Does Rapid Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy At HIV Diagnosis Impact On Virological Response in a Real-Life Setting? A Single Centre Experience in Northern Italy
Abstract Background Rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been largely proven efficacious and safe mostly through clinical trials. Further investigations are needed to better define feasibility and acceptability of rapid ART approach in real-life settings. Methods We conducted a retrospective, observational study on newly HIV-diagnosed patients referred to Infectious and Tropical Diseases department of ASST Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia from September 1st, 2015, to July 31st, 2019. All patients’ baseline characteristics were anonymously extracted from medical records. According to the timing of ART initiation, we distinguished 3 groups of patients (rapid, intermediate and late group) and represented the trend of virological response during a 400 day-period. The hazard ratios of each predictor on viral suppression (HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml) were estimated through Cox proportional hazard model. Results Median time from HIV diagnosis to first medical referral was 15 days and median time from first HIV care access to therapy start was 24 days. Three groups of patients were differentiated depending on ART initiation: within 7 days (rapid group, 37.6%), between 8 and 30 days (intermediate group, 20.6%) and after 30 days (late group, 41.8%). Longer time to ART start and higher baseline viral load were associated with a reduced probability of viral suppression. After one year, all groups showed high viral suppression rate (99%). Conclusions In high-income setting as Italy, rapid ART approach seems to be useful to accelerate time to viral suppression. The latter tends to be great over time regardless the timing of ART initiation.