scholarly journals Bioinformatics and DNA-extraction strategies to reliably detect genetic variants from FFPE breast tissue samples

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Vijay Bhagwate ◽  
Yuanhang Liu ◽  
Stacey J. Winham ◽  
Samantha J. McDonough ◽  
Melody L. Stallings-Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Variant Calling ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Allelic Frequency ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Mutational Signature ◽  
Ffpe Samples ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Wet Lab ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Abstract Background: Archived formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples are valuable clinical resources to examine clinically relevant morphology features and also to study genetic changes. However, DNA quality and quantity of FFPE samples are sub-optimal, and resulting NGS-based genetics variant detections are prone to false positives. Evaluations of wet-lab and bioinformatics approaches are needed to optimize variant detection from FFPE samples. Results: As a pilot study, we designed within-subject triplicate samples of DNA derived from paired FFPE and fresh frozen breast tissues to highlight FFPE-specific artifacts. For FFPE samples, we tested two FFPE DNA extraction methods to determine impact of wet-lab procedures on variant calling: QIAGEN QIAamp DNA Mini Kit ("QA"), and QIAGEN GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit ("QGR"). We also used negative-control (NA12891) and positive control samples (Horizon Discovery Reference Standard FFPE). All DNA sample libraries were prepared for NGS according to the QIAseq Human Breast Cancer Targeted DNA Panel protocol and sequenced on the HiSeq 4000. Variant calling and filtering were performed using QIAGEN Gene Globe Data Portal. Detailed variant concordance comparisons and mutational signature analysis were performed to investigate effects of FFPE samples compared to paired fresh frozen samples, along with different DNA extraction methods. In this study, we found that five times or more variants were called with FFPE samples, compared to their paired fresh-frozen tissue samples even after applying molecular barcoding error-correction and default bioinformatics filtering recommended by the vendor. We also found that QGR as an optimized FFPE-DNA extraction approach leads to much fewer discordant variants between paired fresh frozen and FFPE samples. Approximately 92 % of the uniquely called FFPE variants were of low allelic frequency range (<5%), and collectively shared a “C>T|G>A” mutational signature known to be representative of FFPE artifacts resulting from cytosine deamination. Based on control samples and FFPE-frozen replicates, we derived an effective filtering strategy with associated empirical false-discovery estimates. Conclusions: Through this study, we demonstrated feasibility of calling and filtering genetic variants from FFPE tissue samples using a combined strategy with molecular barcodes, optimized DNA extraction, and bioinformatics methods incorporating genomics context such as mutational signature and variant allelic frequency.

scholarly journals Bioinformatics and DNA-extraction strategies to reliably detect genetic variants from FFPE breast tissue samples

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Vijay Bhagwate ◽  
Yuanhang Liu ◽  
Stacey J. Winham ◽  
Samantha J. McDonough ◽  
Melody L. Stallings-Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Variant Calling ◽  
Allelic Frequency ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Mutational Signature ◽  
Ffpe Samples ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Wet Lab ◽  
Control Samples

