scholarly journals Therapeutic possibilities of topical corticosteroids in modern clinical practice

2020 ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
T. A. Belousova ◽  
M. V. Kail

Over the past decade, dermatological practice has seen an increase in the number of patients suffering from skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases. Annually, 6.4-6.9 million new cases of this group of diseases are registered, which encourages the constant search for new drugs and the continuous improvement of methods and schemes of application of proven drugs. Topical corticosteroids, despite more than 65 years of history of use in the treatment of patients with steroid-sensitive dermatoses, have not lost their relevance. At present, they have no therapeutic alternative in terms of speed of onset and anti-inflammatory activity, so they are essential in the treatment of many skin pathologies. One of the trends in modern pharmacology is not so much the production of new active molecules of TCS or their modifications, as the creation of new pharmacological forms of known molecules - micronized, nanonized, which give the drug the most important property -increased bioavailability. This advanced technology is actively used in the production of domestic topical drugs of Akriderm lines, which make a major contribution to the program of import substitution and drug availability for the population. The optimal combination of ingredients of the foundation of these drugs complements and potentiates the therapeutic effect of steroid. For more than 30 years in clinical practice, a combination of 0.05% betamethasone dipropionate, 0.1% gentamicin sulfate and 1% clotrimazole (Triderm, Akriderm GK) is used. Many years of positive clinical experience of dermatologists using this fixed combination proves the validity of its use in many clinical situations when bacterial and fungal infection is involved. An open randomized comparative study conducted by Russian dermatologists on the efficacy and safety of Akriderm GK (cream) and Triderm (cream) in the complex treatment of eczema showed similar profiles of high clinical efficacy and safety of both drugs.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-287
Author(s):  
Eva Costa Arpín

Fampridine is the only drug approved for the treatment of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. Around a third of the patients on treatment obtained an improvement in walking speed during the development phase. The effects are clinically significant, appear soon after the start of the treatment and are long-lasting, but disappear soon after the drug is withdrawn. In the real-world setting, the number of patients with a significant response to the treatment seems to be higher (around 70%). The tolerance is good, with mild to moderate, and transient adverse events. The most commonly reported are insomnia, headache, fatigue, back pain, dizziness, nausea and balance disorders. The main contraindications are a history of seizures, renal impairment and concomitant treatment with OCT2 inhibitors.


Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1562
Author(s):  
Veronique Seidel

Plants have a long history of use as traditional remedies to treat a range of diseases and the diverse chemicals that they produce have provided great inspiration for the design of new drugs to date. Many plants have yet to be investigated for the presence of biologically-active products. This Special Issue presents a collection of scientific studies which report on the medicinal potential of plants. It also highlights the importance of preserving ethnobotanical knowledge and plant biodiversity worldwide to sustain future drug discovery from plant sources.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 82-90
Author(s):  
A. E. Karateev ◽  
Yu. V. Barysheva ◽  
Ya. V. Belokon ◽  
T. Yu. Bolshakova ◽  
Yu. Yu. Grabovetskaya ◽  
...  

