scholarly journals Effect of preoperative information about pain on postoperative pain experience and patient satisfaction following orthopaedic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moses Othin ◽  
Cornelius Sendagire ◽  
John Mukisa ◽  
Clare Lubulwa ◽  
Phillip Mulepo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pain Experience ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Preoperative Information

Abstract Background: Preoperative information about pain has been shown to improve postoperative pain perception and reduce postoperative analgesia requirements. However, there is limited data regarding the effect of preoperative counselling in low resource settings. This study aimed at assessing the effect of preoperative information about pain on postoperative pain experience measured as postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) and patient satisfaction with pain management. Methods: A randomised, double blind, controlled trial was done in Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH), Kampala. We prospectively enrolled 400 participants aged 18years and above scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery. The consented patients were randomised to either receive the specific preoperative information about pain or not. The primary end points were postoperative pain score and patient satisfaction. A total of 340 were analysed with 170 in either arm. Secondary analyses where done to determine the factors that were associated with postoperative pain and patient satisfaction.Results: In both arms, the lowest pain score was 0/10 at 0 hours and the highest was 7/10 at 12 hours. A statistically significant difference between the intervention and control arms for the median pain score at 48hours (4/10 vs. 5/10) P-value= 0.029 was seen but none at 0, 12, 24hours. There was no difference in satisfaction with pain management (P value=0.059). Conclusion: Preoperative information about pain improves postoperative pain experience and may negatively impact patients’ satisfaction with pain management due to unmet expectations.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03056521. Registered 17 February 2017 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03056521

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Forefoot Offloading Versus Rigid Flat Shoes in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the First Ray

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1189-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. C. Dearden ◽  
Robbie I. Ray ◽  
Peter W. Robinson ◽  
Caroline R. Varrall ◽  
Thomas J. Goff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Forefoot Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: It is common clinical practice to use either flat or reverse camber shoes to protect the foot for up to 6 weeks after surgery for hallux valgus or hallux rigidus. To date there is a paucity of evidence as to whether there is any difference between these 2 postoperative shoes, in either patient satisfaction or clinical outcomes. Methods: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing scarf/Akin osteotomies or first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis were recruited. Patients were randomized 50:50 to either flat or reverse camber postoperative shoes. Patients undergoing ancillary lesser toe procedures were not excluded. Patient satisfaction was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Likert satisfaction survey. Radiographic outcomes were reviewed at 1 year observing differences in fusion rates or deformity recurrence. There were 47 patients in the reverse cam and 43 in the flat shoe group. No difference in primary forefoot operation, additional operation, age at surgery, or preop VAS pain score was seen. Results: At 6 weeks, there was no significant difference in postop VAS pain score. The flat shoe group was significantly more likely to be satisfied with their general mobility (86.0% vs 61.7%; P = .01) and with their stability in the shoe (90.7% vs 69.6%; P = .03). No significant difference was seen between groups for nonunion or hallux valgus recurrence rates. Conclusion: Both forms of postoperative footwear were effective in enabling patients to mobilize and in preventing adverse outcomes. Patients were more likely to be satisfied with a flat postoperative shoe due to improved stability and ease of mobilizing. The results of this study aid surgeon decision making for postoperative footwear in forefoot surgery. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of Intravenous Paracetamol Prophylaxis versus Placebo for Prevention of Pain with Injection Rocuronium

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1852-1854
Author(s):  
Aneeque Alam Khan ◽  
Kiran Mehwish ◽  
Ravi Kumar ◽  
Pavan Kumar ◽  
Tahir Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Aim: To compare the frequency of absence of pain with injection paracetamol versus placebo given before injection rocuronium in patients undergoing elective procedures Study design: Randomized Controlled Trial Place and duration of study: Dept of Anaesthesia, Civil Hospital, Karachi from 15th January to 14th July 2017. Methodology: One hundred and two patients aged 25-75 years of either gender undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. The lottery method was used to divide the patients into two equal groups. Paracetamol (5 mL, 10 mg/mL) or normal saline (5 mL) were used as pretreatment solutions. When the tourniquet was removed after 2 minutes, the rocuronium at 1% concentration was injected throughout the 10 second’s period. Patients were then advised and asked to rate their pain on the hand's dorsum using VAS. Results: Mean age of the patients was 44.11±7.75 years. Mean pain score was 1.49±1.38. Significant difference was observed in the mean pain score in between paracetamol and placebo group (p-value <0.001). Overall absence of pain was found in 49 (40.8%). Absence of pain was found to be higher 34 (69.4%) in paracetamol group as compared to placebo group (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Frequency of absence of pain found lower in patients undergoing elective procedures with injection paracetamol versus placebo given before injection rocuronium. Keywords: Injection rocuronium, Elective procedures, Injection paracetamol, Absence of pain

scholarly journals Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Current Practice Management and Referral Trends in a Closed Healthcare System

