scholarly journals Review of Research Trends based Qualitative Evaluation Index on Collaborative Team Approach Intervention between teacher and therapist

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
표윤희
Author(s):  
Melissa LeCuyer ◽  
Victoria Nyman ◽  
Frances Sykes ◽  
Kimberly Thomas

2013 ◽  
Vol 864-867 ◽  
pp. 2249-2256
Author(s):  
Xin Jian Guan ◽  
Yu Meng ◽  
Ze Ning Wu

This paper presents a method for selecting indexes based on cloud model. The natural language qualitative evaluation of water resources utilization efficiency (WRUE) indexes from several experts were converted into quantitative score values. The randomness and fuzziness of conversion process could be fully reflected. Based on the basic index set of WRUE and fifty experts` comments, cloud model was used to calculate each index`s value. Finally, eight indexes covering overall, agricultural, industrial and living industry were selected to construct the evaluation index system. Cloud model is convenient, objective, and the calculation process is simple. The construction of evaluation index system lays a good foundation for the evaluation of WURE.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 121-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Moffatt ◽  
Rob Goodwin ◽  
Paul Hendrick

Background Primary care faces unprecedented challenges. A move towards a more comprehensive, multi-disciplinary service delivery model has been proposed as a means with which to secure more sustainable services for the future. One seemingly promising response has been the implementation of physiotherapy self-referral schemes, however there is a significant gap in the literature regarding implementation. Aim This evaluation aimed to explore how the professionals and practice staff involved in the delivery of an in-practice physiotherapy self-referral scheme understood the service, with a focus on perceptions of value, barriers and impact. Design and setting A qualitative evaluation was conducted across two UK city centre practices that had elected to participate in a pilot self-referral scheme offering ‘physiotherapy-as-a-first-point-of-contact’ for patients presenting with a musculoskeletal complaint. Methods Individual and focus group interviews were conducted amongst participating physiotherapists, administration/reception staff, general practitioners (GPs) and one practice nurse (in their capacity as practice partner). Interview data were collected from a total of 14 individuals. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three key themes were highlighted by this evaluation. First, the imperative of effecting a cultural change – including management of patient expectation with particular reference to the belief that GPs represented the ‘legitimate choice’, re-visioning contemporary primary care as a genuine team approach, and the physiotherapists’ reconceptualisation of their role and practices. Second, the impact of the service on working practice across all stakeholders – specifically re-distribution of work to ‘unburden’ the GP, and the critical role of administration staff. Finally, beliefs regarding the nature and benefits of physiotherapeutic musculoskeletal expertise – fears regarding physiotherapists’ ability to work autonomously or identify ‘red flags’ were unfounded. Conclusion This qualitative evaluation draws on the themes to propose five key lessons which may be significant in predicting the success of implementing physiotherapy self-referral schemes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Cynthia Bergeron ◽  
Gina Barton ◽  
Wendy Gamache-Holmes ◽  
Mary Ellen Barry ◽  
Barbara Butler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 541-561
Author(s):  
Lauren Clatch ◽  
Ashley Walters ◽  
Eugene Borgida

Contemporary inquiries in psychology and law increasingly cross disciplinary boundaries for inspiration. Our focus is on whether such research is substantive in both directions and whether interdisciplinary psychology-and-law author teams produce more meaningful interdisciplinary work, specifically in decision-making research conducted between 2004 and 2017. We found that interdisciplinary psychology-and-law author teams ( a) produce publications that show more cross-disciplinary integration in methods than single-discipline teams, ( b) produce publications with more conceptual integration in the introduction and discussion than only law author teams, and ( c) elicit more citations than only law or only psychology author teams. When considering a collaborative team approach, we suggest that the disciplinary background of the collaborators is a meaningful indicator of the type of interdisciplinary research to be conducted. We also suggest that it would be beneficial for both psychology and law journals to be more open to publishing scholarship from mixed disciplinary teams.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document