scholarly journals Antifungal Combinations in Dermatophytes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Brescini ◽  
Simona Fioriti ◽  
Gianluca Morroni ◽  
Francesco Barchiesi
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Agent ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Superficial Infection

Dermatophytes are the most common cause of fungal infections worldwide, affecting millions of people annually. The emergence of resistance among dermatophytes along with the availability of antifungal susceptibility procedures suitable for testing antifungal agents against this group of fungi make the combinatorial approach particularly interesting to be investigated. Therefore, we reviewed the scientific literature concerning the antifungal combinations in dermatophytes. A literature search on the subject performed in PubMed yielded 68 publications: 37 articles referring to in vitro studies, and 31 articles referring to case reports/clinical studies. In vitro studies involved over 400 clinical isolates of dermatophytes (69% Trichophyton spp., 29% Microsporum spp., and 2% Epidermophyton floccosum). Combinations included two antifungal agents or an antifungal agent plus another chemical compound including plant extracts/essential oils, calcineurin inhibitors, peptides, disinfectant agents and others. In general, drug combinations yielded variable results spanning from synergism to indifference. Antagonism was rarely seen. In over 700 patients with documented dermatophyte infections an antifungal combination approach could be evaluated. The most frequent combination included a systemic antifungal agent administered orally (i.e.: azole [mainly itraconazole], terbinafine or griseofulvin) plus a topical medication (i.e.: azole, terbinafine, ciclopirox, amorolfine) for several weeks. Clinical results indicate that association of antifungal agents is effective, and it might be useful in accelerate the clinical and microbiological healing of a superficial infection. Antifungal combinations in dermatophytes have gained considerable scientific interest over the years and, in consideration of the interesting results available as far, it is desirable to continue the research in this field.

scholarly journals Antifungal Combinations in Dermatophytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 727
Author(s):  
Lucia Brescini ◽  
Simona Fioriti ◽  
Gianluca Morroni ◽  
Francesco Barchiesi
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Agent ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Superficial Infection

Dermatophytes are the most common cause of fungal infections worldwide, affecting millions of people annually. The emergence of resistance among dermatophytes along with the availability of antifungal susceptibility procedures suitable for testing antifungal agents against this group of fungi make the combinatorial approach particularly interesting to be investigated. Therefore, we reviewed the scientific literature concerning the antifungal combinations against dermatophytes. A literature search on the subject performed in PubMed yielded 68 publications: 37 articles referring to in vitro studies and 31 articles referring to case reports or clinical studies. In vitro studies involved over 400 clinical isolates of dermatophytes (69% Trichophyton spp., 29% Microsporum spp., and 2% Epidermophyton floccosum). Combinations included two antifungal agents or an antifungal agent plus another chemical compound including plant extracts or essential oils, calcineurin inhibitors, peptides, disinfectant agents, and others. In general, drug combinations yielded variable results spanning from synergism to indifference. Antagonism was rarely seen. In over 700 patients with documented dermatophyte infections, an antifungal combination approach could be evaluated. The most frequent combination included a systemic antifungal agent administered orally (i.e., terbinafine, griseofulvin, or azole—mainly itraconazole) plus a topical medication (i.e., azole, terbinafine, ciclopirox, amorolfine) for several weeks. Clinical results indicate that association of antifungal agents is effective, and it might be useful to accelerate the clinical and microbiological healing of a superficial infection. Antifungal combinations in dermatophytes have gained considerable scientific interest over the years and, in consideration of the interesting results available so far, it is desirable to continue the research in this field.

Update on Drug Interactions with Azole Antifungal Agents

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 915-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben M Lomaestro ◽  
Michelle Ann Piatek
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Medline Search

OBJECTIVE: T o review and update the incidence, mechanism, and clinical relevance of drug interactions with itraconazole, ketoconazole, and fluconazole. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified by MEDLINE search (from January 1990 to May 1997) using the name of each antifungal and the term “interaction” as MeSH headings. Abstracts were identified by literature citation and by review of Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy from 1995 to 1996. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled, double-blind studies were emphasized; however, uncontrolled studies and case reports were also included. In vitro data were selected from literature review and citations. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were evaluated with respect to study design, clinical relevance, magnitude of interaction, and recommendations provided. DATA SYNTHESIS: The incidence of fungal infections and consequent azole antifungal usage continues to increase. By virtue of their antifungal mechanism (i.e., inhibition of cytochrome P450 fungal enzyme systems), azoles have been investigated and implicated in several drug interactions. The magnitude of interactions can vary from trivial to potentially fatal, and also vary with specific azole and interactant. CONCLUSIONS: The azole antifungal agents represent a commonly used class of agents with a broad range of potential interactions. Recent data have increased our understanding of drug-drug interactions with azoles. Pharmacists are in a unique position to identify these interactions and to intervene to decrease their morbidity and improve patient care.

