
I Bray

Abstract Background This study assesses whether increased coverage of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination differs between areas where school nurses deliver catch-up MMR doses to adolescents in school settings, compared to signposting to general practice. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Child Health Information Services records within the NHS England South (South Central) commissioning boundary. The sample population included children born 1 September 2000–31 August 2001, in school year 9 during the 2014–15 academic year. Results The primary outcome findings show an increase in coverage of at least one dose of MMR by 1.6% (n = 334) in the cohort receiving catch-up MMR, compared to 0.2% (n = 12) in the cohort signposted to general practice. Over time, the difference in increase between the two cohorts was 1.4%, analysed using the chi-squared comparison of proportions test, providing strong evidence (P &lt; 0.0001) that school nurse delivery of catch-up MMR is effective at increasing coverage. The findings also suggest that school nurse delivery of catch-up MMR may benefit Black, Asian and minority ethnic children and those from more deprived backgrounds. Conclusions It is recommended that commissioners of school-aged immunization services incorporate the delivery of catch-up MMR doses in their contracts with school nurses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i34-i35
Author(s):  
M Carter ◽  
N Abutheraa ◽  
N Ivers ◽  
J Grimshaw ◽  
S Chapman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Audit and Feedback (A&F) involves measuring data about practice, comparing it with clinical guidelines, professional standards or peer performance, and then feeding back the data to individuals/groups of health professionals to encourage change in practice (if required). A 2012 Cochrane review (1) found A&F was effective in changing health professionals’ behaviour and suggested that the person who delivers the A&F intervention influences its effect. Increasingly, pharmacists work in general practice and often have responsibility for medication review and repeat prescriptions. The effectiveness of pharmacist-led A&F in influencing prescribing behaviour is uncertain. Aim This secondary analysis from an ongoing update of the original Cochrane review aims to identify and describe pharmacist-led A&F interventions and evaluate their impact on prescribing behaviour in general practice compared with no intervention. Methods This sub-review is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020194355 and complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (2). For the updated Cochrane review, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group searched MEDLINE (1946 to present), EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library (March 2019) to identify randomised trials featuring A&F interventions. For this sub-review, authors screened titles and abstracts (May 2020) to identify trials involving pharmacist-led A&F interventions in primary care, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB) in eligible studies. Review results are summarised descriptively. Heterogeneity will be assessed and a random-effects meta-analysis is planned. Publication bias for selected outcomes and the certainty of the body of evidence will be evaluated and presented. Sub-group analyses will be conducted. Results Titles and abstracts of 295 studies identified for inclusion in the Cochrane A&F review update were screened. Eleven studies (all cluster-randomised trials) conducted in 9 countries (Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Republic of Ireland, UK, Australia, Malaysia, USA) were identified for inclusion (Figure 1). Six studies had low RoB, two had high risk due to dissimilarities between trial arms at baseline and/or insufficient detail about randomisation, and three studies had unclear RoB. Studies examined the effect of A&F on prescribing for specific conditions (e.g. hypertension), medications (e.g. antibiotics), populations (e.g. patients &gt;70), and prescribing errors (e.g. inappropriate dose). The pharmacist delivering A&F was a colleague of intervention participants in five studies. Pharmacists’ levels of skill and experience varied; seven studies reported details of pharmacist training undertaken for trial purposes. A&F interventions in nine studies demonstrated changes in prescribing, including reductions in errors or inappropriate prescribing according to the study aims and smaller increases in unwanted prescribing compared with the control group. Data analyses are ongoing (results will be available for the conference). Conclusion The preliminary results demonstrate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led A&F interventions in different countries and health systems with influencing prescribing practice to align more closely with guidance. Studies measured different prescribing behaviours; meta-analysis is unlikely to include all 11 studies. Further detailed analysis including feedback format/content/frequency and pharmacist skill level/experience, work-base (external/internal to recipients), will examine the impact of specific features on intervention effectiveness. References 1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(6):CD000259. 2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document