scholarly journals Haematopoietic Score for the Prognostic Evaluation of Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing First-line Treatment With a Bortezomib-based Regimen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
JingSong He ◽  
XiaoYan Yue ◽  
XiaoYan Han ◽  
DongHua He ◽  
Yi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Prognostic Predictors ◽  
Cell Percentage ◽  
Treatment Centre ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Backgroud: It is very important to evaluate the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients before starting treatment. Although haematopoietic status may have a significant impact on patient survival, it has not received sufficient attention in current clinical practice.Methods:This was a retrospective study of 150 newly diagnosed MM patients treated in one hematonosis treatment centre from May 2013 to June 2016, all of whom received first-line treatment with a bortezomib-based regimen.The effects of haematopoietic factors, including haemoglobin levels (Hgb <100 g/L), mean corpuscular volume (MCV>99.1 fL), and platelet count (<150 × 10E9/L), on the prognosis of the patients were analysed. Each of the above factors was assigned a value of 1 to generate a haematopoietic score.Results: According to the results, 59 (39.3%) patients had a score of 0, 43 (28.7%) had a score of 1, 29 (19.3%) had a score of 2, and 19 (12.7%) had a score of 3. The median PFS times were 43.1, 24.5, 32.6 and 14.2 months, respectively (P<0.001), and the median OS times were NR, 47.1 months, NR and 31.4 months, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that the R-ISS stage (3 vs 1-2, HR, 1.4), haematopoietic score (3 vs 0-2, HR, 1.91) and plasma cell percentage (>30%, HR, 1.96) are independent prognostic predictors for PFS; age (≤65 years, HR, 0.54), the Durie-Salmon stage (3B vs 1-3a, HR, 2.96), haematopoietic score (3 vs 0-2, HR, 2.53) and the bone marrow plasma cell percentage (>30%, HR, 2.35) are independent prognostic predictors of OS. Conclusion: This study suggests that the haematopoietic score can be used to evaluate the prognosis of newly treated MM patients in the era of new drugs. However, there is still a need to enlarge the number of cases and carry out prospective research to validate this conclusion.

scholarly journals Hematopoietic Score for the Prognostic Evaluation of Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing First-Line Treatment With A Bortezomib-Based Regimen

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
JingSong He ◽  
XiaoYan Yue ◽  
XiaoYan Han ◽  
DongHua He ◽  
Yi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Prognostic Predictors ◽  
Cell Percentage ◽  
Bone Marrow Plasma ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: It is very important to evaluate the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients before starting treatment. Although hematopoietic status may have a significant impact on patient survival, it has not received sufficient attention in current clinical practice. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 328 newly diagnosed MM patients received first-line treatment with a bortezomib-based regimen. The effects of hematopoietic factors, including hemoglobin (Hgb) levels, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and platelet count (Plt) on the prognosis of the patients were analysed. Results: Hgb<100 g/L, MCV>99.1fL and Plt<150×109/L significantly affect the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of MM patients, each of the above factors was assigned a value of 1 to generate a hematopoietic score. According to the results, 93 (28.4%), 103 (31.4%), 90 (27.4%) and 42 (12.8%) patients had a score of 0, 1, 2, 3, respectively. The median PFS were 38.7, 55.9, 23.9 and 16.7 months, respectively (P<0.001), and the median OS were not reached (NR), 68.4months, 53.6 and 33.2 months, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that hematopoietic score (2-3 vs 0-1, HR, 1.64) and bone marrow plasma cell percentage (>30%, HR, 1.54) are independent prognostic predictors for PFS; age (≥70 years, HR, 1.67), hematopoietic score (2-3 vs 0-1, HR, 1.60), serum creatinine level (>177umol/L, HR, 2.15) and bone marrow plasma cell percentage (>30%, HR, 1.81) are independent prognostic predictors of OS. Conclusions: This study suggests that the hematopoietic score can be used to evaluate the prognosis of newly treated MM patients in the era of new drugs. However, there is still a need to enlarge the number of cases and carry out prospective research to validate this conclusion.

Current Treatment Approaches to Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 690-699
Author(s):  
Susanne Ghandili ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Carsten Bokemeyer ◽  
Lisa Beatrice Leypoldt
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Cell Clone ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Multiple myeloma is a so far incurable malignant plasma cell disorder. During the past 2 decades, treatment paradigms substantially changed when novel drugs were introduced initially in treatment of relapsed disease and subsequently also in first-line treatment. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Up to now, first-line treatment differs between patients initially classified as transplant eligible and those who are considered as nontransplant eligible. Transplant-eligible patients receive a primary proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based induction which is being combined with an immunomodulating agent and a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody followed by high-dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation with subsequent maintenance treatment with lenalidomide. Patients who are considered as nontransplant eligible receive upfront treatment preferentially with a continuous combination treatment either with a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody in combination with the immunomodulating agent lenalidomide or a lenalidomide-PI combination followed by lenalidomide maintenance. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Primary goal of the initiated treatment is to induce a rapid and deep remission which ideally leads to an eradication of the residual plasma cell clone in sense of a minimal residual disease negativity. Achievement of long-term remission with limited toxicity despite continuous treatment strategies and maintenance or improvement of life-quality is key. Despite successful treatment options, specific difficult-to-treat subgroups, especially patients with high-risk myeloma remain with inferior prognosis and a clear unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies. Future concepts will evaluate cellular treatments and other innovative immunotherapies in first-line treatment in curative intention.