scholarly journals PC945, a Novel Inhaled Antifungal Agent, for the Treatment of Respiratory Fungal Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Alison Murray ◽  
Lindsey Cass ◽  
Kazuhiro Ito ◽  
Nicole Pagani ◽  
Darius Armstrong-James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aspergillus Fumigatus ◽  
Antifungal Agent ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Candida Spp ◽  
Aspergillus Infection ◽  
Chronic Lung Diseases

Disease due to pulmonary Aspergillus infection remains a significant unmet need, particularly in immunocompromised patients, patients in critical care and those with underlying chronic lung diseases. To date, treatment using inhaled antifungal agents has been limited to repurposing available systemic medicines. PC945 is a novel triazole antifungal agent, a potent inhibitor of CYP51, purpose-designed to be administered via inhalation for high local lung concentrations and limited systemic exposure. In preclinical testing, PC945 is potent versus Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. and showed two remarkable properties in preclinical studies, in vitro and in vivo. The antifungal effects against Aspergillus fumigatus accumulate on repeat dosing and improved efficacy has been demonstrated when PC945 is dosed in combination with systemic anti-fungal agents of multiple classes. Resistance to PC945 has been induced in Aspergillus fumigatus in vitro, resulting in a strain which remained susceptible to other antifungal triazoles. In healthy volunteers and asthmatics, nebulised PC945 was well tolerated, with limited systemic exposure and an apparently long lung residency time. In two lung transplant patients, PC945 treated an invasive pulmonary Aspergillus infection that had been unresponsive to multiple antifungal agents (systemic ± inhaled) without systemic side effects or detected drug–drug interactions.

scholarly journals In vitro activity of four triazole antifungal drugs against clinically common and uncommon yeast species

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narges Aslani ◽  
Tahereh Shokohi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Ataollahi ◽  
Saham Ansari ◽  
Yousef Gholampour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fungal Pathogens ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Yeast Species ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Antifungal Drugs ◽  
Selection Of

Background and Purpose: Incidence of fungal infections caused by opportunistic fungal pathogens, such as yeasts and yeast-like species, has undergone an increase in otherwise healthy individuals. These pathogens account for high mortality and show reduced susceptibility to the routine antifungal drugs. Accordingly, antifungal susceptibility testing is an urgent need in the determination of the susceptibility spectrum of antifungals and selection of appropriate antifungal agents for the management of patients with fungal infection.Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 110 yeast strains belonging to 15 species recovered from clinical specimens. Susceptibility of the isolates to four antifungal drugs (i.e., fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole) was tested according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines M27-A3 and M27-S4.Results: Fluconazole exhibited no activity against 4.3% (n=2) of C. albicans isolates, whereas the remaining 44 isolates had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 0.125-4 μg/ml. Voriconazole had the lowest geometric mean MIC (0.03 μg/ml) against all isolated yeast species, followed by posaconazole (0.07 μg/ml), itraconazole (0.10 μg/ml), and fluconazole (0.60 μg/ml). Overall, all of the isolates had reduced voriconazole MICs with a MIC range of 0.016-0.5 μg/ml, except for one isolate of C. albicans that had a MIC of 1 μg/ml. Candida haemulonii as a multidrug-resistant fungus showed a fluconazole MIC of > 64 μg/ml.Conclusion: The current study provides insight into the antifungal susceptibility profiles of clinically common and uncommon yeast species to four triazole antifungal agents. According to our findings, voriconazole was the most active agent. Awareness about antifungal susceptibility patterns is highly helpful in the selection of appropriate antifungal drugs and identification of the efficiency of the currently used agents.

Potential of Nanoparticles in Combating Candida Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 478-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faizan Abul Qais ◽  
Mohd Sajjad Ahmad Khan ◽  
Iqbal Ahmad ◽  
Abdullah Safar Althubiani
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Delivery ◽  
Recent Progress ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Antifungal Drugs ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Candida Infections ◽  
Made In

Aims: The aim of this review is to survey the recent progress made in developing the nanoparticles as antifungal agents especially the nano-based formulations being exploited for the management of Candida infections. Discussion: In the last few decades, there has been many-fold increase in fungal infections including candidiasis due to the increased number of immunocompromised patients worldwide. The efficacy of available antifungal drugs is limited due to its associated toxicity and drug resistance in clinical strains. The recent advancements in nanobiotechnology have opened a new hope for the development of novel formulations with enhanced therapeutic efficacy, improved drug delivery and low toxicity. Conclusion: Metal nanoparticles have shown to possess promising in vitro antifungal activities and could be effectively used for enhanced and targeted delivery of conventionally used drugs. The synergistic interaction between nanoparticles and various antifungal agents have also been reported with enhanced antifungal activity.

