scholarly journals Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Web-Based Education Program Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment of Systemic Chemotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Author(s):  
Hicran Bektas ◽  
Hasan Senol Coskun ◽  
Fatma Arikan ◽  
Keziban Ozcan ◽  
Aysel Tekeli ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study aims to develop a web-based education program among cancer patients undergoing treatment of systemic chemotherapy and to evaluate the effect of the program on symptom control, quality of life, self-efficacy, and depression. Methods A web-based education program was prepared in line with patient needs, evidence-based guidelines, and expert opinions and tested with 10 cancer patients. A single-blind, randomised controlled study design was applied at a medical oncology unit of a university hospital. Pretests were applied to 60 cancer patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy, and the patients (intervention:30, control: 30) were randomized. The intervention group used the web-based education program for three months, and they were allowed to communicate with researchers 24/7 via the website. The effectiveness of the web-based education program at baseline and after 12 weeks was evaluated. The CONSORT 2010 guideline was performed. Results Expert opinions were found to be compatible with each other (Kendall's Wa = 0.233, p=0.008). The difference between symptom control (p=0.026) and quality of life (p=0.001) during the three-month follow-up of the groups were statistically significant, and there was no difference between the groups in terms of self-efficacy and depression levels (p˃0.05). Conclusion The web-based education program was found to be effective in remote symptom management and improving the quality of life of cancer patients. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT05076916 (12 October 2021, retrospectively registered)

Open Medicine ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Jocham ◽  
Theo Dassen ◽  
Guy Widdershoven ◽  
Ruud Halfens

AbstractPalliative care aims at improving the patient’s quality of life. The assessment of this quality of life (QoL) is crucial for the evaluation of palliative care outcome. Many patients require hospital admissions for symptom control during their cancer journey and most of them die in hospitals, although they would like to stay at home until the end of their lives. In 1986, the European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) initiated a research programme to develop an integrated, modular approach for evaluating the quality of life of patients participating in international clinical trials. This questionnaire measures cancer patients’ physical, psychological and social functions and was used in a wide range of clinical cancer trials with large numbers of research groups and also in various other non-trial studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties, especially the reliability, validity and applicability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a German sample of terminally ill cancer patients receiving palliative care in different settings. The questionnaire was well accepted in the present patient population. Scale reliability was good (pre-treatment 0.80) especially for the functional scale. The results support the reliability and validity of the QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) as a measure of the health-related quality of life in German cancer patients receiving palliative care treatment.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11511-e11511
Author(s):  
Rao M. Raghavendra ◽  
Kodaganur Srinivasachar Gopinath ◽  
B S Srinath ◽  
Shekhar Patil ◽  
P Shashidhara ◽  
...  

e11511 Background: Adherence plays an important role in success of mind body interventions such as yoga. In this study we evaluated the effects of adherence to yoga intervention on psychological and quality of life outcomes. Methods: Adherence to yoga program was assessed in a randomized controlled trial comparing yoga (n=45) vs. supportive therapy in breast cancer patients with stage II and III disease undergoing primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Subjects were assessed for self reported symptoms and affective states using symptom checklist, Spielberger’s State Trait Anxiety, Becks Depression Inventory and Functional Living Index in cancer for Quality of life following surgery and during radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adherence was categorized based on number of sessions of yoga practiced at home per week [regular (>5 sessions), not so regular (3-5 sessions), occasionally (upto 2 sessions)].Multiple hierarchical regression analysis was used to examine the variance in the above outcomes explained by independent prognostic variables (age group, clinical stage of cancer, type of surgery, respective baseline psychological outcomes and regularity of practice) in yoga group alone. Model B includes these four variables plus regularity of practice. Results: Regularity of practice emerged as a secondary predictor for symptom severity following surgery (β= 0.38, p=0.007) and primary predictor for depression (β= 0.37, p=0.05) and severity of symptoms (β= 0.42, p=0.04) during radiotherapy and depression(β= 0.35, p=0.05), severity of symptoms (β= 0.45, p=0.03), anxiety trait(β= 0.40, p=0.03) and quality of life (β= -0.61, p=0.001) during chemotherapy. Conclusions: Adherence to mind body interventions such as yoga improves psychological and quality of life outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing conventional cancer treatment.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 2022-2029 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Earlam ◽  
C Glover ◽  
M Davies ◽  
C Fordy ◽  
T G Allen-Mersh

