scholarly journals The effect of a 5-year hand hygiene initiative, consisting of the 5 Components, the 5 Steps, and the Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework, an interrupted time-series study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumi Suzuki ◽  
Motoko Morino ◽  
Ichizo Morita ◽  
Shigenori Yamamoto

Abstract Background:A World Health Organization (WHO) guideline-based multimodal hand hygiene (HH) initiative consisting of the 5 Components, the 5 Steps, and the HH Self-Assessment Framework (HHSAF) was introduced hospital-wide to a nonteaching Japanese hospital for 5 years. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of this initiative in terms of changes in alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) consumption and HHSAF score.Methods:The consumption of monthly hospital-wide ABHR was calculated as ml per patient day (PD). The change in ABHR consumption was analysed by an interrupted time series analysis, with a preintervention period of 36 months and an intervention period of 60 months. The correlation between annual ABHR consumption and the HHSAF score was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficients.Results:A statistically significant increase was found in the monthly ABHR consumption (change in slope: + 0.479 ml/PD, p < 0.01). Annual ABHR consumption was strongly correlated with the annual HHSAF score (r = 0.971, p < 0.01).Conclusions:A 5-year, 5-step, WHO-based HH initiative significantly increased ABHR consumption. Our study suggested that the HHSAF score can be a good process measure to improve HH in a single facility, as ABHR consumption increased with the HHSAF score.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumi Suzuki ◽  
Motoko Morino ◽  
Ichizo Morita ◽  
Shigenori Yamamoto

Abstract Background: A World Health Organization (WHO) guideline-based multimodal hand hygiene (HH) initiative was introduced hospital-wide to a nonteaching Japanese hospital for 5 years. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of this initiative in terms of changes in alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) consumption and the Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework (HHSAF) score.Methods: The consumption of monthly hospital-wide ABHR was calculated in L per 1000 patient days (PDs). The change in ABHR consumption was analysed by an interrupted time series analysis with a pre-implementation period of 36 months and an implementation period of 60 months. The correlation between annual ABHR consumption and the HHSAF score was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficients.Results: The annual ABHR consumption was 4.0 (L/1000 PDs) to 4.4 in the pre-implementation period and 10.4 to 34.4 in the implementation period. The HHSAF score was 117.5 (out of 500) in the pre-implementation period and 267.5 to 445 in the implementation period. A statistically significant increase in the monthly ABHR consumption (change in slope: + 0.479 L/1000 PDs, p < 0.01) was observed with the implementation of the initiative. Annual ABHR consumption was strongly correlated with the annual HHSAF score (r = 0.971, p < 0.01).Conclusions: A 5-year WHO-based HH initiative significantly increased ABHR consumption. Our study suggested that the HHSAF assessment can be a good process measure to improve HH in a single facility, as ABHR consumption increased with the HHSAF score.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Garlasco ◽  
Costanza Vicentini ◽  
Ifeoma Nneka Emelurumonye ◽  
Giulia D’Alessandro ◽  
Francesca Quattrocolo ◽  
...  

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e1003269
Author(s):  
David Pell ◽  
Tarra L. Penney ◽  
Oliver Mytton ◽  
Adam Briggs ◽  
Steven Cummins ◽  
...  

