scholarly journals New Pharmacogenetic Markers to Predict the Risk of Bleeding During Taking of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-677
Author(s):  
K. B. Mirzaev ◽  
D. V. Ivashchenko ◽  
I. V. Volodin ◽  
E. A. Grishina ◽  
K. A. Akmalova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleotide Sequence ◽  
Candidate Genes ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Abcb1 Gene ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Cyp3a4 Gene ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs

Aim. To search for new pharmacogenetic biomarkers of bleeding risk in patients taking rivaroxaban and dabigatran for different indications: atrial fibrillation, endoprosthesis of large joints of lower limbs.Material and methods. The study enrolled 29 patients (17 patients received dabigatran and 12 –rivaroxaban), who had hemorrhagic complications during taking direct oral anticoagulants. To find new pharmacogenetic biomarkers of bleeding risk, a next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for selected candidate genes.Results. Among the patients with bleeding who received dabigatran, 13 variants of the nucleotide sequence showed statistically significant deviation from the population values: 11 in the CES1 gene and 2 in the ABCB1 gene. Among the patients with bleeding who received rivaroxaban, 7 variants of nucleotide sequence showed significant deviation: 4 in the ABCG2 gene, 2 in the CYP3A4 gene, and 1 in the ABCB1 gene.Conclusion. The identified in this study polymorphisms of candidate genes ABCB1, ABCG2, CES1, CYP3A4 were associated with the risk of bleeding in patients taking rivaroxaban and dabigatran. It makes an important contribution to the pharmacogenetics of direct oral anticoagulants and require additional assessment of clinical significance in further studies.

scholarly journals Bleeding Risk in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3672-3672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimin Pearl Wang ◽  
Rohan Kehar ◽  
Alla Iansavitchene ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: The standard oral anticoagulant therapy administered to non-valvular AF patients has typically been Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) particularly warfarin. In recent years, Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) including Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) and Direct Factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) have become an alternative to warfarin. Randomized trials comparing warfarin and DOACs showed comparable effectiveness without significant additional major bleeding risk. However, bleeding events in RCTs may differ from those in daily use due to the routine exclusion of patients with a higher risk of bleeding from many studies. We aimed to assess bleeding risk between DOACs and warfarin in AF patients in observational studies and we also sought to determine differences between patients that were experienced or naïve to oral anticoagulants. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the OVID MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCT) from 1990 to January 2019 were retrieved and examined by two independent reviewers. A pooled effect hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using a random effects model using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analyses according to previous exposure to anticoagulants, study type, funding type and DOAC type were conducted. The primary outcome was major bleeding risk. The secondary outcome was clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All studies must have used an established or validated definition of major bleeding. Results: The initial literature search identified 3359 potentially eligible citations. After primary screening, 150 articles were eligible for full text review and there were 35 studies including 2,356,201 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, patients on DOACs were less likely to experience a bleeding event compared to warfarin (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71, 0.85, P<0.001). The results were consistent when analyzing patients receiving DTIs or FXa inhibitors (DTI: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67,0.87; FXa inhibitors: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69,0.89). However, among patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors, there was a significant difference in the risk of bleeding according to individual drug. Among patients receiving rivaroxaban the risk of bleeding was similar to warfarin (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.91,1.06, p=0.60) whereas in those receiving apixaban there was a 40% reduction in the risk of bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.50,0.71, p<0.001) (Figure 1). Three studies reported information according to previous anticoagulant exposure. The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55, 0.82 p<0.001) in favor of patients on DOACs. In the subgroup analysis of previous anticoagulant use, the risk of bleeding was lower for DOACs compared to warfarin in both the experienced population (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.96) and the naïve population (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47,0.87). However, heterogeneity was moderate to high among both subgroups. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis of observational studies including over 2.3 million patients showed that overall DOACs have a lower risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin. Most importantly, although the pooled effect estimate did not differ between DTIs and FXa inhibitors, among patients receiving FXa inhibitors there was a significant difference between individual agents. Patients on apixaban had a significantly lower risk of bleeding compared to warfarin in contrast to patients on rivaroxaban who had a similar risk. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 15396: Atrial Fibrillation Bleeding Risk and Prediction While Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Warfarin Naïve and Experienced Patients

