scholarly journals Do descriptive norms messaging interventions backfire? Protocol for a systematic review of the boomerang effect

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyi Kuang ◽  
Maryann G Delea ◽  
Erik Thulin ◽  
Cristina Bicchieri
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Descriptive Norms ◽  
Intervention Effects ◽  
Boomerang Effect ◽  
Boomerang Effects

Abstract BackgroundDescriptive norms messaging interventions are used to motivate people to adopt or maintain desirable behaviors. Such interventions provide people with information that describes an undesirable behavior as uncommon or a desirable behavior as prevalent within a relevant social group. Descriptive norms messaging interventions have shown promise in increasing individual and social benefit for a broad range of health and sustainability programs. However, evidence suggests that people who have adopted desirable behaviors sometimes regress to undesirable behaviors after receiving descriptive norms messages due to the type of information provided in the messages. This phenomenon is called the boomerang effect. We aim to conduct a systematic review of boomerang effects on health and environmental sustainability behaviors resulting from exposure to descriptive norms messaging interventions.MethodsWe will employ our search strategy to identify studies of descriptive norms messaging interventions published prior to December 31, 2020. We will search Cochrane Library, Campbell Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), and Web of Science to retrieve peer-reviewed articles published in English. We will restrict inclusion to studies (e.g., randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and observational studies) of health and environmental sustainability interventions that assess behaviors before and after exposure to descriptive norms messaging. Two reviewers will independently extract data about study populations and design, intervention components, and behavioral measures. We will use the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (RoB2) and Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies – of Intervention (ROBIN-I) to assess the risk of bias, and the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool (LQAT) to assess the quality of evidence. We will conduct thematic analyses to codify interventions, and examine intervention effects across subgroups of individuals based on their behavior prior to intervention exposure (e.g., those practicing desirable behaviors vs. undesirable behaviors). We will also conduct moderator analyses to determine whether boomerang effects are contingent upon other factors including intervention framing and delivery modality.DiscussionThis systematic review will provide information about descriptive norms messaging intervention effects across subgroups of individuals, and elucidate factors that potentially moderate boomerang effects. The review will yield evidence-based recommendations for the structure and content of descriptive norms messages that can be employed to avoid unintended boomerang effects within the context of health and sustainability programming.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO #: CRD42020156989

scholarly journals Do descriptive norms messaging interventions backfire? Protocol for a systematic review of the boomerang effect

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyi Kuang ◽  
Maryann G Delea ◽  
Erik Thulin ◽  
Cristina Bicchieri
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Descriptive Norms ◽  
Intervention Effects ◽  
Boomerang Effect ◽  
Boomerang Effects

Abstract Background Descriptive norms messaging interventions are used to motivate people to adopt or maintain desirable behaviors. Such interventions provide people with information that describes an undesirable behavior as uncommon or a desirable behavior as prevalent within a relevant social group. Descriptive norms messaging interventions have shown promise in increasing individual and social benefit for a broad range of health and sustainability programs. However, evidence suggests that people who have adopted desirable behaviors sometimes regress to undesirable behaviors after receiving descriptive norms messages due to the type of information provided in the messages. This phenomenon is called the boomerang effect. We aim to conduct a systematic review of boomerang effects on health and environmental sustainability behaviors resulting from exposure to descriptive norms messaging interventions.Methods We will employ our search strategy to identify studies of descriptive norms messaging interventions published prior to January 1, 2020. We will search Cochrane Library, Campbell Library, EMBASE, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Scopus, and Web of Science to retrieve peer-reviewed articles published in English. We will restrict inclusion to studies of health and environmental sustainability interventions that assess behavior before and after exposure to descriptive norms messaging. Two reviewers will independently extract data about study populations and design, intervention components, and behavioral measures. We will use Cochrane’s Risk of Bias assessment tool to assess the risk of bias, and the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool (LQAT) to assess the quality of evidence. We will conduct thematic analyses to codify interventions, and examine intervention effects across subgroups of individuals based on their behavior prior to intervention exposure (e.g., those practicing desirable behaviors vs. undesirable behaviors). We will also conduct moderator analyses to determine whether boomerang effects are contingent upon other factors.Discussion This systematic review will provide information about descriptive norms messaging intervention effects across subgroups of individuals, and elucidate factors that potentially moderate boomerang effects. The review will yield evidence-based recommendations for the structure and content of descriptive norms messages that can be employed to avoid unintended boomerang effects within the context of health and sustainability programming.Systematic review registration PROSPERO #: 156989

scholarly journals Do descriptive norms messaging interventions backfire? Protocol for a systematic review of the boomerang effect

