scholarly journals Influence of enamel acid-etching on mechanical properties and nanoleakage of resin composite after aging

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick Kamiya Coppini ◽  
Lúcia Trazzi Prieto ◽  
Josué Junior Araujo Pierote ◽  
Cíntia Tereza Pimenta de Araújo ◽  
Dayane Carvalho Ramos Salles de Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Artificial Aging ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Thermomechanical Cycling ◽  
Knoop Microhardness

The aim of this study was to evaluate how acid-etching of the cavosurface enamel in Class I resin composite restorations influences the bond strength to the pulpal wall and the restoration, Knoop microhardness and nanoleakage after thermomechanical aging. For this research 76 fresh human molars were selected and restored with Silorane or Clearfil SEBond/Z350XT composite divided in 4 groups (Silorane system restored with or without enamel cavosurface acid-etching and Clearfil SEBond/Z350XT with or without enamel cavosurface acid-etching). To induce artificial aging, samples were subjected to thermomechanical cycling through 200,000 and thermal cycling between 5 and 55 °C with 30 second filling and 15-second drainage steps. Microhardness and microtensile bond strength were evaluated in 32 teeth (n=8) each and nanoleakage evaluation was performed in 12 teeth (n=3). Samples restored by Clearfil SEBond/Z350 XT without cavosurface acid-etching showed significantly lower microtensile bond strength results. The resin composite Z350XT presented higher values of Knoop microhardness. It was observed little or no infiltration for Silorane groups and moderate infiltration for Clearfil SE Bond groups. Acid-etching of the cavosurface enamel during restoration procedure with Clearfil Se Bond resulted in a stronger bond after thermomechanical cycling. Silorane groups showed less infiltration than Clearfil SE Bond groups.

scholarly journals Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-182
Author(s):  
Fabiana França ◽  
Jonathan Tenuti ◽  
Isabela Broglio ◽  
Lara Paiva ◽  
Roberta Basting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Fracture Strength ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Thermomechanical Cycling ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Knoop Microhardness

The aim of this study was to compare low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill composites for Knoop microhardness (KHN), microtensile bond strength (MTBS) to dentin in occlusal cavities, and fracture strength (FS) in molars with mesialocclusal-distal restoration. Disk-shaped samples with different thicknesses (2 or 4 mm) of low-viscosity (SDR Flow, Dentsply) and high-viscosity bulk-fill composites (Filtek BulkFill, 3M ESPE; and Tetric-N Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared for top and bottom KHN analysis (n=10). MTBS to dentin and fracture pattern was evaluated in human molars with occlusal cavities restored with (n=10): conventional nanocomposite (Z350XT, 3M ESPE), low-viscosity (Filtek Bulk-fill Flow, 3M ESPE) or high-viscosity bulk-fill composites (Filtek BulkFill). The FS and fracture pattern of human molar with mesial-occlusal-distal restorations submitted or not to thermomechanical cycling were investigated (n=10) using: intact tooth (control), and restoration based on conventional microhybrid composite (Z250, 3M ESPE), low-viscosity (SDR Flow) or high-viscosity bulk-fill composites (Filtek BulkFill). The data were submitted to split-plot ANOVA (KHN), one-way ANOVA (MTBS), two-way ANOVA (FS) followed by Tukey’s test (α=0.05). For KHN, there was no significant difference for the resin composites between the top and bottom. For MTBS, no significant differences among the materials were detected; however, the low-viscosity composite presented lower frequency of adhesive failures. For FS, there was no significant difference between composites and intact tooth regardless of thermomechanical cycling. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill composites have comparable microhardness and microtensile bond strength when used in occlusal restorations. Likewise, the bulk-fill composites present similar fracture strength in molars with mesio-occlusal-distal restorations.

scholarly journals Evaluating Resin-Dentin Bond by Microtensile Bond Strength Test: Effects of Various Resin Composites and Placement Techniques

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 409-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horieh Moosavi ◽  
Fatemeh Maleknejad ◽  
Maryam Forghani ◽  
Elham Afshari
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Class I ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Filling Method ◽  
Bulk Insertion