A combination of chondroitin and glucosamine is widely used in clinical practice as both a symptomatic and structure-modifying agent for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). The emergence of new drugs based on this combination substantially expands treatment options for OA therapy.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Artroflex® that is a combination of chondroitin sulfate 400 mg and glucosamine sulfate 500 mg (CS + GS) to support joint health in patients with knee and/or hip OA.Patients and methods. When implementing an open observational research program, the results of using the CS + GS complex were assessed in 644 OA patients (74.7% women) (mean age, 58.0±14.6 years) who experienced moderate/severe pain and required to continuously take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The CS + GS complex was prescribed in a dose of 2 capsules per day for 3 months. The investigators estimated changes in pain on movement by a 0 to 10 verbal pain scale, general health (GH) by a 0–10 visual analogue scale), the Lequesne index, the need for NSAIDs, and patient satisfaction with treatment and its tolerance.Results and discussion. After 3-month therapy, there were decreases in pain intensity by 49.2±16.8%, GH scores by 45.6±18.1%, the Lequesne index from 9.0 [6.0; 13.0] to 5.0 [3.0; 9.0]; less than half (45.2%) of the patients still needed for NSAIDs. 82.2% of patients were satisfied or completely satisfied with treatment results; 89.6% reported good treatment tolerance.Adverse events (apparently associated with NSAID use) were recorded in 2.2% of cases. There were no serious complications that required CS + GS treatment discontinuation or hospitalization.Conclusion. The findings have indicated that Artroflex® used to support joint health is an effective agent that controls OA symptoms and has a good safety level.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1744-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Devos ◽  
Koen Theunissen ◽  
Fleur Samantha Benghiat ◽  
Alain Gadisseur ◽  
Stef Meers ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for adult patients with resistant or intolerant chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase, or blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), or those with the T315I mutation. In Belgium, ponatinib has been commercially available since March 2016. The goal of this registry was to collect efficacy and safety data in CML and Ph+ ALL patients and to evaluate ponatinib in routine clinical practice in Belgium. Methods This ongoing, prospective, multi-center registry includes patients ≥18 years of age with CML or Ph+ ALL, who have initiated ponatinib treatment. Demographic, efficacy and safety data were collected for patients enrolled from March 2016 (day 0) onwards. Results up to study month 24 are presented. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Ethics Committee approval was obtained and all patients provided informed consent. Results At time of data analysis, 34 patients (21 CP-CML and 13 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled. The median age of CP-CML and Ph+ ALL patients was 57 and 55 years, respectively. Patients were heavily pretreated: 90% of CML and 92% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥2 prior TKIs. Several patients had one or more risk factors for TKI cardiovascular toxicity: hypertension (10), history of cardiovascular disease (11), smoker (10), hypercholesterolemia (5), and diabetes (4). Median follow-up was 539 days for CML and 135 days for Ph+ ALL patients. The reasons for starting ponatinib therapy were related to refractoriness to previous TKIs (36%), progression (18%), presence of the T315I mutation (18%) or intolerance (29%). Eighty percent (8/10) of the patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs had received ≥3 prior TKIs. At entry, 17 of the 34 patients (50%) had a confirmed BCR-ABL mutation. Of these 17, 10 (59%; 5 CML and 5 Ph+ ALL) had the T315I mutation. Starting doses of ponatinib in CML patients were 45 mg (76%), 30 mg (10%) and 15 mg (14%) once daily. Starting doses in Ph+ ALL patients were 45 mg (85%), 30 mg (8%) and 15 mg (8%). At latest follow up, the median treatment duration for the 21 CML patients was 531 days (range 15 - 2483) and for the 13 Ph+ ALL patients it was 123 days (range 13 - 1945). Best response was a major molecular response (MMR), which was obtained in 71% of CML patients and 38% of Ph+ ALL patients. The median time-to-best response was 175 days in CML and 35 days in Ph+ ALL patients. In the 10 patients (7 CML and 3 Ph+ ALL) who started ponatinib because of intolerance to several previous TKIs, 80% achieved MMR. The median time to achieve best response in these patients was 192 days for CML and 31 days for Ph+ ALL patients. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 20 patients (59%); the most common were rash (26%), dry skin (9%) and constipation (9%). Three patients reported ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (SAE): thrombocytopenia (n=1), cholecystitis (n=1) and hepatocellular injury (n=1). Three serious cardiovascular events were observed in 1 patient, who had a history of congenital cardiomyopathy and aortic prosthesis. They were scored as not related to ponatinib. Dose reductions or interruptions occurred in 33 cases (20 in CML and 13 in Ph+ ALL patients), with the following reasons most frequently mentioned: AEs (76%), to prevent AEs (18%) and other (6%). Dose increases occurred in 12 cases (10 in CML and 2 in Ph+ ALL patients), for the following reasons: good tolerance of treatment (58%), no or low response (33%) or other (8%). At time of analysis, 19 patients (9 CML and 10 Ph+ ALL) had discontinued treatment, of which 32% due to AEs, 5% due to an SAE, 21% due to planned allogeneic transplant, 16% due to disease progression and 26% due to other reasons. [Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding] Conclusion Real-world evidence from this Belgian registry shows that ponatinib has a favorable efficacy and safety profile in, and supports its use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous therapies or those with the T315I mutation. Deep molecular responses were obtained in the majority of patients. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment than those previously reported. Funding: Incyte Biosciences Benelux BV Disclosures Devos: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Theunissen:Incyte: Honoraria. Van Eygen:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Kuipers:Incyte Biosciences Benelux BV: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-83
Author(s):  
L. I. Alekseeva ◽  
A. E. Karateev ◽  
E. Yu. Pogozheva ◽  
V. N. Amirdzanova ◽  
E. S. Filatova ◽  
...  