Background Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is positively associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization recommends that member states implement effective taxes on SSBs to reduce consumption. The United Kingdom Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) is a two-tiered tax, announced in March 2016 and implemented in April 2018. Drinks with ≥8 g of sugar per 100 ml (higher levy tier) are taxed at £0.24 per litre, drinks with ≥5 to <8 g of sugar per 100 ml (lower levy tier) are taxed at £0.18 per litre, and drinks with <5 g sugar per 100 ml (no levy) are not taxed. Milk-based drinks, pure fruit juices, drinks sold as powder, and drinks with >1.2% alcohol by volume are exempt. We aimed to determine if the announcement of the SDIL was associated with anticipatory changes in purchases of soft drinks prior to implementation of the SDIL in April 2018. We explored differences in the volume of and amount of sugar in household purchases of drinks in each levy tier at 2 years post announcement. Methods and findings We used controlled interrupted time series to compare observed changes associated with the announcement of the SDIL to the counterfactual scenario of no announcement. We used data from Kantar Worldpanel, a commercial household purchasing panel with approximately 30,000 British members that includes linked nutritional data on purchases. We conducted separate analyses for drinks liable for the SDIL in the higher, lower, and no-levy tiers controlling with household purchase volumes of toiletries. At 2 years post announcement, there was no difference in volume of or sugar from purchases of higher-levy-tier drinks compared to the counterfactual of no announcement. In contrast, a reversal of the existing upward trend in volume (ml) of and amount of sugar (g) in purchases of lower-levy-tier drinks was seen. These changes led to a −96.1 ml (95% confidence interval [CI] −144.2 to −48.0) reduction in volume and −6.4 g (95% CI −9.8 to −3.1) reduction in sugar purchased in these drinks per household per week. There was a reversal of the existing downward trend in the amount of sugar in household purchases of the no-levy drinks but no change in volume purchased. At 2 years post announcement, these changes led to a 6.1 g (95% CI 3.9–8.2) increase in sugar purchased in these drinks per household per week. There was no evidence that volume of or amount of sugar in purchases of all drinks combined was different from the counterfactual. This is an observational study, and changes other than the SDIL may have been responsible for the results reported. Purchases consumed outside of the home were not accounted for. Conclusions The announcement of the UK SDIL was associated with reductions in volume and sugar purchased in lower-levy-tier drinks before implementation. These were offset by increases in sugar purchased from no-levy drinks. These findings may reflect reformulation of drinks from the lower levy to no-levy tier with removal of some but not all sugar, alongside changes in consumer attitudes and beliefs. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN18042742.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Clarke-Deelder ◽  
Christian Suharlim ◽  
Susmita Chatterjee ◽  
Logan Brenzel ◽  
Arindam Ray ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionThe world is not on track to achieve the goals for immunization coverage and equity described by the World Health Organization’s Global Vaccine Action Plan. In India, only 62% of children had received a full course of basic vaccines in 2016. We evaluated the Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI), a campaign-style intervention to increase routine immunization coverage and equity in India, implemented in 2017-2018.MethodsWe conducted a comparative interrupted time-series analysis using monthly district-level data on vaccine doses delivered, comparing districts participating and not participating in IMI. We estimated the impact of IMI on coverage and under-coverage (defined as the proportion of children who were unvaccinated) during the four-month implementation period and in subsequent months.FindingsDuring implementation, IMI increased delivery of thirteen infant vaccines by between 1.6% (95% CI: −6.4, 10.2%) and 13.8% (3.0%, 25.7%). We did not find evidence of a sustained effect during the 8 months after implementation ended. Over the 12 months from the beginning of implementation, IMI reduced under-coverage of childhood vaccination by between 3.9% (−6.9%, 13.7%) and 35.7% (−7.5%, 77.4%). The largest estimated effects were for the first doses of vaccines against diptheria-tetanus-pertussis and polio.InterpretationIMI had a substantial impact on infant immunization delivery during implementation, but this effect waned after implementation ended. Our findings suggest that campaign-style interventions can increase routine infant immunization coverage and reach formerly unreached children in the shorter term, but other approaches may be needed for sustained coverage improvements.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Marcela Prieto Romero ◽  
Maycon Moura Reboredo ◽  
Edimar Pedrosa Gomes ◽  
Cristina Martins Coelho ◽  
Maria Aparecida Stroppa de Paula ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effects that a hand hygiene education program has on the compliance of health professionals in an ICU. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time-series design, conducted over a 12-month period: the 5 months preceding the implementation of a hand hygiene education program (baseline period); the 2 months of the intensive (intervention) phase of the program; and the first 5 months thereafter (post-intervention phase). Hand hygiene compliance was monitored by one of the researchers, unbeknownst to the ICU team. The primary outcome measure was the variation in the rate of hand hygiene compliance. We also evaluated the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), as well as the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) at 28 days and 60 days, together with mortality at 28 days and 60 days. Results: On the basis of 959 observations, we found a significant increase in hand hygiene compliance rates-from 31.5% at baseline to 65.8% during the intervention phase and 83.8% during the post-intervention phase, corresponding to prevalence ratios of 2.09 and 2.66, respectively, in comparison with the baseline rate (p < 0.001). Despite that improvement, there were no significant changes in duration of MV, VAP incidence (at 28 or 60 days), or mortality (at 28 or 60 days). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a hand hygiene education program can increase hand hygiene compliance among ICU professionals, although it appears to have no impact on VAP incidence, duration of MV, or mortality.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mooketsi Molefi ◽  
John Tlhakanelo ◽  
Thabo Phologolo ◽  
Shimeles G. Hamda ◽  
Tiny Masupe ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPolicy changes are often necessary to contain the detrimental impact of epidemics such as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). China imposed strict restrictions on movement on January 23rd, 2020.Interrupted time series methods were used to study the impact of the lockdown on the incidence of COVID-19. MethodsThe number of cases of COVID-19 reported daily from January 12thto March 30th, 2020 were extracted from the World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 dashboard ArcGIS® and matched to China’s projected population of 1 408 526 449 for 2020 in order to estimate daily incidences. Data were plotted to reflect daily incidences as data points in the series. A deferred interruption point of 6thFebruary was used to allow a 14-day period of diffusion. The magnitude of change and linear trend analyses were evaluated using the itsafunction with ordinary least-squares regression coefficients in Stata® yielding Newey-West standard errors.ResultsSeventy-eight (78) daily incidence points were used for the analysis, with 11(14.10%) before the intervention. There was a daily increase of 163 cases (β=1.16*10-07, p=0.00) in the pre-intervention period. Although there was no statistically significant drop in the number of cases reported daily in the immediate period following 6thFebruary 2020 when compared to the counterfactual (p=0.832), there was a 241 decrease (β=-1.71*10-07, p=0.00) in cases reported daily when comparing the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. A deceleration of 78(47%) cases reported daily. ConclusionThe lockdown policy managed to significantly decrease the incidence of CoVID-19 in China. Lockdown provides an effective means of curtailing the incidence of COVID-19.