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyi Kuang ◽  
Maryann G. Delea ◽  
Erik Thulin ◽  
Cristina Bicchieri
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Descriptive Norms ◽  
Intervention Effects ◽  
Boomerang Effect ◽  
Boomerang Effects

Abstract Background Descriptive norms messaging interventions are used to motivate people to adopt or maintain desirable behaviors. Such interventions provide people with information that describes an undesirable behavior as uncommon or a desirable behavior as prevalent within a relevant social group. Descriptive norms messaging interventions have shown promise in increasing individual and social benefit for a broad range of health and sustainability programs. However, evidence suggests that people who have adopted desirable behaviors sometimes regress to undesirable behaviors after receiving descriptive norms messages due to the type of information provided in the messages. This phenomenon is called the boomerang effect. We aim to conduct a systematic review of boomerang effects on health and environmental sustainability behaviors resulting from exposure to descriptive norms messaging interventions. Methods We will employ our search strategy to identify studies of descriptive norms messaging interventions published prior to December 31, 2020. We will search the Cochrane Library, Campbell Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), and Web of Science to retrieve peer-reviewed articles published in English. We will restrict inclusion to studies (e.g., randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and observational studies) of health and environmental sustainability interventions that assess behaviors before and after exposure to descriptive norms messaging. Two reviewers will independently extract data about study populations and design, intervention components, and behavioral measures. We will use the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (RoB2) and Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies—of Intervention (ROBINS-I) to assess the risk of bias, and the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool (LQAT) to assess the quality of evidence. We will conduct thematic analyses to codify interventions, and examine intervention effects across subgroups of individuals based on their behavior prior to intervention exposure (e.g., those practicing desirable behaviors vs. undesirable behaviors). We will also conduct moderator analyses to determine whether boomerang effects are contingent upon other factors including intervention framing and delivery modality. Discussion This systematic review will provide information about descriptive norms messaging intervention effects across subgroups of individuals and elucidate factors that potentially moderate boomerang effects. The review will yield evidence-based recommendations for the structure and content of descriptive norms messages that can be employed to avoid unintended boomerang effects within the context of health and sustainability programming. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020156989

scholarly journals Effectiveness of adult community-based physical activity interventions with objective physical activity measurements and long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e034541
Author(s):  
Charlotte Wahlich ◽  
Umar A R Chaudhry ◽  
Rebecca Fortescue ◽  
Derek G Cook ◽  
Shashivadan Hirani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Intervention Effects ◽  
Meta Analyses

ObjectiveTo identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity (PA) interventions with objective PA outcomes in adults and to evaluate whether intervention effects were sustained beyond 12 months.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesSeven databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and ASSIA (Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts)) were searched from January 2000 until December 2019.Eligibility criteriaRCTs reporting objective PA outcomes beyond 12 months with community-based participants aged ≥18 years were included; those where controls received active interventions, including advice to increase PA levels, were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers completed extraction of aggregate data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses used random-effects models at different follow-up points. Primary outcomes were daily steps and weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA).ResultsOf 33 282 records identified, nine studies (at generally low risk of bias) were included, five in meta-analyses with 12 months to 4 year follow-up. We observed 12 month increases for intervention vs control participants in steps/day (mean difference (MD)=554 (95% CIs: 384 to 724) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 2446 participants; four studies) and weekly MVPA minutes (MD=35 (95% CI: 27 to 43) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 2647 participants; four studies). Effects were sustained up to 4 years for steps/day (MD=494 (95% CI: 251 to 738) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 1944 participants; four studies) and weekly MVPA minutes (MD=25 (95% CI: 13 to 37) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 1458 participants; three studies).ConclusionsThere are few PA interventions with objective follow-up beyond 12 months, more studies are needed. However, this review provided evidence of PA intervention effects beyond 12 months and sustained up to 4 years for both steps/day and MVPA. These findings have important implications for potential long-term health benefits.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017075753.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of preventive and treatment interventions for primary headaches in the workplace: A systematic review of the literature

Cephalalgia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-73
Author(s):  
Arnaud Lardon ◽  
Marie-Pier Girard ◽  
Chérine Zaïm ◽  
Nadège Lemeunier ◽  
Martin Descarreaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Primary Headaches ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Preventive Medication

Aim The purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the benefits of workplace-based occupational therapies and interventions, including acute and preventive medication, on headache intensity and frequency, related disability as well as work-related outcomes. Methods A search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, CINAHL and Embase using terms related to headache, workplace and occupational health. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias assessment tool was used on individual studies to assess internal validity and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was applied to studies by clinical outcome and used to rate quality of evidence. Results Fifteen articles were included in the systematic review. None of them were classified as low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. This systematic review found preliminary low-quality evidence suggesting that exercise and acupuncture can reduce workers’ headache pain intensity, frequency and related disability. Conclusion Although this systematic review provided preliminary low evidence in favour of work-based intervention, studies with more rigorous designs and methodologies are needed to provide further evidence of the effectiveness of workplace-based headache management strategies.