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C Perino ◽  
Krishna Pundi ◽  
Jun Fan ◽  
Susan K Schmitt ◽  
Mitra Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Warfarin Treatment ◽  
Treatment Analysis ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Favorable Safety

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are guideline-recommended over warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, patients who are DOAC eligible are commonly maintained on warfarin. We sought to evaluate bleeding risk and prediction while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veteran Affairs health care system. We included patients with a prescription for warfarin and/or DOAC from 10/1/2010 to 9/30/2017 with an AF encounter in the 90 days prior to 30 days after prescription. We categorized DOAC treated patients as warfarin-naïve or -experienced and performed an on-treatment analysis to determine bleeding incidence and HAS-BLED score discrimination. In adjusted analyses, we compared risk of bleeding while treated with DOAC (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) to warfarin. Results: The analysis cohort included 99,143 patients treated with warfarin (71±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.6±1.2) and 73,732 and 26,760 patients treated with DOAC who were warfarin-naïve (74±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.4±1.0) and -experienced (71±9 years, HAS-BLED 2.8±1.1), respectively. DOAC patients with warfarin experience had more prior bleeds (DOAC, warfarin-experienced: 11.9%; DOAC, warfarin-naïve: 4.5%; warfarin: 6.2%; p<0.001 for both). Risk of intracranial bleeding was substantially lower while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin ( Table ). HAS-BLED discrimination for bleeding outcomes, intracranial or any bleeding, was modest ( Table ). Conclusion: DOAC treatment had a favorable safety profile compared to warfarin treatment, even for DOAC treated patients with warfarin-experience who had more prior bleeds. These data argue against maintaining DOAC eligible patients on warfarin therapy regardless of HAS-BLED score.

scholarly journals Slightly elevated international normalized ratio predicts bleeding episodes in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006051989443
Author(s):  
Priya Bhardwaj ◽  
Louise Breum Petersen ◽  
Tomas Sorm Binko ◽  
Jan Roland Petersen ◽  
Gitte Gleerup Fornitz
Keyword(s):  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Direct Factor ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Bleeding Episodes

Introduction Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at increased bleeding risk. It is therefore of increasing interest to identify predictors of bleeding episodes to increase safety during treatment with DOACs. Methods This retrospective cohort study systematically reviewed medical records of 235 patients treated with either apixaban, rivaroxaban or dabigatran for non-valvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism and collected data on the international normalized ratio (INR) and all bleeding episodes. Results INR ≥ 1.5 was significantly associated with increased risk of minor and major bleeding events in patients treated with direct factor Xa inhibitors. This association was not present in patients treated with dabigatran. However, a high negative predictive value was identified for INR < 1.5 for all drugs. The relative risks of bleeding episodes in patients with INR ≥ 1.5 and INR < 1.5 were 5.1 and 0.20, respectively. Conclusions Our results demonstrate a strong correlation between INR and risk of bleeding episodes during DOAC treatment. INR < 1.5 was a strong negative predictor for low bleeding risk independent of indication or choice of drug, and INR ≥ 1.5 was associated with increased risk of bleeding episodes in patients treated with direct factor Xa-inhibitors.

Abstract MP13: Comparative Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin on Risk of Bleeding Resulting in Hospitalization Among Venous Thromboembolism Patients

