Feasibility Analysis and Advantages of Wedge Resection Plus Transverse Suture Applied to Closure of Loop Ileostomy

Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and advantages of wedge resection plus transverse suture applied to loop ileostomy closure by analyzing the surgical data and the incidence of postoperative complications of patients undergoing this procedure.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the hospitalization data of patients who underwent ileostomy closure surgery and met the research standards from January 2017 to April 2021 in the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital; all surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The perioperative data were statistically analyzed by grouping.Results: In total, 65 patients were enrolled in this study, with 12 in the wedge resection group, 35 in the stapler group, and 18 in the hand suture group. There was no significant difference in operation time between the wedge resection group and stapler group (P > 0.05), but both groups had shorter operation time than that in the hand suture group (P< 0.05). The postoperative exhaustion time of wedge resection group was earlier than that of the others, and cost of surgical consumables in the wedge resection group was significantly lower than that in the stapler group, all with statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). By contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complication incidences among the three groups.Conclusions: The wedge resection plus transverse suture is safe and easy for closure of loop ileostomy, and the intestinal motility recovers rapidly postoperatively. It has less surgical consumables, and is particularly suitable for the currently implemented Diagnosis-Related Groups payment method.

Download Full-text

Thoracoscopic versus open resection for symptomatic congenital pulmonary airway malformations in neonates: a decade-long retrospective study

BMC Pulmonary Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12890-021-01445-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jintao Zheng ◽

Huajian Tang ◽

Huiyu Xu ◽

Jiequan Li ◽

Xiangming Mao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Wedge Resection ◽

Lower Lobe ◽

Volume Ratio ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operation Time ◽

Lesion Size ◽

Open Resection ◽

Thoracoscopic Resection ◽

Resection Group ◽

Pulmonary Airway

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential advantages of thoracoscopic versus open resection for symptomatic congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) in neonates. Methods A retrospective review of the medical records of neonates (age ≤ 28 days) who underwent surgery for symptomatic CPAM from 2010 to 2020. Results Of the 24 patients, 14 patients underwent thoracoscopic resection and 10 patients underwent open resection. 4 patients with CPAM located in the upper or middle lobes underwent lobectomy, and 20 underwent lung-preserving wedge resection in the lower lobe. Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in related preoperative variables, including gestational age at birth, body weight, head circumference, lesion size, cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio (CVR), and age at operation (P > .05). The differences in intraoperative variables were statistically significant. The length of the surgical incision was significantly shorter in thoracoscopic resection group than in open resection group (1.4 cm [1.3–1.8] vs. 6.0 cm [5.0–8.0], P = .000), along with significantly less operative blood loss (3 ml [1–6] vs. 5 ml [2–10], P = .030) but significantly longer operation time (159 min [100–220] vs. 110 min [70–170], P = .003). Regarding postoperative variables, ventilator days, duration of chest tube use and length of hospital stay were not statistically significant (P > .05). Conclusion Both thoracoscopic and open resection for symptomatic CPAM achieve good clinical outcomes, even in neonates. Thoracoscopic resection has minimal aesthetic effects and does not increase the risk of surgical or postoperative complications. Lung-preserving resection may be feasible for neonatal CPAM surgery.

Download Full-text

A Comparative Study of Intralobar Sequestration and Extralobar Pulmonary Sequestration

10.21203/rs.3.rs-963651/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Xiao Duqing ◽

Wang Gefei ◽

Liang Yalun ◽

Yu Gang ◽

Wu Zhaohong

Keyword(s):

Wedge Resection ◽

Operation Time ◽

Pulmonary Sequestration ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Intralobar Sequestration ◽

Isolated Lung ◽

Microscopic Evaluation ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Difference ◽

