Workplace Arrogance and Job Performance

This chapter is an attempt to clarify the relationship between workplace arrogance and job performance. Thus, the authors focus and define a set of four fundamental concepts—task performance, contextual performance, social support, and self-efficacy—in order to examine and explore this relationship. Hence, the main result of this theoretical study is that workplace arrogance is negatively related to job performance. Although this finding could be considered as a theoretical contribution, more studies are requested to investigate the specific relationship between workplace arrogance and job satisfaction with its two dimensions: task and contextual factors.

This chapter could be considered as an attempt to clarify the relationship between workplace arrogance and job satisfaction. Thus, the authors examine and study this relationship by focusing on the role of self-esteem between these two concepts. Hence, the main result of this theoretical study is that workplace arrogance is negatively related to job satisfaction. Although this finding could be considered as a theoretical contribution, more studies are requested to investigate the specific relationship between workplace arrogance, self-esteem, and job satisfaction with its two dimensions: extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Does self-esteem play a mediated or moderated role in this relationship?


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Chung Shang ◽  
Ching-Cheng Chao ◽  
Taih-Cherng Lirn

Purpose The purpose of this study aims to investigate the relationship between employees’ personality traits and their job performances (including task performance and contextual performance) of Taiwanese freight forwarders by using responses from a NEO Personality Inventory-Revised Form (NEO-PI-R) questionnaire survey. Design/methodology/approach One of the most popular personality trait model is the five-factor model (FFM), which includes the big five domains, namely, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism (OCEAN). Each of these five domains includes six facets. Previous researchers have used OCEAN factors to describe the relationship between human personality and job performance. NEO Personality Inventory is a professional psychological assessment instrument published by psychological assessment resources. Multivariate analysis technique and regression technique are used to analyze surveyees’ responses. Findings Research results reveal the following four issues. The seniority of employees in a company has a positive relationship with their conscientiousness. Employees with higher score on the facets of the neuroticism domain have a negative correlation with their task performance and contextual performance. The relationship between employees’ openness to experience and job performance (both task performance and contextual performance) is not significant. Employees’ seniority has a positive correlation with both their task performance and contextual performance. In a nutshell, freight forwarding industry in Taiwan can use the facets in the neuroticism domain to screen and recruit appropriate job applicants. In addition, retaining senior employees could increase a forwarder’s task performance and contextual performance by their high degree of conscientiousness. Originality/value FFM model is a psychological theory dealing with the personality traits and human behavior. Freight forwarding is a labor-intensive business and is one of the most important sectors in the logistics industry. According the authors’ knowledge, the application of FFM on the logistics industry is simply not existed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwayne Devonish

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test the mediating roles of two dimensions of psychological well-being (job satisfaction and work-related depression) in the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and task performance, individual-targeted citizenship behaviours (OCB-I) and organisation-targeted citizenship behaviours (OCB-O). Design/methodology/approach This survey study of 262 employees in a small island territory in the Caribbean captured data on EI, psychological well-being and various dimensions of job performance. Multiple mediation hypotheses were tested using the 95 per cent bootstrapping confidence interval (CI) estimation approach. Findings The results revealed that job satisfaction and work-related depression mediated the relationship between EI and task performance; and the relationship between EI and OCB-O, but only work-related depression mediated the relationship between EI and OCB-I. Research limitations/implications The study utilised a cross-sectional study design and self-reported measures but still presented significant implications for existing and future theoretical models of EI and job performance. Practical implications Organisations should seek to develop high levels of EI in their employees as a means of improving their overall psychological health and well-being and performance behaviours at work. Originality/value The study examines multiple mediation of various psychological well-being dimensions in the EI-job performance relationship using the 95 per cent bootstrapping CI approach.


2011 ◽  
Vol 346 ◽  
pp. 675-681
Author(s):  
Li Lin

Our study has conducted an inquiry ,based on the " The Structure scale for Job performance of Chinese professional coaches" and "Job satisfaction scale ", and 213 coaches from 19 provinces in China were involved in our investigation.The gathered evidence demonstrate the results that job satisfaction has significant and positive correlation of effects with task performance,contextual performance,as well as development performance,on the contrary, it has shown significant positive effects on counter-production performance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Komal Khalid