Objectives : This in vitro study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of a methacrylate- based compared to a silorane-based resin composite in Class I cavity using different placement techniques.Materials and Methods: Class I cavities with dimension of (4 mm long, 4 mm wide, 3 mm deep) were prepared in extracted sound human molars. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups. The first three groups were filled with Filtek P90 using three methods of insertion; bulk, incremental and snow-plow, and the remaining three groups were filled with Clearfil AP-X using the same three placement techniques. After 24 hours of storage in water at 37°C, the specimens were thermocycled to 1000 cycles. Specimens were prepared for MTBS testing by creating bonded beams obtained from the pulpal floor. Statistical analysis used: Statistical analyses of data were performed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey (α=.05). Results: The experiment showed significant differences between the two resin composites with regard to filling techniques (P<0.05). The MTBS was significantly higher in each of Filtek P90 subgroup compared to Clearfil AP-X ones (P<0.05). With respect to filling technique in both resin composites, bulk insertion showed the significantly lowest MTBS (P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between the outcome of incremental and snow-plow techniques (P>0.05). Conclusion: Silorane-based resin composite as opposed to methacrylate based resin composite and layering placements in contrast to bulk filling method had higher microtensile bond strength.

scholarly journals Influence of Water Aging on Microtensile Bond Strength of a Flowable and a Packable Bulk-fill Resin Composites to Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Ayah Atif Selim ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Abo Elezz ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Aging Effect ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Influence Of Water

AIM: Investigation of the aging effect on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite (RC) versus a conventionally incrementally applied one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 45 sound human impacted third molars extracted molars have been selected to prepare specimens for the μTBS test. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C) according to type of RC material which used for restoring the teeth. Where nanohybrid RC (Grandio®SO) was used as the control Group (C1), packable bulk-fill RC (X-tra fil®) was used for restoring teeth in C2 group and flowable bulk-fill RC (X-tra base®) was used for restoring teeth in C3 group. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 5) according to the water storage time, where in subgroup 1; teeth were stored for 24 h, subgroup 2; teeth were stored for 3 months while for subgroup 3; and teeth were stored for 6 months. After water storage, teeth were sectioned for preparation of μTBS testing beams. Maximum tensile stresses were recorded in megapascal (MPa). RESULTS: After 24 h of water storage, the X-tra base® showed a higher statistically significant μTBS to dentin (33.82 ± 9.84 MPa) than did the other two types of RCs. After 3 months, the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean value of μTBS (10.90 ± 5.66 MPa), meanwhile, after 6 months of water storage Grandio®SO showed the highest mean value of μTBS (15.85 ± 6.76 MPa). Regardless of the time the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean of μTBS (15.07 ± 11.73 MPa), while there is no significant difference between the X-tra base® and Grandio®SO. Furthermore, the water aging adversely affects μTBS values which deceased gradually by time. CONCLUSION: The packable bulk-fill RC characterized by lower μTBS to dentin in comparison to the flowable bulk fill and the incrementally applied nanohybrid RCs. Furthermore, the μTBS of the three tested materials decreased gradually by aging.

scholarly journals Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (21) ◽  
pp. 2405-2418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Derya Merve Halacoglu ◽  
Zümrüt Ceren Ozduman ◽  
Duygu Tuncer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Multi Mode

scholarly journals Effect of 2% Chlorhexidine Following Acid Etching on Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin Restorations: A Meta-Analysis

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasnim Hamdan-Nassar ◽  
Carlos Bellot-Arcís ◽  
Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo ◽  
Verónica García-Sanz ◽  
Agustín Pascual-Moscardó ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Chlorhexidine Solution ◽  
Resin Restorations

Background and Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of 2% chlorhexidine following acid etching on the microtensile bond strength of resin restorations for different follow-up times. Materials and Methods: A thorough search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were conducted. In vitro experimental studies or in vivo studies published up to December 2018 with an experimental group treated with a 2% chlorhexidine solution following acid etching and a control group were included, wherein the final restoration used a resin composite in both the groups. Results: Twenty-one articles were identified for qualitative analysis and 18 for meta-analysis. The difference in the means of microtensile bond strength between the two groups was calculated for the different follow-up times. The differences were significant for 6 months (4.30 MPa; 95% CI 2.72–5.89), 12 months (8.41 MPa; 95% CI 4.93–11.88), and 2–5 years including aged and thermocycling samples (9.08 MPa; 95% CI 5.36–12.81). There were no significant differences for the type of adhesive used. A meta-regression model showed a significant effect of time on the microtensile bond strength. Conclusions: The application of a 2% chlorhexidine solution after acid etching increased the microtensile bond strength significantly for follow-up times of 6 months or more. The adhesive type had no influence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document