scholarly journals Ten-Year Results of Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment In Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiying Fu ◽  
Ting Zhou ◽  
Pengfei Cui ◽  
Shixuan Wang ◽  
Ronghua Liu
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment

Abstract Background: It remains controversial whether postoperative adjuvant treatment is beneficial for the survival of patients after surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. To evaluate whether postoperative adjuvant treatment is beneficial for the survival of patients after surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. We analyzed the outcomes of patients treated with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or progestagen combined with other adjuvant treatments. Methods: We retrospectively examined disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and high risk factors that affected the survival status of all patients who received different postoperative adjuvant therapies. Results: The total relapse and mortality rates were 5.57% and 1.68%, respectively. During follow-up period, fourteen patients (7.29%) developed isolated local recurrence, and 2 patients died (1.04%) of recurrence. The 5-year DFS and OS rates in all patients were 95.83% and 93.75%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the 5-year DFS, 5-year OS, OS, or DFS among the four groups of patients with FIGO stage I endometrial cancer. The differences in the log-rank test results of the estimates of the 5-year DFS, 5-year OS, DFS and OS of patients with different disease stages and different ages were all significant, but no differences were observed in these parameters between patients with varying degrees of differentiation. Histologic grade, CA125 level, ER and PR status and whether adjuvant therapies had no significant effect on the DFS and OS of all patients according to univariate and multivariate regression analyses, but age stratification did reveal significant differences in DFS and OS in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that adjuvant treatments after surgery were not significantly associated with improved DFS or OS in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. However, FIGO stage and age affected the survival of patients with stage I endometrial cancer.

scholarly journals Disease Free Survival of Stage I Endometrial Cancer after Surgery with or without Adjuvant Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Woraluk Moradokkasem ◽  
Nungrutai Saeaib ◽  
Tippawan Liabsuetrakul
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Better Than

This study aimed to define the disease free survival (DFS) and factors associated with recurrence in stage I endometrial cancer after surgery with and without adjuvant treatment. The demographic data, pathological results, adjuvant treatment (AT) and the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer stage I after surgery in Songklanagarind Hospital between January 2002 and July 2014 were collected. The DFS was analyzed by survival analysis and represented by Kaplan–Meier curves. The difference of DFS between AT and non-adjuvant treatment (NAT) groups was tested by the log-rank test. Distributions of risk factors by AT and recurrent status were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact tests for discrete factors, and unpaired t or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous factors. The 5-year DFS was; 91.6%, from a total of 268 patients. DFS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the AT group (95.2 versus 86.5%, p-value = 0.01). Factors associated with recurrence in the NAT group were age, tumor grading, tumor size, and presence of lymphovascular involvement. Among the AT group, age and ratio of myometrial invasion were associated with recurrence. DFS in NAT was better than in AT and the potential factors associated with recurrence, after surgery with or without AT, were not the same.

scholarly journals Disease Free Survival of Stage I Endometrial Cancer after Surgery with or without Adjuvant Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Woraluk Moradokkasem ◽  
Nungrutai Saeaib ◽  
Tippawan Liabsuetrakul
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Better Than

This study aimed to define the disease free survival (DFS) and factors associated with recurrence in stage I endometrial cancer after surgery with and without adjuvant treatment. The demographic data, pathological results, adjuvant treatment (AT) and the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer stage I after surgery in Songklanagarind Hospital between January 2002 and July 2014 were collected. The DFS was analyzed by survival analysis and represented by Kaplan–Meier curves. The difference of DFS between AT and non-adjuvant treatment (NAT) groups was tested by the log-rank test. Distributions of risk factors by AT and recurrent status were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact tests for discrete factors, and unpaired t or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous factors. The 5-year DFS was; 91.6%, from a total of 268 patients. DFS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the AT group (95.2 versus 86.5%, p-value = 0.01). Factors associated with recurrence in the NAT group were age, tumor grading, tumor size, and presence of lymphovascular involvement. Among the AT group, age and ratio of myometrial invasion were associated with recurrence. DFS in NAT was better than in AT and the potential factors associated with recurrence, after surgery with or without AT, were not the same.

Impact of adjuvant treatment on outcome in high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective three-center study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
Limor Helpman ◽  
Tamar Perri ◽  
Natalie Lavee ◽  
Nasreen Hag-Yahia ◽  
Hila Amichay Chariski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Pelvic Radiation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

ObjectiveHigh grade and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers carry a poor prognosis, and the lack of randomized prospective data has led to a wide range of practice regarding adjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.MethodsPatients with high-grade endometrioid, serous endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 were identified from databases in three gynecologic oncology divisions, in Toronto and in Israel. Adjuvant treatment practices differed across the centers, creating a heterogeneous cohort. A comparison of stage I patients stratified by adjuvant treatment was undertaken. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to compare recurrence and survival across treatment groups.Results490patients with high risk endometrial cancer were identified, among them 213 patients with stage I disease. Israeli patients received more chemotherapy (41% vs 10% in stage I disease; P<0.001) than patients in Toronto. Chemotherapy was not associated with improved disease-free, disease-specific or overall survival, nor was it associated with fewer distant recurrences (50% vs 54%). Radiation was also not associated with improved recurrence or survival, nor did it affect the pattern of recurrence. On Cox multivariable analysis, neither radiation treatment nor chemotherapy were significantly associated with outcome (HR for recurrence, 0.72 for pelvic radiation (P=0.46) and 1.99 for chemotherapy (P=0.09); HR for death, 0.67 for pelvic radiation (P=0.29) and 1.03 for chemotherapy (P=0.94)).ConclusionsIn this retrospective analysis, neither adjuvant radiation nor chemotherapy were associated with improved outcome in stage I, high risk endometrial cancer.

Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer With High Intermediate Risk Factors

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1285-1289
Author(s):  
Min Gao ◽  
Naiyi Zhang ◽  
Nan Song ◽  
Hong Zheng ◽  
Xin Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the role of chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) with high-intermediate-risk (HIR) factors.MethodsA prospective study of patients with early-stage EC with HIR factors for recurrence was performed between 2006 and 2014. A total of 96 patients were enrolled, and 50 patients received 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy after surgery. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were evaluated.ResultsA total of 11 (11.5%) of the 96 patients had recurrence, with a median recurrent time of 15.4 months. Of these 11 patients with recurrence, 2 received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, whereas 9 did not receive any treatment. Patients without adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a significantly higher recurrence rate than those with adjuvant chemotherapy (19.6% vs 4%; P = 0.024). Meanwhile, patients with adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival compared with the control group (92.1% vs 70.0%, P = 0.024).ConclusionsChemotherapy is feasible and safe as adjuvant treatment for early-stage EC with HIR factors. Three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy are sufficient for reducing the risk of recurrence. Further, large sample randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Adjuvant brachytherapy for FIGO stage I serous or clear cell endometrial cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002217
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B Jeans ◽  
William G Breen ◽  
Trey C Mullikin ◽  
Brittany A Looker ◽  
Andrea Mariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Vaginal Cuff ◽  
Locoregional Failure ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectivesOptimal adjuvant treatment for early-stage clear cell and serous endometrial cancer remains unclear. We report outcomes for women with surgically staged International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I clear cell, serous, and mixed endometrial cancers following adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy.MethodsFrom April 1998 to January 2020, women with FIGO stage IA–IB clear cell, serous, and mixed endometrial cancer underwent surgery and adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy. Seventy-six patients received chemotherapy. High-dose rate vaginal cuff brachytherapy was planned to a total dose of 21 gray in three fractions using a multichannel vaginal cylinder. The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy and to identify surgicopathological risk factors that could portend towards worse oncological outcomes.ResultsA total of 182 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 5.3 years (2.3–12.2). Ten-year survival was 73.3%. Five-year cumulative incidence (CI) of vaginal, pelvic, and para-aortic relapse was 1.4%, 2.1%, and 0.9%, respectively. Five-year locoregional failure, any recurrence, peritoneal relapse, and other distant recurrence was 4.4%, 11.6%, 5.3%, and 6.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, locoregional failure was worse for larger tumors (per 1 cm) (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0, p≤0.01). Any recurrence was worse for tumors of at least 3.5 cm (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.7, p=0.02) and patients with positive/suspicious cytology (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.5 to 12.4, p≤0.01). Ten-year survival for tumors of at least 3.5 cm was 56.9% versus 86.6% for those with smaller tumors (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.8, p≤0.01). Ten-year survival for positive/suspicious cytology was 50.9% versus 77.4% (HR 2.2, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.4, p=0.09). Multivariate modeling demonstrated worse locoregional failure, any recurrence, and survival with larger tumors, as well as any recurrence with positive/suspicious cytology. Subgroup analysis demonstrated improved outcomes with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large tumors or positive/suspicious cytology.ConclusionAdjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy alone without chemotherapy is an appropriate treatment for women with negative peritoneal cytology and small, early-stage clear cell, serous, and mixed endometrial cancer. Larger tumors or positive/suspicious cytology are at increased risk for relapse and worse survival, and should be considered for additional upfront adjuvant treatments, such as platinum-based chemotherapy.

Defining optimal adjuvant treatment for high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S123-S124
Author(s):  
Olivia Khouri ◽  
Anne Van Arsdale ◽  
Nicole Vilardo ◽  
Divya Gowthaman ◽  
Gregory Gressel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

