scholarly journals Smartphone application for celiac patients: assessing its effect on gastrointestinal symptoms in a randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Nikniaz ◽  
Masood Shirmohammadi ◽  
Elham Maserrat ◽  
Zahra Akbari Namvar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Celiac Disease ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: We aimed to study the effectiveness of information provided via smartphone application on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with celiac disease (CD).Methods: In the present randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 patients with CD were randomly assigned to receive education through a smartphone application (n=30) or conventional clinical education (n=30). The patients were asked to use it for obtaining the required information for three months. We assessed gastrointestinal symptoms using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) questionnaire at baseline and three months after interventions. The GSRS total score, celiac disease GSRS (CD-GSRS) score, abdominal pain, reflux, diarrhea, constipation, and indigestion scores were calculated.Results: Out of 60 randomized patients, 58 patients completed the study. The mean age of the participants was 37.49±9.32 years, and the mean disease duration was 4.57±3.36 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the baseline values. In comparison to baseline, the mean CD-GSRS score (p=0.001) and indigestion subscore score (p<0.001) were significantly decreased in the intervention group. The results of the between-group comparisons showed that although the mean GSRS and CD-GSRS total scores were lower in the intervention group than in the standard care group, the differences were not statistically significant. In terms of GSRS subscores, there was a significant difference between the two groups only in the mean score of indigestion (P=0.002).Conclusion: According to the results, using smartphone application for providing information to patients with celiac disease had only a significant positive effect on indigestion symptoms compared with routine clinic education, and we did not observe any significant differences in GSRS and CD-GSRS scores between the two groups.Trial registration: The protocol of the study was registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT code: IRCT20170117032004N2). trial registry webpage: https://www.irct.ir/user/trial/40187/view. Trial registry date: 2019.6.26

scholarly journals Smartphone application for celiac patients: assessing its effect on gastrointestinal symptoms in a randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Nikniaz ◽  
Masood Shirmohammadi ◽  
Elham Masserat ◽  
Zahra Akbari Namvar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: We aimed to study the effectiveness of a “celiac” smartphone application on gastrointestinal symptoms in celiac patients. Methods: In the present randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 celiac patients were randomly assigned to receive education through a smartphone application (n=30) or conventional clinical education (n=30). We assessed the gastrointestinal symptoms using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) questionnaire at baseline and three months after interventions. The GSRS total score, celiac disease GSRS (CD-GSRS) score, abdominal pain, reflux, diarrhea, constipation, and indigestion scores were calculated. Results: Out of 60 randomized patients, 58 patients completed the study. In comparison to baseline, the mean score of GSRS total score (p=0.04), CD-GSRS score (p=0.001), and indigestion subscore (p<0.001) were significantly decreased in the intervention group. In the control group, compared to baseline, the mean scores of CD-GSRS score (p=0.03) and abdominal pain subscore (p=0.04) were significantly reduced; and the mean score of reflux (p=0.01) subscore was significantly increased. The results of the between-group comparisons showed that although the mean GSRS and CD-GSRS total scores were lower in the intervention group compared with the control group, the differences were not statistically significant. In terms of GSRS subscores, there was a significant difference between the two groups only in the mean score of indigestion (P=0.01).Conclusion: According to the results, smartphone application had a significantly positive effect on indigestion symptoms compared with routine clinic education. However, more large studies with longer duration of the follow-up period are needed to assure this approach Trial registration: The protocol of the study was registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT code: IRCT20170117032004N2). trial registry webpage: : https://www.irct.ir/user/trial/40187/view. Trial registry date: 2019.6.26

scholarly journals The Effect of Rhythmic Breathing on the Severity of Sternotomy Pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hassan Babamohamadi ◽  
Masoumeh Karkeabadi ◽  
Abbasali Ebrahimian
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Background. Moderate-to-severe pain is reported in up to 75% of the patients in the first 48 hours after cardiac surgery. Evidence suggests that distraction is an effective nursing intervention for controlling short-term and transient pain. Distraction can be achieved by various techniques, including progressive muscle relaxation, meditation, and rhythmic breathing (RB). The present research aimed at evaluating the impacts of RB on the severity of sternotomy pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Methods. This randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients after CABG surgery at the open-heart surgery Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Kowsar Hospital, affiliated to Semnan University of Medical Sciences in Semnan, Iran. The patients were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups, including (1) intervention or RB and (2) control groups. RB was performed in the intervention group every 12 hours (9 a.m. and 9 p.m.) for three consecutive days after the surgery. The control group received only routine care for pain control (opioid analgesics) with no additional interventions. The severity of pain was measured every day in both groups of patients before and after the interventions using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results. The mean postintervention pain scores were significantly different from the mean preintervention scores in the intervention group ( p  < 0.05). The changes in the mean pain score in the intervention group were also significantly different from the corresponding changes in the controls ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion. Based on the results, the severity of pain after the intervention was significantly lower in the RB group compared to the control. RB was found to be an effective technique for reducing the patients’ pain and is therefore recommended as a post-CABG pain control technique. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: this trial is clinically registered with IRCT20120109008665N7, registered 3 September 2018.

