scholarly journals Perception of Aesthetic Impairment in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Case Control Study Using a Semi-Quantitative Scale for Body Image Assessment.

Author(s):  
Méryem-Maud Farhat ◽  
Pierre Guerreschi ◽  
Sandrine Morell-Dubois ◽  
Valérie Deken ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a fibrotic disease. Assessment of body image could be central in optimizing care. Yet, data are scarce. The main objective was to assess perception of aesthetic impairment using a visual aesthetic scale (AES) in patients with SSc compared to healthy subjects. Secondary objectives were to assess associations between perception of aesthetic impairment and standardized questionnaires for aesthetic impairment as well as clinical, psychological/quality of life, and functional parameters of SSc. Methods: This study evaluated and compared perception of aesthetic impairment in two populations: patients with SSc, in a referral center at Lille Hospital, France, and healthy controls. Results: This study included 88 patients (69 [78.4%] women) with a median age of 52 years and 88 controls (49 [55.7%] women) with a median age of 45 years. Perception of aesthetic impairment assessed using the AES was poorer in patients than in controls (3.7 ± 0.3 vs 2.8 ± 0.3, p=0.028), with statistical correlation with ASWAP. Patients with anxiety or depressive symptoms had significantly higher AES scores. Conclusion: The AES appears to be an ease of use tool to evaluate body image. Correlations found with psychological and quality of life parameters reflect the importance of these parameters for body image evaluation and its complex assessment.Trials registration: NCT03271320

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1011.1-1011
Author(s):  
M. M. Farhat ◽  
P. Guerreschi ◽  
S. Morell-Dubois ◽  
V. Deken ◽  
J. Labreuche ◽  
...  

Background:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a fibrotic autoimmune disease characterized by dermatological involvement. Skin involvement can alter appearance, which can have a psychological impact(1). Assessment of body image could be central in optimizing care. Yet, data are scarce(2).Objectives:The main objective of our study was to assess aesthetic impairment measured on a visual aesthetic scale (AES) (3) in patients with SSc compared to a group of healthy subjects. Secondary objectives were to assess associations between aesthetic impairment and standardized questionnaires for aesthetic impairment as well as clinical, biological, psychological/quality of life, and functional parameters of SSc.Methods:The “Sclero-esthet” study is a descriptive single-center study of two populations: patients with SSc, included in a referral center for systemic and autoimmune diseases at Lille Hospital, France, and healthy controls.Results:This study, from January 2017 to October 2017, included 88 patients (69 [78.4%] women) with a median age of 52 years (range: 43 to 59) and 88 controls (49 [55.7%] women) with a median age of 45 years (range: 32 to 55). Perception of physical changes assessed using the AES was greater in cases than in controls (3.7 ± 0.3 vs 2.8 ± 0.3, p=0.028), with statistical correlation with ASWAP. SSc patients with anxiety or depressive symptoms had significantly higher AES scores. Cases presented poorer quality of life than controls.Conclusion:The AES appears to be a good tool to evaluate aesthetic impairment. Correlations found with psychological and quality of life parameters support the need to improve patient management in this field.References:[1]Cash TF. Body image: past, present, and future. Body Image 2004;1(1):1–5.[2]Benrud-Larson LM, Heinberg LJ, Boling C, Reed J, White B, Wigley FM. Body image dissatisfaction among women with scleroderma: extent and relationship to psychosocial function. Health Psychol mars. 2003;22(2):130–9.[3]Nguyen C, Ranque B, Baubet T, Bérezné A, Mestre-Stanislas C, Rannou F, et al. Clinical, Functional and Health-Related Quality of Life Correlates of Clinically Significant Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Survey. PLoS ONE 2014;9(2).[4]Heinberg LJ, Kudel I, White B, Kwan A, Medley K, Wigley F. Assessing body image in patients with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): Validation of the Adapted Satisfaction with Appearance Scale. Body Image 2007;4(1):79–86.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Louza Santiago ◽  
Eduardo Santos ◽  
Ana Catarina Duarte ◽  
Patrícia Martins ◽  
Marlene Sousa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients’ objectives and experiences must be core to the study and management of chronic diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although patient-reported outcomes have attracted increasing attention, evaluation of the impact of disease on the overall subjective well-being, equivalent to ‘happiness’, is remarkably lacking. Objectives To examine the determinants of happiness and quality of life in patients with SSc, with emphasis on disease features and personality traits. Methods Observational, cross-sectional multicentre study, including 142 patients, with complete data regarding disease activity, disease impact, personality, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and happiness. Structural equation modelling was used to evaluate the association between the variables. Results The results indicated an acceptable fit of the model to the data. Perceived disease impact had a significant negative direct relation with HR-QoL (β=-0.79, p < 0.001) and with happiness (β=-0.52, p < 0.001). Positive personality traits had a positive relation with happiness (β = 0.36, p = 0.002) and an important indirect association upon QoL (β = 0.43) and happiness (β = 0.23). Perceived disease impact is influenced by body image, fatigue, and SSc-related disability to a higher degree (β =  0.6–0.7) than by disease activity (β = 0.28) or form (β = 0.17). Impact of disease had a much stronger relation with HR-QoL than with happiness. Conclusions The results suggest that treatment strategies targeting not only disease control but also the mitigation of relevant domains of disease impact (body image, fatigue, global disability) may be important to improve the patients’ experience of the disease. The reinforcement of resilience factors, such as positive psychological traits, may also play a contributory role towards better patient outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 698.2-698
Author(s):  
L. Brites ◽  
F. Costa ◽  
L. Saraiva ◽  
A. R. Cunha ◽  
J. A. P. Da Silva ◽  
...  

