scholarly journals Identification of the innate normal tissue specific genes and acquired tumor specific genes in determining the tumor transcriptional profiles

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiwei Wang ◽  
Xinrui Wang ◽  
Liangpu Xu ◽  
Ji Zhang ◽  
Hua Cao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Normal Tissue ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tumor Tissues

Abstract Background: For a specific cancer type, the transcriptional profile is determined by the combination of innate transcriptional features of the original normal tissue and the acquired transcriptional characteristics mediated by genomic and epigenetic aberrations in the tumor development. However, the classification of innate normal tissue specific genes and acquired tumor specific genes is not studied in a pan-cancer manner. Methods: The innate and acquired gene expression profiles in each tumor type were studied using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA-seq dataset. The prognostic effects of the tumor acquired genes were determined by “survival” package in R software. The methylation of the tumor acquired genes was delineated using TCGA HumanMethylation450 microarray data. Results: 90% liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) specific genes are derived from innate normal liver specific genes. On the contrary, 90.3% kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) specific genes and 90.9 % lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) specific genes are acquired in the tumor developmental progress. The innate normal tissue specific genes are down regulated in tumor tissues, while, the tumor acquired specific genes are up regulated in the tumor tissues. The innate normal tissue specific genes and the tumors acquired specific genes are both associated with the tumor overall survival in some tumor types. The hyper-DNA methylation of normal tissue specific genes is contributing to the inhibition of normal tissue specific genes expression in cancer cells. And the tumor acquired specific genes are activated by hypo-DNA methylation and genomic aberrations. Conclusions: Our results provide descriptions of the specific transcriptional features across cancer types and suggest that the tumor acquired specific genes are potential targets for anti-cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Combination the Gene Expression of Adjacent Normal and Tumor Makes more Robust Gene Signature as Cancer Prognosis Biomarker

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Ma ◽  
Dandan Li ◽  
Changjian Zhang ◽  
Ming Xiong ◽  
Yuanyuan Qiao
Keyword(s):  
Expression Profile ◽  
Normal Tissue ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Adjacent Normal Tissue

Abstract Purpose: We tried to explore new gene signature via the combination of tumor-derived expression profile and the adjacent normal-derived expression profile to find more robust cancer biomarker. Methods: Log2 transformed ratio of tumor tissue and the adjacent normal tissue (Log2TN) expression, tumor-derived expression, and normal-derived expression were used to do univariate Cox regression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) respectively. Then, we used factor analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox (LASSO-Cox) to select gene signature in TCGA LUSC for Log2TN, tumor, and adjacent normal respectively.Results: By comparing Log2TN with tumor and adjacent normal in LUSC, we found that genes derived from Log2TN show more robust (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001) and have lower p-values (p < 0.001). Gene signature selected from Log2TN shows the best generalization in the three GEO datasets even though only tumor-derived expression profiles were available in the three datasets. Enrichment analysis showed that the tumor cells mainly focus on proliferation with losing functional of metabolism.Conclusions: These results indicate that (1) Log2TN could get more robust genes and gene signature than tumor-derived expression profiles used traditionally; (2) the adjacent-normal tissue may also play an important role in the progress and outcome of the tumor.Implications for Cancer Survivors: By combined of tumor-derived expression profile and the adjacent normal-derived expression profile, we could find more robust gene signature than traditionally method. Using these robust gene signatures, robust cancer biomarkers could be constructed and will do great help to improve cancer prognosis.

scholarly journals Analyzing cancer gene expression data through the lens of normal tissue-specificity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Robert Frost
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Normal Tissue ◽  
Tissue Specificity ◽  
Cancer Genomics ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Cancer Types

