scholarly journals Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Combined Induction Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Improves Survival in N2-3-positive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Yun Tao ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Cai-Xian He ◽  
Ran Li ◽  
Kun-Peng Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to explore the clinical value of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and induction chemotherapy (ICT).Methods: We included 839 newly diagnosed LANC patients in the study. ICT plus CCRT (ICT+CCRT group) was administered to 443 patients and 396 patients who received ACT after receiving ICT plus CCRT (ICT+CCRT+ACT group). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out in this study. Furthermore, to balance the study and control groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied.Results: 373 pairs of LANC patients were obtained after the PSM analysis. We found that ACT following ICT+CCRT had no significant effect on improving the survival of LANC patients. By further exploring the ICT+CCRT+ACT regimen, we excluded N0-1-positive patients and performed PSM in the ICT+CCRT and ICT+CCRT+ACT groups again. Each group consisted of 237 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that there was a difference between the ICT+CCRT and ICT+CCRT+ACT groups in terms of the 5-year overall survival (OS) (78.9% vs. 85.0%, P = 0.034), disease-free survival (DFS) (73.4% vs. 81.7%, P = 0.029), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (84.9% vs. 76.0%, P = 0.019). In addition, the ICT+CCRT+ACT group had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 acute leukocytopenia/neutropenia.Conclusion: Compared with ICT+CCRT, ACT following ICT plus CCRT can reduce distant metastasis of N2-3-positive LANC and improve the OS and DFS of these patients, thus demonstrating higher clinical feasibility.

scholarly journals The Clinical Outcomes and Toxicities of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Zou ◽  
Jing-Jing Yuan ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Jian-Wu Ding ◽  
Bing Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

PurposeTo analyze the outcomes and toxicities of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).MethodsRetrospective analysis of 163 patients with LA-NPC referred from August 2015 to December 2018 was carried out. All patients underwent platinum-based ICT followed by CCRT plus ACT.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 40 months, ranging from 5 to 69 months. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 80.8, 90.0, 91.6, and 87.4%, respectively. The most frequent acute grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (66.8%), neutropenia (55.8%), mucositis (41.1%), thrombocytopenia (27.0%), and anemia (14.7%).ConclusionICT followed by CCRT plus ACT did not seemingly enhance DFS and OS in LA-NPC patients compared to the addition of ICT to CCRT (historical controls). In contrast, ICT followed by CCRT plus ACT had more acute adverse events than ICT followed by CCRT. Longer-term clinical studies are required to examine the treatment outcomes and late toxicities.

scholarly journals Improved Overall Survival and Decreased Metastasis With Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil and Platinum Chemotherapy After Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for N3 Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Registry-Based Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mu-Hung Tsai ◽  
Shang-Yin Wu ◽  
Tsung Yu ◽  
Sen-Tien Tsai ◽  
Yuan-Hua Wu
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background and purpose Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the established treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, there is no evidence supporting routine adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to demonstrate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and distant metastasis in high-risk N3 NPC patients. Materials and methods We linked the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Cause of Death database to obtain data. Clinical N3 NPC patients were divided as those receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and platinum (PF) chemotherapy and those receiving no chemotherapy after CCRT. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and distant metastasis in both groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results We included 431 patients (152 and 279 patients in the adjuvant PF and observation groups, respectively). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. The 5-year overall survival were 69.1% and 57.4% in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy and observation groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for baseline prognostic factors (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86; p = 0.005). Distant metastasis-free survival at 12 months was higher in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy group than in the observation group (98% vs 84.8%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with freedom from distant metastasis (HR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.46; p = 0.003). Conclusion Prospective evaluation of adjuvant PF chemotherapy in N3 NPC patients treated with definitive CCRT is warranted because adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and decreased risk of distant metastasis.

scholarly journals Treatment effects of cumulative cisplatin dose during radiotherapy following induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: propensity score analyses

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592093742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Peng ◽  
Jia-Luo Chen ◽  
Guang-Li Zhu ◽  
Cheng-Long Huang ◽  
Jun-Yan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Propensity Scores ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Similar Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Background: The treatment effects of cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) during radiotherapy (RT) following induction chemotherapy (IC) have not been determined for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A total of 3460 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who were treated with IC plus cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy or RT alone were included in this retrospective study. Three CCD groups (0 mg/m2 ⩽ CCD <100 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2 ⩽ CCD <200 mg/m2, CCD ⩾200 mg/m2) were balanced through the inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores estimated by a general boosted model. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: CCD ⩾200 mg/m2 and <200 mg/m2 exhibited similar treatment effects for OS and DMFS, and were both superior to CCD <100 mg/m2 for OS and DMFS in patients with stage IVa NPC. The three CCD groups achieved similar treatment effects for patients with stage II–III NPC. After IC, CCD during RT appeared to exert little treatment effect on LRFS. Conclusion: The CCD during RT exerts treatment effects and improves OS by reducing the risk of distant metastasis for patients with stage IVa NPC following IC, and CCD <200 mg/m2 (mainly 160 mg/m2 in this group) is recommended. However, RT alone may be sufficient after IC in patients with stage II–III NPC.