Characteristics of early-stage endometrial cancer and factors that influence disease recurrence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17567-e17567
Author(s):  
Su Yun Chung ◽  
Janice Shen ◽  
Nina Kohn ◽  
Jennifer Hernandez ◽  
Marina Frimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

e17567 Background: Early-stage endometrial cancer (EEC) with FIGO stage I-II generally has a favorable prognosis and overall survival (OS). However, up to 10% of EEC patients (pts) relapse and risk factors for recurrence remain unclear. We evaluated clinical and histopathologic characteristics of EEC and correlated them with OS and recurrence free survival (RFS) through a single-center retrospective analysis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on 511 pts with EEC identified by our cancer registry from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2019. The two main histologic groups were endometrioid adenocarcinomas (E) and other subtypes (O) including carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated, and clear cell carcinomas. Papillary serous histology was excluded. Histopathologic and clinical findings recorded included age, FIGO stage and grade, tumor size, presence of recurrence, adjuvant therapies received, percent of myometrial invasion (MI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). OS and RFS were estimated, and each predictor was compared using the log-rank test. The association between OS and each continuous characteristic was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Factors significantly associated with OS and RFS in the univariable analysis (p < 0.05) were included in a multivariable analysis to examine the joint effects of those factors on survival. Results: A total of 511 cases were reviewed. The analysis included 501 pts (E = 485, O = 16), of which 47 had recurrent disease (E = 45, O = 2) and 17 had died without recurring (E = 15, O = 2) as of their last follow-up. Overall median age was 63 years. Factors significantly associated with recurrence in the multivariable analysis were FIGO grade, (Hazard Ratios (HR): Grade 2 vs 1: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.06-3.58, p = 0.0320, Grade 3 vs 1: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.50-5.52, p = 0.0015), LVI (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10-3.75, p = 0.0244), and greater than 50% of MI (HR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.35-7.36, p = 0.0080). The overall RFS was 92% and 86% at three and five years, respectively. On univariate analysis, among pts with a measurable tumor size (n = 446), larger tumors were not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.65) but was associated with increased recurrence (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.37, for a unit increase, p = 0.0003). On univariate analysis, pts who received adjuvant therapy were more likely to recur (p = 0.0002) with RFS of 86% and 76% at three and five years respectively, versus RFS of 94% and 90%, for those who did not. Conclusions: We confirmed the clinical and histopathologic characteristics that are currently considered to increase risk of recurrence in EEC. On multivariate analysis, risk of recurrence was associated with FIGO grades 2 and 3, presence of LVI, and > 50% MI. A limitation of this study is the lack of molecular analysis. Further molecular stratification may help us identify the subset of pts who are at high risk of recurrence, enabling customized adjuvant therapy in EEC.

Survival Impact of Ovarian Preservation on Women With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haifeng Gu ◽  
Jundong Li ◽  
Yangkui Gu ◽  
Hua Tu ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ovarian Preservation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of this article was to investigate the survival impact of ovarian preservation in surgically treated patients with early-stage endometrial cancer using a meta-analysis.MethodsMajor online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, as well as Grey Literature database, were searched to collect studies on the effects of ovarian preservation compared with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) for surgical treatment in endometrial cancer patients. The literature search was performed up to April 2016. The results were analyzed using RevMan 5.0 software and Stata/SE 12.0 software.ResultsTotally, 7 retrospective cohort studies including 1419 patients in ovarian preservation group and 15,826 patients in BSO group were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients treated with ovarian preservation and BSO (hazards ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–1.39; P = 1.00). Similar result was achieved in the young and premenopausal women (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.70–1.39; P = 0.39). Furthermore, the disease-free survival of patients whose ovaries were preserved was slightly compromised but with no statistical significance (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.56–3.93; P = 0.42).ConclusionsOvarian preservation may be safe in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, and it could be cautiously considered in treating young and premenopausal women because it is not associated with an adverse impact on the patients’ survival. Given the inherent limitations of the included studies, further well-designed randomized controlled trial are needed to confirm and update this analysis.

Retrospective analysis of stage IC uterine cancer patients: A single center experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15573-e15573
Author(s):  
Nadire Kucukoztas ◽  
Selim Yalcin ◽  
Samed Rahatli ◽  
Ozlem Ozen ◽  
Nihan Haberal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Surgical Staging ◽  
Increased Risk

e15573 Background: Stage IC patients are at an increased risk of recurrence and overall worse prognosis compared with stage IA and IB patients. Adjuvant chemoherapy is utilized based on specific pathologic factors. The objective of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes at a single institution in patients with 1988 FIGO stage IC endometrial adenocarcinoma. Methods: Records of the patients with FIGO stage IB (formerly IC) endometrial cancer were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were initially treated surgically with comprehensive staging lymphadenectomy. Results: A total of 85 patients were included. Patient and tumor characteristics are shown in the table. Median age of the patients was 60 (range 27-95). Fifty-nine patients had at least one co-morbid disease. Complete surgical staging including pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection was performed in all the patients. Sixteen patients (19%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, including 6 patients with serous cancer and one patient with small cell cancer. Paclitaxel/carboplatin was the preferred regimen in Median follow up was 30 months (range 10-61 months). Seven patients (8%) relapsed and 4 patients (5%) died on follow up. 5 year disease free survival was 89% and overall survival was 95%. One of the 16 patients (6.2%) who received chemotherapy and 6 of the 69 patients (8.7%) who did not receive relapsed/died on follow up. Survival analysis was not performed because of the low number of events in both groups. Conclusions: We found similar rates of recurrence and death with previous studies in stage IC endometrial cancer. Complete surgical staging is the mainstay of treatment. Marginally lower recurrence rate in chemotherapy treated patients delineate the need for prospective randomized data addressing the role of adjuvant systemic therapy in early-stage patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document