scholarly journals Spectrum and theIn VitroAntifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Yeast Isolates in Ethiopian HIV Patients with Oropharyngeal Candidiasis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birhan Moges ◽  
Adane Bitew ◽  
Aster Shewaamare
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Antifungal Drugs ◽  
Assay Method ◽  
Cryptococcus Laurentii ◽  
Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Disk Diffusion Assay ◽  
Diffusion Assay

Background.In Ethiopia, little is known regarding the distribution and thein vitroantifungal susceptibility profile of yeasts.Objective.This study was undertaken to determine the spectrum and thein vitroantifungal susceptibility pattern of yeasts isolated from HIV infected patients with OPC.Method.Oral pharyngeal swabs taken from oral lesions of study subjects were inoculated onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar. Yeasts were identified by employing conventional test procedures and the susceptibility of yeasts to antifungal agents was evaluated by disk diffusion assay method.Result.One hundred and fifty-five yeast isolates were recovered of which 91 isolates were from patients that were not under HAART and 64 were from patients that were under HAART.C. albicanswas the most frequently isolated species followed byC. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. kefyr, Cryptococcus laurentii, and Rhodotorulaspecies. Irrespective of yeasts isolated and identified, 5.8%, 5.8%, 12.3%, 8.4%, 0.6%, and 1.3% of the isolates were resistant to amphotericin B, clotrimazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, and nystatin, respectively.Conclusion.Yeast colonization rate of 69.2% and 31% resistance to six antifungal agents was documented. These highlight the need for nationwide study on the epidemiology of OPC and resistance to antifungal drugs.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Modified EUCAST Fragmented-Mycelium Inoculum Method forIn VitroSusceptibility Testing of Dermatophytes and the Activity of Novel Antifungal Agents

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 3675-3682 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Risslegger ◽  
C. Lass-Flörl ◽  
G. Blum ◽  
M. Lackner
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Preparation Method ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Inoculum Preparation ◽  
Minimal Effective Concentration

ABSTRACTFor antifungal susceptibility testing of nonsporulating or poorly sporulating dermatophytes, a fragmented-mycelium inoculum preparation method was established and compared to broth microdilution testing according to CLSI and EUCAST guidelines. Moreover, thein vitroactivity of new antifungal agents against dermatophytes was evaluated. Agreement between the mycelial inoculum method and the CLSI broth microdilution method was high (93% to 100%). Echinocandins (minimal effective concentration [MEC], ≤0.5 mg/liter) and posaconazole (MIC, ≤3.00 mg/liter) showed good activity against all tested dermatophytes.

Oral Terbinafine: A New Antifungal Agent

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M Abdel-Rahman ◽  
Milap C Nahata
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pathogenic Yeast

Objective To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage guidelines of terbinafine. Available comparative data of terbinafine and other antimycotic agents are described for understanding the potential role of terbinafine in patient care. Data Sources A MEDLINE search restricted to English language during 1966–1996 and extensive review of journals was conducted to prepare this article. MeSH headings included allylamines, terbinafine, SF 86–327, dermatophytosis, dermatomycosis. Data Extraction The data on pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and drug interactions were obtained from open-label and controlled studies and case reports. Controlled single- or double-blind studies were evaluated to describe the efficacy of terbinafine in the treatment of various fungal infections. Data Synthesis Terbinafine is the first oral antimycotic in the allylamines class: a fungicidal agent that inhibits ergosterol synthesis at the stage of squalene epoxidation. Terbinafine demonstrates excellent in vitro activity against the majority of dermatophyte species including Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and Epidermophyton floccosum; less activity is seen against Dematiaceae and the filamentous fungi. It is least active against the pathogenic yeast and this correlates with the relatively poor efficacy against these organisms in vivo. High concentrations of terbinafine are achieved in keratinous tissues, the site of superficial infections, and these concentrations are maintained for up to 3 months. The clinical efficacy of terbinafine against a number of dermatophyte infections exceeds that of the current standard of therapy, griseofulvin. The efficacy of terbinafine may be as good or better than that of the azole antifungals. Additional studies are required to confirm these observations. Terbinafine demonstrates a good safety profile, and relatively few drug interactions have been identified. Conclusions Terbinafine is more effective than the gold standard, griseofulvin, in the treatment of tinea pedis and tinea unguinum, with considerably shorter treatment duration in the latter. It has been proven as effective as griseofulvin in the treatment of tinea capitis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris. Terbinafine does not appear to offer any advantage in the treatment of nondermatophyte infections; its utility in the treatment of systemic infections has yet to be established. Depending on individual institutional costs, terbinafine may be a front-line drug for some superficial infections responding poorly to the current standard of therapy.

