Sites of Blood Collection and Topical Disinfectants Associated with Contaminated Cultures: An Ambidirectional Cohort Study
Abstract Background: We aimed to determine whether puncture sites for blood sampling and topical disinfectants are associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) of a single institution.Methods: This single-center, ambidirectional cohort study of 548 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years old was performed in the ED of a university hospital in Japan over a 13-month period. Pairs of blood samples were collected for aerobic and anaerobic cultures from patients in the ED. Physicians selected puncture sites and topical disinfectants according to their personal preference.Results: Potential contamination was identified in 110 of the 548 patients (20.1%). One hundred fourteen (20.8%) patients showed true-positive results for bacteremia and 324 (59.1%) patients showed true-negative results. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine (ACHX) (adjusted risk difference, 19.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]), 15.7–22.6; P < 0.001). In terms of blood collection sites, femoral and central venous (CV) catheter with PVI disinfection showed more frequent contamination than venous sites with ACHX (adjusted risk differences: 26.6%, 95%CI 21.3–31.9, P < 0.001 and 41.1%, 95%CI 22.2–59.9, P < 0.001, respectively).Conclusions: Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly higher when blood was collected from CV catheter or femoral sites with PVI as the topical disinfectant.