Glycosaminoglycan-peptide complex (GPC) is a popular injectable extended-release symptomatic agent (ERSA) in Russia for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). To date, no large-scale studies of GPC used in real clinical practice have been conducted in our country.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GPC in the treatment of OA in real clinical practice.Patients and methods. A multicenter observational non-interventional study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of GPC (Rumalon® , a cycle of intramuscular injections thrice weekly; a total of 25 injections). A study group consisted of 2,955 patients (75.4% female) aged 61.4±11.8 years) with knee and hip OA, and generalized OA (GOA) with the previous inefficacy of oral ERSAs, moderate/severe pain, and the need for regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). 414 (14%) patients received a GPC and diacerein combination 100 mg/day. The investigators assessed the dynamics of pain during movement and at rest, functional disorders (on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0–10), as well as the need for NSAIDs at 12 weeks after starting the GPC cycle.Results and discussion. 98.5% of the patients completed their GPC treatment cycle. The therapy decreased the intensity of pain at rest from 4 [3; 5] to 1 [0; 2] and during movement from 6 [5; 7] to 2 [1; 3] and reduced the severity of functional disorders from 5 [4; 6] to 1 [0; 3]. The number of patients with a good response to therapy (a≥50% decrease in symptom severity) for pain at rest and during movement was 55.6 and 53.5%, respectively; and for functional disorders was 50.8%. 68.1% of patients stopped taking NSAIDs. The GPC and diacerein combination was more effective than GPC monotherapy: the number of patients with a ≥50% decrease in movement pain was 62.8 and 54.3%, respectively (p <0.001). GPC was well tolerated. During treatment, there were skin allergic reactions (0.3%), moderate injection-site pain (0.37%), and adverse reactions (ARs) related to the gastrointestinal tract (8%) and cardiovascular system (6%) (which were likely to be caused by NSAIDs). There were no serious ARs that were life-threatening and required hospitalization.Conclusion. GPC allows successful control of the main symptoms of knee and hip OA and GOA, by reducing pain, and those of functional disorders, and the need for NSAIDs. The GPC and diacerein combination is more effective than GPC monotherapy. GPC therapy is well tolerated and very rarely causes ARs.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona P. Harkins ◽  
Bruno Pichon ◽  
Michel Doumith ◽  
Julian Parkhill ◽  
Henrik T. Westh ◽  
...  

AbstractThe spread of drug-resistant bacterial pathogens pose a major threat to global health. It is widely recognised that the widespread use of antibiotics has generated selective pressures that have driven the emergence of resistant strains. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) was first observed in 1960, less than one year after the introduction of this second generation β-lactam antibiotic into clinical practice. Epidemiological evidence has always suggested that resistance arose around this period, when themecAgene encoding methicillin resistance carried on an SCCmecelement, was horizontally transferred to an intrinsically sensitive strain ofS. aureus. Whole genome sequencing a collection of the very first MRSA isolates allowed us to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the archetypal MRSA. Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction was applied to infer the time point at which this early MRSA lineage arose and when SCCmecwas acquired. MRSA emerged in the mid 1940s, following the acquisition of an ancestral type I SCCmecelement, some fourteen years prior to the first therapeutic use of methicillin. Methicillin use was not the original driving factor in the evolution of MRSA as previously thought. Rather it was the widespread use of first generation β-lactams such as penicillin in the years prior to the introduction of methicillin, which selected forS. aureusstrains carrying themecAdeterminant. Crucially this highlights how new drugs, introduced to circumvent known resistance mechanisms, can be rendered ineffective by unrecognised adaptations in the bacterial population due to the historic selective landscape created by the widespread use of other antibiotics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Scognamiglio ◽  
Dario Costa ◽  
Antonio Sorriento ◽  
Claudio Napoli

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of disability and death in industrialized Countries. Among many conditions, which contribute to the etiology and progression of CHD, the presence of high low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels represents the major risk factor. Therefore, the reduction of LDL-C levels plays a key role in the management of patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk. Although statins represent the gold standard therapy for the reduction of cholesterol levels, these drugs do not allow to achieve target levels of LDL-C in all patients. Indeed, a significant number of patients resulted intolerants, especially when the dosage increased. The availability of new lipid-lowering drugs, such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, may represent an important alternative or complement to the conventional lipid-lowering therapies. However, long-term studies are still needed to define both efficacy and safety of use of these latter new drugs. Some nutraceuticals may become an adequate and effective support in the management of some patients. To date, several nutraceuticals with different mechanism of actions that provide a good tolerability are available as lipidlowering agents. In particular, the most investigated are red yeast rice, phytosterols, berberine, beta-glucans and soy. The aim of this review was to report recent data on the efficacy and safety of principle hypocholesterolemic drugs available and to evaluate the possible role of some nutraceuticals as support therapy in the management of patients with dyslipidemias.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092941
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Xiaopeng Hu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Xiaojia Yu ◽  
...  

