An Experimental Study of Improving Viscous Oil Recovery by Using Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques: A Case Study of Alaska North Slope Reservoir

SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Yaoze Cheng ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Abhijit Dandekar ◽  
Jiawei Li

Summary Shallow reservoirs on the Alaska North Slope (ANS), such as Ugnu and West Sak-Schrader Bluff, hold approximately 12 to 17 × 109 barrels of viscous oil. Because of the proximity of these reservoirs to the permafrost, feasible nonthermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are highly needed to exploit these oil resources. This study proposes three hybrid nonthermal EOR techniques, including high-salinity water (HSW) injection sequentially followed by low-salinity water (LSW) and low-salinity polymer (LSP) flooding (HSW-LSW-LSP), solvent-alternating-LSW flooding, and solvent-alternating-LSP flooding, to recover ANS viscous oils. The oil recovery performance of these hybrid EOR techniques has been evaluated by conducting coreflooding experiments. Additionally, constant composition expansion (CCE) tests, ζ potential determinations, and interfacial tension (IFT) measurements have been conducted to reveal the EOR mechanisms of the three proposed hybrid EOR techniques. Coreflooding experiments and IFT measurements have been conducted at reservoir conditions of 1,500 psi and 85°F, while CCE tests have been carried out at a reservoir temperature of 85°F. ζ potential determinations have been conducted at 14.7 psi and 77°F. The coreflooding experiment results have demonstrated that all of the three proposed hybrid EOR techniques could result in much better performance in reducing residual oil saturation than waterflooding and continuous solvent flooding in viscous oil reservoirs on ANS, implying better oil recovery potential. In particular, severe formation damage or blockage at the production end occurred when natural sand was used to prepare the sandpack column, indicating that the natural sand may have introduced some unknown constituents that may react with the injected solvent and polymer, resulting in a severe blocking issue. Our investigation on this is ongoing, and more detailed studies are being conducted in our laboratory. The CCE test results demonstrate that more solvent could be dissolved into the tested viscous oil with increasing pressure, simultaneously resulting in more oil swelling and viscosity reduction. At the desired reservoir conditions of 1,500 psi and 85°F, as much as 60 mol% of solvent could be dissolved into the ANS viscous oil, resulting in more than 31% oil swelling and 97% oil viscosity reduction. Thus, the obvious oil swelling and significant viscosity reduction resulting from solvent injection could lead to much better microscopic displacement efficiency during the solvent flooding. The ζ potential determination results illustrate that LSW resulted in more negative ζ potential than HSW on the interface between sand and water, indicating that lowering the salinity of injected brine could result in the sand surface being more water-wet, but adding polymer to the LSW could not further enhance the water wetness. The IFT measurement results show that the IFT between the tested ANS viscous oil and LSW is higher than that between the tested viscous oil and HSW, which conflicts with the commonly recognized IFT reduction effect by LSW flooding. Thus, the EOR theory of the LSW flooding in our proposed hybrid techniques may be attributed to low-salinity effects (LSEs) such as multi-ion exchange, expansion of electrical double layer, and salting-in effect, while water wetness enhancement may benefit the LSW flooding process to some extent. The LSP’s viscosity is much higher than the viscosities of LSW and solvent, so LSP injection could result in better mobility control in the tested viscous oil reservoirs, leading to improvement of macroscopic sweep efficiency. Combining these EOR theories, the proposed hybrid EOR techniques have the potential to significantly increase oil recovery in viscous oil reservoirs on ANS by maximizing the overall displacement efficiency.

Author(s):  
Abdulrazag Zekri ◽  
Hildah Nantongo ◽  
Fathi Boukadi

AbstractWhile the “low salinity waterflooding” (LSWF) has been praised for enhancing oil recovery from different core rocks, the performance of the technique in different wettability environments remains unclear. The consensus is that LSWF does not work well in water-wet carbonate oil reservoirs. The main research objective was to determine the effect of LSWF on the displacement efficiency (DE) in different wettability environments. Carbonate core flooding experiments on rocks with different wettabilities were performed at in-situ reservoir conditions using seawater as a “base water”. Seawater was sequentially diluted 10 to 50 times and spiked 2 and 6 times with sulfate. Following sequential flooding with four different waters, the DEs were measured for different wettabilities. Five different sequential brine floodings were performed on carbonate rocks. Results indicated that optimum low salinity water is a function of system wettability. Seawater (≈ 50,000 ppm) is the optimum brine for oil-wet and intermediate-wettability systems. Sequential flooding consisting of seawater followed by diluted seawater in a water-wet system yielded the highest DE of 88%. Besides, low-salinity brine followed by sulfate performed better in a water-wet environment than in oil- and intermediate-wettability systems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Ho Lee ◽  
Kun Sang Lee