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela L Lutsey ◽  
Neil A Zakai ◽  
Richard F MacLehose ◽  
Faye L Norby ◽  
Rob F Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban, have been approved as alternatives to warfarin for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, understanding of their comparative effectiveness in practice-based populations is limited. Objective: Among anticoagulant-naïve VTE patients, estimate the association of type of oral anticoagulant (OAC) with the rate of bleeding resulting in hospitalization. Methods: Patients with VTE and prescription for an OAC were identified from the US Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases for the period from 2011-2015. Hospitalization related to bleeding events (inclusive of intracranial, gastrointestinal and other) was defined using a validated algorithm. In head-to-head comparisons, initiators of a specific OAC were matched with up to 5 initiators of the comparing OAC by age, sex, and time since database enrollment. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for bleeding by OAC, adjusted for age, sex, and a comorbidity propensity score (created using prevalence of 20 common diagnoses and procedures). Results: The final analysis included 83,831 VTE patients who were 49.9% female and on average (standard deviation) 59.0 (16.0) years old. Of these, the initial OAC prescribed for 2,604 was apixaban, for 1,669 dabigatran, for 28,518 rivaroxaban, and for 48,514 warfarin. A total of 1,947 bleeding events occurred over an average of 13 months. Compared to new warfarin users, risk of bleeding was lower among patients initiating apixaban [HR (95%CI): 0.55 (0.36, 0.83)] and rivaroxaban [0.80 (0.72, 0.89)], but similar among new dabigatran users [0.96 (0.72, 1.27)]. In head-to-head DOAC comparisons, relative to rivaroxaban, risk of bleeding was lower among users of apixaban [0.57 (0.36, 0.89)] but similar for users of dabigatran [1.05 (0.73, 1.51)]. Due to low numbers we did not conduct analyses of edoxaban or a head-to-head comparison of dabigatran versus apixaban. Conclusion: In this practice-based population of 83,831 patients prescribed OACs for the treatment of VTE, subsequent risk of hospitalized bleeding was lowest among those prescribed apixaban, intermediate among those prescribed rivaroxaban, and highest among those prescribed warfarin and dabigatran. These data demonstrate that differences in bleeding risk exist by DOAC. While risk factors for bleeding might impact choice of warfarin versus the DOACs, the choice between DOACs may be less likely to be based on patient conditions.

Abstract 15237: Predictors of Intracranial and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis With Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Large Population Based Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad U Butt ◽  
Aun R Shah ◽  
Osama Hamid ◽  
Sara Ghoneim ◽  
Maham Malik
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Snomed Ct ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Introduction: Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial, as the studies demonstrating safety of DOACs excluded these patients. Hypothesis: To determine the predictors of Intracranial and Gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhosis with use of DOACs. Methods: We reviewed data from a large commercial database (Explorys IBM) that aggregates electronic health records from 26 large nationwide healthcare systems. Using systemized nomenclature of clinical medical terms (SNOMED CT), we identified adults with liver cirrhosis, intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding. Risk factors known to be associated with bleeding such as alcohol abuse, NSAIDs, CKD and advanced age were collected. Bleeding risk with DOAC use was compared with coumadin. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate strongest predictors Results: Out of 61.4 million active adult patients in the database, 468,580 patients (0.61%) had documented cirrhosis. 9.14 % and 3.14 % of the cirrhotic patients were on DOACs and coumadin, respectively. In cirrhotic patients, there was higher composite risk of ICH or GIB if they were on DOACs (35.47% vs 21.24 % OR 2.04 [2.01-2.07]), used NSAIDs (31.15% vs 23.63% OR 1.46 [1.44-1.48]), had CKD (32.61% vs 25.04 %, OR 1.45 [1.42-1.47]), or abused alcohol (36.22% vs 23.57%, OR 1.84 [1.81- 1.87]). Risk of bleeding was higher with DOACs as compared to coumadin (35.47% vs 22.81%: p< 0.001). In Multivariable model CKD modified composite bleeding risk of ICH or GIB after adjustment for other risk factors. A cirrhotic patient on DOAC had higher risk of bleeding with CKD (OR 2.29 [(2.22-2.37)]) than without CKD (OR 1.66 [(1.63-1.69)]). This interaction was found to be statistically significant. Similar trend was noticed with use of coumadin. Conclusions: Major bleeding risk in cirrhosis was significantly higher with use of DOACs as compared to warfarin. This risk was highest in patients with CKD.

scholarly journals Management of DOAC in patients undergoing planned surgery or invasive procedure: FCSA position paper

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Squizzato ◽  
Daniela Poli ◽  
Doris Barcellona ◽  
Antonia Ciampa ◽  
Elvira Grandone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Perioperative Management ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

Patients on anticoagulant treatment are constantly increasing, with an estimated prevalence in Italy of 2% of the total population. About a quarter of the anticoagulated patients require temporary cessation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists for a planned intervention within 2 years from anticoagulation inception. Several clinical issues about DOAC interruption remain unanswered: many questions are tentatively addressed daily by thousands of physicians worldwide through an experience-based balancing of thrombotic and bleeding risk. Among possible valuable answers the Italian Federation of Centers for the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders and the Surveillance of the Antithrombotic therapies (FCSA) proposes some experience-based suggestions and expert opinions. In particular, FCSA provides practical guidance on the following issues: 1) multiparametric assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk based on patients’ individual and surgical risk factor, 2) testing of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and DOAC plasma levels before surgery or invasive procedure, 3) use of heparin, 4) restarting of full-dose of DOAC after high-risk of bleeding surgery, 5) practical non-pharmacological suggestions to manage patients perioperatively. Finally, FCSA suggests creating a multidisciplinary ‘Anticoagulation Team’ with the aim to define the optimal perioperative management of anticoagulation.

