A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santana Royan ◽  
Bernard Gutmann ◽  
Catherine Colas des Francs-Small ◽  
Suvi Honkanen ◽  
Jason Schmidberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Land Plant ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat

Abstract Targeted cytidine to uridine RNA editing is a widespread phenomenon throughout the land plant lineage. Members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family act as the specificity factors in this process. These proteins consist of helix-turn-helix domains, each of which recognises a single RNA nucleotide following a well-elucidated code. A cytidine deaminase-like domain (present at the C-terminus of some PPR editing factors or provided in trans via protein-protein interactions) is the catalytic domain in the process. The huge expansion of the PPR superfamily in land plants provides the sequence variation required for design of novel consensus-based RNA-binding proteins. We used this approach to construct a synthetic RNA editing factor designed to target one of the two sites in the Arabidopsis chloroplast transcriptome naturally recognised by the RNA editing factor CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS 19 (CLB19). We show that this designed editing factor specifically recognises the target sequence in in vitro binding assays and can partially complement a clb19 mutant. The designed factor is specific for the target rpoA site and does not recognise or edit the other site recognised by CLB19 in the clpP1 transcript. We show that the designed editing factor can function equally specifically in the bacterium E. coli, and shows some activity even in the absence of the editing cofactors that are often required for natural editing factor activity in plants. This study serves as a successful pilot into the design and application of programmable RNA editing factors based on plant PPR proteins.

scholarly journals A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Santana Royan ◽  
Bernard Gutmann ◽  
Catherine Colas des Francs-Small ◽  
Suvi Honkanen ◽  
Jason Schmidberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Ppr Protein ◽  
Ppr Proteins

AbstractMembers of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family act as specificity factors in C-to-U RNA editing. The expansion of the PPR superfamily in plants provides the sequence variation required for design of consensus-based RNA-binding proteins. We used this approach to design a synthetic RNA editing factor to target one of the sites in the Arabidopsis chloroplast transcriptome recognised by the natural editing factor CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS 19 (CLB19). We show that our synthetic editing factor specifically recognises the target sequence in in vitro binding assays. The designed factor is equally specific for the target rpoA site when expressed in chloroplasts and in the bacterium E. coli. This study serves as a successful pilot into the design and application of programmable RNA editing factors based on plant PPR proteins.

scholarly journals Cofactor-Independent RNA Editing by a Synthetic S-Type PPR Protein

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalia Bernath-Levin ◽  
Jason Schmidberger ◽  
Suvi Honkanen ◽  
Bernard Gutmann ◽  
Yueming Kelly Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Rna Processing ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Ppr Proteins ◽  
P Type

ABSTRACT Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are RNA-binding proteins that are attractive tools for RNA processing in synthetic biology applications given their modular structure and ease of design. Several distinct types of motifs have been described from natural PPR proteins, but almost all work so far with synthetic PPR proteins has focused on the most widespread P-type motifs. We have investigated synthetic PPR proteins based on tandem repeats of the more compact S-type PPR motif found in plant organellar RNA editing factors, and particularly prevalent in the lycophyte Selaginella. With the aid of a novel plate-based screening method we show that synthetic S-type PPR proteins are easy to design, bind with high affinity and specificity, and are functional in a wide range of pH, salt and temperature conditions. We find that they outperform a synthetic P-type PPR scaffold in many situations. We designed an S-type editing factor to edit an RNA target in E. coli and demonstrate that it edits effectively without requiring any additional cofactors to be added to the system. These qualities make S-type PPR scaffolds ideal for developing new RNA processing tools.

scholarly journals Multivalent interactions with RNA drive RNA binding protein recruitment and dynamics in biomolecular condensates in Xenopus oocytes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E Cabral ◽  
Kimberly Mowry
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Multivalent Interactions