Pulmonary Wedge Resection

Abstract Objective: This study aims to identify the difference between patients who have been diagnosed with either intralobar sequestration (ILS) or extralobar sequestration (ELS).Methods: In this clinical study, 29 children with pulmonary sequestration (PS), diagnosed via physical examination and imaging at our hospital between January 2019 and January 2020, were enrolled. We compared whether statistical differences existed in the blood loss, operative time, and post-operative hospital stay between the two groups (ILS and ELS) after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection.Results: There were no significant differences in gender, operative age, preoperative weight, and isolated lung position between the ILS and ELS groups (p > 0.05). There was significantly more intra-operative bleeding in children with ILS than those with ELS (p < 0.05), and the operation time and postoperative hospitalization times were significantly longer for those with ILS(p < 0.05). Upon microscopic evaluation after surgery, we found the appearance of ILS and ELS to be similar.Conclusion: Different types of congenital PS have different influences onnewborns during and after operation. For children with ILS, surgery is more difficult and the postoperative recovery is slower than for children with ELS. For this reason, we suggest that more attention should be paid to the clinical treatment of children with ILS. Although ILS and ELS present with different manifestations, we found no evidence of a significant difference in the postoperative microscopy of the two conditions.

Download Full-text

Securing split-thickness skin grafts using negative-pressure wound therapy without suture fixation

Journal of Wound Care ◽

10.12968/jowc.2019.28.sup8.s16 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 28 (Sup8) ◽

pp. S16-S21

Author(s):

Yusuke Inatomi ◽

Hideki Kadota ◽

Kenichi Kamizono ◽

Masuo Hanada ◽

Sei Yoshida

Keyword(s):

Negative Pressure ◽

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Operation Time ◽

Control Group ◽

Skin Grafts ◽

Wound Therapy ◽

Thickness Skin ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Suture Group

Objective: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is generally applied as a bolster for split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) after the graft has been secured with sutures or skin staples. In this study, NPWT was applied to secure STSGs without any sutures or staples. Surgical outcomes of using NPWT without sutures was compared with a control group. Methods: Patients with STSGs were divided into two groups: a ‘no suture’ group using only NPWT, and a control group using conventional fixings. In the no suture group, the grafts were covered with meshed wound dressing and ointment. The NPWT foam was placed over the STSG and negative pressure applied. In the control group, grafts were fixed in place using tie-over bolster, securing with fibrin glue, or NPWT after sutures. Results: A total of 30 patients with 35 graft sites participated in the study. The mean rate of graft take in the no suture group was 95.1%, compared with 93.3% in the control group, with no significant difference between them. No graft shearing occurred in the no suture group. Although the difference did not reach statistical significance, mean surgical time in the no suture group (31.5 minutes) tended to be shorter than that in the control group (55.7 minutes). Conclusion: By eliminating sutures, the operation time tended to be shorter, suturing was avoided and suture removal was not required meaning that patients could avoid the pain associated with this procedure. Furthermore, the potential for staple retention and its associated complications was avoided, making this method potentially beneficial for both medical staff and patients.

Download Full-text

Electrocoagulative Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Conjunctivochalasis

International Surgery ◽

10.9738/cc59.1 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 97 (1) ◽

pp. 90-93 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Xing-Ru Zhang ◽

Zhen-Yong Zhang ◽

Matthew R Hoffman

Keyword(s):