scholarly journals Rehabilitation for balance impairment in patients after stroke: a protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e026844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Li ◽  
Dongling Zhong ◽  
Jing Ye ◽  
Mingxing He ◽  
Xicen Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Medical Database ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Balance Impairment ◽  
Balance Scale

IntroductionMultiple rehabilitation therapies have been reported to be effective for poststroke balance impairment. However, the comparative effectiveness of these rehabilitation therapies is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to summarise evidence and identify the most effective rehabilitation therapy for poststroke balance impairment.Methods and analysisThe following databases will be searched: China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data, the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Medline, Excerpt Medical Database (EMBASE), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, from inception to June 2019. All randomised controlled trials that have used rehabilitation interventions to treat poststroke balance impairment will be included. The primary outcomes are the Berg Balance Scale, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (balance), the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, as well as the function in sitting test, the Sitting Balance Scale, the Ottawa Sitting Scale, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, the Overall Balance Index and the Brunel Balance Assessment. The secondary outcomes include the Barthel Index, the Functional Ambulation Category Scale, fall rates, the Timed Up and Go test, the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and adverse events. To ensure that all relevant studies are included without personal bias, study selection, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Review Manager V.5.3 software will be used to make bias risk diagram and pairwise meta-analysis, while network data synthesis will be performed using WinBUGS V.1.4.3 and R software.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for systematic review and network meta-analysis. The results will be submitted to a peer review journal or at a conference.Trial registration numberPROSPERO (CRD 42018107441).

Does Smear Layer Removal Influence Root Canal Therapy Outcome? A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andréa Vaz Braga Pintor ◽  
Marcello Rotter Marins dos Santos ◽  
Daniele Masterson Ferreira ◽  
Roberta Barcelos ◽  
Laura Guimarães Primo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Root Canal Therapy ◽  
Removal Group

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the smear layer (SL) removal procedure influences the outcome of root canal treatment. Study design: We performed a search on Pubmed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Lilacs and SIGLE. We included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT), with clinical and radiographic outcomes, conducted on subjects who had undergone root canal therapy. The protocol differed only in the SL removal or maintenance procedure. We evaluated the papers for risk of bias according to the Cochrane assessment tool. Results: A total of 1,983 articles were found, after removal of duplicates, 892 remained. We included two studies in this review. One study revealed a low risk of bias and a high success rate for the SL removal group compared to the non SL removal group (P = 0.04), while the other study had a high risk of bias and found no difference between the SL removal and non SL removal groups (P = 1.00). Conclusion: We concluded that the SL removal for root canal treatment of primary teeth with initial clinical signs and symptoms or pulpal necrotic status, could benefit the outcome, although further RCT should be performed to achieve evidence.

scholarly journals Using Machine Learning Technologies in Pressure Injury Management: Systematic Review (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengyao Jiang ◽  
Yuxia Ma ◽  
Siyi Guo ◽  
Liuqi Jin ◽  
Lin Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Pressure Injury

BACKGROUND Pressure injury (PI) is a common and preventable problem, yet it is a challenge for at least two reasons. First, the nurse shortage is a worldwide phenomenon. Second, the majority of nurses have insufficient PI-related knowledge. Machine learning (ML) technologies can contribute to lessening the burden on medical staff by improving the prognosis and diagnostic accuracy of PI. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing systematic review that evaluates how the current ML technologies are being used in PI management. OBJECTIVE The objective of this review was to synthesize and evaluate the literature regarding the use of ML technologies in PI management, and identify their strengths and weaknesses, as well as to identify improvement opportunities for future research and practice. METHODS We conducted an extensive search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Wanfang database, the VIP database, and the China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) to identify relevant articles. Searches were performed in June 2020. Two independent investigators conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS A total of 32 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of those articles (38%) reported using ML technologies to develop predictive models to identify risk factors, 11 (34%) reported using them in posture detection and recognition, and 9 (28%) reported using them in image analysis for tissue classification and measurement of PI wounds. These articles presented various algorithms and measured outcomes. The overall risk of bias was judged as high. CONCLUSIONS There is an array of emerging ML technologies being used in PI management, and their results in the laboratory show great promise. Future research should apply these technologies on a large scale with clinical data to further verify and improve their effectiveness, as well as to improve the methodological quality.

