Comparison of the Effectiveness of Carotid Artery Endarterectomy and Carotid Endarterectomy + Patch Plasty in Preventing Restenosis and Stroke in Carotid Artery Occlusions.
Abstract BackgroundCarotid artery stenosis is one of the most important causes of stroke, and atherosclerosis plays a role in one third of all strokes. It has been reported in some studies that the patency rate of carotid endarterectomies performed with patplasty is better than standard surgical treatment. In this retrospective study, we investigated vascular patency rates and strokes due to postoperative restenosis in patients who underwent classical carotid endarterctomy and patch plasty endarterctomy due to carotid artery stenosis.We investigated 126 patients diagnosed with carotid artery occlusion between January 2015 and January 2021. We retrospectively analyzed and compared 44 patients who were operated on using carotid endarterectomy (CAE) with patch technique and 82 patients who underwent only carotid endarterectomy in terms of risk factors, restenosis and stroke. Color Doppler Ultrasonography (CDUS) and Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) were used in the diagnosis of carotid artery occlusions and the evaluation of restenosis.Results:The characteristics of the risk factors of the patients were examined and recorded. PTFE graft was used as a patch in patients. There were no significant complications during or after the operation. Restenosis and stroke were investigated at the 10th day, third month, sixth month, and first year after discharge, and mostly by imaging with CDUS. Restenosis was detected in one patient in the study group and in thirteen patients in the control group. Stroke was detected in none of the patients in the study group and in four patients in the control group.Conclusion: In our clinic, patch-based CAE is preferred to primary CAE due to its successful results and very low risk of restenosis. We think that CAE with the patch is a much more effective method in protecting patients from neurological pathologies.