scholarly journals In-Vitro Activity of Nano Fluconazole and Conventional Flucon-azole against Clinically Important Dermatophytes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najmossadat MUSAVI BAFRUI ◽  
Seyed Jamal HASHEMI HAZAVEH ◽  
Mansour BAYAT
Keyword(s):  
Zeta Potential ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Nano Particles ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Particle Structure ◽  
Epidermophyton Floccosum ◽  
Dermatophyte Species ◽  
Better Than

Background: Dermatophytosis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans. Antifungals such as fluconazole are effectively used for treating dermatophytosis; however, drug resistance was observed in many cases. Therefore, a newer treatment strategy is essential. Methods: This study (Conducted in the Laboratory of the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran in 2018) evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of nano fluconazole compared to conventional fluconazole on dermatophyte isolates using CLSI M38-A2guidelines. Dermatophyte species isolated from clinical cases of dermatophytosis were identified using PCR sequencing techniques. Zeta potential and size of the nano particles containing fluconazole were measured; scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine nano particle structure. Results: The size of liposomal fluconazole obtained was 88.9  12.14 nm with –20.12  3.8 mV for zeta potential. The encapsulation rate for fluconazole was 75.1  4.2%. MIC50 for the three tested species was 32, 16, and 8 μg/ml for Trichophyton interdigitale, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum isolates, respectively. The corresponding values for nano fluconazole were 8 μg/ml for the three tested species. Conclusion: MIC value for nano-fluconazole was lower than conventional fluconazole in all dermatophytes species tested; therefore, nano-fluconazole could inhibit the growth of dermatophytes better than fluconazole at a lower concentration of the drug.

scholarly journals Distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species in patients with increased risk for fungal infections

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-76
Author(s):  
Gordana Mirchevska ◽  
Maja Jurhar Pavlova ◽  
Elena Trajkovska-Dokic ◽  
Zaklina Cekovska ◽  
Gordana Jankoska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Candida Species ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Fourth Group ◽  
Increased Risk

Candida species are opportunistic yeasts that can be a serious threat for immunocompromised and critically ill patients, and a cause for increased morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and distribution of different Candida species in clinical specimens in patients with increased risk for fungal infections, and to determine the antifungal susceptibility profile of invasive Candida species to antifungal agents. During a two year period, clinical specimens from 120 patients divided into 4 groups were analysed at the Institute of microbiology and parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Each of these 4 groups consisted of specimens from 30 patients, with primary immune deficiency, critically ill patients treated in the intensive care units (ICU), patients with mucosal candidiasis only, and patients with cystic fibrosis. All specimens were investigated with conventional mycological methods. Identification of Candida species was performed with VITEK-2 system (bioMérieux, France). E-test strips of fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin (AB bioMerieux, France) were used for determination of the antifungal susceptibility profile. In this study, a total of 115 isolates of Candida species were confirmed in different clinical specimens (91 isolates from mucosal surfaces and 24 isolates from blood culture). Colonisation of mucosal membranes of gastrointestinal, respiratory and/or urinary tracts was registered in 56.67% (17/30), 56.67% (17/30), 90% (27/30) and 100% (30/30) of the specimens in the first, second, third and fourth group respectively. In all four groups of patients, the following Candida species were confirmed: C. albicans - 55%, C. glabrata - 17.6%, C. parapsilosis - 7.7%, C. tropicalis - 6.6%, unidentified Candida species - 4.4%, C. dubliniensis - 3.3%, C. kefyr - 2.2%, and one isolate of C. rugosa, C. pelliculosa and C. krusei each. Positive blood culture was registered in 23.33% specimens from the first group, 43.33% in the second group, 23.08% of the third group, and in one specimen of the fourth group. The most frequent isolates from blood culture were C. tropicalis and C. krusei, followed by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, and in the second group C. albicans and C. pelliculosa were equally distributed, followed by C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata. All invasive isolates of Candida species were susceptible to amphotericin B, voriconazole and caspofungin. Resistance to fluconazole was registered in 8.3% (2/24) of all confirmed Candida species. Dose-dependent susceptibility to fluconazole was confirmed in 46% (11/24) of the isolates. Our study confirms high prevalence of colonisation and candidemia with non-albicans Candida species. Resistance to antifungal agents was registered only in two isolates of C. krusei. An epidemiological study is necessary for surveillance of dynamics of candidemia and antifungal susceptibility profile of invasive isolates of Candida species in our patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document