scholarly journals Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e045672
Author(s):  
Abdullah Pandor ◽  
Michael Tonkins ◽  
Steve Goodacre ◽  
Katie Sworn ◽  
Mark Clowes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Risk Assessment Models ◽  
Hospital Inpatients

IntroductionHospital-acquired thrombosis accounts for a large proportion of all venous thromboembolism (VTE), with significant morbidity and mortality. This subset of VTE can be reduced through accurate risk assessment and tailored pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. This systematic review aimed to determine the comparative accuracy of risk assessment models (RAMs) for predicting VTE in patients admitted to hospital.MethodsA systematic search was performed across five electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) from inception to February 2021. All primary validation studies were eligible if they examined the accuracy of a multivariable RAM (or scoring system) for predicting the risk of developing VTE in hospitalised inpatients. Two or more reviewers independently undertook study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessments using the PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) tool. We used narrative synthesis to summarise the findings.ResultsAmong 6355 records, we included 51 studies, comprising 24 unique validated RAMs. The majority of studies included hospital inpatients who required medical care (21 studies), were undergoing surgery (15 studies) or receiving care for trauma (4 studies). The most widely evaluated RAMs were the Caprini RAM (22 studies), Padua prediction score (16 studies), IMPROVE models (8 studies), the Geneva risk score (4 studies) and the Kucher score (4 studies). C-statistics varied markedly between studies and between models, with no one RAM performing obviously better than other models. Across all models, C-statistics were often weak (<0.7), sometimes good (0.7–0.8) and a few were excellent (>0.8). Similarly, estimates for sensitivity and specificity were highly variable. Sensitivity estimates ranged from 12.0% to 100% and specificity estimates ranged from 7.2% to 100%.ConclusionAvailable data suggest that RAMs have generally weak predictive accuracy for VTE. There is insufficient evidence and too much heterogeneity to recommend the use of any particular RAM.PROSPERO registration numberSteve Goodacre, Abdullah Pandor, Katie Sworn, Daniel Horner, Mark Clowes. A systematic review of venous thromboembolism RAMs for hospital inpatients. PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020165778. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=165778https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=165778

scholarly journals Does Caffeine Consumption Affect the Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease? A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Reyhanifard ◽  
Sarvin Sanaie ◽  
Mojgan Mirghafurvand ◽  
Sama Rahnemayan ◽  
Arezoo Fathalizadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library

Objectives: This systematic review of the literature was carried out to see whether coffee consumption could affect Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), crossover studies, and quasi-experimental studies were assessed to evaluate the effect of caffeine on PD. The databases including Medline/PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized clinical trials and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to assess the quality of RCTs and non-randomized clinical trials, respectively. A meta-analysis of the results was not possible because of reporting different outcomes. Results: Four papers were included in this study. Only one study reported the significant effect of caffeine on ESS and UPDRS. Another study observed no significant effect of caffeine on ESS during three- and six-week interventions. However, a significant reduction in ESS scores in the sixth week was reported after excluding four protocol violations. This study reported that the UPDRS score reduced in the third week, but significant changes were observed after six weeks. The other two studies did not show a significant effect of caffeine on ESS and UPDRS. Conclusions: Since a meta-analysis was not conducted, there was insufficient evidence to evaluate the effect of caffeine on PD. Thus, it is recommended to conduct more well-designed RCTs with a larger sample size to assess the effect of caffeine on PD.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Nutritional Education for Obese Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 401-401
Author(s):  
Yue-Heng Yin ◽  
Liu Yat Justina
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Nutritional Education ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Education Interventions

Abstract Obesity has been shown to intensify the decline of physical function and lead to frailty. Nutrition is an important method in managing obesity and frailty, while seldom reviews have ever explored the effects of nutritional education interventions. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42019142403) to explore the effectiveness of nutritional education interventions in managing body composition and physio-psychosocial parameters related to frailty. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were searched in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus from 2001 to 2019. Hand search for the reference lists of included papers was conducted as well. We assessed the quality of included studies by Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses and narrative synthesis were used to analyse the data. Two studies with low risk of bias were screened from 180 articles, which involved 177 older people with an average age of 69.69±4.08 years old. The results showed that nutritional education was significantly effective in reducing body weight and fat mass than exercises, and it was beneficial to enhancing physical function and psychosocial well-being. But the effects of nutritional education in increasing muscle strength were not better than exercises. The combined effects of nutritional education and exercises were superior than either exercises or nutritional education interventions solely in preventing the loss of lean mass and bone marrow density, and in improving physical function. Due to limited numbers of relevant studies, the strong evidence of effectiveness of nutritional education interventions on reversing frailty is still lacking.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document