RNA localization and biomolecular condensate formation are key biological strategies for organizing the cytoplasm and generating cellular and developmental polarity. While enrichment of RNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is a hallmark of both processes, the functional and structural roles of RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions within condensates remain unclear. Recent work from our laboratory has shown that RNAs required for germ layer patterning in Xenopus oocytes localize in novel biomolecular condensates, termed Localization bodies (L-bodies). L-bodies are composed of a non-dynamic RNA phase enmeshed in a more dynamic protein-containing phase. However, the interactions that drive the biophysical characteristics of L-bodies are not known. Here, we test the role of RNA-protein interactions using an L-body RNA-binding protein, PTBP3, which contains four RNA-binding domains (RBDs). We find that binding of RNA to PTB is required for both RNA and PTBP3 to be enriched in L-bodies in vivo. Importantly, while RNA binding to a single RBD is sufficient to drive PTBP3 localization to L-bodies, interactions between multiple RRMs and RNA tunes the dynamics of PTBP3 within L-bodies. In vitro, recombinant PTBP3 phase separates into non-dynamic structures in an RNA-dependent manner, supporting a role for RNA-protein interactions as a driver of both recruitment of components to L-bodies and the dynamics of the components after enrichment. Our results point to a model where RNA serves as a concentration-dependent, non-dynamic substructure and multivalent interactions with RNA are a key driver of protein dynamics.

ARCD-1, an apobec-1-related cytidine deaminase, exerts a dominant negative effect on C to U RNA editing

2001 ◽  
Vol 281 (6) ◽  
pp. C1904-C1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrikant Anant ◽  
Debnath Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Vakadappu Sankaranand ◽  
Susan Kennedy ◽  
Jeffrey O. Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Dominant Negative Effect ◽  
Mrna Editing ◽  
Apob Mrna

Mammalian apolipoprotein B (apoB) C to U RNA editing is catalyzed by a multicomponent holoenzyme containing a single catalytic subunit, apobec-1. We have characterized an apobec-1 homologue, ARCD-1, located on chromosome 6p21.1, and determined its role in apoB mRNA editing. ARCD-1 mRNA is ubiquitously expressed; phylogenetic analysis reveals it to be a distant member of the RNA editing family. Recombinant ARCD-1 demonstrates cytidine deaminase and apoB RNA binding activity but does not catalyze C to U RNA editing, either in vitro or in vivo. Although not competent itself to mediate deamination of apoB mRNA, ARCD-1 inhibits apobec-1-mediated C to U RNA editing. ARCD-1 interacts and heterodimerizes with both apobec-1 and apobec-1 complementation factor (ACF) and localizes to both the nucleus and cytoplasm of transfected cells. Together, the data suggest that ARCD-1 is a novel cytidine deaminase that interacts with apobec-1 and ACF to inhibit apoB mRNA editing, possibly through interaction with other protein components of the apoB RNA editing holoenzyme.

scholarly journals Identification of the stress granule transcriptome via RNA-editing in single cells and in vivo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wessel van Leeuwen ◽  
Michael VanInsberghe ◽  
Nico Battich ◽  
Fredrik Salmen ◽  
Alexander van Oudenaarden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Rna Content ◽  
Editing Enzyme

Stress granules are phase separated assemblies formed around mRNAs whose identities remain elusive. The techniques available to identify the RNA content of stress granules rely on their physical purification, and are therefore not suitable for single cells and tissues displaying cell heterogeneity. Here, we adapted TRIBE (Target of RNA-binding proteins Identified by Editing) to detect stress granule RNAs by fusing a stress granule RNA-binding protein (FMR1) to the catalytic domain of an RNA-editing enzyme (ADAR). RNAs colocalized with this fusion are edited, producing mutations that are detectable by sequencing. We first optimized the expression of this fusion protein so that RNA editing preferentially occurs in stress granules. We then show that this purification-free method can reliably identify stress granule RNAs in bulk and single S2 cells, and in Drosophila tissues, such as 398 neuronal stress granule mRNAs encoding ATP binding, cell cycle and transcription factors. This new method opens the possibility to identify the RNA content of stress granules as well other RNA based assemblies in single cells derived from tissues.

scholarly journals Multiple PPR protein interactions are involved in the RNA editing system in Arabidopsis mitochondria and plastids