scholarly journals Bortezomib-based therapy in non-transplant multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective cohort study from the FABIO project

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072199648
Author(s):  
Matteo Franchi ◽  
Claudia Vener ◽  
Donatella Garau ◽  
Ursula Kirchmayer ◽  
Mirko Di Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Model Average ◽  
Italian Regions ◽  
First Line Treatment

Introduction: Randomized clinical trials showed that bortezomib, in addition to conventional chemotherapy, improves survival and disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation. The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is the evaluation of both clinical and economic profile of bortezomib-based versus conventional chemotherapy in daily clinical practice. Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of six Italian regions were used to identify adult patients with non-transplant MM, who started a first-line therapy with bortezomib-based or conventional chemotherapy. Patients were matched by propensity score and were followed from treatment start until death, lost to follow-up or study end-point. Overall survival (OS) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Association between first-line treatment and risk of death was estimated by a conditional Cox proportional regression model. Average mean cumulative costs were estimated and compared between groups. Results: In the period 2010–2016, 3509 non-transplant MM patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 1157 treated with bortezomib-based therapy were matched to 1826 treated with conventional chemotherapy. Median OS and RMST were 33.9 and 27.9 months, and 42.9 and 38.4 months, respectively, in the two treatment arms. Overall, these values corresponded to a HR of death of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71–0.89) over a time horizon of 84 months. Average cumulative cost were 83,839 € and 54,499 €, respectively, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,333 € per year of life gained, a cost coherent with the willingness-to-pay thresholds frequently adopted from Western countries. Conclusions: These data suggested that, in a large cohort of non-transplant MM patients treated outside the experimental setting, first-line treatment with bortezomib-based therapy was associated with a favourable effectiveness and cost-effectiveness profile.

scholarly journals Review of Treatment Options for the Management of Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3745
Author(s):  
Hélène Vellemans ◽  
Marc P. E. André
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Western World ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Line Treatment

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a lymphoid-type hematologic disease that is derived from B cells. The incidence of this lymphoid malignancy is around 2–3/100,000/year in the western world. Long-term remission rates are linked to a risk-adapted approach, which allows remission rates higher than 80%. The first-line treatment for advanced stage classical HL (cHL) widely used today is doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) or escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) chemotherapy. Randomized studies comparing these two regimens and a recently performed meta-analysis have demonstrated consistently better disease control with BEACOPPesc. However, this treatment is not the standard of care, as there is an excess of acute hematological toxicities and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Moreover, there is a recurrent controversy concerning the impact on overall survival with this regimen. More recently, new drugs such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors have become available and have been evaluated in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced cHL with the objective of tumor control improvement. There are still major debates with respect to first-line treatment of advanced cHL. The use of positron emission tomography-adapted strategies has allowed a reduction in the toxicity of chemotherapy regimens. Incorporation of new drugs into the treatment algorithms requires confirmation.

scholarly journals SYSTEMIC FRONT LINE THERAPY OF FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA: WHEN, TO WHOM AND HOW

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e2016062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Pavanello ◽  
Sara Steffanoni ◽  
Michele Ghielmini ◽  
Emanuele Zucca
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

The natural history of follicular lymphoma is usually characterized by an indolent course with a high response rate to the first line therapy followed by recurrent relapses, with a time to next treatment becoming shorter after each subsequent treatment line. More than 80% of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. The time of initiation and the nature of the treatment is mainly conditioned by symptoms, tumor burden, lymphoma grading, co-morbidities and patients preference. A number of clinical and biological factors have been determined to be prognostic in this disease, but the majority of them could not show to be predictive of response to treatment, and therefore can’t be used to guide the treatment choice. CD20 expression is the only predictive factor recognized in the treatment of FL and justifies the use of “naked” or “conjugated” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as single agent or in combination with chemo- or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, as this marker is almost universally found in FL, it has little role for the choice of treatment. The outcome of patients with FL improved significantly in the last years, mainly due to the widespread use of rituximab, autologous and allogeneic transplantation in young and fit relapsed patients, the introduction of new drugs and the improvement in diagnostic accuracy and management of side effects. Agents as new monoclonal antibodies, immuno-modulating drugs and target therapy have recently been developed and approved for the relapsed setting, while studies to evaluate their role in first line treatment are still ongoing. Here we report our considerations on first line treatment approach and on the potential factors which could help in the choice of therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document