Abstract Background Archived formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples are valuable clinical resources to examine clinically relevant morphology features and also to study genetic changes. However, DNA quality and quantity of FFPE samples are often sub-optimal, and resulting NGS-based genetics variant detections are prone to false positives. Evaluations of wet-lab and bioinformatics approaches are needed to optimize variant detection from FFPE samples. Results As a pilot study, we designed within-subject triplicate samples of DNA derived from paired FFPE and fresh frozen breast tissues to highlight FFPE-specific artifacts. For FFPE samples, we tested two FFPE DNA extraction methods to determine impact of wet-lab procedures on variant calling: QIAGEN QIAamp DNA Mini Kit ("QA"), and QIAGEN GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit ("QGR"). We also used negative-control (NA12891) and positive control samples (Horizon Discovery Reference Standard FFPE). All DNA sample libraries were prepared for NGS according to the QIAseq Human Breast Cancer Targeted DNA Panel protocol and sequenced on the HiSeq 4000. Variant calling and filtering were performed using QIAGEN Gene Globe Data Portal. Detailed variant concordance comparisons and mutational signature analysis were performed to investigate effects of FFPE samples compared to paired fresh frozen samples, along with different library preparations. In this study, we found that five times or more variants were called with FFPE samples, compared to their paired fresh-frozen tissue samples even after applying molecular barcoding error-correction and default bioinformatics filtering recommended by the vendor. We also found that QGR as an optimized FFPE-DNA extraction approach leads to much fewer discordant variants between paired fresh frozen and FFPE samples. Approximately 92% of the uniquely called FFPE variants were of low allelic frequency range (<5%), and collectively shared a “C>T|G>A” mutational signature known to be representative of FFPE artifacts resulting fromcytosine deamination. Based on control samples and FFPE-frozen replicates, we derived an effective filtering strategy with associated empirical false-discovery estimates. Conclusions Through this study, we demonstrated feasibility of calling and filtering genetic variants from FFPE tissue samples using a combined strategy with molecular barcodes, optimized DNA extraction, and bioinformatics methods incorporating genomics context such as mutational signature and variant allelic frequency.

scholarly journals Bioinformatics and DNA-extraction strategies to reliably detect genetic variants from FFPE breast tissue samples

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Vijay Bhagwate ◽  
Yuanhang Liu ◽  
Stacey J. Winham ◽  
Samantha J. McDonough ◽  
Melody L. Stallings-Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Variant Calling ◽  
Allelic Frequency ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Mutational Signature ◽  
Ffpe Samples ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Wet Lab ◽  
Control Samples

Abstract Background Archived formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples are valuable clinical resources to examine clinically relevant morphology features and also to study genetic changes. However, DNA quality and quantity of FFPE samples are often sub-optimal, and resulting NGS-based genetics variant detections are prone to false positives. Evaluations of wet-lab and bioinformatics approaches are needed to optimize variant detection from FFPE samples. Results As a pilot study, we designed within-subject triplicate samples of DNA derived from paired FFPE and fresh frozen breast tissues to highlight FFPE-specific artifacts. For FFPE samples, we tested two FFPE DNA extraction methods to determine impact of wet-lab procedures on variant calling: QIAGEN QIAamp DNA Mini Kit ("QA"), and QIAGEN GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit ("QGR"). We also used negative-control (NA12891) and positive control samples (Horizon Discovery Reference Standard FFPE). All DNA sample libraries were prepared for NGS according to the QIAseq Human Breast Cancer Targeted DNA Panel protocol and sequenced on the HiSeq 4000. Variant calling and filtering were performed using QIAGEN Gene Globe Data Portal. Detailed variant concordance comparisons and mutational signature analysis were performed to investigate effects of FFPE samples compared to paired fresh frozen samples, along with different library preparations. In this study, we found that five times or more variants were called with FFPE samples, compared to their paired fresh-frozen tissue samples even after applying molecular barcoding error-correction and default bioinformatics filtering recommended by the vendor. We also found that QGR as an optimized FFPE-DNA extraction approach leads to much fewer discordant variants between paired fresh frozen and FFPE samples. Approximately 92% of the uniquely called FFPE variants were of low allelic frequency range (<5%), and collectively shared a “C>T|G>A” mutational signature known to be representative of FFPE artifacts resulting fromcytosine deamination. Based on control samples and FFPE-frozen replicates, we derived an effective filtering strategy with associated empirical false-discovery estimates. Conclusions Through this study, we demonstrated feasibility of calling and filtering genetic variants from FFPE tissue samples using a combined strategy with molecular barcodes, optimized DNA extraction, and bioinformatics methods incorporating genomics context such as mutational signature and variant allelic frequency.

scholarly journals Use of FFPE-Derived DNA in Next Generation Sequencing: DNA extraction methods