Carbonated water injection (CWI) induces oil swelling and viscosity reduction. Another advantage of this technique is that CO2 can be stored via solubility trapping. The CO2 solubility of brine is a key factor that determines the extent of these effects. The solubility is sensitive to pressure, temperature, and salinity. The salting-out phenomenon makes low saline brine a favorable condition for solubilizing CO2 into brine, thus enabling the brine to deliver more CO2 into reservoirs. In addition, low saline water injection (LSWI) can modify wettability and enhance oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. The high CO2 solubility potential and wettability modification effect motivate the deployment of hybrid carbonated low salinity water injection (CLSWI). Reliable evaluation should consider geochemical reactions, which determine CO2 solubility and wettability modification, in brine/oil/rock systems. In this study, CLSWI was modeled with geochemical reactions, and oil production and CO2 storage were evaluated. In core and pilot systems, CLSWI increased oil recovery by up to 9% and 15%, respectively, and CO2 storage until oil recovery by up to 24% and 45%, respectively, compared to CWI. The CLSWI also improved injectivity by up to 31% in a pilot system. This study demonstrates that CLSWI is a promising water-based hybrid EOR (enhanced oil recovery).


SPE Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 432-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Lewis ◽  
Eric Dao ◽  
Kishore K. Mohanty

Summary Evaluation and improvement of sweep efficiency are important for miscible displacement of medium-viscosity oils. A high-pressure quarter-five-spot cell was used to conduct multicontact miscible (MCM) water-alternating-gas (WAG) displacements at reservoir conditions. A dead reservoir oil (78 cp) was displaced by ethane. The minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for ethane with the reservoir oil is approximately 4.14 MPa (600 psi). Gasflood followed by waterflood improves the oil recovery over waterflood alone in the quarter five-spot. As the pressure decreases, the gasflood oil recovery increases slightly in the pressure range of 4.550-9.514 MPa (660-1,380 psi) for this undersaturated viscous oil. WAG improves the sweep efficiency and oil recovery in the quarter five-spot over the continuous gas injection. WAG injection slows down gas breakthrough. A decrease in the solvent amount lowers the oil recovery in WAG floods, but significantly more oil can be recovered with just 0.1 pore volume (PV) solvent (and water) injection than with waterflood alone. Use of a horizontal production well lowers the sweep efficiency over the vertical production well during WAG injection. Sweep efficiency is higher for the nine-spot pattern than for the five-spot pattern during gas injection. Sweep efficiency during WAG injection increases with the WAG ratio in the five-spot model. Introduction As the light-oil reservoirs get depleted, there is increasing interest in producing more-viscous-oil reservoirs. Thermal techniques are appropriate for heavy-oil reservoirs. But gasflooding can play an important role in medium-viscosity-oil (30-300 cp) reservoirs and is the subject of this paper. Roughly 20 billion to 25 billion bbl of medium-weight- to heavy-weight-oil deposits are estimated in the North Slope of Alaska. Approximately 10 billion to 12 billion bbl exist in West Sak/Schrader Bluff formation alone (McGuire et al. 2005). Miscible gasflooding has been proved to be a cost-effective enhanced oil recovery technique. There are approximately 80 gasflooding projects (CO2, flue gas, and hydrocarbon gas) in the US and approximately 300,000 B/D is produced from gasflooding, mostly from light-oil reservoirs (Moritis 2004). The recovery efficiency [10-20% of the original oil in place (OOIP)] and solvent use (3-12 Mcf/bbl) need to be improved. The application of miscible and immiscible gasflooding needs to be extended to medium-viscosity-oil reservoirs. McGuire et al. (2005) have proposed an immiscible WAG flooding process, called viscosity-reduction WAG, for North Slope medium-visocisty oils. Many of these oils are depleted in their light-end hydrocarbons C7-C13. When a mixture of methane and natural gas liquid is injected, the ethane and components condense into the oil and decrease the viscosity of oil, making it easier for the water to displace the oil. From reservoir simulation, this process is estimated to enhance oil recovery compared to waterflood from 19 to 22% of the OOIP, which still leaves nearly 78% of the OOIP. Thus, further research should be directed at improving the recovery efficiency of these processes for viscous-oil reservoirs. Recovery efficiency depends on microscopic displacement efficiency and sweep efficiency. Microscopic displacement efficiency depends on pressure, (Dindoruk et al. 1992; Wang and Peck 2000) composition of the solvent and oil (Stalkup 1983; Zick 1986), and small-core-scale heterogeneity (Campbell and Orr 1985; Mohanty and Johnson 1993). Sweep efficiency of a miscible flood depends on mobility ratio (Habermann 1960; Mahaffey et al. 1966; Cinar et al. 2006), viscous-to-gravity ratio (Craig et al. 1957; Spivak 1974; Withjack and Akervoll 1988), transverse Peclet number (Pozzi and Blackwell 1963), well configuration, and reservoir heterogeneity, (Koval 1963; Fayers et al. 1992) in general. The effect of reservoir heterogeneity is difficult to study at the laboratory scale and is addressed mostly by simulation (Haajizadeh et al. 2000; Jackson et al. 1985). Most of the laboratory sweep-efficiency studies (Habermann 1960; Mahaffey et al. 1966; Jackson et al. 1985; Vives et al. 1999) have been conducted with first-contact fluids or immiscible fluids at ambient pressure/temperature and may not be able to respresent the displacement physics of multicontact fluids at reservoir conditions. In fact, four methods are proposed for sweep improvement in gasflooding: WAG (Lin and Poole 1991), foams (Shan and Rossen 2002), direct thickeners (Xu et al. 2003), and dynamic-profile control in wells (McGuire et al. 1998). To evaluate any sweep-improvement methods, one needs controlled field testing. Field tests generally are expensive and not very controlled; two different tests cannot be performed starting with identical initial states, and, thus, results are often inconclusive. Field-scale modeling of compositionally complex processes can be unreliable because of inadequate representation of heterogeneity and process complexity in existing numerical simulators. There is a need to conduct laboratory sweep-efficiency studies with the MCM fluids at reservoir conditions to evaluate various sweep-improvement techniques. Reservoir-conditions laboratory tests can be used to calibrate numerical simulators and evaluate qualitative changes in sweep efficiency. We have built a high-pressure quarter-five-spot model where reservoir-conditions multicontact WAG floods can be conducted and evaluated (Dao et al. 2005). The goal of this paper is to evaluate various WAG strategies for a model oil/multicontact solvent in this high-pressure laboratory cell. In the next section, we outline our experimental techniques. The results are summarized in the following section.


SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 417-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Khorsandi ◽  
Changhe Qiao ◽  
Russell T. Johns

Summary Polymer flooding can significantly improve sweep and delay breakthrough of injected water, thereby increasing oil recovery. Polymer viscosity degrades in reservoirs with high-salinity brines, so it is advantageous to inject low-salinity water as a preflush. Low-salinity waterflooding (LSW) can also improve local-displacement efficiency by changing the wettability of the reservoir rock from oil-wet to more water-wet. The mechanism for wettability alteration for LSW in sandstones is not very well-understood; however, experiments and field studies strongly support that cation-exchange (CE) reactions are the key elements in wettability alteration. The complex coupled effects of CE reactions, polymer properties, and multiphase flow and transport have not been explained to date. This paper presents the first analytical solutions for the coupled synergistic behavior of LSW and polymer flooding considering CE reactions, wettability alteration, adsorption, inaccessible pore volume (IPV), and salinity effects on polymer viscosity. A mechanistic approach that includes the CE of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ is used to model the wettability alteration. The aqueous phase viscosity is a function of polymer and salt concentrations. Then, the coupled multiphase-flow and reactive-transport model is decoupled into three simpler subproblems—the first in which CE reactions are solved, the second in which a variable polymer concentration can be added to the reaction path, and the third in which fractional flows can be mapped onto the fixed cation and polymer-concentration paths. The solutions are used to develop a front-tracking algorithm, which can solve the slug-injection problem of low-salinity water as a preflush followed by polymer. The results are verified with experimental data and PennSim (2013), a general-purpose compositional simulator. The analytical solutions show that decoupling allows for estimation of key modeling parameters from experimental data, without considering the chemical reactions. Recovery can be significantly enhanced by a low-salinity preflush before polymer injection. For the cases studied, the improved oil recovery (IOR) for a chemically tuned low-salinity polymer (LSP) flood can be as much as 10% original oil in place (OOIP) greater than with considering polymer alone. The results show the structure of the solutions, and, in particular, the velocity of multiple shocks that develop. These shocks can interact, changing recovery. For example, poor recoveries obtained in corefloods for small-slug sizes of low salinity are explained by the intersection of shocks without considering mixing. The solutions can also be used to benchmark numerical solutions and for experimental design. We demonstrate the potential of LSP flooding as a less-expensive and more-effective way for performing polymer flooding when the reservoir wettability can be altered with chemically tuned low-salinity brine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Akai ◽  
Amer M. Alhammadi ◽  
Martin J. Blunt ◽  
Branko Bijeljic