Comparision of two fluoride varnishes for controlling white spot lesions. Randomized clinical trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Alberto Luengo - Fereira
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
White Spot ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
White Spot Lesions ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To compare two fluorinated varnishes for the control of white spot lesions.Material and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. A total of 103 active whitespot lesions on permanent upper anterior teeth from 24 patients, aged 7 to 9 years were randomly assigned totwo groups, G1: Duraphat® (n=52) and G2: DuraShield® (n=51). Weekly applications were perform for fourconsecutive weeks. Fifth week the dimension, regression and activity of the lesions were evaluated. Student’sT test, Wilcoxon Ranks and Chi square were used at 5% significance. Results: At the end of the study, the lesion reduction was observed in 69.7%, finding significant differences(p<0.05) in the mean of the initial and final dimensions in general (2.74 mm to 1.91 mm) and in each group, G1(2.84 mm to 2.03 mm), G2 (2.64 mm to 1.78 mm). In the activity of the lesions, it was found in the G1, 12 active and6 inactive lesions; while in G2, there were 14 active and 29 inactive; these differences were significant (p<0.05). Conclusions: The two evaluated products showed similar clinical efficacy in the remineralization of activewhite spot lesions after 4 weeks of therapy.

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Four Anti-Dandruff Shampoos

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Rapaport
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Test Preparation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Rate Of Improvement

A total of 199 patients were selected for a comparison of the anti-dandruff efficacy of four shampoos. After a 2-week lead-in (all patients used only Johnson's Baby Shampoo twice weekly) the patients were randomly assigned to Selsun Blue®, Head & Shoulders®, Flex®, or Tegrin®. The test preparation, which was unknown to the observer, was used twice weekly for 4 weeks. Loose and adherent dandruff were each rated on a scale of 0 to 20 (absent to severe) at the end of the lead-in (when a total score of 15 was required), and each week of study. The mean total pre-study score for all subjects was 19.5. At the end of the study the mean improvement scores were: 162 (Selsun Blue), 14.6 (Head & Shoulders), 13.5 (Flex), and 13.1 (Tegrin). The improvement was significantly greater (p < 0.05) on Selsun Blue than on any of the other shampoos. At the end of the study significantly (p < 0.05) more patients had total scores of zero on Selsun Blue (15) than on Tegrin or Head & Shoulders. In addition, the rate of improvement was significantly (p < 0.05) faster with Selsun Blue than with any of the other test preparations.

scholarly journals The Effect of Isometric Exercises on Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Sara Azima ◽  
Hajar Rajaei Bakhshayesh ◽  
Keramatollah Abbasnia ◽  
Maasumeh Kaviani ◽  
Mehrab Sayadi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Primary Dysmenorrhea ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pharmacological Method

Background: Primary dysmenorrhea is the most common cyclic pelvic pain and is also the most common gynecological problem worldwide and affects quality of life. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of isometric exercises on intensity and duration of pain and level of anxiety in the students with primary dysmenorrhea.Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 68 students living in dormitories of Shiraz University with primary dysmenorrhea  were randomly assigned to isometric exercises and control groups. The intervention group performed isometric exercises since the third day of the menstrual cycle for 8 weeks. Pain intensity was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, the anxiety level was assessed using Spielberger questionnaire. The data were analyzed using independent t-test, repeated measures ANOVA, and Bonferroni Post hoc test at the end of the second and third months of the study. Besides, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results: Pain intensity and duration of pain was significantly reduced in exercises group (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups concerning the mean anxiety levels.Conclusion: Primary dysmenorrhea is a common complaint among young women. Isometric exercises seem to be an easy, non-pharmacological method for reducing primary dysmenorrheal.

scholarly journals Comparison of Complications and Safety of Hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasureand Hemorrhoidectomy with Ferguson: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-56
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Control

Introduction: Hemorrhoid is one of the most common anorectal diseases which affects 5% of the general population. Complications and pain are inevitable after all surgeries with different intensities and degrees.Management and control of these complications is one of the most important aspects of postoperative care. There are surgical techniques and interventions for the treatment and control of pain after hemorrhoid. According to the contradictory results of the studies on surgical methods, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness, complications, and safety of hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasureand Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: The study sample in this randomized controlled clinical trial studyincluded54 patientswhowere randomly divided into two groupsofLigasureandFerguson surgery. Prior to the surgery, patients were educated abouttheVisual Analogue Scale(VAS).Patients underwent general anesthesia and the same surgeon performed the surgery in both groups. Immediately after the surgery (oncethe patient regainedconsciousness and understoodthe environment), 6, 12, and 24 hours after the surgery, patients’ pain and complications were assessed.The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 18)through independent t-test, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test at a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The mean bleeding during the surgery was significantly lower in the Ligasuregroupthan the Ferguson group. The mean pain at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hafterthe surgery was not significantly different between the two groups.Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the Ligasuregroup than the Ferguson group. Conclusion: Ligasurehemorrhoidectomy is not superior to the Ferguson method in terms of analgesia up to 24 h after the surgery; however, this method of surgeryis preferable to the Ferguson method in terms of bleeding during the surgery.