Author(s):  
Sajad Delavari ◽  
Zahra Jamali ◽  
Mohsen Bayati

Abstract Background: Countries are trying several policy options for decreasing the incidence and burden of the COVID-19. One of these strategies is a lockdown, complete closure, to reduce the risk of distributing disease via social interactions. This study aimed to analyze the effect of a three-week lockdown on the mortality and morbidity of the COVID-19 in Iran. Methods: Official daily data on COVID-19 incidence and death reported on the COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO) were extracted from September 1, 2020, to January 14, 2021. Data were analyzed using interrupted time series analysis via STATA 14 software. Results: Lockdown resulted in a significant reduction in the daily death from Covid-19 in the short-term (β=-139, P<0.01) and in the long-term (β=-12, P<0.01). Moreover, lockdown in the short-term insignificantly (β=-21.58, P=0.969), and in the long-term significantly (β=-317.31, P<0.01) reduced the Covid-19 daily incidence. Discussion: The results showed that the lockdown has a significant effect on incidence and death numbers. Therefore, it could be a suitable short-term strategy for controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. On the other hand, its negative effects on households and businesses should be considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S20-S20
Author(s):  
Pascale Yola Gassant ◽  
Marie Immacula Fleury ◽  
Genara Santana ◽  
María Dolores Gil ◽  
Manauri H Morel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hand hygiene (HH) is a basic measure to prevent the spread of infections in healthcare settings. We describe HH practices and resources in three pediatric oncology units (POUs) in Haiti and the Dominican Republic that comprise the Hispaniola Project (HP1: Santiago; HP2: Santo Domingo; HP3: Port-au-Prince). This project, started in January 2019, is a quality improvement initiative in infection care and prevention in pediatric oncology. The POUs are main referral centers for pediatric oncology on the island, HP1 (24 inpatient beds) and HP2 (18 beds) are housed within large public pediatric hospitals; HP3 (17 beds) is housed in a mother/child hospital. Methods Data related to HH resources and practices are intermittently collected as part of ongoing surveillance activities at Hispaniola Project sites; standardized data collection forms track infrastructure, supplies, compliance, and training. At regular intervals, the POUs conduct the World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene self-assessment framework (HHSAF) to assess the level (inadequate, basic, intermediate, advanced) of their units. Additionally, the POUs monitor HH compliance indirectly via alcohol gel (AG) consumption in liters, measured monthly. HP1 and HP3 also use direct observation to monitor HH compliance. Results From baseline to September 2020, the WHO HHSAF scores increased from 65 (Inadequate) to 210 (Intermediate) at HP1, 260 (Intermediate) to 363 (Intermediate) at HP2, and 260 (Intermediate) to 270 (Intermediate) at HP3. Despite constraints imposed by COVID-19, all 3 participating POUs remained at the intermediate level (scoring 260–375). HH infrastructure, including the sink:bed and AG:patient ratios remained stable from January 2020 to present. The AG:patient ratios were 1:3, 1:1 and 10:13 at HP1, HP2, and HP3 respectively. The sink:bed ratios were 1:6, 1:5 and 5:13 at HP1, HP2 and HP3 respectively. Indirect compliance (AG consumption) was first measured in January 2020 at HP1 and has remained relatively stable from June to present. At HP2, AG consumption increased from January to February but decreased throughout the year due to lack of AG which was replaced by soap and water. AG consumption at HP3 increased from January to March, with some variation throughout the year but generally at higher levels than in 2019. Direct HH observation data are limited; however, an increased number of observations at HP1 and increased compliance rates were noted for HP1 and HP3 between January and September 2020. As the pandemic emerged, all 3 POUs increased training of staff, patients, and caretakers. Between January and April, 8 training sessions were held for 349 attendees including 235 healthcare workers (HCWs) at HP1; 13 sessions were held for 443 attendees including 61 HCWs at HP2; 15 sessions were held for 288 attendees including 87 HCWs at HP3. Since these early efforts, a smaller number of sessions with fewer attendees have been held. Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of HH practice was reinforced for HCWs, patients, and caretakers. As organizations and individuals, it is essential to ensure the continuation and sustainability of HH improvement as a strategy to ensure safe healthcare even after the threat of COVID-19 has subsided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document