Short- and long-term mortality prediction in critically ill subjects: a cohort study
Abstract Background. There are several scoring systems used for in-hospital mortality prediction in critical illness. Their application in a local scenario requires validation to ensure appropriate diagnostic accuracy. Also, their use in assessing post-discharge mortality in the ICU survivors has not been extensively studied.Aim. To evaluate the ability of APACHE II, III and SAPS II to predict in-hospital and post-discharge mortality in adult ICU patients.Material and methods. APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II, with corresponding predicted mortality ratios, were calculated for 303 consecutive patients admitted to the 10-bed ICU in 2016. Long-term mortality was calculated based on information taken from PESEL database.Results. Median APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores were 19, 67 and 44 points, with corresponding in-hospital mortality ratios of 28.1, 18.5 and 34.8%. Observed in-hospital mortality was 35.6%. 12-month post-discharge mortality reached 17.4%. All systems predicted in-hospital mortality (p<0.05): APACHE II (AUC=0.783; 95%CI 0.732-0.828), APACHE III (AUC=0.793; 95%CI 0.743-0.838) and SAPS II (AUC=0.792; 95%CI 0.742-0.836), as well as mortality after ICU discharge (p<0.05): APACHE II (AUC=0.712; 95%CI 0.643-0.775), APACHE III (AUC=0.721; 95%CI 0.653-0.783) and SAPS II (AUC=0.695; 95%CI 0.625-0.759), with no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05).Conclusions. Although the predictive values were the highest for APACHE III and SAPS II, no differences were noticed between the scores. In case of post-discharge mortality, diagnostic accuracy was much lower. Further studies are needed to create scores estimating the long-term prognosis of subjects successfully discharged from the ICU.