AbstractThe genetic alterations that underlie cancer development are highly tissue-specific with the majority of driving alterations occurring in only a few cancer types and with alterations common to multiple cancer types often showing a tissue-specific functional impact. This tissue-specificity means that the biology of normal tissues carries important information regarding the pathophysiology of the associated cancers, information that can be leveraged to improve the power and accuracy of cancer genomic analyses. Research exploring the use of normal tissue data for the analysis of cancer genomics has primarily focused on the paired analysis of tumor and adjacent normal samples. Efforts to leverage the general characteristics of normal tissue for cancer analysis has received less attention with most investigations focusing on understanding the tissue-specific factors that lead to individual genomic alterations or dysregulated pathways within a single cancer type. To address this gap and support scenarios where adjacent normal tissue samples are not available, we explored the genome-wide association between the transcriptomes of 21 solid human cancers and their associated normal tissues as profiled in healthy individuals. While the average gene expression profiles of normal and cancerous tissue may appear distinct, with normal tissues more similar to other normal tissues than to the associated cancer types, when transformed into relative expression values, i.e., the ratio of expression in one tissue or cancer relative to the mean in other tissues or cancers, the close association between gene activity in normal tissues and related cancers is revealed. As we demonstrate through an analysis of tumor data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and normal tissue data from the Human Protein Atlas, this association between tissue-specific and cancer-specific expression values can be leveraged to improve the prognostic modeling of cancer, the comparative analysis of different cancer types, and the analysis of cancer and normal tissue pairs.

scholarly journals Systematic Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies TREM2 as an Immunological and Prognostic Biomarker

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Cheng ◽  
Xiaowei Wang ◽  
Kechao Nie ◽  
Lin Cheng ◽  
Zheyu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Immunoglobulin Superfamily ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Pan Cancer

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) is a transmembrane receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily and a crucial signaling hub for multiple pathological pathways that mediate immunity. Although increasing evidence supports a vital role for TREM2 in tumorigenesis of some cancers, no systematic pan-cancer analysis of TREM2 is available. Thus, we aimed to explore the prognostic value, and investigate the potential immunological functions, of TREM2 across 33 cancer types. Based on datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, Genotype Tissue-Expression, cBioPortal, and Human Protein Atlas, we employed an array of bioinformatics methods to explore the potential oncogenic roles of TREM2, including analyzing the relationship between TREM2 and prognosis, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), DNA methylation, and immune cell infiltration of different tumors. The results show that TREM2 is highly expressed in most cancers, but present at low levels in lung cancer. Further, TREM2 is positively or negatively associated with prognosis in different cancers. Additionally, TREM2 expression was associated with TMB and MSI in 12 cancer types, while in 20 types of cancer, there was a correlation between TREM2 expression and DNA methylation. Six tumors, including breast invasive carcinoma, cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, skin cutaneous melanoma, and stomach adenocarcinoma, were screened out for further study, which demonstrated that TREM2 gene expression was negatively correlated with infiltration levels of most immune cells, but positively correlated with infiltration levels of M1 and M2 macrophages. Moreover, correlation with TREM2 expression differed according to T cell subtype. Our study reveals that TREM2 can function as a prognostic marker in various malignant tumors because of its role in tumorigenesis and tumor immunity.

SEGreg: a database for human specifically expressed genes and their regulations in cancer and normal tissue

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1322-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Tang ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
Yao Lv ◽  
Ya-Ru Miao ◽  
An-Yuan Guo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Line ◽  
Normal Tissue ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Cancer

AbstractHuman specifically expressed genes (SEGs) usually serve as potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis and treatment. However, the regulation underlying their specific expression remains to be revealed. In this study, we constructed SEG regulation database (SEGreg; available at http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/SEGreg) for showing SEGs and their transcription factors (TFs) and microRNA (miRNA) regulations under different physiological conditions, which include normal tissue, cancer tissue and cell line. In total, SEGreg collected 6387, 1451, 4506 and 5320 SEGs from expression profiles of 34 cancer types and 55 tissues of The Cancer Genome Atlas, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, Human Body Map and Genotype-Tissue Expression databases/projects, respectively. The cancer or tissue corresponding expressed miRNAs and TFs were identified from miRNA and gene expression profiles, and their targets were collected from several public resources. Then the regulatory networks of all SEGs were constructed and integrated into SEGreg. Through a user-friendly interface, users can browse and search SEGreg by gene name, data source, tissue, cancer type and regulators. In summary, SEGreg is a specialized resource to explore SEGs and their regulations, which provides clues to reveal the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and biological processes.