Abstract We demonstrate how to use numerical simulation models directly on micro-CT images to understand the impact of several enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods on microscopic displacement efficiency. To describe the physics with high-fidelity, we calibrate the model to match a water-flooding experiment conducted on the same rock sample (Akai et al. in Transp Porous Media 127(2):393–414, 2019. 10.1007/s11242-018-1198-8). First we show comparisons of water-flooding processes between the experiment and simulation, focusing on the characteristics of remaining oil after water-flooding in a mixed-wet state. In both the experiment and simulation, oil is mainly present as thin oil layers confined to pore walls. Then, taking this calibrated simulation model as a base case, we examine the application of three EOR processes: low salinity water-flooding, surfactant flooding and polymer flooding. In low salinity water-flooding, the increase in oil recovery was caused by displacement of oil from the centers of pores without leaving oil layers behind. Surfactant flooding gave the best improvement in the recovery factor of 16% by reducing the amount of oil trapped by capillary forces. Polymer flooding indicated improvement in microscopic sweep efficiency at a higher capillary number, while it did not show an improvement at a low capillary number. Overall, this work quantifies the impact of different EOR processes on local displacement efficiency and establishes a workflow based on combining experiment and modeling to design optimal recovery processes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alhammadi ◽  
Shehadeh Masalmeh Masalmeh ◽  
Budoor Al-Shehhi ◽  
Mehran Sohrabi ◽  
Amir Farzaneh

Abstract This study aims to compare the roles of rock and crude oil in improving recovery by low salinity water injection (LSWI) and, particularly, to explore the significance of micro-dispersion formation in LSWI performance. Core samples and crude oil were taken from two carbonate reservoirs (A and B) in Abu Dhabi. The oil samples were selected such that one of them would form micro-dispersion when in contact with low salinity brine while the other would not. A series of coreflood experiments was performed in secondary and tertiary modes under reservoir conditions. First, a core sample from reservoir A was initialized and aged with crude oil from reservoir A and a core sample from reservoir B was initialized and aged with crude oil from reservoir B. The cores were then swapped, and the performance of low salinity injection was tested using rock from reservoir A and crude from reservoir B, and vice versa. For the first set of experiments, we found that the crude oil sample capable of forming micro-dispersion (we call this oil "positive", from reservoir A) resulted in extra oil recovery in both secondary and tertiary LSWI modes, compared to high salinity flooding. Moreover, in the secondary LSWI mode we observed significant acceleration of oil production, with higher ultimate oil recovery (12.5%) compared to tertiary mode (6.5%). To ensure repeatability, the tertiary experiment was repeated, and the results were reproduced. The core flood test performed using "negative" crude oil that did not form micro-dispersion (from reservoir B) showed no improvement in oil recovery compared to high salinity waterflooding. In the "cross-over" experiments (when cores were swapped), the positive crude oil showed a similar improvement in oil recovery and the negative crude oil showed no improvement in oil recovery even though each of them was used with a core sample from the other reservoir. These results suggest that it is the properties of crude oil rather than the rock that play the greater role in oil recovery. These results suggest that the ability of crude oil to form micro-dispersion when contacted with low salinity water is an important factor in determining whether low salinity injection will lead to extra oil recovery during both secondary and tertiary LSWI. The pH and ionic composition of the core effluent were measured for all experiments and were unaffected by the combination of core and oil used in each experiment. This work provides new experimental evidence regarding real reservoir rock and oil under reservoir conditions. The novel crossover approach in which crude oil from one reservoir was tested in another reservoir rock was helpful for understanding the relative roles of crude oil and rock in the low salinity water mechanism. Our approach suggests a simple, rapid and low-cost methodology for screening target reservoirs for LSWI.


SPE Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (06) ◽  
pp. 1212-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad W. Al-Shalabi ◽  
Kamy Sepehrnoori ◽  
Gary Pope

Summary The advantages of using the low-salinity-water-injection (LSWI) technique to improve oil recovery in carbonates are reported in the literature; however, the mechanism behind it is still uncertain. This paper represents a comparison between two geochemical simulators [UTCHEM (UTCHEM manual, 2000) and PHREEQC (Parkhurst and Appelo 2013)] through modeling fluid- and solid-species concentrations of a recently published LSWI coreflood. Moreover, an attempt to interpret the mechanism controlling the LSWI effect on oil recovery from carbonates is presented on the basis of the findings of this work. The LSWI technique is case-dependent, and hence, the findings cannot be generalized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document