Background Two new drugs, abiraterone and enzalutamide, had recently shown beneficial effects on survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of abiraterone and enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in real-world practice. Methods A search from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase was conducted up to 6 March 2019. Available articles from conferences were searched. The endpoint was prostate-specific antigen response, overall survival, progression-free survival, number of patients with any adverse event. Results Fourteen cohort studies involving 3469 participants were included. Pooled result showed that prostate-specific antigen response was higher for patients receiving enzalutamide than abiraterone (790 patients, odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29–0.77, P = 0.003, I2=59%). Enzalutamide was significantly associated with increased adverse events rate in comparison with abiraterone (730 patients, OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.13–0.92, P = 0.03, I2=65%). There was no statistical difference between abiraterone and enzalutamide with respect to perceived cognitive impairments (1856 patients, OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.29–2.76, P = 0.85, I2=5%). Enzalutamide was significantly associated with increased fatigue risk in comparison with abiraterone (2477 patients, OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.34–0.63, P<0.00001, I2=0%). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that enzalutamide was more efficacious than abiraterone for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but was associated with a significantly elevated risk of side effects, particularly fatigue.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
SC Hazra ◽  
MR Siddique ◽  
L Khondker ◽  
MSI Khan ◽  
MM Mahmud

Melasma is characterized by brown patches, typically on malar prominences and forehead. The pigmented patches are usually affect darker complexioned individual especially Asian. So it is a great problem in our country. A clinical trial was conducted to find out the effect of the combination of 20% azelaic acid cream with 0.05% tretinoin cream in the treatment of melasma. Thirty clinically diagnosed cases of melasma attending the outpatient department of Dermatology and Venereology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, were enrolled Majority of !he study subjects (43%) were between 26 to 30 years and most of them (73.3%) were female. Regarding occupation 56.7% were housewife. Out of the study subjects 70% were married and 86.7% were of middle class. Around 66.7% cases had positive family history of melasma and maximum 93.3% patient had no history of systemic drug and the maxim11m 73.3% patient had no history of use of cosmetics. It was observed that highest (93.3%) number of patients had malar area involvement and 6. 7% had centro-facial area involvement. The st11dy showed that after treatment, the average MASI (Melasma Area and Severity Index) score was decreased by 38 66% indicating moderate reduction of the severity of melasma Out of the study subjects, 50%, 30%, 16% developed burning sensation, itching and erythema respectively It could be concluded that combination of 20% azelaic acid and 0.05% tretinoin cream, has a moderate lightening effect in the treatment of melasma. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v40i2.18501 Bangladesh Medical Journal 2011 Vol.40(2): 26-30


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
Krishna Gopal Sen ◽  
Sumitendra Kumar Sarkar ◽  
Md Shafiqul Islam ◽  
Md Kamal Mostofa ◽  
Asit Ranjan Das ◽  
...  

Melasma is characterized by melanosis with sharply demarcated blotchy, brown macules usually in a symmetric distribution over the cheeks and forehead and sometimes on the upper lip and neck. It is most often seen in women during pregnancy, at menopause and while taking oral contraceptives; it occasionally occurs in women who are not pregnant or taking oral contraceptives, as well as men. So it is a great problem in our country. A clinical trial was conducted to find out the effect of the combination of 20% azelaic acid with 0.05% tretinoin cream in the treatment of melasma. Twenty clinically diagnosed cases of melasma attending the outpatient department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faridpur Medical College Hospital, Faridpur were enrolled. Majority of the study subjects (40%) were between 26 to 30 years of age and most of them (60%) were females. Regarding occupation, 60% were housewife. Out of the study subjects 75% were married and 60% were middle class. Around 60% cases had positive family history of melasma and maximum (90%) patient had no history of systemic drug and the maximum (80%) patients had no history of use of cosmetics. It was observed that highest (90%) number of patients had malar area involvement and 10% had centro-facial area involvement. The study showed moderate reduction of the severity of melasma after the treatment. Out of the study subjects, 40% and 20% developed burning sensation and erythema respectively. It could be concluded that combination of 20% azelaic acid and 0.05% tretinoin cream, has a moderate lightening effect in the treatment of melasma.Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jul 2016;11(2): 50-53


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document