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (33) ◽  
pp. 8883-8888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuria Andrés-Colás ◽  
Qiang Zhu ◽  
Mizuki Takenaka ◽  
Bert De Rybel ◽  
Dolf Weijers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Ppr Protein ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Ppr Proteins ◽  
P Type

Recent identification of several different types of RNA editing factors in plant organelles suggests complex RNA editosomes within which each factor has a different task. However, the precise protein interactions between the different editing factors are still poorly understood. In this paper, we show that the E+-type pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein SLO2, which lacks a C-terminal cytidine deaminase-like DYW domain, interacts in vivo with the DYW-type PPR protein DYW2 and the P-type PPR protein NUWA in mitochondria, and that the latter enhances the interaction of the former ones. These results may reflect a protein scaffold or complex stabilization role of NUWA between E+-type PPR and DYW2 proteins. Interestingly, DYW2 and NUWA also interact in chloroplasts, and DYW2-GFP overexpressing lines show broad editing defects in both organelles, with predominant specificity for sites edited by E+-type PPR proteins. The latter suggests a coordinated regulation of organellar multiple site editing through DYW2, which probably provides the deaminase activity to E+ editosomes.

scholarly journals Differential Binding of Mitochondrial Transcripts by MRB8170 and MRB4160 Regulates Distinct Editing Fates of Mitochondrial mRNA in Trypanosomes

mBio ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Dixit ◽  
Michaela Müller-McNicoll ◽  
Vojtěch David ◽  
Kathi Zarnack ◽  
Jernej Ule ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Mitochondrial Rna ◽  
Nucleotide Resolution ◽  
Additional Role

ABSTRACT A dozen mRNAs are edited by multiple insertions and/or deletions of uridine residues in the mitochondrion of Trypanosoma brucei . Several protein complexes have been implicated in performing this type of RNA editing, including the mitochondrial RNA-binding complex 1 (MRB1). Two paralogous novel RNA-binding proteins, MRB8170 and MRB4160, are loosely associated with the core MRB1 complex. Their roles in RNA editing and effects on target mRNAs are so far not well understood. In this study, individual-nucleotide-resolution UV-cross-linking and affinity purification (iCLAP) revealed a preferential binding of both proteins to mitochondrial mRNAs, which was positively correlated with their extent of editing. Integrating additional in vivo and in vitro data, we propose that binding of MRB8170 and/or MRB4160 onto pre-mRNA marks it for the initiation of editing and that initial binding of both proteins may facilitate the recruitment of other components of the RNA editing/processing machinery to ensure efficient editing. Surprisingly, MRB8170 also binds never-edited mRNAs, suggesting that at least this paralog has an additional role outside RNA editing to shape the mitochondrial transcriptome. IMPORTANCE Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial mRNAs undergo maturation by RNA editing, a unique process involving decrypting open reading frames by the precise deletion and/or insertion of uridine (U) residues at specific positions on an mRNA. This process is catalyzed by multiprotein complexes, such as the RNA editing core complex, which provides the enzymatic activities needed for U insertion/deletion at a single editing site. Less well understood is how RNA editing occurs throughout an mRNA bearing multiple sites. To address this question, we mapped at single-nucleotide resolution the RNA interactions of two unique RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). These RBPs are part of the mitochondrial RNA-binding complex 1, hypothesized to mediate multiple rounds of RNA editing. Both RBPs were shown to mark mRNAs for the process in correlation with the number of editing sites on the transcript. Surprisingly, one also binds mRNAs that bypass RNA editing, indicating that it may have an additional role outside RNA editing.

scholarly journals Plant Ribonuclease J: An Essential Player in Maintaining Chloroplast RNA Quality Control for Gene Expression

Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Amber M. Hotto ◽  
David B. Stern ◽  
Gadi Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Land Plant ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Quality ◽  
Rna Quality Control ◽  
Chloroplast Rna