Ocular Surface ◽

Medical Management ◽

Operation Time ◽

Disease Index ◽

Ocular Surface Disease Index ◽

Resection Group ◽

Ocular Symptoms ◽

Group I ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group Ii

Abstract The purpose of this study was to present a new procedure to treat symptomatic conjunctivochalasis (CCh) and to evaluate its efficacy. Forty-two patients with symptomatic CCh refractory to medical management were included on this study. Twenty-two patients (n = 32, eyes; n = 14 women and n = 8 men) underwent the new electrocoagulation procedure (Group I). Twenty patients (n = 27 eyes; n = 11 women and n = 9 men) underwent crescent-shaped conjunctiva resection (Group II). Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was used to evaluate ocular symptoms. There was a significant difference in mean and SD operation time between Group I (8.67 ± 2.07 minutes) and Group II (20.45 ± 3.98 minutes; P < 0.0001). OSDI scores (mean ± SD) were significantly lower in Group I (28.38 ± 3.14) than Group II (31.62 ± 3.17) at postoperative week 2 (P = 0.0004). No differences in OSDI scores were found between the 2 groups at postoperative week 4 (P = 0.1749) or 8 (P = 0.1483). OSDI scores were significantly lower at postoperative week 8 than at baseline in both Group I (P = 0.0002) and Group II (P = 0.0011). Electrocoagulation of the conjunctiva can successfully treat symptomatic CCh with earlier symptomatic attenuation and less operation time than traditional conjunctiva resection.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes and functional analysis of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumours: a propensity score-matched study

Updates in Surgery ◽

10.1007/s13304-021-01014-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Feiyu Shi ◽

Gaixia Liu ◽

Qi Sun ◽

Haowei zhang ◽

Hongtao Wu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Wedge Resection ◽

Third Space ◽

Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽

Operation Time ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Gastrointestinal Function ◽

Laparoscopic Wedge Resection ◽

Significant Difference

AbstractThird space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (TS-RECS) is a novel minimally invasive surgery for resecting gastric submucosal tumours (GSMTs), which could accomplish the completely oncological curability and maximal functional preservation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function after TS-RECS versus laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for GSMTs. This was a single-centre retrospective study that included 130 patients with GSMTs who underwent LWR or TS-RECS from 2013 to 2019. To overcome selection biases, we performed propensity score matching (1:1) using seven covariates that could impact the group assignment and outcomes. Then, the clinical outcomes and gastrointestinal function in the LWR and TS-RECS groups were compared in a matched cohort. Among the 130 enrolled patients, 96 patients underwent LWR, and 34 underwent TS-RECS and were matched into 30 patients for each group. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P = 0.543). However, the TS-RECS group had significantly less blood loss (20,5–100 vs 95,10–310 ml, P < 0.0001) and better postoperative recovery in terms of time to oral intake (2,2–4 vs 3,2–6 days, P < 0.0001) and postoperative hospital stay (5,4–10 vs 8.5,5–16 days, P < 0.0001) than the LWR group. The severity and frequency scores of postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the TS-RECS group were significantly lower than those in the LWR group. The median follow-up period was 24 months (10–60 months) in the LWR group and 18 months (10–27 months) in the TS-RECS group, and there was in total a single recurrence in the LWR group. TS-RECS appears to be a technically safe and effective surgery with preservation of gastrointestinal function for resection of GSMT resection.

Download Full-text

Study on the Method of Enucleation of Anterior Uterine Fibroids by Transverse Incision of Lower Uterine Segment During Cesarean Section

10.21203/rs.3.rs-692369/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Li Xia ◽

Jinxiao Lin ◽

Rongli Xu ◽

Wenqiang You ◽

Yan Dai

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Operation Time ◽

Anterior Wall ◽

Control Group ◽

Study Group ◽

Transverse Incision ◽

Postoperative Fever ◽

Perioperative Bleeding ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Surgical Data

Abstract Introduction: A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of enucleation fibroids of the anterior wall of the uterus by transverse incision of the uterus at the same time during cesarean section. Methods The medical history, surgical data, preoperative and postoperative blood system changes and complications of 90 pregnant women who underwent myomectomy of the anterior uterine wall during cesarean section in the second Department of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Fujian Province were analyzed retrospectively. Results There was no significant difference in the number of leiomyoma, pathological type, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, incidence of perioperative bleeding, frequency of blood transfusion, incidence of postoperative fever, uterine involution and lochia between the study group and the control group. The proportion of large fibroids in the study group was slightly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05), and the operation time and average hospitalization time in the study group were slightly longer than that in the control group (p < 0.05).The distribution of type III-V fibroids in the study group was slightly more than that in the control group (p < 0.05), and the distribution of type VI fibroids in the study group was less than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion It is safe and effective to enucleate the fibroids of the anterior wall of the uterus through the lower uterine transverse incision in cesarean section. Potential to reduce the risk of pelvic adhesion and intrauterine adhesion in the future, so that some patients avoid the risk of reoperation.