Osteology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Connor Zale ◽  
Joshua Hansen ◽  
Paul Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Occupational Outcomes ◽  
Mean Delay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Over Time

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neurologic condition that can present with severe pain and dysfunction. Delay in treatment adversely affects outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient outcomes as they relate to the time from diagnosis to pain management referral once the diagnosis of CRPS has been made in a closed healthcare system. Methods: A retrospective record review from a closed healthcare system was utilized for CRPS cases from 2010–2019. Demographics, injury pattern, surgeries, pain score, treatment modalities, occupational outcomes, and time to pain management referral were recorded. Results: There were 26 cases of CRPS that met inclusion criteria. The mean time from diagnosis to treatment was 55 days. 16/26 (61.5%) were medically discharged from the military. 23/26 (88.5%) were unable to return to full duty due to CRPS. There was no significant difference in the reported pain scores over time regardless of treatment (p = 0.76). A linear regression demonstrated a significantly higher Visual Analog Scale Pain Score (VAS) over time in patients that were medically discharged (p = 0.022). Conclusions: The mean delay in referral to the pain service was 55 days. The majority of patients (88.5%) did not return to full duty secondary to the diagnosis of CRPS, and 61.5% of patients required medical separation from active duty. Due to the negative impact that the diagnosis of CRPS has on occupational outcomes with a mean delay in referral of 55 days, clinics and providers should set up referral criteria and establish early pain pathways for patients diagnosed with CRPS.

Comparative Study on Vit. E & Mefenamic acid vs Mefenamic acid alone on mean reduction in pain in Primary Dysmenorrhea

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3195-3197
Author(s):  
Fariha Sadiqa ◽  
Mufakhara Fatimah ◽  
Abdul Mudabbir Rehan ◽  
Sidra Mushtaq ◽  
Asia Firdous ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin E ◽  
Mefenamic Acid ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acid Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Primary Dysmenorrhea ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Menstrual Fluid

Background: Pelvic pain around the time of mensturation without any identifiable pathologic lesion present from menarche is called primary dysmenorrhea. The pain is believed to be related to prostaglandin (PG). Women with dysmenorrhoea have a relatively high concentration of PGF 2 alpha in menstrual fluid and suppression of PG synthesis has become the main treatment. Aim: To compare mean reduction in pain in patients presenting with primary dysmenorrhea given vitamin E & Mefenamic acid versus Mefenamic acid alone. Results: It was a randomized controlled trial which was conducted in Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, THQ Raiwind Hospital, Lahore for 6 months duration w.e.f 01/02/2017 to 31/07/2017. In this study, 18(36%) in Vitamin-E group and 21(42%) in Mefenamic acid group were between 15-20 years while 32(64%) in Vitamin-E group and 29(58%) in Mefenamic acid group were between 21-25 years, mean±sd was calculated as 20.86±2.92 and 20.66±2.86 years respectively, mean dysmenorrheal pain at baseline was recorded as 50.06±10.27 in Vitamin-E group and 50.14±10.28 in Mefenamic acid group, p value < 0.754, showing that both groups are insignificant, mean dysmenorrheal pain after treatment was recorded as 20.50±10.04 in Vitamin-E group and 30.22±10.28 in Mefenamic acid group, p value was < 0.002 showing significant difference between the two group, comparison of mean reduction in dysmenorrheal pain after treatment was recorded as 20.56±0.91 in Vitamin-E group and 10.92±0.75 in Mefenamic acid group, p value was < 0.000, showing significant difference. Conclusion: We concluded that there is a significant mean reduction in dysmenorrhic pain in patients given Mefenamic Acid + Vitamen E as compared to patients given Mefenamic Acid alone. Keywords: Dysmenorrhic pain, Mefenamic Acid + Vitamen E, mean reduction in dysmenorrhic pain

Effectiveness of sustained natural apophyseal glides in females with cervicogenic headache: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kashif ◽  
Nosheen Manzoor ◽  
Rimsha Safdar ◽  
Hafsa Khan ◽  
Maryam Farooq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Cervicogenic Headache ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Head Positioning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Neck Disability

BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a common condition that results in significant disability. To treat this dysfunction, Mulligan described sustained natural apophyseal gliders (SNAGs) as a manual therapy approach. However, only inconclusive short-term evidence exists for treating CGH with SNAGs. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the effect of SNAGs in the treatment of CGH. METHODS: Fourty female patients ranging from 20 to 40 years with CGH were randomly assigned to two groups: 20 in a treatment group and 20 in a control group. SNAGs were applied to the treatment group while the control group received placebo treatment. Both groups received their respective treatment for 20 minutes, alternately three times per week, for a total of 12 times in four weeks. The outcome measures were the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants were assessed at baseline and at the end of each week. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 20. Independent t-testing was used to reveal changes between groups. One-way ANOVA was used to determine changes within groups. The level of significance was P< 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty participants (100%) in the treatment group and 17 (85%) in the control group had a history of headache aggravation with active movements or passive head positioning. There was no significant difference at baseline (p> 0.05), indicating that both groups were homogeneous at the time of recruitment. The p value (p< 0.05) showed a significant difference in pain and level of disability at three and four weeks (p< 0.05) in patients treated with SNAGs. However, the cervical range of motion (ROM) showed a statistically significant improvement in flexion and extension in the treatment group (p< 0.05) while there was no significant improvement in side flexion and rotation ROM in both groups (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study found that SNAGs were effective in reducing pain and neck disability and improved ROM in females with CGH.

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Sinonasal Surgery

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 471-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K. Wise ◽  
Justin C. Wise ◽  
John M. DelGaudio
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Pain Location ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
Analgesic Use

Background Pain after sinonasal surgery concerns both patients and surgeons. Factors affecting sinonasal postoperative pain have not been examined extensively. Methods Using a prospective survey design, sinonasal surgery patients evaluated postoperative pain (on a scale of 0–10), pain location, and medication use. Results One hundred twenty-seven patients consented to participate. One hundred fifteen patients returned surveys, with 100 patients appropriate for analysis over the 6-day postoperative period. Pain score and medication use were evaluated with respect to sex, primary/revision case, nasal packing, and other factors. Repeated measures analysis of variance and chi-square analysis were conducted (p < 0.05). Pain ratings and analgesic use declined significantly over the postoperative period (p < 0.05). Mean pain score on postoperative day (POD) 1 was 3.61 and on POD 6 was 1.72. Mean medication use was 1.37 tablets on POD 1 and 0.55 tablets on POD 6. Additionally, a significant interaction existed, such that narcotic medication use declined from 1.91 tablets on POD 1 to 0.52 tablets on POD 6, whereas nonnarcotic medication use remained steady (p < 0.05). Periorbital pain was most frequent (46.3%), with unilateral facial pain reported least (4.1%). A significant difference existed for distribution of pain location (p < 0.05). Finally, the difference in pain rating between primary and revision procedure for women (0.65) was less than for men (1.12); this interaction was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion Multiple patient and operative factors affect pain rating and medication use after sinonasal surgery. Generally, pain level should be low with little analgesic use postoperatively.

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

scholarly journals Effect of platelet rich-fibrin on alveolar osteitis incidence following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali S. Abdul Kareem ◽  
Ali H. Al Hussaini
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Similar Distribution ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Alveolar Osteitis

Background: Postoperative morbidity after extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) is inevitable. One of the most common postoperative complication is alveolar osteitis (AO) which is a painful non healed socket. Many researches were attempted to prevent the occurrence of AO by introducing and applying a new materials inside the extraction socket. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) is a biological complex fibrin matrix where autologous platelets and leucocytes are present, used to enhance tissue healing process and reduce the early adverse effects of the inflammation. Aims: To evaluate the effect of PRF on the incidence of AO. Also to assess PRF effect on pain, swelling, and trismus following the surgical removal of IMTM and compare it with the control group. Materials and methods: This clinical prospective study was conducted from October 2016 to October 2017 at the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of dentistry/University of Baghdad; and Al-Sadr Specialized Health Center. A total number of 50 IMTMs were surgically removed from 45 patients who met the inclusion criteria (21 males and 24 females) with age ranged from 16-41 years. The cases were divided into two groups: a study group (25 cases) where PRF were placed inside the extraction socket and control group (25 cases) where traditional surgery were performed. AO, trismus and swelling were assessed at the 2nd and 7th postoperative day. Pain scored by numeric rating scale daily by the patients. Results: The study showed that age, gender, side of impaction, oral hygiene condition, impacted tooth classification, surgical difficulty, and the time of procedure in both control and study groups had nearly similar distribution with non- significant difference. At the 1st follow up period: Trismus (P-value = 0.834) and Swelling (P-value = 0.592) were non- significant between the two groups. AO had overall incidence of 4% occurred only in the control group, while the PRF group had no occurrence (0%), but the difference was statistically non significant. Postoperative pain had no significance difference in both groups. At the 2nd follow up period there was no significant difference regarding trismus, swelling, and incidence of AO between both groups. Conclusion: Local application of PRF can reduce the incidence of AO but not to a significant level. PRF had no effect concerning postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document