Research Highlights The aim of this study is to provide an overview on occupational self-efficacy and their interrelationships between organizational cynicism forms (i.e. Cognitive /Affective / Behavioural) and employee job performance dimensions (i.e. Task / Contextual) in manufacturing and service sectors of Pakistan. The study proposed four hypotheses, examining direct and indirect relationships between variables. Data collection was done through self-administrated questionnaire (7-point Likert scale) using a multiphase non-probability sampling technique. From both service and manufacturing sectors of Pakistan in total 758 responses were collected. For statistical data analysis descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, univariate analysis and independent sample t- test were conducted. Results indicate that occupational self-efficacy significantly moderate the relationships between forms of organizational cynicism and task and contextual performance in service sector. However, in manufacturing sector, occupational self-efficacy shows strong moderation between affective-task relationship, moderate significant moderation between cognitive-task relationship and no moderation between behavioural-task relationship.               __________________________________________________________________________ Graphical Abstract     ________________________________________________________________ Research Objectives The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of organizational cynicism forms (i.e. Cognitive / Affective / Behavioral) and employee performance dimensions (i.e. Task / Contextual) in manufacturing and service sectors of Pakistan. This research study also explores the moderating impact of employee’s occupational self-efficacy on the relationships with forms of organizational cynicism and employee’s task and contextual performances. The differences existing in both organizational sectors in regard to occupational self-efficacy, forms of organizational cynicism and dimensions of employee performance variables is also studied in this paper. It is assumed by the researcher that if employees have low occupational self- efficacy and they have negative feelings about their organization, it can result in further reduction of his job performance (Vera, Salanova, & Lorente, 2012). As occupational self-efficacy is central to past experiences of employees, it is also logical that organizational cynicism can effect levels of occupational self-efficacy. Thus, the occupational self-efficacy and cynicism relationship is mutual (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2010).  Based on differences at organizational and functional level in both sectors it can be predicted that occupational self-efficacy, organizational cynicism and employee job performance variates in service and manufacturing sectors (Othman, 1999; Jiang, 2009). Methodology The hypotheses were evaluated through data from banking, higher education and healthcare (i.e. Service sector), and cement, pharmaceutical and food (i.e. Manufacturing sector) organizations of Pakistan. Data was collected through self-administrative questionnaire and emails from six major cities of Pakistan. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to first-line and middle level employees. A multiphase non-probability sampling technique was utilized for data collection. In phase 1, organizations were selected through convenience sampling. In phase 2 of data collection, quota sampling was done (i.e. 10 survey forms per organization). The same technique was adopted by Munir, Ghafoor, & Rasli in 2016. In each sector almost 500 survey forms were distributed. After Cook’s distance and Central Leverage value method outliers from the data was removed, from manufacturing sector 365 (Response rate 73%) and from service sector 393 (Response rate 78.6%) complete questionnaires were received, therefore total response rate was 75.1% from both sectors. After establishing validity (Rotated Factor Matrix), reliability (Cronbach Alpha) and multicollinearity (VIF and Tolerance) of the scale; descriptive statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation), Pearson correlation analysis, univariate analysis and independent sample t-test were conducted. Results In both sectors, Occupational self-efficacy has positive correlation with employee task (Manufacturing r = .33; Service r = .42) and contextual performance (Manufacturing r = .29; Service r = .38). However, Occupational self-efficacy is negatively related with three forms of organizational cynicism in Manufacturing (Affective r = -.19; Cognitive r = -.13; Behavioral r = -.11) and service sector (Affective r = -.21; Cognitive r = -.18; Behavioral r = -.13). According to univariate analysis in manufacturing sector occupational self-efficacy, forms of organizational cynicism and their interactional products predicts 32% variation in contextual performance and 38% variation in task performance. However, in service sector, occupational self-efficacy, forms of organizational cynicism and their interactional products predicts 39% variation in contextual performance and 46% variation in task performance. In service sector, occupational self-efficacy significantly moderates the relationships between forms of organizational cynicism and task and contextual performance. Whereas, in manufacturing sector, occupational self-efficacy shows strong moderation between affective cynicism-task relationship, moderately significant moderation between cognitive cynicism-task relationship and no moderation between behavioral cynicism-task relationship. Results also indicates service sector employees have higher occupational self-efficacy, contextual and task performance as compared to manufacturing sector employees who reported higher organizational cynicism. Findings Findings indicate that in both sectors occupational self-efficacy had significant impact on the relationships between organizational cynicism and employee performance. Study concluded that in manufacturing sector occupational self-efficacy strongly moderate the cognitive cynicism and employee task performance relationship while within service sector occupational self-efficacy strongly moderate both cognitive and behavioral cynicism and employee task performance relationships. Study also provide evidence that in manufacturing sector occupational self-efficacy and forms of organizational cynicism has a moderate influence on employee contextual performance while within service sector occupational self-efficacy strongly moderate behavioral cynicism and employee contextual performance relationship.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Nasina Mat Desa ◽  
Muhammad Hasmi Abu Hassan Asaari ◽  
Azley Abd Razak