Complex antithrombotic therapy and bleeding risk in patients with peripheral arterial disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tseng ◽  
S Bhatt ◽  
M Girardo ◽  
D Liedl ◽  
P Wennberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Introduction Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for many atherosclerotic vascular pathologies including peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD often have comorbid conditions that require complex antithrombotic therapy, i.e. combined antiplatelet and anticoagulation. Methods All adult patients undergoing ankle brachial index (ABI) measurements were included in the study. ABI values between 1.00 and 1.40 were considered normal, and values below 1.00 or above 1.40 were considered PAD. Demographic, comorbidity and outcome data were obtained using diagnostic codes from the electronic health record. Three medication classes were analyzed: aspirin, non-aspirin oral antiplatelets (e.g. P2Y12 inhibitors) and oral anticoagulants (warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants). Medication use was determined for patients who had been on a medication for at least one year. Cox proportional hazard analysis for the time to first bleeding event was analyzed. Bleeding was defined as any bleeding requiring medical evaluation (including clinically-relevant non-major bleeding and major bleeding). Results In all, 40,144 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 66±15, 43% female). Patients with PAD were more likely to be on double therapy (one antiplatelet with anticoagulation) (28% vs 19%) and triple therapy (dual antiplatelet with anticoagulation) (10% vs 4%). Unadjusted hazard ratios for bleeding risk showed increased risk of bleeding for patients with PAD (1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.29), though the association is no longer present after adjustment for antithrombotic therapy. Adjusting for age, sex and PAD class, compared to no antithrombotic therapy, there was increased risk of bleeding for monotherapy (1.91, 95% CI: 1.61–2.26), double therapy (3.40, 95% CI: 2.89–4.00) and triple therapy (5.00, 95% CI: 4.21–5.96). Among medications, aspirin and anticoagulant use was independently associated with the greatest increase in risk of bleeding. Conclusion Patients in PAD are at increased risk of bleeding secondary to antithrombotic therapy. Complex antithrombotic therapy with double or triple therapy confer additional bleeding risk, particularly regimens containing aspirin and oral anticoagulants. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Novel bleeding risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Adam ◽  
Martin Feller ◽  
Lamprini Syrogiannouli ◽  
Cinzia Del‐Giovane ◽  
Jacques Donzé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk

Contemporary Clinical Use of Aspirin: Mechanisms of Action, Current Concepts, Unresolved Questions, and Future Perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikael Christiansen ◽  
Erik Lerkevang Grove ◽  
Anne-Mette Hvas
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Action Current ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Treatment Indications ◽  
Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease

AbstractThe ability of aspirin to inhibit platelet aggregation has positioned this agent within the most frequently used drugs worldwide. The aim of this article is to review the contemporary clinical use of aspirin and also to discuss unresolved issues not yet translated into clinical practice. Results from several clinical trials have led to strong guideline recommendations for aspirin use in the acute management and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. On the contrary, guidelines regarding aspirin use as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease are almost conservative, supported by recent trials reporting that the bleeding risk outweighs the potential benefits in most patients. In pregnancy, aspirin has proved efficient in preventing preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age births in women at high risk, and is hence widely recommended in clinical guidelines. Despite the vast amount of clinical data on aspirin, several unresolved questions remain. Randomized trials have reported that aspirin reduces the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, but the clinical relevance remains limited, because direct oral anticoagulants are more effective. Laboratory studies suggest that a twice-daily dosing regimen or evening intake may lead to more efficient platelet inhibition, and the potential clinical benefit of such strategies is currently being explored in ongoing clinical trials. Enteric-coated formulations of aspirin are frequently used, but it remains unclear if they are safer and as efficient as plain aspirin. In the future, aspirin use after percutaneous coronary interventions might not be mandatory in patients who also need anticoagulant therapy, as several trials support shorter aspirin duration strategies. On the other hand, new treatment indications for aspirin will likely arise, as there is growing evidence that aspirin may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and other types of cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document