scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of surgery and radiotherapy for survival of clinically localized prostate cancer patients: A population-based coarsened exact matching retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Yasui ◽  
Masahiko Sakaguchi ◽  
Ryousuke Jikuya ◽  
Sohgo Tsutsumi ◽  
Tomoyuki Tatenuma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are currently the main treatment options for localized prostate cancer. However, not yet a large cohort study of comparison between surgery and radiation has been investigated in Japan nor Asia. Objective of this study was to compare the survival outcome between surgery and radiotherapy among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and in the elderly and young patients. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated survival outcomes of localized prostate cancer patients (age at diagnosis ≤79 years, cT1-3) initially treated with surgery or radiotherapy. Data were collected from the population-based cancer registry of Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. A 1:1 coarsened exact matching of age at diagnosis, clinical T stage, and cancer differentiation was made between the two treatment groups. Patients were also categorized into two groups by age at a cut-off of 70 years for analysis. Results. The cohort comprised 4,810 patients aged 50-79 years. No significant difference in CSS was observed between the two groups (p=0.612), but the surgery group had significantly better prognosis in OS (p=0.004). When stratified for age, similar tendencies were seen in the elderly group (aged 70-79 years) (p=0.961 and p=0.007, respectively). By contrast, no significant difference in either CSS or OS was found in the younger group (p=0.550 and p=0.408, respectively). Intrinsic deaths were more likely to occur in elderly patients treated with radiotherapy than in those undergoing surgery (69.3% vs 78.2%, p=0.128).Conclusions. Our data suggests that surgery provided significantly better OS than radiotherapy, particularly among the elderly. However, radiotherapy may be more appropriate in elderly patients due to less invasiveness of the procedure. Prospective trials evaluating these therapies are warranted.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6578-6578
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Katz ◽  
Ying Cao ◽  
Xinglei Shen ◽  
Deborah Usinger ◽  
Sarah Walden ◽  
...  

6578 Background: Men with localized prostate cancer must select from multiple treatment options, without one clear best choice. Consequently, personal factors, such as knowing other prostate cancer patients who have undergone treatment, may influence patient decision-making. However, associations between knowledge about others’ experiences and treatment decision-making among localized prostate cancer patients has not been well characterized. We used data from a population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients to examine whether patient-reported knowledge of others’ experiences is associated with treatment choice. Methods: The North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness & Survivorship Study (NC ProCESS) is a population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients enrolled from 2011-2013 throughout the state of North Carolina in collaboration with the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. All patients were enrolled prior to treatment and followed prospectively. Patient decision-making factors including knowledge of others’ experiences with prostate cancer treatment options were collected through patient report. Patient treatment choice was determined through medical record abstraction and cancer registry data. Results: Among 1,202 patients, 17% reported knowing someone who pursued active surveillance (AS) while 28%, 46%, and 59% reported knowing someone who received brachytherapy, external beam radiation (EBRT), or radical prostatectomy (RP), respectively; 26% underwent AS, 9% brachytherapy, 21% EBRT, and 39% RP as their initial treatment. In unadjusted analyses, patients with knowledge of others’ experiences with brachytherapy, EBRT or RP had more than twice the odds of receiving that treatment compared to patients who did not. Knowledge of others’ experience with AS was not associated with choice to undergo AS. Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race, risk group, and patient-reported goals of care showed knowledge of others’ experiences with brachytherapy (OR 4.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.76 to 7.68), EBRT (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.34), or RP (OR 4.02, 95% CI 2.84 to 5.70) was significantly associated with odds of receiving that treatment. The odds of receiving a particular treatment option were further increased among patients who reported knowing someone who had a “good” experience with the treatment in question. Conclusions: This is the first population-based study to directly demonstrate the impact of a patient’s knowledge of others’ experiences on treatment choice in prostate cancer. These data provide a new consideration to clinicians in their counseling of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, and also impacts research into the informed decision-making process for this disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix452
Author(s):  
M. Laurent ◽  
E. Paillaud ◽  
M. Carvalho-Verlinde ◽  
P. Caillet ◽  
A. Le Thuaut ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rano Matta ◽  
Christopher J.D. Wallis ◽  
Amanda Hird ◽  
Erind Dvorani ◽  
Zachary Klaassen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 1189-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Li ◽  
Jie Si-Tu ◽  
Jianguang Qiu ◽  
Li Lu ◽  
Yunhua Mao ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1258-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Lund ◽  
Michael Borre ◽  
Jacob Jacobsen ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
Mette Nørgaard

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panai Song ◽  
Dong Yang ◽  
Jine Li ◽  
Ning Zhuo ◽  
Xiao Fu ◽  
...  

Abstract The microbiology and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) related peritonitis in elderly patients have not been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to investigate the microbiological distribution and clinical outcome in elderly patients with PD-associated peritonitis to guide clinical practice. We conducted a prospective, one center cohort study in Hunan province, China from September 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020. Among incident patients (n =279), basic clinical characteristics, pathogen distribution and prognosis of elderly PD patients (up to 65 years, n = 64) were compared with those of PD patients aged under 65 years (n = 215). The survival rate and technical survival rate were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Among the 279 patients there were 394 peritonitis episodes, including 88 in elderly group, and 306 in younger groups. G+ bacteria were the main pathogenic bacteria in both groups (43.2% and 38.0%, respectively). Staphylococcus was the most common G+ bacteria. Peritonitis caused by fungal infection was significantly higher in elderly patients (P = 0.01), however, there is no significant difference in the proportions of G + bacteria and G- bacteria between the two groups. The most common G- bacteria was Escherichia coli. Interestingly, we found that Acinetobacter baumannii, polymicrobial infection and culture negative peritonitis in the elderly patients was significantly higher than that in other patients. Additionally, elderly PD patients had higher peritonitis-related mortality (HR=7.27, P = 0.01). However, the technical survival rate was similar (P = 0.67) in both elderly and other patients. Taken together, this retrospective cohort study found that elderly patients had a higher probability of peritonitis caused by of Acinetobacter baumannii, fungi and polymicrobial infections. In addition, the elderly peritonitis patients had a higher risk of mortality. Understanding the characteristics of microbiology and clinical outcome in elderly patients will help us to take effective measures to reduce the incidence of elderly PD-associated peritonitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document