scholarly journals Effect of an Ergonomics Educational Program on Musculoskeletal Disorders in Nursing Staff Working in the Operating Room: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (19) ◽  
pp. 7333
Author(s):  
Tahereh Abdollahi ◽  
Shadan Pedram Razi ◽  
Daryoush Pahlevan ◽  
Mir Saeed Yekaninejad ◽  
Sara Amaniyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
The Body ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background: Nursing staff working in the operating room are exposed to risk factors that can cause musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and work-related disabilities. The use of ergonomics principles can help with the prevention of MSDs. This study aimed to examine the effect of an ergonomics educational program on MSDs among nursing staff working in the operating room. Methods: In this pragmatic parallel group quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial, 74 nursing staff working in the operating rooms of two teaching hospitals participated. The hospitals were randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group and all nursing staff working in the operating room of each hospital were invited to take part in this research. They were initially assessed for the prevalence and risk of MSDs by using the Nordic questionnaire and the rapid entire body assessment (REBA) checklist. The intervention group received the ergonomics educational program and were assessed in two-week intervals over a period of three months. At the end of the study, the risk and prevalence of MSDs were compared between the intervention and control groups. Results: Statistically significant differences were reported between the groups in terms of the prevalence and risk of MSDs. The overall risk of MSDs decreased in the intervention group after the educational program (p = 0.03). The reduction in the prevalence of MSDs in the different parts of the body in the intervention group was as follows: ankle (p = 0.005), hand/wrist (p = 0.041), low back (p = 0.000), the neck (p = 0.003), hip (p = 0.001) and shoulder (p = 0.043). Conclusion: The education of nursing staff about ergonomics can influence the prevalence and risk of MSDs. Therefore, it should be incorporated into the degree education and on-the-job training initiatives for nurses working in the operating theatre in order to reduce workplace injuries and associated absences, and increase the quality of care delivered by them. This clinical trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT2015081823677N1.

scholarly journals Treatment of Periimplantitis with Electrolytic Cleaning versus Mechanical and Electrolytic Cleaning: 18-Month Results from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3475
Author(s):  
Markus Schlee ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang ◽  
Thomas Stumpf ◽  
Urs Brodbeck ◽  
Dieter Bosshardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Regenerative Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Probing Pocket Depth ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
The Mean

Aim of the study: This RCT assesses patients’ 18-month clinical outcomes after the regenerative therapy of periimplantitis lesions using either an electrolytic method (EC) to remove biofilms or a combination of powder spray and an electrolytic method (PEC). Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients (24 implants) suffering from periimplantitis were randomly treated by EC or PEC followed by augmentation and submerged healing. Probing pocket depth (PPD), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), suppuration, and standardized radiographs were assessed before surgery (T0), 6 months after augmentation (T1), and 6 (T2) and 12 (T3) months after the replacement of the restoration. Results: The mean PPD changed from 5.8 ± 1.6 mm (T0) to 3.1 ± 1.4 mm (T3). While BoP and suppuration at T0 were 100%, BoP decreased at T2 to 36.8% and at T3 to 35.3%. Suppuration was found to be at a level of 10.6% at T2 and 11.8% at T3. The radiologic bone level measured from the implant shoulder to the first visible bone to the implant contact was 4.9 ± 1.9 mm at mesial sites and 4.4 ± 2.2 mm at distal sites at T0 and 1.7 ± 1.7 mm and 1.5 ± 17 mm at T3. Conclusions: Significant radiographic bone fill and the improvement of clinical parameters were demonstrated 18 months after therapy.

scholarly journals The effect of a care plan based on the Roy adaptation model on general health in hemodialysis patients; a randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e11-e11
Author(s):  
Monir Nobahar ◽  
Mohadese Saffari ◽  
Hassan Babamohamadi ◽  
Nemat Sotodehasl ◽  
Majid Mirmohammadkhani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Health ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Roy Adaptation Model ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Adaptation Model

Introduction: Evidence suggests that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) significantly affects general health in the patients, causing their general health to be poorer compared to the general population. The Roy adaptation model (RAM) is the best one for ESRD patients. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the effect of a RAM-based care plan on general health in hemodialysis patients. Patients and Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial conducted on 60 hemodialysis patients in Iran. The data collected using a demographic questionnaire and the general health questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28). In the intervention group, the Roy assessment form was completed and the RAM-based care plan was then trained in four group sessions over 4 weeks. Individual sessions were also held if required and patients followed-up for 2 weeks. The control group received only routine care. At the end of the follow-up, general health was re-assessed in the patients. The findings were analysed using t test, the chi-square test and the McNemar test. Results: Despite observing no significant differences between the two groups in terms of general health levels before the intervention (P=0.530), the difference was significant after the intervention (P=0.028), since the mean score of general health decreased by 4.07 in the intervention group compared to before the intervention (P=0.003). The intervention significantly affected the subscales of somatic symptoms (P=0.013), anxiety and insomnia (P=0.006), social dysfunction (P=0.016) and depression (P=0.031). Conclusion: The findings suggested the positive effects of using the RAM on general health in hemodialysis patients. The RAM is therefore recommended that be used as a holistic care approach to improving general health in these patients

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document