scholarly journals Analyzing cancer gene expression data through the lens of normal tissue-specificity

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. e1009085
Author(s):  
H. Robert Frost
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Normal Tissue ◽  
Tissue Specificity ◽  
Cancer Genomics ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Cancer Types

The genetic alterations that underlie cancer development are highly tissue-specific with the majority of driving alterations occurring in only a few cancer types and with alterations common to multiple cancer types often showing a tissue-specific functional impact. This tissue-specificity means that the biology of normal tissues carries important information regarding the pathophysiology of the associated cancers, information that can be leveraged to improve the power and accuracy of cancer genomic analyses. Research exploring the use of normal tissue data for the analysis of cancer genomics has primarily focused on the paired analysis of tumor and adjacent normal samples. Efforts to leverage the general characteristics of normal tissue for cancer analysis has received less attention with most investigations focusing on understanding the tissue-specific factors that lead to individual genomic alterations or dysregulated pathways within a single cancer type. To address this gap and support scenarios where adjacent normal tissue samples are not available, we explored the genome-wide association between the transcriptomes of 21 solid human cancers and their associated normal tissues as profiled in healthy individuals. While the average gene expression profiles of normal and cancerous tissue may appear distinct, with normal tissues more similar to other normal tissues than to the associated cancer types, when transformed into relative expression values, i.e., the ratio of expression in one tissue or cancer relative to the mean in other tissues or cancers, the close association between gene activity in normal tissues and related cancers is revealed. As we demonstrate through an analysis of tumor data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and normal tissue data from the Human Protein Atlas, this association between tissue-specific and cancer-specific expression values can be leveraged to improve the prognostic modeling of cancer, the comparative analysis of different cancer types, and the analysis of cancer and normal tissue pairs.

scholarly journals Molecular subtypes based on DNA methylation predict prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-Shen Li ◽  
Ke-Chao Nie ◽  
Zhi-Hua Zheng ◽  
Rui-Sheng Zhou ◽  
Yu-Sheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Prognostic Analysis

Abstract Background Due to tumor heterogeneity, the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are difficult. DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, which may help the diagnosis and therapy of patients with LUSC. Methods In this study, we collected the clinical information of LUSC patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the relevant methylated sequences of the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) database to construct methylated subtypes and performed prognostic analysis. Results Nine hundred sixty-five potential independent prognosis methylation sites were finally identified and the genes were identified. Based on consensus clustering analysis, seven subtypes were identified by using 965 CpG sites and corresponding survival curves were plotted. The prognostic analysis model was constructed according to the methylation sites’ information of the subtype with the best prognosis. Internal and external verifications were used to evaluate the prediction model. Conclusions Models based on differences in DNA methylation levels may help to classify the molecular subtypes of LUSC patients, and provide more individualized treatment recommendations and prognostic assessments for different clinical subtypes. GNAS, FZD2, FZD10 are the core three genes that may be related to the prognosis of LUSC patients.

scholarly journals Development of a DNA Methylation–Based Diagnostic Signature to Distinguish Benign Oncocytoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
pp. 1141-1151
Author(s):  
Kevin Brennan ◽  
Thomas J. Metzner ◽  
Chia-Sui Kao ◽  
Charlie E. Massie ◽  
Grant D. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Normal Tissue ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Biopsy Specimens ◽  
Preoperative Biopsy