PURPOSE Since systemic and regional (HAI) fluorinated pyrimidine chemotherapies offer similar survival benefit in treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), we sought to identify their impact on quality of life (QoL), which might be a useful indicator of treatment preference. METHODS We compared QoL in 135 CLM patients managed by symptom control (n = 49 patients), systemic fluorouracil (5FU)/folinic acid (n = 35), or hepatic arterial floxuridine (FUDR) (n = 51). Full blood count and liver function tests, World Health Organization (WHO) toxicity criteria, and QoL (Rotterdam Symptom Checklist [RSC], the Sickness Impact Profile [SIP], and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale [HAD]) were measured monthly in all patients. RESULTS The HAD anxiety score was significantly increased in symptom control compared with chemotherapy patients 1 month after randomization. There was a significant increase in RSC physical score (repeated measures, P = .05), and in scores for sore mouth (P < .01), dry mouth (P < .01), and tingling hands and feet (P < .01) in systemic chemotherapy compared with symptom control patients. Significant QoL differences (repeated measures and Mann-Whitney U [MWU]) between HAI and symptom control patients were not detected. Systemic chemotherapy patients lived for significantly longer (log-rank test, P < or = .0001) with abnormal HAD anxiety, RSC psychosocial, or RSC sore mouth scores compared with HAI patients, but there were no overall survival differences. CONCLUSION Randomization to symptom control only was associated with increased anxiety. QoL with systemic chemotherapy was impaired by side effects. HAI was associated with similar survival to systemic chemotherapy but with better sustained QoL.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. e126 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Fuentes-Raspall ◽  
J.M. Inoriza ◽  
M.J. Martí-Utzet ◽  
C. Auñón-Sanz ◽  
P. Garcia-Martin ◽  
...  

10.2196/17497 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e17497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Morton ◽  
Sharon HJ Hou ◽  
Oonagh Fogarty ◽  
Greg Murray ◽  
Steven Barnes ◽  
...  

Background Quality of life (QoL) is considered a key treatment outcome in bipolar disorder (BD) across research, clinical, and self-management contexts. Web-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes offer numerous pragmatic benefits but require validation to ensure measurement equivalency. A web-based version of the Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD) questionnaire was developed (QoL Tool). Objective This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a web-based QoL self-report questionnaire for BD (QoL Tool). Key aims were to (1) characterize the QoL of the sample using the QoL Tool, (2) evaluate the internal consistency of the web-based measure, and (3) determine whether the factor structure of the original version of the QoL.BD instrument was replicated in the web-based instrument. Methods Community-based participatory research methods were used to inform the development of a web-based adaptation of the QoL.BD instrument. Individuals with BD who registered for an account with the QoL Tool were able to opt in to sharing their data for research purposes. The distribution of scores and internal consistency estimates, as indicated by Cronbach alpha, were inspected. An exploratory factor analysis using maximum likelihood and oblique rotation was conducted. Inspection of the scree plot, eigenvalues, and minimum average partial correlation were used to determine the optimal factor structure to extract. Results A total of 498 people with BD (349/498, 70.1% female; mean age 39.64, SD 12.54 years; 181/498, 36.3% BD type I; 195/498, 39.2% BD type II) consented to sharing their QoL Tool data for the present study. Mean scores across the 14 QoL Tool domains were, in general, significantly lower than that of the original QoL.BD validation sample. Reliability estimates for QoL Tool domains were comparable with that observed for the QoL.BD instrument (Cronbach alpha=.70-.93). Exploratory factor analysis supported the extraction of an 11-factor model, with item loadings consistent with the factor structure suggested by the original study. Findings for the sleep and physical domains differed from the original study, with this analysis suggesting one shared latent construct. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the web-based QoL Tool are largely concordant with the original pen-and-paper QoL.BD, although some minor differences in the structure of the sleep and physical domains were observed. Despite this small variation from the factor structure identified in the QoL.BD instrument, the latent factor structure of the QoL Tool largely reproduced the original findings and theoretical structure of QoL areas relevant to people with BD. These findings underscore the research and clinical utility of this instrument, but further comparison of the psychometric properties of the QoL Tool relative to the QoL.BD instrument is warranted. Future adaptations of the QoL Tool, including the production of an app-based version of the QoL Tool, are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document