Background:Satisfaction with body image has a major impact in quality of life. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a can result in disfiguring physical changes.Objectives:Our aim was to determine the impact of systemic sclerosis on body image using the Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (SWAP). (1)Methods:Cross-sectional study including patients satisfying the 2013 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SSc diagnosis, aged ≥ 18 years, treated in a tertiary Rheumatology Department. Demographic and clinical data were collected from Reuma.pt and clinical records. All patients provided informed consent and fulfilled SWAP questionnaire, which consists of 14 questions in 4 subscales: satisfaction with facial appearance, satisfaction with non-facial appearance, social discomfort due to appearance and perceived social impact of appearance. Patients rate each item on a numerical rating scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores for the facial and non-facial appearance range from 0-24 and scores for the social discomfort and perceived social impact subscales range from 0-18. Total SWAP score can range from 0-84 and higher values indicate greater dissatisfaction with appearance and poorer body image. A descriptive analysis was used to summarize demographic and clinical data; categorical variables were described using frequencies; and continuous data using mean and standard deviation. Correlation between variables [Rodnan, age, disease duration, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Short Form Health Survey (SF36)] and SWAP score was tested with Pearson or Spearman coefficient, as appropriated. Scores of SWAP and its subscales in preclinical, limited and diffuse forms of SSc were compared using ANOVA test. Analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics, V.21 andp<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:We enrolled 38 patients, 84.2% (n=32) female, with mean age 60.3±14.5 years and mean disease duration 13.3±6.5 years. All but one were caucasian. Fifty percent (n=19) had a limited form, 26.3% (n=10) had preclinical scleroderma and 23.7% (n=9) had a diffuse form of SSc. Regarding the autoantibody profile: 63.2% (n=24) had anti-centromere antibodies, 28.9% (n=11) had anti-Scl-70 antibodies, 5.3% (n=2) had anti-PM antibodies and 2.6% (n=1) had no positive antibodies. The median of Rodnan scores was 4 (IQR 0-9). The total mean SWAP score was 44.8±12.5 with worse results at “Satisfaction with facial appearance” subscale (mean score 14.4±6.1). There is no statistically significant difference in the SWAP score (or its subscales) between the three diagnosis subtypes. No statistically significant correlation was found between the total and subscale SWAP scores and any of the continuous variables considered and no statistically significant difference was found between the different forms of SSc.Conclusion:We found no significant differences between preclinical, limited or diffused SS. SWAP scores were not significantly correlated with the total Rodnan score, age or disease duration. Contrary to our expectations SWAP did not show any relationship with depression, anxiety (HADS) or quality of Life (SF-36) However, our sample is too small to support definite conclusions. Further studies assessing body image in SSc and its impact in quality of life are warranted to support the holistic care of these patients.References:[1]doi:10.3899/jrheum.141482.;[2]10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.130;[3]10.3899/jrheum.141482.Disclosure of Interests:Luisa Brites: None declared, Flavio Costa: None declared, LILIANA SARAIVA: None declared, Ana Rita Cunha: None declared, José Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Tânia Santiago: None declared, Maria Joao Salvador: None declared


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 92-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Mikołajczyk ◽  
Teresa Rzepa ◽  
Joanna Król ◽  
Ryszard Żaba

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 1624-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah D. Mills ◽  
Rina S. Fox ◽  
Erin L. Merz ◽  
Philip J. Clements ◽  
Suzanne Kafaja ◽  
...  

Objective.Changes in appearance are common in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and can significantly affect well-being. The Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (SWAP) measures body image dissatisfaction in persons with visible disfigurement; the Brief-Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (Brief-SWAP) is its short form. The present study evaluated the reliability and validity of SWAP and Brief-SWAP scores in SSc.Methods.A sample of 207 patients with SSc participating in the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Quality of Life Study completed the SWAP. Brief-SWAP scores were derived from the SWAP. The structural validity of both measures was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability of total and subscale scores was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Convergent and divergent validity was evaluated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 questionnaire.Results.SWAP and Brief-SWAP total scores were highly correlated (r = 0.97). The 4-factor structure of the SWAP fit well descriptively; the 2-factor structure of the Brief-SWAP fit well descriptively and statistically. Internal consistencies for total and subscale scores were good, and results supported convergent and divergent validity.Conclusion.Both versions are suitable for use in patients with SSc. The Brief-SWAP is most efficient; the full SWAP yields additional subscales that may be informative in understanding body image issues in patients with SSc.


Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yaron Har-Shai ◽  
Lior Har-Shai ◽  
Viktor A. Zouboulis ◽  
Christos C. Zouboulis

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Auricular keloids belong to the most perplexing medical conditions, which have significant psychosocial impact on the patient’s body image and quality of life. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The article is purposed to provide dermatologists and plastic surgeons with the best proven practice using intralesional cryosurgery for the treatment of the different auricular keloid types in order to obtain superior clinical results by minimizing the probability of recurrence. In the past 20 years, the authors have developed novel procedures in order to increase the effectiveness of intralesional cryosurgery on auricular keloids, including hydrodissection, warm gauze technique, and excision of dangling skin. Long-lasting clinical results with a low recurrence rate and a satisfactory aesthetic outcome are achieved with no deformation of the ear framework.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document