PURPOSE A challenge in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is to distinguish chromophobe RCC (chRCC) from benign renal oncocytoma, because these tumor types are histologically and morphologically similar, yet they require different clinical management. Molecular biomarkers could provide a way of distinguishing oncocytoma from chRCC, which could prevent unnecessary treatment of oncocytoma. Such biomarkers could also be applied to preoperative biopsy specimens such as needle core biopsy specimens, to avoid unnecessary surgery of oncocytoma. METHODS We profiled DNA methylation in fresh-frozen oncocytoma and chRCC tumors and adjacent normal tissue and used machine learning to identify a signature of differentially methylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites (CpGs) that robustly distinguish oncocytoma from chRCC. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering of Stanford and preexisting RCC data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed that of all RCC subtypes, oncocytoma is most similar to chRCC. Unexpectedly, however, oncocytoma features more extensive, overall abnormal methylation than does chRCC. We identified 79 CpGs with large methylation differences between oncocytoma and chRCC. A diagnostic model trained on 30 CpGs could distinguish oncocytoma from chRCC in 10-fold cross-validation (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC], 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.00)) and could distinguish TCGA chRCCs from an independent set of oncocytomas from a previous study (AUC, 0.87). This signature also separated oncocytoma from other RCC subtypes and normal tissue, revealing it as a standalone diagnostic biomarker for oncocytoma. CONCLUSION This CpG signature could be developed as a clinical biomarker to support differential diagnosis of oncocytoma and chRCC in surgical samples. With improved biopsy techniques, this signature could be applied to preoperative biopsy specimens.

scholarly journals BioMethyl: an R package for biological interpretation of DNA methylation data

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (19) ◽  
pp. 3635-3641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Wang ◽  
Jennifer M Franks ◽  
Michael L Whitfield ◽  
Chao Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
R Package ◽  
Biological Pathways ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Methylation Data ◽  
Biological Interpretation

AbstractMotivationThe accumulation of publicly available DNA methylation datasets has resulted in the need for tools to interpret the specific cellular phenotypes in bulk tissue data. Current approaches use either single differentially methylated CpG sites or differentially methylated regions that map to genes. However, these approaches may introduce biases in downstream analyses of biological interpretation, because of the variability in gene length. There is a lack of approaches to interpret DNA methylation effectively. Therefore, we have developed computational models to provide biological interpretation of relevant gene sets using DNA methylation data in the context of The Cancer Genome Atlas.ResultsWe illustrate that Biological interpretation of DNA Methylation (BioMethyl) utilizes the complete DNA methylation data for a given cancer type to reflect corresponding gene expression profiles and performs pathway enrichment analyses, providing unique biological insight. Using breast cancer as an example, BioMethyl shows high consistency in the identification of enriched biological pathways from DNA methylation data compared to the results calculated from RNA sequencing data. We find that 12 out of 14 pathways identified by BioMethyl are shared with those by using RNA-seq data, with a Jaccard score 0.8 for estrogen receptor (ER) positive samples. For ER negative samples, three pathways are shared in the two enrichments with a slight lower similarity (Jaccard score = 0.6). Using BioMethyl, we can successfully identify those hidden biological pathways in DNA methylation data when gene expression profile is lacking.Availability and implementationBioMethyl R package is freely available in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/yuewangpanda/BioMethyl).Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Molecular Subtypes Based on DNA Methylation Predict Prognosis in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
XiuShen Li ◽  
Ke-Chao Nie ◽  
Zhi-Hua Zheng ◽  
Rui-Sheng Zhou ◽  
Yu-Sheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Tumor Heterogeneity ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Prognostic Analysis

Abstract Background: Due to tumor heterogeneity, the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are difficult. DNA methylation can affect tumor heterogeneity by participating in gene expression. Methods: In this study, we collected the clinical information of LUSC patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the relevant methylated sequences of the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) database to construct methylated subtypes and performed prognostic analysis. Results: 965 potential independent prognosis methylation sites were finally identified and the genes were identified. Based on consensus clustering analysis, seven subtypes were identified by using 965 CpG sites and corresponding survival curves were plotted. The prognostic analysis model was constructed according to the methylation sites’ information of the subtype with the best prognosis. Internal and external verifications were used to evaluate the prediction model. Conclutions: Models based on differences in DNA methylation levels may help to classify the molecular subtypes of LUSC patients, and provide more individualized treatment recommendations and prognostic assessments for different clinical subtypes. GNAS, FZD2, FZD10 are the core three genes that may be related to the prognosis of LUSC patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document