scholarly journals Geographical disparities in the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a large institution-based cohort study from an endemic area

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e037150
Author(s):  
Si-Ting Lin ◽  
Dong-Fang Meng ◽  
Qi Yang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Li-Xia Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectivesGeographical disparities have been identified as a specific barrier to cancer screening and a cause of worse outcomes for patients with cancer. In the present study, our aim was to assess the influence of geographical disparities on the survival outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).DesignCohort study.SettingGuangzhou, China.ParticipantsA total of 1002 adult patients with NPC (724 males and 278 females) who were classified by area of residence (rural or urban) received IMRT from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014, at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Following propensity score matching (PSM), 812 patients remained in the analysis.Main outcome measuresWe used PSM to reduce the bias of variables associated with treatment effects and outcome prediction. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors.ResultsIn the matched cohort, 812 patients remained in the analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the rural group was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS, p<0.001), disease-free survival (DFS, p<0.001), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS, p=0.003) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, p<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression showed worse OS (HR=3.126; 95% CI 1.902 to 5.138; p<0.001), DFS (HR=2.579; 95% CI 1.815 to 3.665; p<0.001), LRRFS (HR=2.742; 95% CI 1.359 to 5.533; p=0.005) and DMFS (HR=2.461; 95% CI 1.574 to 3.850; p<0.001) for patients residing in rural areas.ConclusionsThe survival outcomes of patients with NPC who received the same standardised treatment were significantly better in urban regions than in rural regions. By analysing the geographic disparities in outcomes for NPC, we can guide the formulation of healthcare policies.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy In Subgroups of Stage III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Analysis Based On 10-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Wu Zheng ◽  
Wanqin Cheng ◽  
Dehuan Xie ◽  
Feifei Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N2 Disease

Abstract PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in subgroups of stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the context of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods272 patients with stage III NPC who underwent IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological features were evaluated by a Cox regression model to identify independent prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 108 months. The 10-year locoregional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.8%, 80.7%, 68.8%, and 74.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the N classification was significantly associated with DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.616, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.387-9.428, P=0.009), DFS (HR 2.417, 95% CI 1.291-4.423, P=0.006), and OS (HR 3.024, 95% CI 1.385-6.602, P=0.005). In patients with T1-3N2 disease, CCRT was associated with improved 10-year LRFS (89.6% vs. 65.4%, P=0.005), DFS (71.9% vs. 39.4%, P=0.001) and OS (80.0% vs. 50.5%, P=0.004) compared with IMRT alone. However, in patients with T3N0-1 disease, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IMRT alone and CCRT (P>0.05). ConclusionCCRT is an effective therapy in stage III NPC, especially for patients with N2 disease but N0-1 disease. Individualized treatment strategies are essential for patients with varying disease risks.

scholarly journals Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in subgroups of stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis based on 10-year follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Zheng Wu ◽  
Wanqin Cheng ◽  
Dehuan Xie ◽  
Feifei Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N2 Disease

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in subgroups of stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the context of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods A total of 272 patients with stage III NPC who underwent IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological features were evaluated by a Cox regression model to identify independent prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Results The median follow-up time was 108 months. The 10-year locoregional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.8%, 80.7%, 68.8%, and 74.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the N classification was significantly associated with DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.616, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.387–9.428, P = 0.009), DFS (HR 2.417, 95% CI 1.291–4.423, P = 0.006), and OS (HR 3.024, 95% CI 1.385–6.602, P = 0.005). In patients with T1-3N2 disease, CCRT was associated with improved 10-year LRFS (89.6% vs. 65.4%, P = 0.005), DFS (71.9% vs. 39.4% P = 0.001) and OS (80.0% vs. 50.5%, P = 0.004) compared with IMRT alone. However, in patients with T3N0-1 disease, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IMRT alone and CCRT (P > 0.05). Conclusions CCRT is an effective therapy in stage III NPC, especially for patients with N2 disease, but IMRT alone may be adequate for N0-1 disease. Individualized treatment strategies are essential for patients with varying disease risks.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lekha Madhavan Nair ◽  
Rejnish Ravi Kumar ◽  
Malu Rafi ◽  
Farida Nazeer ◽  
Kainickal Cessal Thommachan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Free Survival

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a unique disease entity among head and neck cancers due to its epidemiology and clinical behavior. Non-keratinizing or undifferentiated carcinoma is the most common histological type in endemic areas. Radiotherapy is the treatment for early-stage disease. With the widespread use of IMRT, loco-regional control has improved significantly in locally advanced diseases. But distant metastasis continues to be the most common pattern of failure. To address this issue, chemotherapy has been incorporated into radiotherapy in various settings; as concurrent, induction, and adjuvant. The initial trials of concurrent chemotherapy incorporated adjuvant chemotherapy also and the magnitude of benefit contributed by each treatment was not clear. Later trials proved that adjuvant chemotherapy was not beneficial. Induction chemotherapy when added to concurrent chemoradiation resulted in improvement in Failure Free Survival, Overall Survival, and Distant Metastasis Free Survival. Thus, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation became the standard of care for locally advanced disease (stage III and IVA). The role of chemotherapy in stage II disease is still evolving. Metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma is treated by platinum doublet chemotherapy, Cisplatin-gemcitabine is the standard regimen.

