Establishing Cross-Systems Collaborations for Implementation: Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study

Abstract Background: Cross-system interventions can help integrate services across different service delivery systems but require organizations to establish strong collaborative relationships for implementation. Contingency theory suggests that the effectiveness of different collaborative strategies (i.e. specific ways organizations align operations and services) varies by context. This paper describes a study of different strategies for fostering collaboration between child welfare and substance abuse treatment agencies and the conditions under which they are effective for implementation. We also describe the development and piloting of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) tool—a decision-making guide intended to help researchers and organizational leaders identify and use appropriate collaborative strategies for their context. Methods/Design: This multisite longitudinal, mixed methods study, leverages a naturally occurring implementation initiative -- in up to 17 Ohio counties -- to implement Ohio START (Sobriety Treatment and Reducing Trauma). START is a child welfare model that requires strong collaboration with local substance use treatment organizations to promote integrated services. During the first two years, we will identify collaborative strategies associated with improved START implementation (penetration and fidelity) and service delivery outcomes (timeliness), given system, and organizational features. We will conduct a convergent mixed methods study drawing on worker surveys, agency documents, administrative data, formal partner agreements, and group interviews. Data will be integrated and analyzed using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). To develop the CASPI, an expert panel comprised of implementation experts, and community stakeholders will convene to synthesize our findings and develop contents (including a decision tree). During the final year of the study, we will assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the CASPI in a randomized vignette experiment, and a pilot-test with 3 child welfare agencies that have not yet implemented START. Discussion: Our results will lay the groundwork for a larger controlled trial that will test the CASPI’s effectiveness for supporting effective and efficient implementation of cross-system interventions like START. The CASPI is expected to help leaders and researchers select and use collaboration strategies tailored to their context and be applicable in a wide range of settings including rural communities. Our work also advances system-level implementation strategies.Trial Registration: NCT03931005, Registered April 29, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03931005

Download Full-text

Establishing Cross-Systems Collaborations for Implementation: Study Protocol for Implementation Decision Support

10.21203/rs.3.rs-29980/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Alicia C. Bunger ◽

Emmeline Chuang ◽

Amanda Girth ◽

Kathryn E. Lancaster ◽

Fawn Gadel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Substance Use ◽

Decision Support ◽

Child Welfare ◽

Program Implementation ◽

Mixed Methods Study ◽

Substance Use Treatment ◽

Pilot Test ◽

Organizational Leaders ◽

Collaborative Strategies ◽

Cross System

Abstract Background: Cross-system interventions can help integrate services across different service delivery systems but require organizations to establish strong collaborative relationships for implementation. Contingency theory suggests that the effectiveness of different collaborative strategies (i.e. specific ways organizations align operations and services) varies by context. This paper describes a study of different strategies for fostering collaboration between child welfare and substance abuse treatment agencies and the conditions under which they are effective for implementation. We also describe the development and piloting of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) tool—a decision-making guide intended to help researchers and organizational leaders identify and use appropriate collaborative strategies for their context.Methods/Design: This multisite longitudinal, mixed methods study, leverages a naturally occurring implementation initiative -- in up to 17 Ohio counties -- to implement Ohio START (Sobriety Treatment and Reducing Trauma). START is a child welfare model that requires strong collaboration with local substance use treatment organizations to promote integrated services. During the first two years, we will identify collaborative strategies associated with improved START implementation (penetration and fidelity) and service delivery outcomes (timeliness), given system, and organizational features. We will conduct a convergent mixed methods study drawing on worker surveys, agency documents, administrative data, formal partner agreements, and group interviews. Data will be integrated and analyzed using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). To develop the CASPI, an expert panel comprised of implementation experts, and community stakeholders will convene to synthesize our findings and develop contents (including a decision tree). During the final year of the study, we will assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the CASPI in a randomized vignette experiment, and a pilot-test with 3 child welfare agencies that have not yet implemented START.Discussion: Our results will lay the groundwork for a larger controlled trial that will test the CASPI’s effectiveness for supporting effective and efficient implementation of cross-system interventions like START. The CASPI is expected to help leaders and researchers select and use collaboration strategies tailored to their context and be applicable in a wide range of settings including rural communities. Our work also advances system-level implementation strategies.Trial Registration: NCT03931005, Registered April 29, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03931005Contributions to the Literature · Implementing cross-system interventions depends on strong collaboration. Yet, collaborative strategies vary and the conditions under which they are most effective for implementation are unclear. · This study will (1) examine the collaborative strategies associated with implementation of a cross-system intervention that aligns child welfare and substance use treatment systems, (2) develop the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) tool, a flexible decision support for organizational leaders, and (3) pilot test CASPI with organizational leaders. · Our study is intended to advance the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing cross-system interventions by helping leaders identify challenges, and effective collaborative strategies that address them.

Download Full-text

Habits-GDM mobile application in managing gestational diabetes in Singapore: A mixed-methods study (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.23177 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shilpa Surendran ◽

Chang Siang Lim ◽

Gerald Choon Huat Koh ◽

Tong Wei Yew ◽

E Shyong Tai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mixed Methods ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Perceived Usefulness ◽

Mixed Methods Study ◽

Automatic Data ◽

Glucose Testing ◽

Randomised Controlled

BACKGROUND The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing in Singapore and the cost of providing traditional care for GDM is high. Mobile health (mHealth) applications may act as useful tools in the management of GDM. OBJECTIVE The objective of this mixed-methods study was to measure the usage behaviour and explore users’ perceived usefulness of the Habits-GDM application when managing GDM in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS We conducted a quantitative analysis of the application usage behaviour in 170 Habits-GDM application users and 14 semi-structured interviews with users from a randomised controlled trial. RESULTS The convenience of automatic data transfer of weight values to the Habits-GDM application helped users (116/170, 68%) log their weight at least once a week. However, when the application had usability challenges, users avoided using that feature, i.e. users logged only an average of less than one meal/week out of the recommended six meals/week. Of the usability challenges, many users (12/14, 85.7%) mentioned food items not worded in the commonly known way and limited ethnic food database as the primary barriers. Only half of the users (84/170, 49.4%) accessed the educational lessons, but many (9/14, 64%) identified the provision of always available, valuable health-related information as an advantage of the educational lessons. ‘Healthy eating’ and ‘Why exercise’ were the most (56/84, 66.67%) and least (38/84, 45.24%) frequently accessed educational lessons, respectively. Users (10/14, 71.4%) reported sending messages to the coach via the chat interface only when they faced logistic issues and 86.45% of all the coach messages were replies typed by the research coordinator in response to the logistics issues (i.e. a request for blood glucose testing strips and appointment confirmation) raised by the users. Healthcare professionals lack of access to the coach’s dashboard discouraged users from asking queries related to GDM via the e-coaching feature. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that mHealth application acts as a useful tool in managing GDM. Culturally sensitive mHealth applications with a provision for women to interact with healthcare professionals should be developed in cooperation with the users. CLINICALTRIAL Not applicable.

Download Full-text