scholarly journals Effect of Adding Metformin to Insulin Therapy in Pregnant Women with Uncontrolled Type I Diabetes as Regard Pregnancy Outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-247
Author(s):  
Amal Abdullah ◽  
Amir Gabr ◽  
Doaa Hamed ◽  
Mohamed Eweis
2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludmila Yu Orekhova ◽  
Anna A Aleksandrova ◽  
Ludmila A Aleksandrova ◽  
Ramila S Musaeva ◽  
Gulrukhsor Kh Tolibova ◽  
...  

Introduction. More and more researches dedicated to the communication of diseases of the oral cavity of pregnant women with diabetes. It is proved that the intensity of caries and inflammatory periodontal diseases (gingivitis and periodontitis) increase significantly during pregnancy, while the presence of comorbidities, such as diabetes, increase these indexes.Aim. The aim of the work was to study the dental status of pregnant women with diabetes.Materials and methods. The study compared women with gestational diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes, to a control group of pregnant women without diabetes. In addition to clinical research methods, liquid-based cytology of the contents of the gingival sulcus was performed.Results. The results of clinical and laboratory studies have shown that inflammatory diseases of periodontium and teeth within pregnant women with diabetes are more common than within the pregnant women without this disease. It should be noted that the frequency of occurrence and severity of these diseases in the pregnant women with type I diabetes is higher than in the other groups.Conclusion. Pregnant women with diabetes are at risk for dental disease and require more attention from dentists, endocrinologists and obstetricians. The use of liquid-based cytology method helps in the diagnosis of inflammatory periodontal diseases.


1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 373-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Peter Chase ◽  
Satish K. Garg ◽  
Sandy L Hoops ◽  
Sherrie Harris ◽  
William Wilcox

1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Guastafierro ◽  
F Sessa ◽  
T Cerciello ◽  
C Cuomo ◽  
G Giannetti

Diabetes Care ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1265-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. B. Hirsch ◽  
R. Farkas-Hirsch ◽  
J. S. Skyler

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. A267-A268
Author(s):  
AJ Holman ◽  
V Munro ◽  
S Nielsen ◽  
AC Lloyd

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ahmed Al Qarni ◽  
Reem Mohammad Alamoudi ◽  
Salwa Al-Aidarous ◽  
Awad Saad Alshahrani ◽  
Munir Abuhelalah ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: For a whole month, every year Muslims fast daily from dawn to sunset. Those with health conditions that put them at risk are exempted from fasting, yet most of patients with diabetes choose to fast. Clinical and metabolic complications of diabetes during this month are issues of concern for patients and their managing physicians. This study is designed to evaluate the impact of fasting Ramadan on safety of patients. Methods: A multicentercross-sectional survey was conducted in four hospitals under the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs; King Abdulaziz Hospital,Al-Ahsa, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal Hospital, Dammam, King Abdulaziz Medicalcities, Riyadh and Jeddah. All patients with diabetes followed in the diabetes clinics of all four centers who fulfilled the study inclusion and exclusion criteria were approached within three months post Ramadan and consented for participation in the survey, then filled a self-administered validated questionnaire that consisted of 15 items. Results: Socio-demographic,clinical, and laboratory characteristics of 1438 patients with diabetes were analyzed. The majority 1207 (83.9%) had type II diabetes, and 828 (57.6%) were females.The mean age was 57.9 ± 14.9 years, and mean BMI 25.25 ± 5.39.The majority 1060 (73.7%) had concomitant diseases. 36 (2.5%)were on diet therapy alone, 147 (10.2%) on metformin monotherapy, and 261 (18.2%) on insulin therapy alone. The remaining 994 (69.1%) were on combination of insulin and oral agents. Health education was received on average by 688 (57.8%) of patients. Out of the 1191 (82.8%) who fasted the full month, 497 (41.7%) experienced acute glycemic complications. Multivariate analyses revealed that significant predictors for unsafe fasting were: type I diabetes [OR 1.8 (95%CI 1.2 - 2.8), p-value 0.007], insulin therapy [OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.4 - 2.3), p-value0.0001], previous history of breaking fast for glycemic reasons [OR 2.1 (95% CI1.5 - 2.9), p-value 0.0001], and not receiving health education [OR 1.6 (95% CI1.2 - 2.0), p-value 0.0006]. Blood sugar control, presence of concomitant diseases, and history of diabetes related hospitalization were not statistically significant predictors [(OR 1.25, 95% CI, 0.9 - 1.7, p-value 0.15),(1.3, 95% CI, 0.9 - 1.8, p-value 0.14), (1.1, 95% CI, 0.8 - 1.6, p-value 0.45)] respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with diabetes do not receive specific education pertinent to fasting Ramadan. Lack of health education, in addition to; type I diabetes, insulin therapy, and previous experience of complications are predictors for unsafe fasting. This highlights the need for better structured educational programs and further research in the field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document