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J. McDonough ◽  
Aditya Bhagwate ◽  
Zhifu Sun ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Michael Zschunke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Total Yield ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Fragment Analysis ◽  
Whole Exome ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Ffpe Samples ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Genomic Studies ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

AbstractArchival tissues represent a rich resource for clinical genomic studies, particularly when coupled with comprehensive medical records. Use of these in NGS is a priority. Nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) DNA extraction methods were evaluated using twelve FFPE samples of varying tissue types. Quality assessment included total yield, percent ds DNA, fragment analysis and multiplex PCR. After assessment, three tissue types from four FFPE DNA methods were selected for NGS downstream evaluation, whole exome (WES) and targeted sequencing. In addition, two low input library protocols were evaluated for WES. Analysis revealed average coverage across the target regions for WES was ~20-30X for all four FFPE DNA methods. For the targeted panels, the highest molecular tag coverage was obtained with the Kingfisher FFPE extraction method. The genotype concordance was 99% for the commonly called variant positions between all four extraction methods with the targeted PCR NGS panel and 96% with WES.

scholarly journals Comparison of different DNA extraction methods from hair root follicles to genotype Finnish Landrace boars with the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. SIRONEN ◽  
P. UIMARI ◽  
J. VILKKI
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Hair Root ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Preparation Methods ◽  
Large Populations ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Recent developments in sequencing methods have enabled whole genome sequencing of several species and the available sequence information has allowed the development of high throughput genotyping chips. However, these genotyping methods require high quality DNA. The possibility to genotype samples based on DNA from non-invasive sources would permit retrospective genotyping of previously collected samples and also facilitate the analysis of large populations e.g. for genomic selection. In this study we have developed and evaluated different DNA preparation methods from porcine hair root follicles for high throughput genotyping with the PorcineSNP60 Genotyping BeadChip (Illumina). We describe a method for DNA extraction from porcine hair root samples, which produces results from high throughput genotyping with the same high degree of accuracy as previously reported for DNA extracted from sperm, blood or tissue samples. This method was used for the genotyping of 273 hair follicle samples. When the DNA concentration was > 30 ng/ìl all samples had the same high call rate ( > 99%) as sperm samples confirming the robustness of this DNA extraction method for high throughput genotyping. Our data also establishes the suitability of the PorcineSNP60 BeadChip for genotyping the Finnish Landrace population.;

OPTIMIZATION OF DNA EXTRACTION METHODS FROM BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS OF HONEY BEES IN A DIFFERENT METAMOTPHOSIS PHASE

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
M. Palkina ◽  
O. Metlitska
Keyword(s):  
Ion Exchange ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Biological Material ◽  
Exchange Resin ◽  
Ion Exchange Resin ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Chelex 100 ◽  
Drone Brood ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