Pituitary surgery as alternative to dopamine agonists treatment for microprolactinomas, a cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Baussart ◽  
Chiara Villa ◽  
Anne Jouinot ◽  
Marie-Laure Raffin-Sanson ◽  
Luc Foubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dopamine Agonists ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pituitary Surgery ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Neurosurgical Department ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Disease Free

Objective: Microprolactinomas are currently treated with dopamine agonists. Outcome information on microprolactinoma patients treated by surgery is limited. This study reports the first large series of consecutive non-invasive microprolactinoma patients treated by pituitary surgery and evaluates the efficiency and safety of this treatment. Design: Follow-up of a cohort of consecutive patients treated by surgery. Methods: Between January 2008 and October 2020, 114 adult patients with pure microprolactinomas were operated on in a single tertiary expert neurosurgical department, using an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Eligible patients were presenting a microprolactinoma with no obvious cavernous invasion on MRI. Prolactin was assayed before and after surgery. Disease-free survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier representation. A cox regression model was used to predict remission. Results: Median follow-up was 18.2 months (range: 2.8 to 155). In this cohort, 14/114 (12%) patients were not cured by surgery, including 10 early surgical failures, and 4 late relapses occurring 37.4 months (33 to 41.8) after surgery. From Kaplan Meier estimates, 1-year and 5-year disease free survival were 90.9% (95% CI, 85.6%-96.4%) and 81% (95% CI,71.2%-92.1%) respectively. The preoperative prolactinemia was the only significant preoperative predictive factor for remission (P<0.05). No severe complication was reported, with no anterior pituitary deficiency after surgery, one diabetes insipidus, and one postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage properly treated by muscle plasty. Conclusions: In well selected microprolactinoma patients, pituitary surgery performed by an expert neurosurgical team is a valid first-line alternative treatment to dopamine agonists.

Survival Outcomes for Induction vs Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Maxillary Sinus

2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe Kuo ◽  
Sina J. Torabi ◽  
Dennis Kraus ◽  
Benjamin L. Judson
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Objective In advanced maxillary sinus cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, poor local control rates and the potential for organ preservation have prompted interest in the use of systemic therapy. Our objective was to present outcomes for induction compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in the maxillary sinus. Study Design Secondary database analysis. Setting National Cancer Database (NCDB). Subjects and Methods In total, 218 cases of squamous cell maxillary sinus cancer treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the NCDB and stratified into induction chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy cohorts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were compared by log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression was performed to evaluate overall survival when adjusting for other prognostic factors. Propensity score matching was also used for further comparison. Results Twenty-three patients received induction chemotherapy (10.6%) and 195 adjuvant chemotherapy (89.4%). The log-rank test comparing induction to adjuvant chemotherapy was not significant ( P = .076). In multivariate Cox regression when adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidity, grade, insurance, and T/N stage, there was a significant mortality hazard ratio of 2.305 for adjuvant relative to induction chemotherapy (confidence interval, 1.076-4.937; P = .032). Conclusion Induction chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in comparison to adjuvant chemotherapy in a relatively small cohort of patients (in whom treatment choice cannot be characterized), suggesting that this question warrants further investigation in a controlled clinical trial before any recommendations are made.

scholarly journals Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092821
Author(s):  
Li-Ting Liu ◽  
Yu-Jing Liang ◽  
Shan-Shan Guo ◽  
Hao-Yuan Mo ◽  
Ling Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Alternative Treatment Strategy

Background: This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) in different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A total of 1814 eligible patients with stage II–IVB disease treated with CCRT or IC plus RT were included. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Nomograms were developed to predict OS, PFS and DMFS (C-index: 0.71, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively). Patients were then divided into three different risk groups based on the scores calculated by the nomogram for OS. In the low and intermediate-risk group, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IC plus RT alone and CCRT (5-year OS, 97.3% versus 95.6%, p = 0.642 and 87.6% versus 89.7%, p = 0.381, respectively; PFS, 95.9% versus 95.6%, p = 0.325 and 87.6% versus 89.0%, p = 0.160, respectively; DMFS, 97.2% versus 94.8%, p = 0.339 and 87.2% versus 89.3%, p = 0.628, respectively). However, in the high-risk group, IC plus RT displayed an unfavorable 5-year OS (71.0% versus 77.2%, p = 0.022) and PFS (69.4.0% versus 75.4%, p = 0.019) compared with CCRT. A significantly higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was documented in patients treated with CCRT than in those treated with IC plus RT in all risk groups ( p = 0.040). Conclusion: IC followed by RT represents an alternative treatment strategy to CCRT for patients with low and intermediate-risk NPC, but it is not recommended for patients with high-risk NPC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document