RNA quality control is an indispensable but poorly understood process that enables organisms to distinguish functional RNAs from nonfunctional or inhibitory ones. In chloroplasts, whose gene expression activities are required for photosynthesis, retrograde signaling, and plant development, RNA quality control is of paramount importance, as transcription is relatively unregulated. The functional RNA population is distilled from this initial transcriptome by a combination of RNA-binding proteins and ribonucleases. One of the key enzymes is RNase J, a 5′→3′ exoribonuclease and an endoribonuclease that has been shown to trim 5′ RNA termini and eliminate deleterious antisense RNA. In the absence of RNase J, embryo development cannot be completed. Land plant RNase J contains a highly conserved C-terminal domain that is found in GT-1 DNA-binding transcription factors and is not present in its bacterial, archaeal, and algal counterparts. The GT-1 domain may confer specificity through DNA and/or RNA binding and/or protein–protein interactions and thus be an element in the mechanisms that identify target transcripts among diverse RNA populations. Further understanding of chloroplast RNA quality control relies on discovering how RNase J is regulated and how its specificity is imparted.

scholarly journals A plant pentatricopeptide repeat protein with a DYW-deaminase domain is sufficient for catalyzing C-to-U RNA editing in vitro

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (11) ◽  
pp. 3497-3505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Hayes ◽  
Paola I. Santibanez
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Inductively Coupled Plasma ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Physcomitrella Patens ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Transition State Analogs ◽  
Ppr Proteins ◽  
Editing Activity

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with C-terminal DYW domains are present in organisms that undergo C-to-U editing of organelle RNA transcripts. PPR domains act as specificity factors through electrostatic interactions between a pair of polar residues and the nitrogenous bases of an RNA target. DYW-deaminase domains act as the editing enzyme. Two moss (Physcomitrella patens) PPR proteins containing DYW-deaminase domains, PPR65 and PPR56, can convert Cs to Us in cognate, exogenous RNA targets co-expressed in Escherichia coli. We show here that purified, recombinant PPR65 exhibits robust editase activity on synthetic RNAs containing cognate, mitochondrial PpccmFC sequences in vitro, indicating that a PPR protein with a DYW domain is solely sufficient for catalyzing C-to-U RNA editing in vitro. Monomeric fractions possessed the highest conversion efficiency, and oligomeric fractions had reduced activity. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP)–MS analysis indicated a stoichiometry of two zinc ions per highly active PPR65 monomer. Editing activity was sensitive to addition of zinc acetate or the zinc chelators 1,10-o-phenanthroline and EDTA. Addition of ATP or nonhydrolyzable nucleotide analogs stimulated PPR65-catalyzed RNA-editing activity on PpccmFC substrates, indicating potential allosteric regulation of PPR65 by ATP. Unlike for bacterial cytidine deaminase, addition of two putative transition-state analogs, zebularine and tetrahydrouridine, failed to disrupt RNA-editing activity. RNA oligonucleotides with a single incorporated zebularine also did not disrupt editing in vitro, suggesting that PPR65 cannot bind modified bases due to differences in the structure of the active site compared with other zinc-dependent nucleotide deaminases.

scholarly journals RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. 2734-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana Van Treeck ◽  
David S. W. Protter ◽  
Tyler Matheny ◽  
Anthony Khong ◽  
Christopher D. Link ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Self Assembly ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
In Cells

Stress granules are higher order assemblies of nontranslating mRNAs and proteins that form when translation initiation is inhibited. Stress granules are thought to form by protein–protein interactions of RNA-binding proteins. We demonstrate RNA homopolymers or purified cellular RNA forms assemblies in vitro analogous to stress granules. Remarkably, under conditions representative of an intracellular stress response, the mRNAs enriched in assemblies from total yeast RNA largely recapitulate the stress granule transcriptome. We suggest stress granules are formed by a summation of protein–protein and RNA–RNA interactions, with RNA self-assembly likely to contribute to other RNP assemblies wherever there is a high local concentration of RNA. RNA assembly in vitro is also increased by GR and PR dipeptide repeats, which are known to increase stress granule formation in cells. Since GR and PR dipeptides are involved in neurodegenerative diseases, this suggests that perturbations increasing RNA–RNA assembly in cells could lead to disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document