Self-Efficacy, Task Performance and Contextual Performance: A Sri Lankan Experience

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sampath Kappagoda

This chapter is an attempt to clarify the relationship between workplace arrogance and job performance. Thus, the authors focus and define a set of four fundamental concepts—task performance, contextual performance, social support, and self-efficacy—in order to examine and explore this relationship. Hence, the main result of this theoretical study is that workplace arrogance is negatively related to job performance. Although this finding could be considered as a theoretical contribution, more studies are requested to investigate the specific relationship between workplace arrogance and job satisfaction with its two dimensions: task and contextual factors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Komal Khalid

Research Highlights The aim of this study is to provide an overview on occupational self-efficacy and their interrelationships between organizational cynicism forms (i.e. Cognitive /Affective / Behavioural) and employee job performance dimensions (i.e. Task / Contextual) in manufacturing and service sectors of Pakistan. The study proposed four hypotheses, examining direct and indirect relationships between variables. Data collection was done through self-administrated questionnaire (7-point Likert scale) using a multiphase non-probability sampling technique. From both service and manufacturing sectors of Pakistan in total 758 responses were collected. For statistical data analysis descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, univariate analysis and independent sample t- test were conducted. Results indicate that occupational self-efficacy significantly moderate the relationships between forms of organizational cynicism and task and contextual performance in service sector. However, in manufacturing sector, occupational self-efficacy shows strong moderation between affective-task relationship, moderate significant moderation between cognitive-task relationship and no moderation between behavioural-task relationship.               __________________________________________________________________________ Graphical Abstract     ________________________________________________________________ Research Objectives The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of organizational cynicism forms (i.e. Cognitive / Affective / Behavioral) and employee performance dimensions (i.e. Task / Contextual) in manufacturing and service sectors of Pakistan. This research study also explores the moderating impact of employee’s occupational self-efficacy on the relationships with forms of organizational cynicism and employee’s task and contextual performances. The differences existing in both organizational sectors in regard to occupational self-efficacy, forms of organizational cynicism and dimensions of employee performance variables is also studied in this paper. It is assumed by the researcher that if employees have low occupational self- efficacy and they have negative feelings about their organization, it can result in further reduction of his job performance (Vera, Salanova, & Lorente, 2012). As occupational self-efficacy is central to past experiences of employees, it is also logical that organizational cynicism can effect levels of occupational self-efficacy. Thus, the occupational self-efficacy and cynicism relationship is mutual (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2010).  Based on differences at organizational and functional level in both sectors it can be predicted that occupational self-efficacy, organizational cynicism and employee job performance variates in service and manufacturing sectors (Othman, 1999; Jiang, 2009). Methodology The hypotheses were evaluated through data from banking, higher education and healthcare (i.e. Service sector), and cement, pharmaceutical and food (i.e. Manufacturing sector) organizations of Pakistan. Data was collected through self-administrative questionnaire and emails from six major cities of Pakistan. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to first-line and middle level employees. A multiphase non-probability sampling technique was utilized for data collection. In phase 1, organizations were selected through convenience sampling. In phase 2 of data collection, quota sampling was done (i.e. 10 survey forms per organization). The same technique was adopted by Munir, Ghafoor, & Rasli in 2016. In each sector almost 500 survey forms were distributed. After Cook’s distance and Central Leverage value method outliers from the data was removed, from manufacturing sector 365 (Response rate 73%) and from service sector 393 (Response rate 78.6%) complete questionnaires were received, therefore total response rate was 75.1% from both sectors. After establishing validity (Rotated Factor Matrix), reliability (Cronbach Alpha) and multicollinearity (VIF and Tolerance) of the scale; descriptive statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation), Pearson correlation analysis, univariate analysis and independent sample t-test were conducted. Results In both sectors, Occupational self-efficacy has positive correlation with employee task (Manufacturing r = .33; Service r = .42) and contextual performance (Manufacturing r = .29; Service r = .38). However, Occupational self-efficacy is negatively related with three forms of organizational cynicism in Manufacturing (Affective r = -.19; Cognitive r = -.13; Behavioral r = -.11) and service sector (Affective r = -.21; Cognitive r = -.18; Behavioral r = -.13). According to univariate analysis in manufacturing sector occupational self-efficacy, forms of organizational cynicism and their interactional products predicts 32% variation in contextual performance and 38% variation in task performance. However, in service sector, occupational self-efficacy, forms of organizational cynicism and their interactional products predicts 39% variation in contextual performance and 46% variation in task performance. In service sector, occupational self-efficacy significantly moderates the relationships between forms of organizational cynicism and task and contextual performance. Whereas, in manufacturing sector, occupational self-efficacy shows strong moderation between affective cynicism-task relationship, moderately significant moderation between cognitive cynicism-task relationship and no moderation between behavioral cynicism-task relationship. Results also indicates service sector employees have higher occupational self-efficacy, contextual and task performance as compared to manufacturing sector employees who reported higher organizational cynicism. Findings Findings indicate that in both sectors occupational self-efficacy had significant impact on the relationships between organizational cynicism and employee performance. Study concluded that in manufacturing sector occupational self-efficacy strongly moderate the cognitive cynicism and employee task performance relationship while within service sector occupational self-efficacy strongly moderate both cognitive and behavioral cynicism and employee task performance relationships. Study also provide evidence that in manufacturing sector occupational self-efficacy and forms of organizational cynicism has a moderate influence on employee contextual performance while within service sector occupational self-efficacy strongly moderate behavioral cynicism and employee contextual performance relationship.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 2451-2457
Author(s):  
Xu Dong Ni ◽  
Ji Hong Yu ◽  
Xian An Li