This study explores the relationship and the impact of the participation in related activities and autonomy of job performance toward task performance and contextual performance of job performance. The study was conducted on the electrical and electronics (E&E) engineers in the Bayan Lepas Free Trade Zone, Penang. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed through the E&E manufacturing companies’ human resource managers. A total of 1,100 questionnaires were distributed that adapted and adopted the research tools of Govino on participation in related activities, Conway and Monks on autonomy, Williams and Anderson on task performance, and Hochwarter et al. on contextual performance. A total of 181 were returned but 150 questionnaires were useable for this study. A factor analysis was conducted on all variables of the study. Interestingly, participation in work-related variables had been divided into participation in HR-related activities and participation in work-related activities. Results indicated that participation in HR-related activities had no association with task performance but had a low relationship with the contextual performance. Furthermore, the participation in work-related activities had no relationship with both, the task performance and the contextual performance. Finally, the engineers indicated that their autonomy had a low relationship with the task performance and moderate relationship with the contextual performance.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Younes Daryoush ◽  
Abu Daud Silong ◽  
Zohara Omar ◽  
Jamilah Othman

A main point of this study was that successful workplace learning is depended on workplace environment and its relationship with job performance will be improved in certain organizational culture values and practices. We hypothesized that the relationship between formal, informal and incidental workplace learning with task and contextual performance would be higher in result-oriented cultures. These two hypotheses were supported. We further hypothesized and found support that workplace learning and task performance relationships are stronger in combined outcome- and innovation-oriented cultures. Our results indicate that these two cultural values complement each other in facilitating positive outcomes for workplace learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Faisal Ahmed Ali Al-Hammadi ◽  
Ahmad Amri Zainal Adnan

The purpose of the current study was to elaborate the moderating effect of culture on workplace learning and employees’ performances in the United Arab Emirates. The study had a purpose to contribute new knowledge to the existing literature available on the workplace learning and job performances. It also highlighted the contemporary literature on the topic specifically formal and information learning, as well as, performance related to tasks and contextual. The research explained and highlighted the role of training and development on employees’ performances to improve the quality of task process. An empirical study was conducted and data was collected through questionnaire to obtain the results. The present study aimed to contribute to new knowledge to the existing literature on workplace learning and job performance. Particularly, the study analysed contemporary literature on workplace learning and job performances, specifically formal and informal learning as well as employee task performance and contextual performance. The study hypothesized that informal, incidental and formal workplace learning had direct positive significant relationships with employee task and contextual performance. Findings of the study developed that adopting effective techniques of workplace learning, and techniques can improve employees’ performances. The study, further, showed that the Informal, formal and incidental workplace learning had direct and positive impact on employee task and contextual performance. The study showed that there is a significant positive relationship between workplace learning including formal, informal and incidental learning, and job performance including task performance, contextual performance and counterproductive work behaviour. It was also found that there was a positive relationship between result-oriented cultures with two types of job performance but there was a significant relationship between team orient culture and task performance. Furthermore, the moderating effect of innovation, communication and people-oriented culture on the relationship between incidental workplace learning and contextual performance was significant.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Eny Sulistyowati ◽  
Susi Widjajani

<p><span><em>The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between selfefficacy and job performance; job satisfaction and job stress as a mediating variable. </em><span><em>This research also investigates the impact of job satisfaction on job performance </em><span><em>and job stress on job performance. Variables in this research were measured with a </em><span><em>survey of 109 insurances salespersons in Yogyakarta and Semarang. Path Analysis </em><span><em>were used to examine the effects of self-efficacy and job performance, job satisfaction </em><span><em>on job performance, and job stress on job performance. </em></span></span></span></span></span></span><em>Results showed that the relationship showed that self-efficacy significantly related </em><em>to job satisfaction and performance, but no significant relationship existed with </em><em>job stress. It also showed that job satisfaction partially mediated the relationship </em><em>between self-efficacy and job performance. In addition, this research found that job </em><em>stress not mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and job performance. There </em><em>is no significant relationship existed between job stress and job performance but this </em><em>research showed that job satisfaction significantly related to job performance.</em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document