The aim of the research – adaptation, optimization and using of existing DNA extraction methods from bees’ biological material with the reagent «Chelex-100" under complex economic conditions of native laboratories, which will optimize labour costs and improve the economic performance of DNA extraction protocol. Materials and methods. In order to conduct the research the samples of honey bees’ biological material: queen pupae exuviae, larvae of drone brood, some adult bees’ bodies (head and thorax) were selected. Bowl and drone brood were obtained from the experimental bee hives of Institute of Apiculture nd. a. P. I. Prokopovich of NAAS. DNA extraction from biosamples of Apis mellifera ssp. was carried out using «Chelex-100®» ion exchange resin in different concentrations and combinations. Before setting tests for determination of quantitative and quality indexes, dilution of DNA samples of the probed object was conducted in ratio 1:40. The degree of contamination with protein and polysaccharide fractions (OD 260/230), quantitative content of DNA (OD 260/280) in the extracted tests were conducted using spectrophotometer of «Biospec – nano» at the terms of sample volume in 2 µl and length of optical way in 0,7 mm [7]. Verification of DNA samples from biological material of bees, isolated by «Chelex-100®», was conducted after cold keeping during 24 hours at 20°C using PСR with primaries to the fragment of gene of quantitative trait locus (QTL) Sting-2 of next structure [8]:  3' – CTC GAC GAG ACG ACC AAC TTG – 5’; 3' – AAC CAG AGT ATC GCG AGT GTT AC – 5’ Program of amplification: 94 °C – 5 minutes – 1 cycle; 94 °C – 1 minute, 57°C – 1 minute, 72 °C – 2 minutes – 30 cycles; elongation after 72°C during 2 minutes – 1 cycle. The division of obtained amplicons was conducted by gel electrophoresis at a low current – 7 µÀ, in 1,5 % agarose gel (Sigma ®) in TAE buffer [7]. The results. At the time of optimization of DNA isolation methods, according to existing methods of foreign experts, it was found optimal volume of ion exchange resin solution was in the proposed concentration: instead of 60 µl of solution used 120 µl of «Chelex-100®», time of incubation was also amended from 30 minutes to 180 minutes [9]. The use of the author's combination of method «Chelex-100®» with lysis enzymes, proteinase K and detergents (1M dithiothreitol), as time of incubation was also amended, which was reduced to 180 minutes instead of the proposed 12 hours [10]. Changes in quality characteristics of obtained DNA in samples after reduction in incubation time were not found. Conclusions. The most economical method of DNA isolation from bees’ biological material is 20% solution of «Chelex-100» ion exchange resin with the duration of the incubation period of 180 minutes. It should also be noted that the best results can be obtained from exuviae, selected immediately after the queen’s exit from bowl, that reduces the likelihood of DNA molecules destruction under the influence of nucleases activation, but not later than 12 hours from release using the technology of isolated obtain of queens.

scholarly journals Impact of Collection Volume and DNA Extraction Method on the Detection of Biomarkers and HPV DNA in First-Void Urine

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1989
Author(s):  
Laura Téblick ◽  
Severien Van Keer ◽  
Annemie De Smet ◽  
Pierre Van Damme ◽  
Michelle Laeremans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Urine Collection ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Herpesvirus 1 ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
Detection Of Biomarkers ◽  
High Risk Hpv

The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and other biomarkers has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. In this study, we investigated whether the volume of this initial urine stream has an impact on the analytical performance of biomarkers. In parallel, we evaluated different DNA extraction protocols and introduced an internal control in the urine preservative. Twenty-five women, diagnosed with high-risk HPV, provided three home-collected FV urine samples using three FV urine collection devices (Colli-Pee) with collector tubes that differ in volume (4, 10, 20 mL). Each collector tube was prefilled with Urine Conservation Medium spiked with phocine herpesvirus 1 (PhHV-1) DNA as internal control. Five different DNA extraction protocols were compared, followed by PCR for GAPDH and PhHV-1 (qPCR), HPV DNA, and HBB (HPV-Risk Assay), and ACTB (methylation-specific qPCR). Results showed limited effects of collection volume on human and HPV DNA endpoints. In contrast, significant variations in yield for human endpoints were observed for different DNA extraction methods (p < 0.05). Additionally, the potential of PhHV-1 as internal control to monitor FV urine collection, storage, and processing was demonstrated.

scholarly journals A Rapid Bacteriophage DNA Extraction Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Džiuginta Jakočiūnė ◽  
Arshnee Moodley
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Illumina Miseq ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Phage Dna ◽  
Specialized Equipment ◽  
Miseq Platform ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Bacteriophages (phages) are intensely investigated as non-antibiotic alternatives to circumvent antibiotic resistance development as well as last resort therapeutic options against antibiotic resistant bacteria. As part of gaining a better understanding of phages and to determine if phages harbor putative virulence factors, whole genome sequencing is used, for which good quality phage DNA is needed. Traditional phage DNA extraction methods are tedious and time consuming, requiring specialized equipment e.g., an ultra-centrifuge. Here, we describe a quick and simple method (under four hours) to extract DNA from double stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages at titers above 1.0 × 1010 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL. This DNA was suitable for library preparation using the Nextera XT kit and sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document