This paper started with theories of team heterogeneity and team performance, according to questionnaire survey method, reviewed three dimensions of knowledge heterogeneity (speciality heterogeneity, education heterogeneity and work experience heterogeneity) and their effects on team performance. The result showed that speciality heterogeneity was positively related to task performance and contextual performance, while work experience heterogeneity was positively related to contextual performance significantly, but had no significant relationship with task performance. In addition, education heterogeneity had no significant relationship with task performance and contextual performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-425
Author(s):  
Mah’d Hussein Abu Joma

The study aimed to identify the impact of Performance management’s dimensions (Task performance & Contextual performance) on improving human resources management’s elements in Al Hikmah Pharmaceutical Company. The study sample consisted of the employees working of Al Hikmah Pharmaceutical Company where 302 questionnaires were distributed to the employees working in in the company in Jordan; (12) questionnaires were excluded because they were not valid for analysis. The study used the descriptive analytical method. The study data was collected through a specially designed questionnaire for this purpose. The results of the study showed that the performance management factors (Task performance & Contextual performance) factors in Al Hikmah pharmaceutical company, the values of their arithmetic averages ranged between (3.675- 4.149) and according to the adopted scale, all these values are (high), which confirms the presence of a high impact of both performance management factors on all factors of human resources management in Al hikmah company. The study also showed that there is a discrepancy in the amount of the impact of performance management factors on the stages of human resources management’s elements, as follows: 1-The training and development. factor came first, 2-The organizational culture. factor came second, 3-The evaluate performance factor came third. Human resources management’s elements have been influenced to a lesser extent by the performance management factors. Based on the study results, researcher recommended the necessity of adapting Performance management by administration's leaders so as to develop the human resources department’s elements in the company because this contributes to raise productivity of it, which also means bigger market share, better revenues, best quality, then driving organization to achieve its goals.


Author(s):  
Skilan A. Ortiz ◽  
Clint A. Bowers ◽  
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers

This study examined the effects of using serious games for training on task performance and declarative knowledge outcomes. The purpose was to determine if serious games are more effective training tools than traditional methods. Self-efficacy, expectations for training, and engagement were considered as moderators of the relationship between type of training and task performance as well as type of training and declarative knowledge. Results of the study offered support for the potential of serious games to be more effective than traditional methods of training when it comes to task performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document