Download Full-text

Impact of intrawound vancomycin powder on prevention of surgical site infection after posterior spinal surgery

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.8.spine20992 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Hiroki Ushirozako ◽

Tomohiko Hasegawa ◽

Yu Yamato ◽

Go Yoshida ◽

Tatsuya Yasuda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Spinal Surgery ◽

Control Group ◽

Control Groups ◽

Propensity Score Model ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Surgical Data ◽

Vancomycin Powder ◽

Vancomycin Group ◽

And Control

OBJECTIVESurgical site infection (SSI) after posterior spinal surgery is one of the severe complications that may occur despite administration of prophylactic antibiotics and the use of intraoperative aseptic precautions. The use of intrawound vancomycin powder for SSI prevention is still controversial, with a lack of high-quality and large-scale studies. The purpose of this retrospective study using a propensity score–matched analysis was to clarify whether intrawound vancomycin powder prevents SSI occurrence after spinal surgery.METHODSThe authors analyzed 1261 adult patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery between 2010 and 2018 (mean age 62.3 years; 506 men, 755 women; follow-up period at least 1 year). Baseline and surgical data were assessed. After a preliminary analysis, a propensity score model was established with adjustments for age, sex, type of disease, and previously reported risk factors for SSI. The SSI rates were compared between patients with intrawound vancomycin powder treatment (vancomycin group) and those without (control group).RESULTSIn a preliminary analysis of 1261 unmatched patients (623 patients in the vancomycin group and 638 patients in the control group), there were significant differences between the groups in age (p = 0.041), body mass index (p = 0.013), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p < 0.001), malnutrition (p = 0.001), revision status (p < 0.001), use of steroids (p = 0.019), use of anticoagulation (p = 0.033), length of surgery (p = 0.003), estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), and use of instrumentation (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SSI rates between the vancomycin and control groups (21 SSIs [3.4%] vs 33 SSIs [5.2%]; OR 0.640, 95% CI 0.368–1.111; p = 0.114). Using a one-to-one propensity score–matched analysis, 444 pairs of patients from the vancomycin and control groups were selected. There was no significant difference in the baseline and surgical data, except for height (p = 0.046), between both groups. The C-statistic for the propensity score model was 0.702. In the score-matched analysis, 12 (2.7%) and 24 (5.4%) patients in the vancomycin and control groups, respectively, developed SSIs (OR 0.486, 95% CI 0.243–0.972; p = 0.041). There were no systemic complications related to the use of vancomycin.CONCLUSIONSThe current study showed that intrawound vancomycin powder was useful in reducing the risk of SSI after posterior spinal surgery by half, without adverse events. Intrawound vancomycin powder use is a safe and effective procedure for SSI prevention.

Download Full-text

Efficacy evaluation of three-dimensional printing assisted osteotomy guide plate in accurate osteotomy of adolescent cubitus varus deformity

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-019-1403-7 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yuan-Wei Zhang ◽

Xin Xiao ◽

Wen-Cheng Gao ◽

Yan Xiao ◽

Su-Li Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

3D Printing ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Operation Time ◽

Varus Deformity ◽

Conventional Group ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Cubitus Varus ◽

Guide Plate ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background This present study is aimed to retrospectively assess the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) printing assisted osteotomy guide plate in accurate osteotomy of adolescent cubitus varus deformity. Material and methods Twenty-five patients (15 males and 10 females) with the cubitus varus deformity from June 2014 to December 2017 were included in this study and were enrolled into the conventional group (n = 11) and 3D printing group (n = 14) according to the different surgical approaches. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, osteotomy degrees, osteotomy end union time, and postoperative complications between the two groups were observed and recorded. Results Compared with the conventional group, the 3D printing group has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, higher rate of excellent correction, and higher rate of the parents’ excellent satisfaction with appearance after deformity correction (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.019, P = 0.023). Nevertheless, no significant difference was presented in postoperative carrying angle of the deformed side and total complication rate between the two groups (P = 0.626, P = 0.371). Conclusions The operation assisted by 3D printing osteotomy guide plate to correct the adolescent cubitus varus deformity is feasible and effective, which might be an optional approach to promote the accurate osteotomy and optimize the efficacy.

Download Full-text

Procedural times in early non-intubated VATS program - a propensity score analysis

BMC Anesthesiology ◽

10.1186/s12871-021-01270-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Isabella Metelmann ◽

Johannes Broschewitz ◽

Uta-Carolin Pietsch ◽

Gerald Huschak ◽

Uwe Eichfeld ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Surgical Procedure ◽

Recovery Time ◽

Propensity Score Analysis ◽

Wedge Resection ◽

University Hospital ◽

Implementation Phase ◽

Score Analysis ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Procedural Time

Abstract Background Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NiVATS) has been introduced to surgical medicine in order to reduce the invasiveness of anesthetic procedures and avoid adverse effects of intubation and one-lung ventilation (OLV). The aim of this study is to determine the time effectiveness of a NiVATS program compared to conventional OLV. Methods This retrospective analysis included all patients in Leipzig University Hospital that needed minor VATS surgery between November 2016 and October 2019 constituting a NiVATS (n = 67) and an OLV (n = 36) group. Perioperative data was matched via propensity score analysis, identifying two comparable groups with 23 patients. Matched pairs were compared via t-Test. Results Patients in NiVATS and OLV group show no significant differences other than the type of surgical procedure performed. Wedge resection was performed significantly more often under NiVATS conditions than with OLV (p = 0,043). Recovery time was significantly reduced by 7 min (p = 0,000) in the NiVATS group. There was no significant difference in the time for induction of anesthesia, duration of surgical procedure or overall procedural time. Conclusions Recovery time was significantly shorter in NiVATS, but this effect disappeared when extrapolated to total procedural time. Even during the implementation phase of NiVATS programs, no extension of procedural times occurs.

Download Full-text

Clinical Evaluation of Microendoscopy-Assisted Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina57020135 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 57 (2) ◽

pp. 135

Author(s):

Tomohide Segawa ◽

Hisashi Koga ◽

Masahito Oshina ◽

Katsuhiko Ishibashi ◽

Yuichi Takano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Outcome Measure ◽

Operation Time ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Invasive Technique ◽

Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽

Surgical Methods ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽

Lateral Interbody

Background and objectives: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is a widely performed, minimally invasive technique to achieve lumbar lateral interbody fusion. However, some complications can arise due to constraints posed by the limited surgical space and visual field. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes of microendoscopy-assisted OLIF (ME-OLIF) compared to conventional OLIF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 75 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF or ME-OLIF. The age, sex, diagnosis, and number of fused levels were obtained from medical records. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative complications were also collected. Operation time and EBL were only measured per level required for the lateral procedure, excluding the posterior fixation surgery. The primary outcome measure was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The secondary outcome measure was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), measured preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Results: This case series consisted of 14 patients in the OLIF group and 61 patients in the ME-OLIF group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time and EBL (p = 0.90 and p = 0.50, respectively). The perioperative complication rate was 21.4% in the OLIF group and 21.3% in the ME-OLIF group (p = 0.99). In both groups, the postoperative JOABPEQ, EQ-5D, and ODI scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in clinical results between the two surgical methods, the results suggest that both are safe surgical methods and that microendoscopy-assisted OLIF could serve as a potential alternative to the conventional OLIF procedure.

Download Full-text